Two neuronal peptides encoded from a single transcript regulate mitochondrial complex III in Drosophila

  1. Justin A Bosch  Is a corresponding author
  2. Berrak Ugur
  3. Israel Pichardo-Casas
  4. Jordan Rabasco
  5. Felipe Escobedo
  6. Zhongyuan Zuo
  7. Ben Brown
  8. Susan Celniker
  9. David A Sinclair
  10. Hugo J Bellen
  11. Norbert Perrimon  Is a corresponding author
  1. Harvard University, United States
  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Yale University, United States
  3. Baylor College of Medicine, United States
  4. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, United States

Abstract

Naturally produced peptides (<100 amino acids) are important regulators of physiology, development, and metabolism. Recent studies have predicted that thousands of peptides may be translated from transcripts containing small open reading frames (smORFs). Here, we describe two peptides in Drosophila encoded by conserved smORFs, Sloth1 and Sloth2. These peptides are translated from the same bicistronic transcript and share sequence similarities, suggesting that they encode paralogs. Yet, Sloth1 and Sloth2 are not functionally redundant, and loss of either peptide causes animal lethality, reduced neuronal function, impaired mitochondrial function, and neurodegeneration. We provide evidence that Sloth1/2 are highly expressed in neurons, imported to mitochondria, and regulate mitochondrial complex III assembly. These results suggest that phenotypic analysis of smORF genes in Drosophila can provide a wealth of information on the biological functions of this poorly characterized class of genes.

Data availability

The current manuscript did not generate any datasets. Raw gel and western image source files are present in Supplemental File 4, which can be downloaded at:https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.83bk3j9vc

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Justin A Bosch

    Department of Genetics, Harvard University, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    jabosch@hms.harvard.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8499-1566
  2. Berrak Ugur

    Department of Neuroscience, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4806-8891
  3. Israel Pichardo-Casas

    Department of Genetics, Harvard University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Jordan Rabasco

    Department of Genetics, Harvard University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Felipe Escobedo

    Department of Genetics, Harvard University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6830-9210
  6. Zhongyuan Zuo

    Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Ben Brown

    Biological Systems and Engineering, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Susan Celniker

    Biological Systems and Engineering, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. David A Sinclair

    Department of Genetics, Harvard University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Hugo J Bellen

    Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    Hugo J Bellen, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5992-5989
  11. Norbert Perrimon

    Department of Genetics, Harvard University, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    perrimon@genetics.med.harvard.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7542-472X

Funding

Damon Runyon Foundation

  • Justin A Bosch

National Institutes of Health (R01GM084947)

  • Susan Celniker

National Institutes of Health (R01GM067761)

  • Susan Celniker

National Institutes of Health (R24OD019847)

  • Susan Celniker

National Institutes of Health (NHGRI HG009352)

  • Susan Celniker

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Agnieszka Chacinska, IMol Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: July 2, 2020 (view preprint)
  2. Received: August 15, 2022
  3. Accepted: November 1, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: November 8, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: November 22, 2022 (version 2)

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 1,885
    views
  • 357
    downloads
  • 4
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Justin A Bosch
  2. Berrak Ugur
  3. Israel Pichardo-Casas
  4. Jordan Rabasco
  5. Felipe Escobedo
  6. Zhongyuan Zuo
  7. Ben Brown
  8. Susan Celniker
  9. David A Sinclair
  10. Hugo J Bellen
  11. Norbert Perrimon
(2022)
Two neuronal peptides encoded from a single transcript regulate mitochondrial complex III in Drosophila
eLife 11:e82709.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82709

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82709

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Jean-David Larouche, Céline M Laumont ... Claude Perreault
    Research Article

    Transposable elements (TEs) are repetitive sequences representing ~45% of the human and mouse genomes and are highly expressed by medullary thymic epithelial cells (mTECs). In this study, we investigated the role of TEs on T-cell development in the thymus. We performed multiomic analyses of TEs in human and mouse thymic cells to elucidate their role in T-cell development. We report that TE expression in the human thymus is high and shows extensive age- and cell lineage-related variations. TE expression correlates with multiple transcription factors in all cell types of the human thymus. Two cell types express particularly broad TE repertoires: mTECs and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs). In mTECs, transcriptomic data suggest that TEs interact with transcription factors essential for mTEC development and function (e.g., PAX1 and REL), and immunopeptidomic data showed that TEs generate MHC-I-associated peptides implicated in thymocyte education. Notably, AIRE, FEZF2, and CHD4 regulate small yet non-redundant sets of TEs in murine mTECs. Human thymic pDCs homogenously express large numbers of TEs that likely form dsRNA, which can activate innate immune receptors, potentially explaining why thymic pDCs constitutively secrete IFN ɑ/β. This study highlights the diversity of interactions between TEs and the adaptive immune system. TEs are genetic parasites, and the two thymic cell types most affected by TEs (mTEcs and pDCs) are essential to establishing central T-cell tolerance. Therefore, we propose that orchestrating TE expression in thymic cells is critical to prevent autoimmunity in vertebrates.

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    Pianpian Zhao, Zhifeng Sheng ... Hou-Feng Zheng
    Research Article

    The ‘diabetic bone paradox’ suggested that type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients would have higher areal bone mineral density (BMD) but higher fracture risk than individuals without T2D. In this study, we found that the genetically predicted T2D was associated with higher BMD and lower risk of fracture in both weighted genetic risk score (wGRS) and two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses. We also identified ten genomic loci shared between T2D and fracture, with the top signal at SNP rs4580892 in the intron of gene RSPO3. And the higher expression in adipose subcutaneous and higher protein level in plasma of RSPO3 were associated with increased risk of T2D, but decreased risk of fracture. In the prospective study, T2D was observed to be associated with higher risk of fracture, but BMI mediated 30.2% of the protective effect. However, when stratified by the T2D-related risk factors for fracture, we observed that the effect of T2D on the risk of fracture decreased when the number of T2D-related risk factors decreased, and the association became non-significant if the T2D patients carried none of the risk factors. In conclusion, the genetically determined T2D might not be associated with higher risk of fracture. And the shared genetic architecture between T2D and fracture suggested a top signal around RSPO3 gene. The observed effect size of T2D on fracture risk decreased if the T2D-related risk factors could be eliminated. Therefore, it is important to manage the complications of T2D to prevent the risk of fracture.