Clinical characteristics, racial inequities, and outcomes in patients with breast cancer and COVID-19: a COVID-19 and cancer consortium (CCC19) cohort study

  1. Gayathri Nagaraj  Is a corresponding author
  2. Shaveta Vinayak
  3. Ali Raza Khaki
  4. Tianyi Sun
  5. Nicole M Kuderer
  6. David M Aboulafia
  7. Jared D Acoba
  8. Joy Awosika
  9. Ziad Bakouny
  10. Nicole B Balmaceda
  11. Ting Bao
  12. Babar Bashir
  13. Stephanie Berg
  14. Mehmet A Bilen
  15. Poorva Bindal
  16. Sibel Blau
  17. Brianne E Bodin
  18. Hala T Borno
  19. Cecilia Castellano
  20. Horyun Choi
  21. John Deeken
  22. Aakash Desai
  23. Natasha Edwin
  24. Lawrence E Feldman
  25. Daniel B Flora
  26. Christopher R Friese
  27. Matthew D. Galsky
  28. Cyndi J Gonzalez
  29. Petros Grivas
  30. Shilpa Gupta
  31. Marcy Haynam
  32. Hannah Heilman
  33. Dawn L Hershman
  34. Clara Hwang
  35. Chinmay Jani
  36. Sachin R Jhawar
  37. Monika Joshi
  38. Virginia Kaklamani
  39. Elizabeth J Klein
  40. Natalie Knox
  41. Vadim S Koshkin
  42. Amit A Kulkarni
  43. Daniel H Kwon
  44. Chris Labaki
  45. Philip E Lammers
  46. Kate I Lathrop
  47. Mark A Lewis
  48. Xuanyi Li
  49. Gilbert de Lima Lopes
  50. Gary H Lyman
  51. Della F Makower
  52. Abdul-Hai Mansoor
  53. Merry-Jennifer Markham
  54. Sandeep H Mashru
  55. Rana R McKay
  56. Ian Messing
  57. Vasil Mico
  58. Rajani Nadkarni
  59. Swathi Namburi
  60. Ryan H Nguyen
  61. Taylor Kristian Nonato
  62. Tracey Lynn O'Connor
  63. Orestis A Panagiotou
  64. Kyu Park
  65. Jaymin M Patel
  66. Kanishka GopikaBimal Patel
  67. Jeffrey Peppercorn
  68. Hyma Polimera
  69. Matthew Puc
  70. Yuan James Rao
  71. Pedram Razavi
  72. Sonya A Reid
  73. Jonathan W Riess
  74. Donna R Rivera
  75. Mark Robson
  76. Suzanne J Rose
  77. Atlantis D Russ
  78. Lidia Schapira
  79. Pankil K Shah
  80. M Kelly Shanahan
  81. Lauren C Shapiro
  82. Melissa Smits
  83. Daniel G Stover
  84. Mitrianna Streckfuss
  85. Lisa Tachiki
  86. Michael A. Thompson
  87. Sara M Tolaney
  88. Lisa B Weissmann
  89. Grace Wilson
  90. Michael T Wotman
  91. Elizabeth M Wulff-Burchfield
  92. Sanjay Mishra
  93. Benjamin French
  94. Jeremy L Warner
  95. Maryam B Lustberg
  96. Melissa K Accordino
  97. Dimpy P Shah  Is a corresponding author
  98. on behalf of the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium
  1. Loma Linda University, United States
  2. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, United States
  3. Stanford University, United States
  4. Vanderbilt University Medical Center, United States
  5. University of Washington, United States
  6. Virginia Mason Institute, United States
  7. University of Hawaii, United States
  8. University of Cincinnati, United States
  9. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, United States
  10. University of Kansas Cancer Center, United States
  11. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
  12. Thomas Jefferson University, United States
  13. Loyola University Medical Center, United States
  14. Emory University, United States
  15. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, United States
  16. Northwest Medical Specialties, United States
  17. Columbia University, United States
  18. University of California, San Francisco, United States
  19. Inova Schar Cancer Institute, United States
  20. Mayo Clinic, United States
  21. ThedaCare, United States
  22. University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System, United States
  23. St. Elizabeth Healthcare, United States
  24. University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, United States
  25. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, United States
  26. Cleveland Clinic, United States
  27. The Ohio State University, United States
  28. Henry Ford Hospital, United States
  29. Mount Auburn Hospital, United States
  30. Penn State Health St Joseph Cancer Center, United States
  31. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
  32. Brown University, United States
  33. Loyola University, United States
  34. University of Minnesota, United States
  35. Baptist Cancer Center, United States
  36. Intermountain Healthcare, United States
  37. University of Miami, United States
  38. Albert Einstein College of Medicine, United States
  39. Kaiser Permanente Northwest, United States
  40. University of Florida, United States
  41. University of California, San Diego, United States
  42. George Washington University, United States
  43. Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute, United States
  44. Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, United States
  45. University of California, Davis, United States
  46. Massachusetts General Hospital, United States
  47. Penn State Health St. Joseph Cancer Center, United States
  48. Virtua Health, United States
  49. National Cancer Institute, United States
  50. Stamford Hospital, United States
  51. METAvivor, United States
  52. ThedaCare Cancer Care, United States
  53. Advocate Aurora Health, United States
  54. Fred Hutchinson/University of Washington Cancer Consortium, United States
  55. Yale University, United States

