Longitudinal fundus imaging and its genome-wide association analysis provide evidence for a human retinal aging clock

  1. Sara Ahadi  Is a corresponding author
  2. Kenneth A Wilson Jr
  3. Boris Babenko
  4. Cory Y McLean  Is a corresponding author
  5. Drew Bryant
  6. Orion Pritchard
  7. Ajay Kumar
  8. Enrique M Carrera
  9. Ricardo Lamy
  10. Jay M Stewart
  11. Avinash Varadarajan
  12. Marc Berndl
  13. Pankaj Kapahi  Is a corresponding author
  14. Ali Bashir
  1. Google Research, United States
  2. Buck Institute for Research on Aging, United States
  3. Google Health, United States
  4. Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, India
  5. Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, United States
  6. University of California, San Francisco, United States

Abstract

Biological age, distinct from an individual's chronological age, has been studied extensively through predictive aging clocks. However, these clocks have limited accuracy in short time-scales. Here we trained deep learning models on fundus images from the EyePACS dataset to predict individuals' chronological age. Our retinal aging clocking, 'eyeAge', predicted chronological age more accurately than other aging clocks (mean absolute error of 2.86 and 3.30 years on quality-filtered data from EyePACS and UK Biobank, respectively). Additionally, eyeAge was independent of blood marker-based measures of biological age, maintaining an all-cause mortality hazard ratio of 1.026 even when adjusted for phenotypic age. The individual-specific nature of eyeAge was reinforced via multiple GWAS hits in the UK Biobank cohort. The top GWAS locus was further validated via knockdown of the fly homolog, Alk, which slowed age-related decline in vision in flies. This study demonstrates the potential utility of a retinal aging clock for studying aging and age-related diseases and quantitatively measuring aging on very short time-scales, opening avenues for quick and actionable evaluation of gero-protective therapeutics.

Data availability

A subset of EyePACS data is freely available online (https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/diabetic-retinopathy-detection/data). To enquire about access to the full EyePACS dataset, researchers should contact Jorge Cuadros (jcuadros@eyepacs.com). Proposals and agreements are assessed internally at EyePACS and may be subject to ethics approvals. The UKB data are available for approved projects (application process detailed at https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/enable-your-research/apply-for-access) through the UK Biobank Access Management System (https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk) . We have deposited the derived data fields and model predictions following UKB policy, which will be available through the UK Biobank Access Management System. Full GWAS summary statistics are available in the Supplementary File. To develop the eyeAge model we used the TensorFlow deep learning framework, available at https://www.tensorflow.org . Code and detailed instructions for both model training and prediction of chronological age from fundus images is open-source and freely available as a minor modification (https://gist.github.com/cmclean/a7e01b916f07955b2693112dcd3edb60) of our previously published repository for fundus model training (https://zenodo.org/record/7154413).

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sara Ahadi

    Google Research, Mountain View, United States
    For correspondence
    saraahadi@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    Sara Ahadi, Sara Ahadi is not currently affiliated with Google Research, however work for this manuscript was conducted while affiliated with Google Research. The author has no other competing interests to declare..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7849-2135
  2. Kenneth A Wilson Jr

    Kapahi Lab, Buck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Boris Babenko

    Google Health, Palo Alto, United States
    Competing interests
    Boris Babenko, Boris Babenko is affiliated with Google Health. The author has no other competing interests to declare..
  4. Cory Y McLean

    Google Health, Cambridge, United States
    For correspondence
    cym@google.com
    Competing interests
    Cory Y McLean, Cory Y McLean is affiliated with Google Health. The author has no other competing interests to declare..
  5. Drew Bryant

    Google Research, Mountain View, United States
    Competing interests
    Drew Bryant, Drew Bryant is affiliated with Google Research. The author has no other competing interests to declare..
  6. Orion Pritchard

    Google Research, Mountain View, United States
    Competing interests
    Orion Pritchard, Orion Pritchard is affiliated with Google Research. The author has no other competing interests to declare..
  7. Ajay Kumar

    Department of Biophysics, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Enrique M Carrera

    Kapahi Lab, Buck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Ricardo Lamy

    Department of Ophthalmology, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Jay M Stewart

    Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Avinash Varadarajan

    Google Health, Palo Alto, United States
    Competing interests
    Avinash Varadarajan, Avinash Varadarajan is affiliated with Google Health. The author has no other competing interests to declare..
  12. Marc Berndl

    Google Research, Mountain View, United States
    Competing interests
    Marc Berndl, Marc Berndl is affiliated with Google Research. The author has no other competing interests to declare..
  13. Pankaj Kapahi

    Kapahi Lab, Buck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, United States
    For correspondence
    Pkapahi@buckinstitute.org
    Competing interests
    Pankaj Kapahi, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5629-4947
  14. Ali Bashir

    Google Research, Mountain View, United States
    Competing interests
    Ali Bashir, Ali Bashir is not currently affiliated with Google Research, however work for this manuscript was conducted while affiliated with Google Research. The author has no other competing interests to declare..

