Abstract

The activation of Src kinase in cells is strictly controlled by intramolecular inhibitory interactions mediated by SH3 and SH2 domains. They impose structural constraints on the kinase domain holding it in a catalytically non‑permissive state. The transition between inactive and active conformation is known to be largely regulated by the phosphorylation state of key tyrosines 416 and 527. Here we identified that phosphorylation of tyrosine 90 reduces binding affinity of the SH3 domain to its interacting partners, opens the Src structure, and renders Src catalytically active. This is accompanied by an increased affinity to the plasma membrane, decreased membrane motility and slower diffusion from focal adhesions. Phosphorylation of tyrosine 90 controlling SH3‑medited intramolecular inhibitory interaction, analogical to tyrosine 527 regulating SH2‑C‑terminus bond, enables SH3 and SH2 domains to serve as cooperative but independent regulatory elements. This mechanism allows Src to adopt several distinct conformations of varying catalytic activities and interacting properties, enabling it to operate not as a simple switch but as a tunable regulator functioning as a signaling hub in a variety of cellular processes.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supplementary figures. Source Data files have been provided for Figures 1-7.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Lenka Koudelková

    Department of Cell Biology, Charles University, Vestec, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Markéta Pelantová

    Department of Cell Biology, Charles University, Vestec, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Zuzana Brůhová

    Department of Cell Biology, Charles University, Vestec, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Martin Sztacho

    Department of Cell Biology, Charles University, Vestec, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Vojtěch Pavlík

    Department of Cell Biology, Charles University, Vestec, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Dalibor Pánek

    Imaging Methods Core Facility, Charles University, Vestec, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Jakub Gemperle

    Department of Cell Biology, Charles University, Vestec, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Pavel Talacko

    Proteomics Core Facility, Charles University, Vestec, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Jan Brábek

    Department of Cell Biology, Charles University, Vestec, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Daniel Rösel

    Department of Cell Biology, Charles University, Vestec, Czech Republic
    For correspondence
    rosel@natur.cuni.cz
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7221-8672

Funding

Grantová Agentura České Republiky (19-03932S)

  • Lenka Koudelková
  • Jan Brábek
  • Daniel Rösel

Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy (LX22NPO5102)

  • Lenka Koudelková
  • Markéta Pelantová
  • Jan Brábek
  • Daniel Rösel

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2023, Koudelková et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 979
    views
  • 163
    downloads
  • 1
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Lenka Koudelková
  2. Markéta Pelantová
  3. Zuzana Brůhová
  4. Martin Sztacho
  5. Vojtěch Pavlík
  6. Dalibor Pánek
  7. Jakub Gemperle
  8. Pavel Talacko
  9. Jan Brábek
  10. Daniel Rösel
(2023)
Phosphorylation of tyrosine 90 in SH3 domain is a new regulatory switch controlling Src kinase
eLife 12:e82428.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82428

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82428

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Bernd K Gilsbach, Franz Y Ho ... Christian Johannes Gloeckner
    Research Article

    The Parkinson’s disease (PD)-linked protein Leucine-Rich Repeat Kinase 2 (LRRK2) consists of seven domains, including a kinase and a Roc G domain. Despite the availability of several high-resolution structures, the dynamic regulation of its unique intramolecular domain stack is nevertheless still not well understood. By in-depth biochemical analysis, assessing the Michaelis–Menten kinetics of the Roc G domain, we have confirmed that LRRK2 has, similar to other Roco protein family members, a KM value of LRRK2 that lies within the range of the physiological GTP concentrations within the cell. Furthermore, the R1441G PD variant located within a mutational hotspot in the Roc domain showed an increased catalytic efficiency. In contrast, the most common PD variant G2019S, located in the kinase domain, showed an increased KM and reduced catalytic efficiency, suggesting a negative feedback mechanism from the kinase domain to the G domain. Autophosphorylation of the G1+2 residue (T1343) in the Roc P-loop motif is critical for this phosphoregulation of both the KM and the kcat values of the Roc-catalyzed GTP hydrolysis, most likely by changing the monomer–dimer equilibrium. The LRRK2 T1343A variant has a similar increased kinase activity in cells compared to G2019S and the double mutant T1343A/G2019S has no further increased activity, suggesting that T1343 is crucial for the negative feedback in the LRRK2 signaling cascade. Together, our data reveal a novel intramolecular feedback regulation of the LRRK2 Roc G domain by a LRRK2 kinase-dependent mechanism. Interestingly, PD mutants differently change the kinetics of the GTPase cycle, which might in part explain the difference in penetrance of these mutations in PD patients.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Katherine A Senn, Karli A Lipinski ... Aaron A Hoskins
    Research Article

    Pre-mRNA splicing is catalyzed in two steps: 5ʹ splice site (SS) cleavage and exon ligation. A number of proteins transiently associate with spliceosomes to specifically impact these steps (first and second step factors). We recently identified Fyv6 (FAM192A in humans) as a second step factor in Saccharomyces cerevisiae; however, we did not determine how widespread Fyv6’s impact is on the transcriptome. To answer this question, we have used RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) to analyze changes in splicing. These results show that loss of Fyv6 results in activation of non-consensus, branch point (BP) proximal 3ʹ SS transcriptome-wide. To identify the molecular basis of these observations, we determined a high-resolution cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structure of a yeast product complex spliceosome containing Fyv6 at 2.3 Å. The structure reveals that Fyv6 is the only second step factor that contacts the Prp22 ATPase and that Fyv6 binding is mutually exclusive with that of the first step factor Yju2. We then use this structure to dissect Fyv6 functional domains and interpret results of a genetic screen for fyv6Δ suppressor mutations. The combined transcriptomic, structural, and genetic studies allow us to propose a model in which Yju2/Fyv6 exchange facilitates exon ligation and Fyv6 promotes usage of consensus, BP distal 3ʹ SS.