Abstract

Background: Limited information is available for patients with breast cancer (BC) and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), especially among underrepresented racial/ethnic populations.

Methods: This is a COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) registry-based retrospective cohort study of females with active or history of BC and laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection diagnosed between March 2020 and June 2021 in the US. Primary outcome was COVID-19 severity measured on a five-level ordinal scale, including none of the following complications, hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, and all-cause mortality. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression model identified characteristics associated with COVID-19 severity.

Results: 1,383 female patient records with BC and COVID-19 were included in the analysis, the median age was 61 years, and median follow-up was 90 days. Multivariable analysis revealed higher odds of COVID-19 severity for older age (aOR per decade, 1.48 [95% CI, 1.32 -1.67]); Black patients (aOR 1.74; 95 CI 1.24-2.45), Asian Americans and Pacific Islander patients (aOR 3.40; 95 CI 1.70 - 6.79) and Other (aOR 2.97; 95 CI 1.71-5.17) racial/ethnic groups; worse ECOG performance status (ECOG PS ≥2: aOR, 7.78 [95% CI, 4.83 - 12.5]); pre-existing cardiovascular (aOR, 2.26 [95% CI, 1.63 - 3.15])/pulmonary comorbidities (aOR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.20 - 2.29]); diabetes mellitus (aOR, 2.25 [95% CI, 1.66 - 3.04]); and active and progressing cancer (aOR, 12.5 [95% CI, 6.89 - 22.6]). Hispanic ethnicity, timing and type of anti-cancer therapy modalities were not significantly associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes. The total all-cause mortality and hospitalization rate for the entire cohort was 9% and 37%, respectively however, it varied according to the BC disease status.

Conclusions: Using one of the largest registries on cancer and COVID-19, we identified patient and BC related factors associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, underrepresented racial/ethnic patients experienced worse outcomes compared to Non-Hispanic White patients.

Funding: This study was partly supported by National Cancer Institute grant number P30 CA068485 to Tianyi Sun, Sanjay Mishra, Benjamin French, Jeremy L. Warner; P30-CA046592 to Christopher R. Friese; P30 CA023100 for Rana R McKay; P30-CA054174 for Pankil K. Shah and Dimpy P. Shah; and the American Cancer Society and Hope Foundation for Cancer Research (MRSG-16-152-01 -CCE) and P30-CA054174 for Dimpy P. Shah. REDCap is developed and supported by Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research grant support (UL1 TR000445 from NCATS/NIH). The funding sources had no role in the writing of the manuscript or the decision to submit it for publication.

Clinical Trial Number: CCC19 registry is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04354701.

