Tissue-specific modifier alleles determine Mertk loss-of-function traits

  1. Yemsratch T Akalu
  2. Maria E Mercau
  3. Marleen Ansems
  4. Lindsey D Hughes
  5. James Nevin
  6. Emily J Alberto
  7. Xinran N Liu
  8. Li-Zhen He
  9. Diego Alvarado
  10. Tibor Keler
  11. Yong Kong
  12. William M Philbrick
  13. Marcus Bosenberg
  14. Silvia C Finnemann
  15. Antonio Iavarone
  16. Anna Lasorella
  17. Carla V Rothlin  Is a corresponding author
  18. Sourav Ghosh  Is a corresponding author
  1. Department of Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, United States
  2. Department of Cell Biology, Center for Cellular and Molecular Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, United States
  3. Celldex Therapeutics, United States
  4. Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, W. M. Keck Foundation Biotechnology Resource Laboratory, School of Medicine, Yale University, United States
  5. Center on Endocrinology and Metabolism, Yale Genome Editing Center, School of Medicine, Yale University, United States
  6. Departments of Dermatology, Pathology and Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, United States
  7. Center for Cancer, Genetic Diseases and Gene Regulation, Department of Biological Sciences, Fordham University, United States
  8. Departments of Neurology and Pathology and Cell Biology, Institute for Cancer Genetics, Columbia Medical Center, United States
  9. Departments of Pediatrics and Pathology and Cell Biology, Institute for Cancer Genetics, Columbia University, United States
  10. Departments of Immunobiology and Pharmacology, Yale School of Medicine, United States
  11. Departments of Neurology and Pharmacology, Yale School of Medicine, United States

Decision letter

  1. Florent Ginhoux
    Reviewing Editor; Agency for Science Technology and Research, Singapore
  2. Satyajit Rath
    Senior Editor; Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER), India
  3. Hind Medyouf
    Reviewer; Georg-Speyer-Haus, Germany
  4. Marten A Hoeksema
    Reviewer; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands

Our editorial process produces two outputs: (i) public reviews designed to be posted alongside the preprint for the benefit of readers; (ii) feedback on the manuscript for the authors, including requests for revisions, shown below. We also include an acceptance summary that explains what the editors found interesting or important about the work.

Decision letter after peer review:

Thank you for submitting your article "Tissue-specific modifier alleles determine Mertk loss-of-function traits" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by 2 peer reviewers, and the evaluation has been overseen by a Reviewing Editor and Satyajit Rath as the Senior Editor. The following individuals involved in the review of your submission have agreed to reveal their identity: Hind Medyouf (Reviewer #1); Marten A Hoeksema (Reviewer #2).

The reviewers have discussed their reviews with one another, and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this to help you prepare a revised submission.

Essential revisions:

Textual and figure modifications are only required for clarity as recommended by the reviewers below.

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):

As mentioned in the public review, TYRO3 protein levels appear to be elevated in Mertk-/- v2 or Mertk-/- v3 compared to Mertk-/- v1 (readily notable in the WB presented Figure 5a) although no significant changes are reported at mRNA. This point should be re-evaluated by the authors and discussed in their conclusions as a compensatory increase in TYRO3 may, at least in part, contribute to masking some of the Mertk-/- v2 or Mertk-/- v3 phenotypes, especially given previous work, demonstrating that even hypomorphic expression of TYRO3 in Tyro3 B6/129 can suppress the phenotypes of Mertk-/- v1 loss-of-function. WB quantification of Figure 5a may help solve this apparent discrepancy between the data presented in the figure and the main text in which it is stated that " TYRO3 levels in these newly generated mice are comparable to BL6".

Can the authors provide additional data as to the cellular mediators of the protective phenotype observed in Mertk-/-v1? What is the status of these functionally relevant cell types in the newly generated Mertk deficiency models, Mertk-/- v2, Mertk-/- v3 at steady state and upon tumor challenge?

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80530.sa1

Author response

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):

As mentioned in the public review, TYRO3 protein levels appear to be elevated in Mertk-/- v2 or Mertk-/- v3 compared to Mertk-/- v1 (readily notable in the WB presented Figure 5a) although no significant changes are reported at mRNA. This point should be re-evaluated by the authors and discussed in their conclusions as a compensatory increase in TYRO3 may, at least in part, contribute to masking some of the Mertk-/- v2 or Mertk-/- v3 phenotypes, especially given previous work, demonstrating that even hypomorphic expression of TYRO3 in Tyro3 B6/129 can suppress the phenotypes of Mertk-/- v1 loss-of-function. WB quantification of Figure 5a may help solve this apparent discrepancy between the data presented in the figure and the main text in which it is stated that " TYRO3 levels in these newly generated mice are comparable to BL6".

We sincerely apologize for the confusion. Quantitation of 5 independent immunoblots for TYRO3 from Mertk -/-V2 and Mertk -/-V3 RPEs failed to show statistically significant differences. These results are consistent with the mRNA expression data, which also failed to reveal statistically significant differences in Tyro3 expression between WT, Mertk -/-V2 and Mertk -/-V3 RPEs. Only Mertk -/-V1 RPEs showed significantly less Tyro3 mRNA and protein compared to WT.

Can the authors provide additional data as to the cellular mediators of the protective phenotype observed in Mertk-/-v1? What is the status of these functionally relevant cell types in the newly generated Mertk deficiency models, Mertk-/- v2, Mertk-/- v3 at steady state and upon tumor challenge?

This is an excellent question. Understanding the cellular and molecular basis of anti-tumor protection in Mertk -/-V1 would be highly significant. We have been indeed pursuing this remarkably important but extremely complex question. So far, we have been able to determine that the anti-tumor resistance is entirely dependent upon T cells. Depletion of CD8+ or CD4+ T cells completely reverts this anti-tumor phenotype in Mertk -/-V1. Furthermore, we have performed extensive bone-marrow chimera experiments followed by single cell RNA sequencing to individually compare and contrast the hematopoietic and stromal compartments of Mertk -/-V1 with WT B6 in tumor implanted mice, as well as performed linkage mapping to investigate the Mendelian inheritance of the element that determines the anti-tumor immune phenotype. We are currently in the process of preparing a separate manuscript to describe these results. We hope that the Reviewer will agree that these findings are beyond the scope of this manuscript.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80530.sa2

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Yemsratch T Akalu
  2. Maria E Mercau
  3. Marleen Ansems
  4. Lindsey D Hughes
  5. James Nevin
  6. Emily J Alberto
  7. Xinran N Liu
  8. Li-Zhen He
  9. Diego Alvarado
  10. Tibor Keler
  11. Yong Kong
  12. William M Philbrick
  13. Marcus Bosenberg
  14. Silvia C Finnemann
  15. Antonio Iavarone
  16. Anna Lasorella
  17. Carla V Rothlin
  18. Sourav Ghosh
(2022)
Tissue-specific modifier alleles determine Mertk loss-of-function traits
eLife 11:e80530.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80530

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80530