Microstructural differences in the osteochondral unit of terrestrial and aquatic mammals

  1. Irina AD Mancini
  2. Riccardo Levato
  3. Marlena M Ksiezarczyk
  4. Miguel Dias Castilho
  5. Michael Chen
  6. Mattie HP van Rijen
  7. Lonneke L IJsseldijk
  8. Marja Kik
  9. René van Weeren
  10. Jos Malda  Is a corresponding author
  1. Utrecht University, Netherlands
  2. University Medical Center Utrecht, Netherlands
  3. Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands
  4. University of Adelaide, Netherlands

Abstract

During evolution, animals have returned from land to water, adapting with morphological modifications to life in an aquatic environment. We compared the osteochondral units of the humeral head of marine and terrestrial mammals across species spanning a wide range of body weights, focusing on microstructural organization and biomechanical performance. Aquatic mammals feature cartilage with essentially random collagen fiber configuration, lacking the depth-dependent, arcade-like organization characteristic of terrestrial mammalian species. They have a less stiff articular cartilage at equilibrium with a significantly lower peak modulus, and at the osteochondral interface do not have a calcified cartilage layer, displaying only a thin, highly porous subchondral bone plate. This totally different constitution of the osteochondral unit in aquatic mammals reflects that accommodation of loading is the primordial function of the osteochondral unit. Recognizing the crucial importance of the microarchitecture-function relationship is pivotal for understanding articular biology and, hence, for the development of durable functional regenerative approaches for treatment of joint damage, which are thus far lacking.

Data availability

Data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file; Source Data files have been provided for Figure 1.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Irina AD Mancini

    Department of Clinical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Riccardo Levato

    Department of Clinical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Marlena M Ksiezarczyk

    Department of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Miguel Dias Castilho

    Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Michael Chen

    5Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Mattie HP van Rijen

    Department of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Lonneke L IJsseldijk

    Department of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7288-9118
  8. Marja Kik

    Department of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. René van Weeren

    Department of Clinical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6654-1817
  10. Jos Malda

    Department of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
    For correspondence
    j.malda@umcutrecht.nl
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9241-7676

Funding

European Commission (3099622 (FP7))

  • Irina AD Mancini
  • René van Weeren
  • Jos Malda

Dutch Arthritis Society (LLP12 and LLP22)

  • Riccardo Levato
  • Miguel Dias Castilho
  • René van Weeren
  • Jos Malda

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Di Chen, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: June 10, 2022 (view preprint)
  2. Received: June 10, 2022
  3. Accepted: November 24, 2023
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: November 27, 2023 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: January 10, 2024 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2023, Mancini et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 578
    views
  • 138
    downloads
  • 0
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Irina AD Mancini
  2. Riccardo Levato
  3. Marlena M Ksiezarczyk
  4. Miguel Dias Castilho
  5. Michael Chen
  6. Mattie HP van Rijen
  7. Lonneke L IJsseldijk
  8. Marja Kik
  9. René van Weeren
  10. Jos Malda
(2023)
Microstructural differences in the osteochondral unit of terrestrial and aquatic mammals
eLife 12:e80936.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80936

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80936

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    Zhimin Xu, Zhao Wang ... Yingchuan B Qi
    Research Article

    Precise developmental timing control is essential for organism formation and function, but its mechanisms are unclear. In C. elegans, the microRNA lin-4 critically regulates developmental timing by post-transcriptionally downregulating the larval-stage-fate controller LIN-14. However, the mechanisms triggering the activation of lin-4 expression toward the end of the first larval stage remain unknown. We demonstrate that the transmembrane transcription factor MYRF-1 is necessary for lin-4 activation. MYRF-1 is initially localized on the cell membrane, and its increased cleavage and nuclear accumulation coincide with lin-4 expression timing. MYRF-1 regulates lin-4 expression cell-autonomously and hyperactive MYRF-1 can prematurely drive lin-4 expression in embryos and young first-stage larvae. The tandem lin-4 promoter DNA recruits MYRF-1GFP to form visible loci in the nucleus, suggesting that MYRF-1 directly binds to the lin-4 promoter. Our findings identify a crucial link in understanding developmental timing regulation and establish MYRF-1 as a key regulator of lin-4 expression.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Samuel C Griffiths, Jia Tan ... Hsin-Yi Henry Ho
    Research Article Updated

    The receptor tyrosine kinase ROR2 mediates noncanonical WNT5A signaling to orchestrate tissue morphogenetic processes, and dysfunction of the pathway causes Robinow syndrome, brachydactyly B, and metastatic diseases. The domain(s) and mechanisms required for ROR2 function, however, remain unclear. We solved the crystal structure of the extracellular cysteine-rich (CRD) and Kringle (Kr) domains of ROR2 and found that, unlike other CRDs, the ROR2 CRD lacks the signature hydrophobic pocket that binds lipids/lipid-modified proteins, such as WNTs, suggesting a novel mechanism of ligand reception. Functionally, we showed that the ROR2 CRD, but not other domains, is required and minimally sufficient to promote WNT5A signaling, and Robinow mutations in the CRD and the adjacent Kr impair ROR2 secretion and function. Moreover, using function-activating and -perturbing antibodies against the Frizzled (FZ) family of WNT receptors, we demonstrate the involvement of FZ in WNT5A-ROR signaling. Thus, ROR2 acts via its CRD to potentiate the function of a receptor super-complex that includes FZ to transduce WNT5A signals.