Data availability

All datasets (with restriction of time variables to protect patient confidentiality) and code associated with the article are available at: https://datadryad.org/stash/dataset/doi:10.5061/dryad.1g1jwsv10

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Gayathri Nagaraj

    Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, United States
    For correspondence
    gnagaraj@llu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7586-6920
  2. Shaveta Vinayak

    Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Ali Raza Khaki

    Stanford University, Palo Alto, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Tianyi Sun

    Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Nicole M Kuderer

    University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. David M Aboulafia

    Virginia Mason Institute, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Jared D Acoba

    University of Hawaii, Honolulu, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Joy Awosika

    University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Ziad Bakouny

    Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Nicole B Balmaceda

    University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Ting Bao

    Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Babar Bashir

    Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Stephanie Berg

    Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Mehmet A Bilen

    Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Poorva Bindal

    Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Sibel Blau

    Northwest Medical Specialties, Tacoma, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Brianne E Bodin

    Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Hala T Borno

    Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Cecilia Castellano

    Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  20. Horyun Choi

    University of Hawaii, Honolulu, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  21. John Deeken

    Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  22. Aakash Desai

    Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  23. Natasha Edwin

    ThedaCare, Appleton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  24. Lawrence E Feldman

    University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  25. Daniel B Flora

    St. Elizabeth Healthcare, Edgewood, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  26. Christopher R Friese

    Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  27. Matthew D. Galsky

    Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  28. Cyndi J Gonzalez

    Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  29. Petros Grivas

    Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  30. Shilpa Gupta

    Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  31. Marcy Haynam

    Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  32. Hannah Heilman

    University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  33. Dawn L Hershman

    Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  34. Clara Hwang

    Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0998-323X
  35. Chinmay Jani

    Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  36. Sachin R Jhawar

    Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  37. Monika Joshi

    Penn State Health St Joseph Cancer Center, Reading, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  38. Virginia Kaklamani

    Mays Cancer Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  39. Elizabeth J Klein

    Lifespan Cancer Institute, Brown University, Providence, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  40. Natalie Knox

    Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University, Maywood, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  41. Vadim S Koshkin

    Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  42. Amit A Kulkarni

    Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  43. Daniel H Kwon

    Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  44. Chris Labaki

    Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  45. Philip E Lammers

    Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  46. Kate I Lathrop

    Mays Cancer Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  47. Mark A Lewis

    Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  48. Xuanyi Li

    Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  49. Gilbert de Lima Lopes

    Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  50. Gary H Lyman

    Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  51. Della F Makower

    Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  52. Abdul-Hai Mansoor

    Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  53. Merry-Jennifer Markham

    Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  54. Sandeep H Mashru

    Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  55. Rana R McKay

    Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  56. Ian Messing

    Division of Radiation Oncology, George Washington University, Washington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  57. Vasil Mico

    Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  58. Rajani Nadkarni

    Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute, Hartford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  59. Swathi Namburi

    Northwest Medical Specialties, Tacoma, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  60. Ryan H Nguyen

    University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  61. Taylor Kristian Nonato

    Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  62. Tracey Lynn O'Connor

    Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  63. Orestis A Panagiotou

    Lifespan Cancer Institute, Brown University, Providence, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  64. Kyu Park

    Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  65. Jaymin M Patel

    Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  66. Kanishka GopikaBimal Patel

    UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  67. Jeffrey Peppercorn

    Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  68. Hyma Polimera

    Penn State Health St. Joseph Cancer Center, Reading, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  69. Matthew Puc

    Virtua Health, Marlton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9281-2262
  70. Yuan James Rao

    Division of Radiation Oncology, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  71. Pedram Razavi

    Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  72. Sonya A Reid

    Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  73. Jonathan W Riess

    UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  74. Donna R Rivera

    Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  75. Mark Robson

    Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  76. Suzanne J Rose

    Carl & Dorothy Bennett Cancer Center, Stamford Hospital, Stamford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  77. Atlantis D Russ

    Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  78. Lidia Schapira

    Stanford University, Palo Alto, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  79. Pankil K Shah

    Mays Cancer Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  80. M Kelly Shanahan

    METAvivor, Annapolis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  81. Lauren C Shapiro

    Department of Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  82. Melissa Smits

    ThedaCare Cancer Care, Appleton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  83. Daniel G Stover

    Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  84. Mitrianna Streckfuss

    Aurora Cancer Care, Advocate Aurora Health, Milwaukee, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  85. Lisa Tachiki

    Fred Hutchinson/University of Washington Cancer Consortium, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  86. Michael A. Thompson

