1. Genetics and Genomics

Evaluating the effect of metabolic traits on oral and oropharyngeal cancer risk using Mendelian randomization

  1. Mark Gormley  Is a corresponding author
  2. Tom Dudding
  3. Steven J Thomas
  4. Jessica Tyrrell
  5. Andrew R Ness
  6. Miranda Pring
  7. Danny Legge
  8. George Davey Smith
  9. Rebecca C Richmond
  10. Emma E Vincent
  11. Caroline Bull
  1. University of Bristol, United Kingdom
  2. University of Exeter, United Kingdom
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82674
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Mark Gormley
  2. Tom Dudding
  3. Steven J Thomas
  4. Jessica Tyrrell
  5. Andrew R Ness
  6. Miranda Pring
  7. Danny Legge
  8. George Davey Smith
  9. Rebecca C Richmond
  10. Emma E Vincent
  11. Caroline Bull
(2023)
Evaluating the effect of metabolic traits on oral and oropharyngeal cancer risk using Mendelian randomization
eLife 12:e82674.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82674
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

A recent World Health Organization report states that at least 40% of all cancer cases may be preventable, with smoking, alcohol consumption and obesity identified as three of the most important modifiable lifestyle factors. Given the significant decline in smoking rates, particularly within developed countries, other potentially modifiable risk factors for head and neck cancer warrant investigation. Obesity and related metabolic disorders such as type 2 diabetes and hypertension have been associated with head and neck cancer risk in multiple observational studies. However, adiposity has also been correlated with smoking, with bias, confounding or reverse causality possibly explaining these findings. To overcome the challenges of observational studies, we conducted two-sample Mendelian randomization (inverse variance weighted (IVW) method) using genetic variants which were robustly associated with adiposity, glycaemic and blood pressure traits in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Outcome data was taken from the largest available GWAS of 6,034 oral and oropharyngeal cases, with 6,585 controls. We found limited evidence of a causal effect of genetically proxied body mass index (OR IVW = 0.89, 95%CI 0.72-1.09, p = 0.26 per 1 SD in BMI (4.81 kg/m2)) on oral and oropharyngeal cancer risk. Similarly, there was limited evidence for related traits including type 2 diabetes and hypertension.

Data availability

Summary-level analysis was conducted using publicly available GWAS data as cited. Full summary statistics for the GAME-ON outcome data GWAS can be accessed via dbGAP (OncoArray: Oral and Pharynx Cancer; study accession number: phs001202.v1.p1, August 2017) at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/gap/cgi-bin/study.cgi?study_id=phs001202.v1.p1) (Lesseur et al., 2016). This data is also available via the IEU OpenGWAS project (https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/).All exposure data used in this study is publicly available from the relevant studies as described below. Data for BMI, WC and WHR GWAS was downloaded from the Genetic Investigation of ANthropometric Traits (GIANT) consortiumhttps://portals.broadinstitute.org/collaboration/giant/index.php/GIANT_consortium_data_files (Pulit et al., 2019; Shungin et al., 2015) and UK Biobank (http://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk). T2D data was downloaded from the DIAMANTE (DIAbetes Meta-ANalysis of Trans-Ethnic association studies) consortium from: https://kp4cd.org/node/169 (Vujkovic et al., 2020). Data for FG, FI and HbA1c, were obtained from GWAS published by the MAGIC (Meta-Analyses of Glucose and Insulin-Related Traits) Consortium, available for download from: https://magicinvestigators.org/downloads/ (Lagou et al., 2021),. Finally, data for SBP and DBP were extracted from a GWAS meta-analysis of participants in UK Biobank (and UK Biobank (http://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk) and the International Consortium of Blood Pressure Genome Wide Association Studies (ICBP), available via dbGAP (International Consortium for Blood Pressure (ICBP), study accession number: phs000585.v2.p1, October 2016) at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/gap/cgi-bin/study.cgi?study_id=phs000585.v2.p1 (Evangelou et al., 2018).Instrument-risk factor analysis outcome summary-level data were derived from the GWAS and Sequencing Consortium of Alcohol and Nicotine use (GSCAN) and UK Biobank and UK Biobank (http://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk) for alcoholic drinks per week https://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/201564 (Liu et al., 2019) and the comprehensive smoking index (Wootton et al., 2019). Data for risk tolerance and educational attainment were taken from Social Science Genetic Association Consortium (SSGAC) data available from http://www.thessgac.org/data (Karlsson Linner et al., 2019; J. Lee et al., 2018). MR analyses were conducted using the 'TwoSampleMR' package in R (version 3.5.3). A copy of the code and all data files used in this study are available at GitHub (https://github.com/MGormley12/metabolic_trait_hnc_mr.git).

The following previously published data sets were used
    1. Vujkovic M
    2. et al
    (2020) DIAMANTE (European) T2D GWAS
    DIAMANTE (DIAbetes Meta-ANalysis of Trans-Ethnic association studies).
    https://kp4cd.org/node/169

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Mark Gormley

    MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    mark.gormley@bristol.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5733-6304

  2. Tom Dudding

    Bristol Dental Hospital and School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  3. Steven J Thomas

    Bristol Dental Hospital and School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  4. Jessica Tyrrell

    Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  5. Andrew R Ness

    University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  6. Miranda Pring

    Bristol Dental Hospital and School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  7. Danny Legge

    Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3897-5861

  8. George Davey Smith

    MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1407-8314

  9. Rebecca C Richmond

    MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  10. Emma E Vincent

    MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8917-7384

  11. Caroline Bull

    MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2176-5120

Funding

Wellcome Trust (220530/Z/20/Z)

