The genetic risk of gestational diabetes in South Asian women

  1. Amel Lamri
  2. Jayneel Limbachia
  3. Karleen M Schulze
  4. Dipika Desai
  5. Brian Kelly
  6. Russell J de Souza
  7. Guillaume Paré
  8. Deborah A Lawlor
  9. John Wright
  10. Sonia S Anand  Is a corresponding author
  1. McMaster University, Canada
  2. Bradford Royal Infirmary, United Kingdom
  3. University of Bristol, United Kingdom

Abstract

South Asian women are at increased risk of developing gestational diabetes (GDM). Few studies have investigated the genetic contributions to GDM risk. We investigated the association of a type 2 diabetes (T2D) polygenic risk score (PRS), on its own, and with GDM risk factors, on GDM-related traits using data from two birth cohorts in which South Asian women were enrolled during pregnancy. 837 and 4,372 pregnant South Asian women from the SouTh Asian BiRth CohorT (START) and Born in Bradford (BiB) cohort studies underwent a 75-gram glucose tolerance test. PRSs were derived using GWAS results from an independent multi-ethnic study (~18% South Asians). Associations with fasting plasma glucose (FPG); 2h post-load glucose (2hG); area under the curve glucose; and GDM were tested using linear and logistic regressions. The population attributable fraction (PAF) of the PRS was calculated. Every 1 SD increase in the PRS was associated with a 0.085 mmol/L increase in FPG ([95%CI=0.07-0.10], P=2.85 × 10-20); 0.21 mmol/L increase in 2hG ([95%CI=0.16-0.26], P=5.49 × 10-16); and a 45% increase in the risk of GDM ([95%CI=32-60%], P=2.27 × 10-14), independent of parental history of diabetes and other GDM risk factors. PRS tertile 3 accounted for 12.5% of the population's GDM alone, and 21.7% when combined with family history. A few weak PRS and GDM risk factors interactions modulating FPG and GDM were observed. Together, these results show that a T2D PRS and family history of diabetes are strongly and independently associated with multiple GDM-related traits in women of South Asian descent, an effect that could be modulated by other environmental factors.

Data availability

Data from START is not publicly available, since the study is bound by consent which indicates the data will not be used by an outside group. Requests for collaboration or replication will be considered for research purposes only (no commercial use allowed, as per the study's informed consent). Requests should be addressed to the study's principal investigator (Sonia Anand, anands@mcmaster.ca) via a form which will be provided upon request by emailing natcampb@mcmaster.ca. The request will be evaluated by PIs and co-investigators, and projects deemed of scientific interest will be further evaluated/validated by local REB chair. Born in Bradford data are available for research purposes only by sending an expression of interest form downloadable from https://borninbradford.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/BiB_EoI_v3.1_10.05.21.doct to borninbradford@bthft.nhs.uk . The proposal will be reviewed by BiB's executive team. If the request is approved, the requester will be asked to sign a Data Sharing Contract and a Data Sharing Agreement. Full details on how to access data and forms can be found here https://borninbradford.nhs.uk/research/how-to-access-data/. The code used to analyze the data is available at https://github.com/AmelLamri/Paper_T2dPrsGdm_StartBiB. All Sharable processed versions of the datasets used in the manuscript are made available as supplementary material or at https://github.com/AmelLamri/Paper_T2dPrsGdm_StartBiB.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Amel Lamri

    Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7182-0661
  2. Jayneel Limbachia

    Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Karleen M Schulze

    Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Dipika Desai

    Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Brian Kelly

    Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Russell J de Souza

    Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Guillaume Paré

    Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6795-4760
  8. Deborah A Lawlor

    Population Health Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Deborah A Lawlor, has received support from Medtronic Ltd and Roche Diagnostics for research unrelated to that presented here. No financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work..
  9. John Wright

    Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Sonia S Anand

    Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
    For correspondence
    anands@mcmaster.ca
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3692-7441

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Project grant 298104;Foundation grant number: FDN-143255)

  • Sonia S Anand

Bristol NIHR Biomedical Research Center

  • Deborah A Lawlor

UK Medical Research Council (MC_UU_00011/6)

  • Deborah A Lawlor

British Heart Foundation (CH/F/20/90003)

  • Deborah A Lawlor

Canada Research Chairs

  • Sonia S Anand

Heart and Stroke Foundation/Michael G. DeGroote Chair

  • Sonia S Anand

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: All START and BiB participants provided informed consent. The START study was approved by local ethics committees (Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board [ID:10-640], William Osler Health System [ID:11-0001], and Trillium Health Partners [RCC:11-018, ID:492]). Ethical approval for all aspects of the research was granted by Bradford Research Ethics Committee [Ref 07/H1302/112].