    Aurora Cancer Care, Advocate Aurora Health, Milwaukee, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  87. Sara M Tolaney

    Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  88. Lisa B Weissmann

    Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  89. Grace Wilson

    Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  90. Michael T Wotman

    Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  91. Elizabeth M Wulff-Burchfield

    University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  92. Sanjay Mishra

    Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  93. Benjamin French

    Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  94. Jeremy L Warner

    Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  95. Maryam B Lustberg

    Yale Cancer Center, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  96. Melissa K Accordino

    Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  97. Dimpy P Shah

    Mays Cancer Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, San Antonio, United States
    For correspondence
    shahdp@uthscsa.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

National Cancer Institute (P30 CA068485)

  • Tianyi Sun
  • Sanjay Mishra
  • Benjamin French
  • Jeremy L Warner

National Cancer Institute (P30-CA046592)

  • Christopher R Friese

National Cancer Institute (P30 CA023100)

  • Rana R McKay

National Cancer Institute (P30-CA054174)

  • Pankil K Shah
  • Dimpy P Shah

American Cancer Society (MRSG-16-152-01 -CCE)

  • Dimpy P Shah

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Jennifer Cullen, Case Western Reserve University, United States

Ethics

Human subjects: This study was exempt from institutional review board (IRB) review (VUMC IRB#200467) and was approved by IRBs at participating sites per institutional policy. CCC19 registry is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04354701.

Version history

  1. Received: August 11, 2022
  2. Preprint posted: March 10, 2023 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: September 18, 2023
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: October 17, 2023 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: November 10, 2023 (version 2)

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 732
    views
  • 134
    downloads
  • 1
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Gayathri Nagaraj
  2. Shaveta Vinayak
  3. Ali Raza Khaki
  4. Tianyi Sun
  5. Nicole M Kuderer
  6. David M Aboulafia
  7. Jared D Acoba
  8. Joy Awosika
  9. Ziad Bakouny
  10. Nicole B Balmaceda
  11. Ting Bao
  12. Babar Bashir
  13. Stephanie Berg
  14. Mehmet A Bilen
  15. Poorva Bindal
  16. Sibel Blau
  17. Brianne E Bodin
  18. Hala T Borno
  19. Cecilia Castellano
  20. Horyun Choi
  21. John Deeken
  22. Aakash Desai
  23. Natasha Edwin
  24. Lawrence E Feldman
  25. Daniel B Flora
  26. Christopher R Friese
  27. Matthew D. Galsky
  28. Cyndi J Gonzalez
  29. Petros Grivas
  30. Shilpa Gupta
  31. Marcy Haynam
  32. Hannah Heilman
  33. Dawn L Hershman
  34. Clara Hwang
  35. Chinmay Jani
  36. Sachin R Jhawar
  37. Monika Joshi
  38. Virginia Kaklamani
  39. Elizabeth J Klein
  40. Natalie Knox
  41. Vadim S Koshkin
  42. Amit A Kulkarni
  43. Daniel H Kwon
  44. Chris Labaki
  45. Philip E Lammers
  46. Kate I Lathrop
  47. Mark A Lewis
  48. Xuanyi Li
  49. Gilbert de Lima Lopes
  50. Gary H Lyman
  51. Della F Makower
  52. Abdul-Hai Mansoor
  53. Merry-Jennifer Markham
  54. Sandeep H Mashru
  55. Rana R McKay
  56. Ian Messing
  57. Vasil Mico
  58. Rajani Nadkarni
  59. Swathi Namburi
  60. Ryan H Nguyen
  61. Taylor Kristian Nonato
  62. Tracey Lynn O'Connor
  63. Orestis A Panagiotou
  64. Kyu Park
  65. Jaymin M Patel
  66. Kanishka GopikaBimal Patel
  67. Jeffrey Peppercorn
  68. Hyma Polimera
  69. Matthew Puc
  70. Yuan James Rao
  71. Pedram Razavi
  72. Sonya A Reid
  73. Jonathan W Riess
  74. Donna R Rivera
  75. Mark Robson
  76. Suzanne J Rose
  77. Atlantis D Russ
  78. Lidia Schapira
  79. Pankil K Shah
  80. M Kelly Shanahan
  81. Lauren C Shapiro
  82. Melissa Smits
  83. Daniel G Stover
  84. Mitrianna Streckfuss
  85. Lisa Tachiki
  86. Michael A. Thompson
  87. Sara M Tolaney
  88. Lisa B Weissmann
  89. Grace Wilson
  90. Michael T Wotman
  91. Elizabeth M Wulff-Burchfield
  92. Sanjay Mishra
  93. Benjamin French
  94. Jeremy L Warner
  95. Maryam B Lustberg
  96. Melissa K Accordino
  97. Dimpy P Shah
  98. on behalf of the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium
(2023)
Clinical characteristics, racial inequities, and outcomes in patients with breast cancer and COVID-19: a COVID-19 and cancer consortium (CCC19) cohort study
eLife 12:e82618.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82618

