Osteoclast-mediated resorption primes the skeleton for successful integration during axolotl limb regeneration

  1. Camilo Riquelme-Guzmán
  2. Stephanie L Tsai
  3. Karen Carreon Paz
  4. Congtin Nguyen
  5. David Oriola
  6. Maritta Schuez
  7. Jan Brugués
  8. Joshua D Currie
  9. Tatiana Sandoval-Guzman  Is a corresponding author
  1. Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
  2. Harvard University, United States
  3. European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Spain
  4. Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Germany
  5. Wake Forest University, United States

Abstract

Early events during axolotl limb regeneration include an immune response and the formation of a wound epithelium. These events are linked to a clearance of damaged tissue prior to blastema formation and regeneration of the missing structures. Here, we report the resorption of calcified skeletal tissue as an active, cell-driven and highly regulated event. This process, carried out by osteoclasts, is essential for a successful integration of the newly formed skeleton. Indeed, the extent of resorption is directly correlated with the integration efficiency and treatment with zoledronic acid resulted in osteoclast function inhibition and failed tissue integration. Moreover, we identified the wound epithelium as a regulator of skeletal resorption, likely releasing signals involved in recruitment/differentiation of osteoclasts. Finally, we reported a correlation between resorption and blastema formation, particularly, a coordination of resorption with cartilage condensation. In sum, our results identify resorption as a major event upon amputation, playing a critical role in the overall process of skeletal regeneration.

Data availability

No dataset have been generated for this manuscript.

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Camilo Riquelme-Guzmán

    Center for Regenerative Therapies, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5126-6584
  2. Stephanie L Tsai

    Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7549-3418
  3. Karen Carreon Paz

    Center for Regenerative Therapies, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Congtin Nguyen

    Center for Regenerative Therapies, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. David Oriola

    European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8356-7832
  6. Maritta Schuez

    Center for Regenerative Therapies, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Jan Brugués

    Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6731-4130
  8. Joshua D Currie

    Department of Biology, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Tatiana Sandoval-Guzman

    Department of Internal Medicine 3, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    For correspondence
    tatiana.sandoval_guzman@tu-dresden.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1802-5145

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SA 3349/3-1)

  • Camilo Riquelme-Guzmán
  • Tatiana Sandoval-Guzman

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Mei Wan, Johns Hopkins University, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All procedures were performed according to the Animal Ethics Committee of the State of Saxony, Germany, and the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) Guidelines at Harvard University (Protocol 11-32).

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: April 27, 2022 (view preprint)
  2. Received: May 4, 2022
  3. Accepted: October 11, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: October 11, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: October 19, 2022 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2022, Riquelme-Guzmán et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,363
    views
  • 264
    downloads
  • 4
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Camilo Riquelme-Guzmán
  2. Stephanie L Tsai
  3. Karen Carreon Paz
  4. Congtin Nguyen
  5. David Oriola
  6. Maritta Schuez
  7. Jan Brugués
  8. Joshua D Currie
  9. Tatiana Sandoval-Guzman
(2022)
Osteoclast-mediated resorption primes the skeleton for successful integration during axolotl limb regeneration
eLife 11:e79966.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79966

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79966

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    Edgar M Pera, Josefine Nilsson-De Moura ... Ivana Milas
    Research Article

    We previously showed that SerpinE2 and the serine protease HtrA1 modulate fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling in germ layer specification and head-to-tail development of Xenopus embryos. Here, we present an extracellular proteolytic mechanism involving this serpin-protease system in the developing neural crest (NC). Knockdown of SerpinE2 by injected antisense morpholino oligonucleotides did not affect the specification of NC progenitors but instead inhibited the migration of NC cells, causing defects in dorsal fin, melanocyte, and craniofacial cartilage formation. Similarly, overexpression of the HtrA1 protease impaired NC cell migration and the formation of NC-derived structures. The phenotype of SerpinE2 knockdown was overcome by concomitant downregulation of HtrA1, indicating that SerpinE2 stimulates NC migration by inhibiting endogenous HtrA1 activity. SerpinE2 binds to HtrA1, and the HtrA1 protease triggers degradation of the cell surface proteoglycan Syndecan-4 (Sdc4). Microinjection of Sdc4 mRNA partially rescued NC migration defects induced by both HtrA1 upregulation and SerpinE2 downregulation. These epistatic experiments suggest a proteolytic pathway by a double inhibition mechanism:

    SerpinE2 ┤HtrA1 protease ┤Syndecan-4 → NC cell migration.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Kristine B Walhovd, Stine K Krogsrud ... Didac Vidal-Pineiro
    Research Article

    Human fetal development has been associated with brain health at later stages. It is unknown whether growth in utero, as indexed by birth weight (BW), relates consistently to lifespan brain characteristics and changes, and to what extent these influences are of a genetic or environmental nature. Here we show remarkably stable and lifelong positive associations between BW and cortical surface area and volume across and within developmental, aging and lifespan longitudinal samples (N = 5794, 4–82 y of age, w/386 monozygotic twins, followed for up to 8.3 y w/12,088 brain MRIs). In contrast, no consistent effect of BW on brain changes was observed. Partly environmental effects were indicated by analysis of twin BW discordance. In conclusion, the influence of prenatal growth on cortical topography is stable and reliable through the lifespan. This early-life factor appears to influence the brain by association of brain reserve, rather than brain maintenance. Thus, fetal influences appear omnipresent in the spacetime of the human brain throughout the human lifespan. Optimizing fetal growth may increase brain reserve for life, also in aging.