Funding

NIH (T32AG000266-23)

  • Kenneth A Wilson Jr

NIH (R01AG038688)

  • Pankaj Kapahi

NIH (AG045835)

  • Pankaj Kapahi

Larry L. Hillblom Foundation

  • Pankaj Kapahi

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: The UK Biobank study was reviewed and approved by the North West Multi-Centre Research Ethics Committee. For the EyePACS study, ethics review and IRB exemption was obtained using Quorum Review IRB (Seattle, WA).

Copyright

© 2023, Ahadi et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,295
    views
  • 686
    downloads
  • 25
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Sara Ahadi
  2. Kenneth A Wilson Jr
  3. Boris Babenko
  4. Cory Y McLean
  5. Drew Bryant
  6. Orion Pritchard
  7. Ajay Kumar
  8. Enrique M Carrera
  9. Ricardo Lamy
  10. Jay M Stewart
  11. Avinash Varadarajan
  12. Marc Berndl
  13. Pankaj Kapahi
  14. Ali Bashir
(2023)
Longitudinal fundus imaging and its genome-wide association analysis provide evidence for a human retinal aging clock
eLife 12:e82364.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82364

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82364

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Daniel Hui, Scott Dudek ... Marylyn D Ritchie
    Research Article

    Apart from ancestry, personal or environmental covariates may contribute to differences in polygenic score (PGS) performance. We analyzed the effects of covariate stratification and interaction on body mass index (BMI) PGS (PGSBMI) across four cohorts of European (N = 491,111) and African (N = 21,612) ancestry. Stratifying on binary covariates and quintiles for continuous covariates, 18/62 covariates had significant and replicable R2 differences among strata. Covariates with the largest differences included age, sex, blood lipids, physical activity, and alcohol consumption, with R2 being nearly double between best- and worst-performing quintiles for certain covariates. Twenty-eight covariates had significant PGSBMI–covariate interaction effects, modifying PGSBMI effects by nearly 20% per standard deviation change. We observed overlap between covariates that had significant R2 differences among strata and interaction effects – across all covariates, their main effects on BMI were correlated with their maximum R2 differences and interaction effects (0.56 and 0.58, respectively), suggesting high-PGSBMI individuals have highest R2 and increase in PGS effect. Using quantile regression, we show the effect of PGSBMI increases as BMI itself increases, and that these differences in effects are directly related to differences in R2 when stratifying by different covariates. Given significant and replicable evidence for context-specific PGSBMI performance and effects, we investigated ways to increase model performance taking into account nonlinear effects. Machine learning models (neural networks) increased relative model R2 (mean 23%) across datasets. Finally, creating PGSBMI directly from GxAge genome-wide association studies effects increased relative R2 by 7.8%. These results demonstrate that certain covariates, especially those most associated with BMI, significantly affect both PGSBMI performance and effects across diverse cohorts and ancestries, and we provide avenues to improve model performance that consider these effects.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Cesare V Parise, Marc O Ernst
    Research Article

    Audiovisual information reaches the brain via both sustained and transient input channels, representing signals’ intensity over time or changes thereof, respectively. To date, it is unclear to what extent transient and sustained input channels contribute to the combined percept obtained through multisensory integration. Based on the results of two novel psychophysical experiments, here we demonstrate the importance of the transient (instead of the sustained) channel for the integration of audiovisual signals. To account for the present results, we developed a biologically inspired, general-purpose model for multisensory integration, the multisensory correlation detectors, which combines correlated input from unimodal transient channels. Besides accounting for the results of our psychophysical experiments, this model could quantitatively replicate several recent findings in multisensory research, as tested against a large collection of published datasets. In particular, the model could simultaneously account for the perceived timing of audiovisual events, multisensory facilitation in detection tasks, causality judgments, and optimal integration. This study demonstrates that several phenomena in multisensory research that were previously considered unrelated, all stem from the integration of correlated input from unimodal transient channels.