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82618

Further reading

    1. Epidemiology and Global Health
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Patrick E Brown, Sze Hang Fu ... Ab-C Study Collaborators
    Research Article

    Background: Few national-level studies have evaluated the impact of 'hybrid' immunity (vaccination coupled with recovery from infection) from the Omicron variants of SARS-CoV-2.

    Methods: From May 2020 to December 2022, we conducted serial assessments (each of ~4000-9000 adults) examining SARS-CoV-2 antibodies within a mostly representative Canadian cohort drawn from a national online polling platform. Adults, most of whom were vaccinated, reported viral test-confirmed infections and mailed self-collected dried blood spots to a central lab. Samples underwent highly sensitive and specific antibody assays to spike and nucleocapsid protein antigens, the latter triggered only by infection. We estimated cumulative SARS-CoV-2 incidence prior to the Omicron period and during the BA.1/1.1 and BA.2/5 waves. We assessed changes in antibody levels and in age-specific active immunity levels.

    Results: Spike levels were higher in infected than in uninfected adults, regardless of vaccination doses. Among adults vaccinated at least thrice and infected more than six months earlier, spike levels fell notably and continuously for the nine months post-vaccination. By contrast, among adults infected within six months, spike levels declined gradually. Declines were similar by sex, age group, and ethnicity. Recent vaccination attenuated declines in spike levels from older infections. In a convenience sample, spike antibody and cellular responses were correlated. Near the end of 2022, about 35% of adults above age 60 had their last vaccine dose more than six months ago, and about 25% remained uninfected. The cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection rose from 13% (95% CI 11-14%) before omicron to 78% (76-80%) by December 2022, equating to 25 million infected adults cumulatively. However, the COVID-19 weekly death rate during the BA.2/5 waves was less than half of that during the BA.1/1.1 wave, implying a protective role for hybrid immunity.

    Conclusions: Strategies to maintain population-level hybrid immunity require up-to-date vaccination coverage, including among those recovering from infection. Population-based, self-collected dried blood spots are a practicable biological surveillance platform.

    Funding: Funding was provided by the COVID-19 Immunity Task Force, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Pfizer Global Medical Grants, and St. Michael's Hospital Foundation. PJ and ACG are funded by the Canada Research Chairs Program.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Epidemiology and Global Health
    Javier I Ottaviani, Virag Sagi-Kiss ... Gunter GC Kuhnle
    Research Article

    The chemical composition of foods is complex, variable, and dependent on many factors. This has a major impact on nutrition research as it foundationally affects our ability to adequately assess the actual intake of nutrients and other compounds. In spite of this, accurate data on nutrient intake are key for investigating the associations and causal relationships between intake, health, and disease risk at the service of developing evidence-based dietary guidance that enables improvements in population health. Here, we exemplify the importance of this challenge by investigating the impact of food content variability on nutrition research using three bioactives as model: flavan-3-ols, (–)-epicatechin, and nitrate. Our results show that common approaches aimed at addressing the high compositional variability of even the same foods impede the accurate assessment of nutrient intake generally. This suggests that the results of many nutrition studies using food composition data are potentially unreliable and carry greater limitations than commonly appreciated, consequently resulting in dietary recommendations with significant limitations and unreliable impact on public health. Thus, current challenges related to nutrient intake assessments need to be addressed and mitigated by the development of improved dietary assessment methods involving the use of nutritional biomarkers.