Copyright

© 2022, Lamri et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,838
    views
  • 141
    downloads
  • 18
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Amel Lamri
  2. Jayneel Limbachia
  3. Karleen M Schulze
  4. Dipika Desai
  5. Brian Kelly
  6. Russell J de Souza
  7. Guillaume Paré
  8. Deborah A Lawlor
  9. John Wright
  10. Sonia S Anand
(2022)
The genetic risk of gestational diabetes in South Asian women
eLife 11:e81498.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81498

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81498

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Omid Gholamalamdari, Tom van Schaik ... Andrew S Belmont
    Research Article

    Models of nuclear genome organization often propose a binary division into active versus inactive compartments yet typically overlook nuclear bodies. Here, we integrated analysis of sequencing and image-based data to compare genome organization in four human cell types relative to three different nuclear locales: the nuclear lamina, nuclear speckles, and nucleoli. Although gene expression correlates mostly with nuclear speckle proximity, DNA replication timing correlates with proximity to multiple nuclear locales. Speckle attachment regions emerge as DNA replication initiation zones whose replication timing and gene composition vary with their attachment frequency. Most facultative LADs retain a partially repressed state as iLADs, despite their positioning in the nuclear interior. Knock out of two lamina proteins, Lamin A and LBR, causes a shift of H3K9me3-enriched LADs from lamina to nucleolus, and a reciprocal relocation of H3K27me3-enriched partially repressed iLADs from nucleolus to lamina. Thus, these partially repressed iLADs appear to compete with LADs for nuclear lamina attachment with consequences for replication timing. The nuclear organization in adherent cells is polarized with nuclear bodies and genomic regions segregating both radially and relative to the equatorial plane. Together, our results underscore the importance of considering genome organization relative to nuclear locales for a more complete understanding of the spatial and functional organization of the human genome.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Keva Li, Nicholas Tolman ... UK Biobank Eye and Vision Consortium
    Research Article

    A glaucoma polygenic risk score (PRS) can effectively identify disease risk, but some individuals with high PRS do not develop glaucoma. Factors contributing to this resilience remain unclear. Using 4,658 glaucoma cases and 113,040 controls in a cross-sectional study of the UK Biobank, we investigated whether plasma metabolites enhanced glaucoma prediction and if a metabolomic signature of resilience in high-genetic-risk individuals existed. Logistic regression models incorporating 168 NMR-based metabolites into PRS-based glaucoma assessments were developed, with multiple comparison corrections applied. While metabolites weakly predicted glaucoma (Area Under the Curve = 0.579), they offered marginal prediction improvement in PRS-only-based models (p=0.004). We identified a metabolomic signature associated with resilience in the top glaucoma PRS decile, with elevated glycolysis-related metabolites—lactate (p=8.8E-12), pyruvate (p=1.9E-10), and citrate (p=0.02)—linked to reduced glaucoma prevalence. These metabolites combined significantly modified the PRS-glaucoma relationship (Pinteraction = 0.011). Higher total resilience metabolite levels within the highest PRS quartile corresponded to lower glaucoma prevalence (Odds Ratiohighest vs. lowest total resilience metabolite quartile=0.71, 95% Confidence Interval = 0.64–0.80). As pyruvate is a foundational metabolite linking glycolysis to tricarboxylic acid cycle metabolism and ATP generation, we pursued experimental validation for this putative resilience biomarker in a human-relevant Mus musculus glaucoma model. Dietary pyruvate mitigated elevated intraocular pressure (p=0.002) and optic nerve damage (p<0.0003) in Lmx1bV265D mice. These findings highlight the protective role of pyruvate-related metabolism against glaucoma and suggest potential avenues for therapeutic intervention.