Abstract

Mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC) dysfunction due to mutations in the nuclear or mitochondrial genome is a common cause of metabolic disease in humans and displays striking tissue specificity depending on the affected gene. The mechanisms underlying tissue specific phenotypes are not understood. Complex I (cI) is classically considered the entry point for electrons into the ETC, and in vitro experiments indicate that cI is required for basal respiration and maintenance of the NAD+/NADH ratio, an indicator of cellular redox status. This finding has largely not been tested in vivo. Here, we report that mitochondrial complex I is dispensable for homeostasis of the adult mouse liver; animals with hepatocyte-specific loss of cI function display no overt phenotypes or signs of liver damage, and maintain liver function, redox and oxygen status. Further analysis of cI-deficient livers did not reveal significant proteomic or metabolic changes, indicating little to no compensation is required in the setting of complex I loss. In contrast, complex IV (cIV) dysfunction in adult hepatocytes results in decreased liver function, impaired oxygen handling, steatosis, and liver damage, accompanied by significant metabolomic and proteomic perturbations. Our results support a model whereby complex I loss is tolerated in the mouse liver because hepatocytes use alternative electron donors to fuel the mitochondrial ETC.

Data availability

Data and material availability: Proteomics datasets have been deposited into the PRIDE database (identifier PXD031716), and metabolomics datasets have been deposited into Metabolomics Workbench (identifiers 3426, 3428, 3429). All other data are provided within the manuscript and supplementary files.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Nicholas P Lesner

    Children's Medical Center Research Institute, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Xun Wang

    Children's Medical Center Research Institute, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Zhenkang Chen

    Children's Medical Center Research Institute, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7919-5546
  4. Anderson Frank

    Department of Biochemistry, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Cameron Menezes

    Children's Medical Center Research Institute, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5759-8099
  6. Sara House

    Children's Medical Center Research Institute, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Spencer D Shelton

    Children's Medical Center Research Institute, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1236-5317
  8. Andrew Lemoff

    Department of Biochemistry, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4943-0170
  9. David G McFadden

    Department of Biochemistry, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Janaka Wanaspura

    Advanced Imaging Research Center, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Ralph J DeBerardinis

    Children's Medical Center Research Institute, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    Ralph J DeBerardinis, is an advisor to Agios Pharmaceuticals.
  12. Prashant Mishra

    Children's Medical Center Research Institute, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    For correspondence
    prashant.mishra@utsouthwestern.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2223-1742

Funding

United Mitochondrial Disease Foundation

  • Prashant Mishra

National Institutes of Health (1DP2ES030449-01)

  • Prashant Mishra

National Institutes of Health (1R01AR073217-01)

  • Prashant Mishra

National Institutes of Health (1F31-DK122676)

  • Nicholas P Lesner

Moody Medical Research Institute

  • Prashant Mishra

National Science Foundation (GRFP 2019281210)

  • Spencer D Shelton

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All mouse experiments were performed according to protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (protocol 102654).

Copyright

© 2022, Lesner et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,124
    views
  • 807
    downloads
  • 17
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Nicholas P Lesner
  2. Xun Wang
  3. Zhenkang Chen
  4. Anderson Frank
  5. Cameron Menezes
  6. Sara House
  7. Spencer D Shelton
  8. Andrew Lemoff
  9. David G McFadden
  10. Janaka Wanaspura
  11. Ralph J DeBerardinis
  12. Prashant Mishra
(2022)
Differential requirements for mitochondrial electron transport chain components in the adult murine liver
eLife 11:e80919.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80919

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80919

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Fatima Tleiss, Martina Montanari ... C Leopold Kurz
    Research Article

    Multiple gut antimicrobial mechanisms are coordinated in space and time to efficiently fight foodborne pathogens. In Drosophila melanogaster, production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) together with intestinal cell renewal play a key role in eliminating gut microbes. A complementary mechanism would be to isolate and treat pathogenic bacteria while allowing colonization by commensals. Using real-time imaging to follow the fate of ingested bacteria, we demonstrate that while commensal Lactiplantibacillus plantarum freely circulate within the intestinal lumen, pathogenic strains such as Erwinia carotovora or Bacillus thuringiensis, are blocked in the anterior midgut where they are rapidly eliminated by antimicrobial peptides. This sequestration of pathogenic bacteria in the anterior midgut requires the Duox enzyme in enterocytes, and both TrpA1 and Dh31 in enteroendocrine cells. Supplementing larval food with hCGRP, the human homolog of Dh31, is sufficient to block the bacteria, suggesting the existence of a conserved mechanism. While the immune deficiency (IMD) pathway is essential for eliminating the trapped bacteria, it is dispensable for the blockage. Genetic manipulations impairing bacterial compartmentalization result in abnormal colonization of posterior midgut regions by pathogenic bacteria. Despite a functional IMD pathway, this ectopic colonization leads to bacterial proliferation and larval death, demonstrating the critical role of bacteria anterior sequestration in larval defense. Our study reveals a temporal orchestration during which pathogenic bacteria, but not innocuous, are confined in the anterior part of the midgut in which they are eliminated in an IMD-pathway-dependent manner.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Kourosh Hayatigolkhatmi, Chiara Soriani ... Simona Rodighiero
    Tools and Resources

    Understanding the cell cycle at the single-cell level is crucial for cellular biology and cancer research. While current methods using fluorescent markers have improved the study of adherent cells, non-adherent cells remain challenging. In this study, we addressed this gap by combining a specialized surface to enhance cell attachment, the FUCCI(CA)2 sensor, an automated image analysis pipeline, and a custom machine learning algorithm. This approach enabled precise measurement of cell cycle phase durations in non-adherent cells. This method was validated in acute myeloid leukemia cell lines NB4 and Kasumi-1, which have unique cell cycle characteristics, and we tested the impact of cell cycle-modulating drugs on NB4 cells. Our cell cycle analysis system, which is also compatible with adherent cells, is fully automated and freely available, providing detailed insights from hundreds of cells under various conditions. This report presents a valuable tool for advancing cancer research and drug development by enabling comprehensive, automated cell cycle analysis in both adherent and non-adherent cells.