Inhibited KdpFABC transitions into an E1 off-cycle state

  1. Jakob M Silberberg
  2. Charlott Stock
  3. Lisa Hielkema
  4. Robin A Corey
  5. Jan Rheinberger
  6. Dorith Wunnicke
  7. Victor RA Dubach
  8. Phillip J Stansfeld
  9. Inga Hänelt  Is a corresponding author
  10. Cristina Paulino  Is a corresponding author
  1. Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany
  2. Aarhus University, Denmark
  3. University of Groningen, Netherlands
  4. University of Oxford, United Kingdom
  5. University of Warwick, United Kingdom

Abstract

KdpFABC is a high-affinity prokaryotic K+ uptake system that forms a functional chimera between a channel-like subunit (KdpA) and a P-type ATPase (KdpB). At high K+ levels, KdpFABC needs to be inhibited to prevent excessive K+ accumulation to the point of toxicity. This is achieved by a phosphorylation of the serine residue in the TGES162 motif in the A domain of the pump subunit KdpB (KdpBS162-P). Here, we explore the structural basis of inhibition by KdpBS162 phosphorylation by determining the conformational landscape of KdpFABC under inhibiting and non-inhibiting conditions. Under turnover conditions, we identified a new inhibited KdpFABC state that we termed E1P tight, which is not part of the canonical Post-Albers transport cycle of P-type ATPases. It likely represents the biochemically described stalled E1P state adopted by KdpFABC upon KdpBS162 phosphorylation. The E1P tight state exhibits a compact fold of the three cytoplasmic domains and is likely adopted when the transition from high-energy E1P states to E2P states is unsuccessful. This study represents a structural characterization of a biologically relevant off-cycle state in the P-type ATPase family and supports the emerging discussion of P-type ATPase regulation by such states.

Data availability

The three-dimensional cryo-EM densities and corresponding modelled coordinates generated have been deposited in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank and the Protein Data Bank under the accession numbers summarized in Table 4. The depositions include maps calculated with higher b-factors, both half-maps and the mask used for the final FSC calculation.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jakob M Silberberg

    Institute of Biochemistry, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1721-8666
  2. Charlott Stock

    Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5471-3696
  3. Lisa Hielkema

    Department of Structural Biology, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Robin A Corey

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1820-7993
  5. Jan Rheinberger

    Department of Structural Biology, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9901-2065
  6. Dorith Wunnicke

    Institute of Biochemistry, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Victor RA Dubach

    Department of Structural Biology, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1657-7184
  8. Phillip J Stansfeld

    Department of Chemistry, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Inga Hänelt

    Institute of Biochemistry, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
    For correspondence
    haenelt@biochem.uni-frankfurt.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1495-3163
  10. Cristina Paulino

    Department of Structural Biology, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
    For correspondence
    c.paulino@rug.nl
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7017-109X

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Veni grant 722.017.001)

  • Cristina Paulino

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/R002517/1)

  • Phillip J Stansfeld

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/S003339/1)

  • Phillip J Stansfeld

State of Hesse (LOEWE Schwerpunkt TRABITA)

  • Jakob M Silberberg

Wellcome Trust (208361/Z/17/Z)

  • Robin A Corey

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Start-Up grant 740.018.016)

  • Cristina Paulino

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Emmy Noether grant HA6322/3-1)

  • Inga Hänelt

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Heisenberg program HA6322/5-1)

  • Inga Hänelt

Aventis Foundation (Life Science Bridge Award)

  • Inga Hänelt

Uniscientia Foundation

  • Inga Hänelt

Wellcome Trust (208361/Z/17/Z)

  • Phillip J Stansfeld

Medical Research Council (MR/S009213/1)

  • Phillip J Stansfeld

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/P01948X/1)

  • Phillip J Stansfeld

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Silberberg et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 883
    views
  • 210
    downloads
  • 8
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jakob M Silberberg
  2. Charlott Stock
  3. Lisa Hielkema
  4. Robin A Corey
  5. Jan Rheinberger
  6. Dorith Wunnicke
  7. Victor RA Dubach
  8. Phillip J Stansfeld
  9. Inga Hänelt
  10. Cristina Paulino
(2022)
Inhibited KdpFABC transitions into an E1 off-cycle state
eLife 11:e80988.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80988

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80988

Further reading

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Yao Chi Chen, Karen Sargsyan ... Carmay Lim
    Research Article

    Experimental detection of residues critical for protein–protein interactions (PPI) is a time-consuming, costly, and labor-intensive process. Hence, high-throughput PPI-hot spot prediction methods have been developed, but they have been validated using relatively small datasets, which may compromise their predictive reliability. Here, we introduce PPI-hotspotID, a novel method for identifying PPI-hot spots using the free protein structure, and validated it on the largest collection of experimentally confirmed PPI-hot spots to date. We explored the possibility of detecting PPI-hot spots using (i) FTMap in the PPI mode, which identifies hot spots on protein–protein interfaces from the free protein structure, and (ii) the interface residues predicted by AlphaFold-Multimer. PPI-hotspotID yielded better performance than FTMap and SPOTONE, a webserver for predicting PPI-hot spots given the protein sequence. When combined with the AlphaFold-Multimer-predicted interface residues, PPI-hotspotID yielded better performance than either method alone. Furthermore, we experimentally verified several PPI-hotspotID-predicted PPI-hot spots of eukaryotic elongation factor 2. Notably, PPI-hotspotID can reveal PPI-hot spots not obvious from complex structures, including those in indirect contact with binding partners. PPI-hotspotID serves as a valuable tool for understanding PPI mechanisms and aiding drug design. It is available as a web server (https://ppihotspotid.limlab.dnsalias.org/) and open-source code (https://github.com/wrigjz/ppihotspotid/).

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Bradley P Clarke, Alexia E Angelos ... Yi Ren
    Research Article

    In eukaryotes, RNAs transcribed by RNA Pol II are modified at the 5′ end with a 7-methylguanosine (m7G) cap, which is recognized by the nuclear cap binding complex (CBC). The CBC plays multiple important roles in mRNA metabolism, including transcription, splicing, polyadenylation, and export. It promotes mRNA export through direct interaction with a key mRNA export factor, ALYREF, which in turn links the TRanscription and EXport (TREX) complex to the 5′ end of mRNA. However, the molecular mechanism for CBC-mediated recruitment of the mRNA export machinery is not well understood. Here, we present the first structure of the CBC in complex with an mRNA export factor, ALYREF. The cryo-EM structure of CBC-ALYREF reveals that the RRM domain of ALYREF makes direct contact with both the NCBP1 and NCBP2 subunits of the CBC. Comparing CBC-ALYREF with other cellular complexes containing CBC and/or ALYREF components provides insights into the coordinated events during mRNA transcription, splicing, and export.