Abstract

The activation of Src kinase in cells is strictly controlled by intramolecular inhibitory interactions mediated by SH3 and SH2 domains. They impose structural constraints on the kinase domain holding it in a catalytically non‑permissive state. The transition between inactive and active conformation is known to be largely regulated by the phosphorylation state of key tyrosines 416 and 527. Here we identified that phosphorylation of tyrosine 90 reduces binding affinity of the SH3 domain to its interacting partners, opens the Src structure, and renders Src catalytically active. This is accompanied by an increased affinity to the plasma membrane, decreased membrane motility and slower diffusion from focal adhesions. Phosphorylation of tyrosine 90 controlling SH3‑medited intramolecular inhibitory interaction, analogical to tyrosine 527 regulating SH2‑C‑terminus bond, enables SH3 and SH2 domains to serve as cooperative but independent regulatory elements. This mechanism allows Src to adopt several distinct conformations of varying catalytic activities and interacting properties, enabling it to operate not as a simple switch but as a tunable regulator functioning as a signaling hub in a variety of cellular processes.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supplementary figures. Source Data files have been provided for Figures 1-7.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Lenka Koudelková

    Department of Cell Biology, Charles University, Vestec, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Markéta Pelantová

    Department of Cell Biology, Charles University, Vestec, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Zuzana Brůhová

    Department of Cell Biology, Charles University, Vestec, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Martin Sztacho

    Department of Cell Biology, Charles University, Vestec, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Vojtěch Pavlík

    Department of Cell Biology, Charles University, Vestec, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Dalibor Pánek

    Imaging Methods Core Facility, Charles University, Vestec, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Jakub Gemperle

    Department of Cell Biology, Charles University, Vestec, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Pavel Talacko

    Proteomics Core Facility, Charles University, Vestec, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Jan Brábek

    Department of Cell Biology, Charles University, Vestec, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Daniel Rösel

    Department of Cell Biology, Charles University, Vestec, Czech Republic
    For correspondence
    rosel@natur.cuni.cz
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7221-8672

Funding

Grantová Agentura České Republiky (19-03932S)

  • Lenka Koudelková
  • Jan Brábek
  • Daniel Rösel

Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy (LX22NPO5102)

  • Lenka Koudelková
  • Markéta Pelantová
  • Jan Brábek
  • Daniel Rösel

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Kathleen Gould, Vanderbilt University, United States

Version history

  1. Received: August 3, 2022
  2. Preprint posted: August 24, 2022 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: July 7, 2023
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: July 10, 2023 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: July 21, 2023 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2023, Koudelková et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 851
    views
  • 148
    downloads
  • 1
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Lenka Koudelková
  2. Markéta Pelantová
  3. Zuzana Brůhová
  4. Martin Sztacho
  5. Vojtěch Pavlík
  6. Dalibor Pánek
  7. Jakub Gemperle
  8. Pavel Talacko
  9. Jan Brábek
  10. Daniel Rösel
(2023)
Phosphorylation of tyrosine 90 in SH3 domain is a new regulatory switch controlling Src kinase
eLife 12:e82428.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82428

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82428

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Plant Biology
    Henning Mühlenbeck, Yuko Tsutsui ... Cyril Zipfel
    Research Article

    Transmembrane signaling by plant receptor kinases (RKs) has long been thought to involve reciprocal trans-phosphorylation of their intracellular kinase domains. The fact that many of these are pseudokinase domains, however, suggests that additional mechanisms must govern RK signaling activation. Non-catalytic signaling mechanisms of protein kinase domains have been described in metazoans, but information is scarce for plants. Recently, a non-catalytic function was reported for the leucine-rich repeat (LRR)-RK subfamily XIIa member EFR (elongation factor Tu receptor) and phosphorylation-dependent conformational changes were proposed to regulate signaling of RKs with non-RD kinase domains. Here, using EFR as a model, we describe a non-catalytic activation mechanism for LRR-RKs with non-RD kinase domains. EFR is an active kinase, but a kinase-dead variant retains the ability to enhance catalytic activity of its co-receptor kinase BAK1/SERK3 (brassinosteroid insensitive 1-associated kinase 1/somatic embryogenesis receptor kinase 3). Applying hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) analysis and designing homology-based intragenic suppressor mutations, we provide evidence that the EFR kinase domain must adopt its active conformation in order to activate BAK1 allosterically, likely by supporting αC-helix positioning in BAK1. Our results suggest a conformational toggle model for signaling, in which BAK1 first phosphorylates EFR in the activation loop to stabilize its active conformation, allowing EFR in turn to allosterically activate BAK1.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Katarzyna Marta Zoltowska, Utpal Das ... Lucía Chávez-Gutiérrez
    Research Article

    Amyloid β (Aβ) peptides accumulating in the brain are proposed to trigger Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, molecular cascades underlying their toxicity are poorly defined. Here, we explored a novel hypothesis for Aβ42 toxicity that arises from its proven affinity for γ-secretases. We hypothesized that the reported increases in Aβ42, particularly in the endolysosomal compartment, promote the establishment of a product feedback inhibitory mechanism on γ-secretases, and thereby impair downstream signaling events. We conducted kinetic analyses of γ-secretase activity in cell-free systems in the presence of Aβ, as well as cell-based and ex vivo assays in neuronal cell lines, neurons, and brain synaptosomes to assess the impact of Aβ on γ-secretases. We show that human Aβ42 peptides, but neither murine Aβ42 nor human Aβ17–42 (p3), inhibit γ-secretases and trigger accumulation of unprocessed substrates in neurons, including C-terminal fragments (CTFs) of APP, p75, and pan-cadherin. Moreover, Aβ42 treatment dysregulated cellular homeostasis, as shown by the induction of p75-dependent neuronal death in two distinct cellular systems. Our findings raise the possibility that pathological elevations in Aβ42 contribute to cellular toxicity via the γ-secretase inhibition, and provide a novel conceptual framework to address Aβ toxicity in the context of γ-secretase-dependent homeostatic signaling.