Long COVID in cancer patients: preponderance of symptoms in majority of patients over long time period
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
- Integrative Medicine Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
- Hospital Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
- Pharmacy Clinical Programs, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
- Emergency Medicine-Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
- Gastroenterology Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
- Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
- Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
Decision letter
-
Jameel IqbalReviewing Editor; DaVita Labs, United States
-
Eduardo L FrancoSenior Editor; McGill University, Canada
-
Nawale HajjajiReviewer; Oscar Lambret Cancer Center, United States
Our editorial process produces two outputs: (i) public reviews designed to be posted alongside the preprint for the benefit of readers; (ii) feedback on the manuscript for the authors, including requests for revisions, shown below. We also include an acceptance summary that explains what the editors found interesting or important about the work.
Decision letter after peer review:
Thank you for submitting your article "Long COVID in Cancer patients: Preponderance of Symptoms in Majority of Patients over Long Time Period" for consideration by eLife. The evaluation has been overseen by a Reviewing Editor and a Senior Editor. The following individual involved in review of your submission has agreed to reveal their identity: Nawale Hajjaji.
As is customary in eLife, the reviewers have discussed their critiques with one another. What follows below is the Reviewing Editor's edited compilation of the essential and ancillary points provided by reviewers in their critiques and in their interaction post-review. Please submit a revised version that addresses these concerns directly. Although we expect that you will address these comments in your response letter, we also need to see the corresponding revision clearly marked in the text of the manuscript. Some of the reviewers' comments may seem to be simple queries or challenges that do not prompt revisions to the text. Please keep in mind, however, that readers may have the same perspective as the reviewers. Therefore, it is essential that you attempt to amend or expand the text to clarify the narrative accordingly.
Essential revisions:
Overall this was a good manuscript that could be improved by kindly addressing the concerns of the reviewer below.
The following comments could be helpful to strengthen the work:
1) Whether cancer stage or the type of anticancer therapy are associated to PASC is of great interest; these data should be within reach and added to Table 1.
2) Some patients might have participated in a vaccination trial with mRNA vaccine between March and September 2020. If this is the case, this information should be added to Table 1.
3) As mentioned by the authors in the introduction section line 94 "there is limited data available on PASC in cancer patients and how it affects their cancer progression, care and treatment". The addition of these analyses would greatly strengthen the article.
4) It could be interesting to distinguish severe and mild covid at diagnosis to compare their pattern of long covid. In fact, the frequency of long covid reported in cancer patients with mild covid was only 22% (doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.901426), much less than the frequency reported in this article.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81182.sa1Author response
The following comments could be helpful to strengthen the work:
1) Whether cancer stage or the type of anticancer therapy are associated to PASC is of great interest; these data should be within reach and added to Table 1.
The type of underlying malignancy (hematological vs solid tumor) as well as those with metastatic diseases were similar in both PASC and non-PASC groups. However, patients with PASC were significantly less likely to have refractory or relapse diseases (19% vs 29%) Added to the Results section. High risk patients with baseline relapsing and refractory malignancy tend to be associated with more acute severe COVID and higher mortality but less long term COVID. Added to the Discussion section.
2) Some patients might have participated in a vaccination trial with mRNA vaccine between March and September 2020. If this is the case, this information should be added to Table 1.
None of our patients were vaccinated between March and September 2020 (added in methods).
3) As mentioned by the authors in the introduction section line 94 "there is limited data available on PASC in cancer patients and how it affects their cancer progression, care and treatment". The addition of these analyses would greatly strengthen the article.
We thank the reviewer for their comments. We extracted additional data and found that the rates of delay in cancer treatment after COVID were similar in both PASC and non-PASC patients (43% vs 38%; p=0.44). Mortality beyond 30 days of initial COVID diagnosis was significantly higher in patients without PASC compared to those with PASC (27% vs 10%; p<0.0001). Added in the results and Discussion section We have added the name of an author (Patrick Chaftari) who helped collect the additional data.
4) It could be interesting to distinguish severe and mild covid at diagnosis to compare their pattern of long covid. In fact, the frequency of long covid reported in cancer patients with mild covid was only 22% (doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.901426), much less than the frequency reported in this article.
We thank the reviewers for their interesting comments. Patients without long COVID were more likely to have more acute severe COVID at diagnosis than patients who developed long COVID (26% vs 14%; p=0.009). Added in results and Discussion section.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81182.sa2Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Long COVID in cancer patients: preponderance of symptoms in majority of patients over long time period
eLife 12:e81182.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81182