  • Mark Gormley

Diabetes UK (SBF004\1079)

  • Jessica Tyrrell

National Institute for Health and Care Research (RP-PG-0707-10034)

  • Andrew R Ness

Cancer Research UK (C18281/A20919)

  • Andrew R Ness

National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (R01 DE025712 and 1X01HG007780-0)

  • Andrew R Ness

Diabetes UK (17/0005587)

  • Emma E Vincent

World Cancer Research Fund (IIG_2019_2009)

  • Emma E Vincent

Medical Research Council (MC_UU_00011/1,MC_UU_00011/5,MC_UU_00011/6,MC_UU_00011/7)

  • George Davey Smith

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: Publicly available summary level data only used in this study. Application entitled "Investigating aetiology, associations and causality in diseases of the head and neck" (Project ID: 40644) covers use of all UK Biobank data in this study and dbGaP application made for accessing OncoArray: Oral and Pharynx Cancer; study accession number: phs001202.v1.p1 data entitled "Investigating risk factors in head and neck cancer using Mendelianrandomization" (Project ID 24266).

Copyright

© 2023, Gormley et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,166
    views
  • 165
    downloads
  • 18
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Mark Gormley
  2. Tom Dudding
  3. Steven J Thomas
  4. Jessica Tyrrell
  5. Andrew R Ness
  6. Miranda Pring
  7. Danny Legge
  8. George Davey Smith
  9. Rebecca C Richmond
  10. Emma E Vincent
  11. Caroline Bull
(2023)
Evaluating the effect of metabolic traits on oral and oropharyngeal cancer risk using Mendelian randomization
eLife 12:e82674.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82674

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82674

Categories and tags

Research organism

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics

    Deterministic genetic barcoding for multiplexed behavioral and single-cell transcriptomic studies

    Jorge Blanco Mendana, Margaret Donovan ... Daryl M Gohl
    Tools and Resources

    Advances in single-cell sequencing technologies have provided novel insights into the dynamics of gene expression and cellular heterogeneity within tissues and have enabled the construction of transcriptomic cell atlases. However, linking anatomical information to transcriptomic data and positively identifying the cell types that correspond to gene expression clusters in single-cell sequencing data sets remains a challenge. We describe a straightforward genetic barcoding approach that takes advantage of the powerful genetic tools in Drosophila to allow in vivo tagging of defined cell populations. This method, called Targeted Genetically-Encoded Multiplexing (TaG-EM), involves inserting a DNA barcode just upstream of the polyadenylation site in a Gal4-inducible UAS-GFP construct so that the barcode sequence can be read out during single-cell sequencing, labeling a cell population of interest. By creating many such independently barcoded fly strains, TaG-EM enables positive identification of cell types in cell atlas projects, identification of multiplet droplets, and barcoding of experimental timepoints, conditions, and replicates. Furthermore, we demonstrate that TaG-EM barcodes can be read out using next-generation sequencing to facilitate population-scale behavioral measurements. Thus, TaG-EM has the potential to enable large-scale behavioral screens in addition to improving the ability to multiplex and reliably annotate single-cell transcriptomic experiments.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics

    The PRC2.1 subcomplex opposes G1 progression through regulation of CCND1 and CCND2

    Adam D Longhurst, Kyle Wang ... David P Toczyski
    Tools and Resources

    Progression through the G1 phase of the cell cycle is the most highly regulated step in cellular division. We employed a chemogenetic approach to discover novel cellular networks that regulate cell cycle progression. This approach uncovered functional clusters of genes that altered sensitivity of cells to inhibitors of the G1/S transition. Mutation of components of the Polycomb Repressor Complex 2 rescued proliferation inhibition caused by the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib, but not to inhibitors of S phase or mitosis. In addition to its core catalytic subunits, mutation of the PRC2.1 accessory protein MTF2, but not the PRC2.2 protein JARID2, rendered cells resistant to palbociclib treatment. We found that PRC2.1 (MTF2), but not PRC2.2 (JARID2), was critical for promoting H3K27me3 deposition at CpG islands genome-wide and in promoters. This included the CpG islands in the promoter of the CDK4/6 cyclins CCND1 and CCND2, and loss of MTF2 lead to upregulation of both CCND1 and CCND2. Our results demonstrate a role for PRC2.1, but not PRC2.2, in antagonizing G1 progression in a diversity of cell linages, including chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), breast cancer, and immortalized cell lines.

    1. Genetics and Genomics

    Intergenerational transport of double-stranded RNA in C. elegans can limit heritable epigenetic changes

    Nathan M Shugarts Devanapally, Aishwarya Sathya ... Antony M Jose
    Research Article

    RNAs in circulation carry sequence-specific regulatory information between cells in plant, animal, and host-pathogen systems. Such RNA can cross generational boundaries, as evidenced by somatic double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans silencing genes of matching sequence in progeny. Here we dissect the intergenerational path taken by dsRNA from parental circulation and discover that cytosolic import through the dsRNA importer SID-1 in the parental germline and/or developing progeny varies with developmental time and dsRNA substrates. Loss of SID-1 enhances initiation of heritable RNA silencing within the germline and causes changes in the expression of the sid-1-dependent gene sdg-1 that last for more than 100 generations after restoration of SID-1. The SDG-1 protein is enriched in perinuclear germ granules required for heritable RNA silencing but is expressed from a retrotransposon targeted by such silencing. This auto-inhibitory loop suggests how retrotransposons could persist by hosting genes that regulate their own silencing.