A choline-releasing glycerophosphodiesterase essential for phosphatidylcholine biosynthesis and blood stage development in the malaria parasite

  1. Abhinay Ramaprasad
  2. Paul-Christian Burda
  3. Enrica Calvani
  4. Aaron J Sait
  5. Susana Alejandra Palma-Duran
  6. Chrislaine Withers-Martinez
  7. Fiona Hackett
  8. James Macrae
  9. Lucy Collinson
  10. Tim Wolf Gilberger  Is a corresponding author
  11. Michael J Blackman  Is a corresponding author
  1. The Francis Crick Institute, United Kingdom
  2. Centre for Structural Systems Biology, Germany
  3. Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Germany

Abstract

The malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum synthesizes significant amounts of phospholipids to meet the demands of replication within red blood cells. De novo phosphatidylcholine (PC) biosynthesis via the Kennedy pathway is essential, requiring choline that is primarily sourced from host serum lysophosphatidylcholine (lysoPC). LysoPC also acts as an environmental sensor to regulate parasite sexual differentiation. Despite these critical roles for host lysoPC, the enzyme(s) involved in its breakdown to free choline for PC synthesis are unknown. Here we show that a parasite glycerophosphodiesterase (PfGDPD) is indispensable for blood stage parasite proliferation. Exogenous choline rescues growth of PfGDPD-null parasites, directly linking PfGDPD function to choline incorporation. Genetic ablation of PfGDPD reduces choline uptake from lysoPC, resulting in depletion of several PC species in the parasite, whilst purified PfGDPD releases choline from glycerophosphocholine in vitro. Our results identify PfGDPD as a choline-releasing glycerophosphodiesterase that mediates a critical step in PC biosynthesis and parasite survival.

Data availability

Sequencing data have been deposited in ENA under Project PRJEB55180.All data generated or analysed are included in the manuscript or provided as source data files.All source codes are available via github - https://github.com/a2g1n/GDPDxcute.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Abhinay Ramaprasad

    Malaria Biochemistry Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9372-5526
  2. Paul-Christian Burda

    Centre for Structural Systems Biology, Hamburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0461-4352
  3. Enrica Calvani

    Mass Spectrometry Science Technology Platform, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Aaron J Sait

    Electron Microscopy Science Technology Platform, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6091-0426
  5. Susana Alejandra Palma-Duran

    Mass Spectrometry Science Technology Platform, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Chrislaine Withers-Martinez

    Malaria Biochemistry Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Fiona Hackett

    Malaria Biochemistry Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. James Macrae

    Mass Spectrometry Science Technology Platform, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1464-8583
  9. Lucy Collinson

    Electron Microscopy Science Technology Platform, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Tim Wolf Gilberger

    Parasitology, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany
    For correspondence
    gilberger@bnitm.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7965-8272
  11. Michael J Blackman

    Malaria Biochemistry Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    Mike.Blackman@crick.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7442-3810

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (751865)

  • Abhinay Ramaprasad

Wellcome Trust (20318/A/20/Z)

  • Michael J Blackman

Cancer Research UK (CC2129)

  • Abhinay Ramaprasad
  • Enrica Calvani
  • Aaron J Sait
  • Susana Alejandra Palma-Duran
  • Chrislaine Withers-Martinez
  • Fiona Hackett
  • James Macrae
  • Lucy Collinson
  • Michael J Blackman

Medical Research Council (CC2129)

  • Abhinay Ramaprasad
  • Enrica Calvani
  • Aaron J Sait
  • Susana Alejandra Palma-Duran
  • Chrislaine Withers-Martinez
  • Fiona Hackett
  • James Macrae
  • Lucy Collinson
  • Michael J Blackman

Wellcome Trust (CC2129)

  • Abhinay Ramaprasad
  • Enrica Calvani
  • Aaron J Sait
  • Susana Alejandra Palma-Duran
  • Chrislaine Withers-Martinez
  • Fiona Hackett
  • James Macrae
  • Lucy Collinson
  • Michael J Blackman

Wellcome Trust (ISSF2)

  • Michael J Blackman

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (414222880)

  • Paul-Christian Burda

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Malcolm J McConville, The University of Melbourne, Australia

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: June 14, 2022 (view preprint)
  2. Received: July 27, 2022
  3. Accepted: December 23, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: December 28, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: January 30, 2023 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2022, Ramaprasad et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 918
    views
  • 189
    downloads
  • 9
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Abhinay Ramaprasad
  2. Paul-Christian Burda
  3. Enrica Calvani
  4. Aaron J Sait
  5. Susana Alejandra Palma-Duran
  6. Chrislaine Withers-Martinez
  7. Fiona Hackett
  8. James Macrae
  9. Lucy Collinson
  10. Tim Wolf Gilberger
  11. Michael J Blackman
(2022)
A choline-releasing glycerophosphodiesterase essential for phosphatidylcholine biosynthesis and blood stage development in the malaria parasite
eLife 11:e82207.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82207

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82207

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Natalia E Ketaren, Fred D Mast ... John D Aitchison
    Research Advance

    To date, all major modes of monoclonal antibody therapy targeting SARS-CoV-2 have lost significant efficacy against the latest circulating variants. As SARS-CoV-2 omicron sublineages account for over 90% of COVID-19 infections, evasion of immune responses generated by vaccination or exposure to previous variants poses a significant challenge. A compelling new therapeutic strategy against SARS-CoV-2 is that of single-domain antibodies, termed nanobodies, which address certain limitations of monoclonal antibodies. Here, we demonstrate that our high-affinity nanobody repertoire, generated against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (Mast et al., 2021), remains effective against variants of concern, including omicron BA.4/BA.5; a subset is predicted to counter resistance in emerging XBB and BQ.1.1 sublineages. Furthermore, we reveal the synergistic potential of nanobody cocktails in neutralizing emerging variants. Our study highlights the power of nanobody technology as a versatile therapeutic and diagnostic tool to combat rapidly evolving infectious diseases such as SARS-CoV-2.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Benjamin R Duewell, Naomi E Wilson ... Scott D Hansen
    Research Article

    Phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) beta (PI3Kβ) is functionally unique in the ability to integrate signals derived from receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), G-protein coupled receptors, and Rho-family GTPases. The mechanism by which PI3Kβ prioritizes interactions with various membrane-tethered signaling inputs, however, remains unclear. Previous experiments did not determine whether interactions with membrane-tethered proteins primarily control PI3Kβ localization versus directly modulate lipid kinase activity. To address this gap in our knowledge, we established an assay to directly visualize how three distinct protein interactions regulate PI3Kβ when presented to the kinase in a biologically relevant configuration on supported lipid bilayers. Using single molecule Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence (TIRF) Microscopy, we determined the mechanism controlling PI3Kβ membrane localization, prioritization of signaling inputs, and lipid kinase activation. We find that auto-inhibited PI3Kβ prioritizes interactions with RTK-derived tyrosine phosphorylated (pY) peptides before engaging either GβGγ or Rac1(GTP). Although pY peptides strongly localize PI3Kβ to membranes, stimulation of lipid kinase activity is modest. In the presence of either pY/GβGγ or pY/Rac1(GTP), PI3Kβ activity is dramatically enhanced beyond what can be explained by simply increasing membrane localization. Instead, PI3Kβ is synergistically activated by pY/GβGγ and pY/Rac1 (GTP) through a mechanism consistent with allosteric regulation.