Abstract

The activation of Src kinase in cells is strictly controlled by intramolecular inhibitory interactions mediated by SH3 and SH2 domains. They impose structural constraints on the kinase domain holding it in a catalytically non‑permissive state. The transition between inactive and active conformation is known to be largely regulated by the phosphorylation state of key tyrosines 416 and 527. Here we identified that phosphorylation of tyrosine 90 reduces binding affinity of the SH3 domain to its interacting partners, opens the Src structure, and renders Src catalytically active. This is accompanied by an increased affinity to the plasma membrane, decreased membrane motility and slower diffusion from focal adhesions. Phosphorylation of tyrosine 90 controlling SH3‑medited intramolecular inhibitory interaction, analogical to tyrosine 527 regulating SH2‑C‑terminus bond, enables SH3 and SH2 domains to serve as cooperative but independent regulatory elements. This mechanism allows Src to adopt several distinct conformations of varying catalytic activities and interacting properties, enabling it to operate not as a simple switch but as a tunable regulator functioning as a signaling hub in a variety of cellular processes.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supplementary figures. Source Data files have been provided for Figures 1-7.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Lenka Koudelková

    Department of Cell Biology, Charles University, Vestec, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Markéta Pelantová

    Department of Cell Biology, Charles University, Vestec, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Zuzana Brůhová

    Department of Cell Biology, Charles University, Vestec, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Martin Sztacho

    Department of Cell Biology, Charles University, Vestec, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Vojtěch Pavlík

    Department of Cell Biology, Charles University, Vestec, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Dalibor Pánek

    Imaging Methods Core Facility, Charles University, Vestec, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Jakub Gemperle

    Department of Cell Biology, Charles University, Vestec, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Pavel Talacko

    Proteomics Core Facility, Charles University, Vestec, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Jan Brábek

    Department of Cell Biology, Charles University, Vestec, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Daniel Rösel

    Department of Cell Biology, Charles University, Vestec, Czech Republic
    For correspondence
    rosel@natur.cuni.cz
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7221-8672

Funding

Grantová Agentura České Republiky (19-03932S)

  • Lenka Koudelková
  • Jan Brábek
  • Daniel Rösel

Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy (LX22NPO5102)

  • Lenka Koudelková
  • Markéta Pelantová
  • Jan Brábek
  • Daniel Rösel

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2023, Koudelková et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 956
    views
  • 159
    downloads
  • 1
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Lenka Koudelková
  2. Markéta Pelantová
  3. Zuzana Brůhová
  4. Martin Sztacho
  5. Vojtěch Pavlík
  6. Dalibor Pánek
  7. Jakub Gemperle
  8. Pavel Talacko
  9. Jan Brábek
  10. Daniel Rösel
(2023)
Phosphorylation of tyrosine 90 in SH3 domain is a new regulatory switch controlling Src kinase
eLife 12:e82428.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82428

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82428

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Shraddha KC, Kenny H Nguyen ... Thomas C Boothby
    Research Article

    The conformational ensemble and function of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are sensitive to their solution environment. The inherent malleability of disordered proteins, combined with the exposure of their residues, accounts for this sensitivity. One context in which IDPs play important roles that are concomitant with massive changes to the intracellular environment is during desiccation (extreme drying). The ability of organisms to survive desiccation has long been linked to the accumulation of high levels of cosolutes such as trehalose or sucrose as well as the enrichment of IDPs, such as late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins or cytoplasmic abundant heat-soluble (CAHS) proteins. Despite knowing that IDPs play important roles and are co-enriched alongside endogenous, species-specific cosolutes during desiccation, little is known mechanistically about how IDP-cosolute interactions influence desiccation tolerance. Here, we test the notion that the protective function of desiccation-related IDPs is enhanced through conformational changes induced by endogenous cosolutes. We find that desiccation-related IDPs derived from four different organisms spanning two LEA protein families and the CAHS protein family synergize best with endogenous cosolutes during drying to promote desiccation protection. Yet the structural parameters of protective IDPs do not correlate with synergy for either CAHS or LEA proteins. We further demonstrate that for CAHS, but not LEA proteins, synergy is related to self-assembly and the formation of a gel. Our results suggest that functional synergy between IDPs and endogenous cosolutes is a convergent desiccation protection strategy seen among different IDP families and organisms, yet the mechanisms underlying this synergy differ between IDP families.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Alejandro J Brenes, Eva Griesser ... Angus I Lamond
    Research Article

    Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) have great potential to be used as alternatives to embryonic stem cells (hESCs) in regenerative medicine and disease modelling. In this study, we characterise the proteomes of multiple hiPSC and hESC lines derived from independent donors and find that while they express a near-identical set of proteins, they show consistent quantitative differences in the abundance of a subset of proteins. hiPSCs have increased total protein content, while maintaining a comparable cell cycle profile to hESCs, with increased abundance of cytoplasmic and mitochondrial proteins required to sustain high growth rates, including nutrient transporters and metabolic proteins. Prominent changes detected in proteins involved in mitochondrial metabolism correlated with enhanced mitochondrial potential, shown using high-resolution respirometry. hiPSCs also produced higher levels of secreted proteins, including growth factors and proteins involved in the inhibition of the immune system. The data indicate that reprogramming of fibroblasts to hiPSCs produces important differences in cytoplasmic and mitochondrial proteins compared to hESCs, with consequences affecting growth and metabolism. This study improves our understanding of the molecular differences between hiPSCs and hESCs, with implications for potential risks and benefits for their use in future disease modelling and therapeutic applications.