Proteome-wide systems genetics identifies UFMylation as a regulator of skeletal muscle function

  1. Jeffrey Molendijk
  2. Ronnie Blazev
  3. Richard J Mills
  4. Yaan-Kit Ng
  5. Kevin I Watt
  6. Daryn Chau
  7. Paul Gregorevic
  8. Peter J Crouch
  9. James BW Hilton
  10. Leszek Lisowski
  11. Peixiang Zhang
  12. Karen Reue
  13. Aldons J Lusis
  14. James Hudson
  15. David E James
  16. Marcus M Seldin
  17. Benjamin L Parker  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Melbourne, Australia
  2. QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Australia
  3. University of California, Irvine, United States
  4. University of Sydney, Australia
  5. University of California, Los Angeles, United States

Abstract

Improving muscle function has great potential to improve the quality of life. To identify novel regulators of skeletal muscle metabolism and function, we performed a proteomic analysis of gastrocnemius muscle from 73 genetically distinct inbred mouse strains, and integrated the data with previously acquired genomics and >300 molecular/phenotypic traits via quantitative trait loci mapping and correlation network analysis. These data identified thousands of associations between protein abundance and phenotypes and can be accessed online (https://muscle.coffeeprot.com/) to identify regulators of muscle function. We used this resource to prioritize targets for a functional genomic screen in human bioengineered skeletal muscle. This identified several negative regulators of muscle function including UFC1, an E2 ligase for protein UFMylation. We show UFMylation is up-regulated in a mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, a disease that involves muscle atrophy. Furthermore, in vivo knockdown of UFMylation increased contraction force, implicating its role as a negative regulator of skeletal muscle function.

Data availability

The proteomics data generated in this study are deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE (Perez-Riverol et al., 2019) under the identifiers PXD032729, PXD034913 and PXD035170. The code used for downstream analysis of proteomic data can be found at: https://github.com/JeffreyMolendijk/skeletal_muscle.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jeffrey Molendijk

    Department of Anatomy and Physiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6575-504X
  2. Ronnie Blazev

    Department of Anatomy and Physiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Richard J Mills

    QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Yaan-Kit Ng

    Department of Anatomy and Physiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Kevin I Watt

    Department of Anatomy and Physiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Daryn Chau

    Department of Biological Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Paul Gregorevic

    Department of Anatomy and Physiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Peter J Crouch

    Department of Anatomy and Physiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7777-4747
  9. James BW Hilton

    Department of Biochemistry and Pharmacology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Leszek Lisowski

    Children's Medical Research Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Peixiang Zhang

    Department of Human Genetics/Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Karen Reue

    Department of Human Genetics/Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Aldons J Lusis

    Department of Human Genetics/Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. James Hudson

    QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. David E James

    School of Life and Environmental Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    David E James, Senior editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5946-5257
  16. Marcus M Seldin

    Department of Biological Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8026-4759
  17. Benjamin L Parker

    Department of Anatomy and Physiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    For correspondence
    ben.parker@unimelb.edu.au
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1818-2183

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1184363)

  • Karen Reue
  • Marcus M Seldin
  • Benjamin L Parker

National Institute of Health (HL147883)

  • Aldons J Lusis

National Institute of Health (DK117850)

  • Aldons J Lusis

Weary Dunlop Foundation (NA)

  • Benjamin L Parker

The ALS Association (21-DDC-574)

  • Paul Gregorevic
  • Peter J Crouch

National Health and Medical Research Council (APP2009642)

  • Benjamin L Parker

National Health and Medical Research Council (APP2013189)

  • Richard J Mills

National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1156562)

  • Paul Gregorevic
  • Benjamin L Parker

National Institute of Health (HL138193)

  • Marcus M Seldin

National Institute of Health (DK130640)

  • Marcus M Seldin

National Institute of Health (DK097771)

  • Marcus M Seldin

National Institute of Health (GM115318)

  • Karen Reue

National Institute of Health (AG070959)

  • Aldons J Lusis

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All rAAV6 intramuscular injection mouse experiments were approved by The University of Melbourne Animal Ethics Committee (AEC ID1914940) and conformed to the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia guidelines regarding the care and use of experimental animals. All studies involving the use of SOD1G37R mice and non-transgenic littermates were approved by a University of Melbourne Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee (approval #2015124) and conformed with guidelines of the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.

Copyright

© 2022, Molendijk et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,726
    views
  • 245
    downloads
  • 11
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jeffrey Molendijk
  2. Ronnie Blazev
  3. Richard J Mills
  4. Yaan-Kit Ng
  5. Kevin I Watt
  6. Daryn Chau
  7. Paul Gregorevic
  8. Peter J Crouch
  9. James BW Hilton
  10. Leszek Lisowski
  11. Peixiang Zhang
  12. Karen Reue
  13. Aldons J Lusis
  14. James Hudson
  15. David E James
  16. Marcus M Seldin
  17. Benjamin L Parker
(2022)
Proteome-wide systems genetics identifies UFMylation as a regulator of skeletal muscle function
eLife 11:e82951.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82951

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82951

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Cesare V Parise, Marc O Ernst
    Research Article

    Audiovisual information reaches the brain via both sustained and transient input channels, representing signals’ intensity over time or changes thereof, respectively. To date, it is unclear to what extent transient and sustained input channels contribute to the combined percept obtained through multisensory integration. Based on the results of two novel psychophysical experiments, here we demonstrate the importance of the transient (instead of the sustained) channel for the integration of audiovisual signals. To account for the present results, we developed a biologically inspired, general-purpose model for multisensory integration, the multisensory correlation detectors, which combines correlated input from unimodal transient channels. Besides accounting for the results of our psychophysical experiments, this model could quantitatively replicate several recent findings in multisensory research, as tested against a large collection of published datasets. In particular, the model could simultaneously account for the perceived timing of audiovisual events, multisensory facilitation in detection tasks, causality judgments, and optimal integration. This study demonstrates that several phenomena in multisensory research that were previously considered unrelated, all stem from the integration of correlated input from unimodal transient channels.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Computational and Systems Biology
    Sarah De Beuckeleer, Tim Van De Looverbosch ... Winnok H De Vos
    Research Article

    Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) technology is revolutionizing cell biology. However, the variability between individual iPSC lines and the lack of efficient technology to comprehensively characterize iPSC-derived cell types hinder its adoption in routine preclinical screening settings. To facilitate the validation of iPSC-derived cell culture composition, we have implemented an imaging assay based on cell painting and convolutional neural networks to recognize cell types in dense and mixed cultures with high fidelity. We have benchmarked our approach using pure and mixed cultures of neuroblastoma and astrocytoma cell lines and attained a classification accuracy above 96%. Through iterative data erosion, we found that inputs containing the nuclear region of interest and its close environment, allow achieving equally high classification accuracy as inputs containing the whole cell for semi-confluent cultures and preserved prediction accuracy even in very dense cultures. We then applied this regionally restricted cell profiling approach to evaluate the differentiation status of iPSC-derived neural cultures, by determining the ratio of postmitotic neurons and neural progenitors. We found that the cell-based prediction significantly outperformed an approach in which the population-level time in culture was used as a classification criterion (96% vs 86%, respectively). In mixed iPSC-derived neuronal cultures, microglia could be unequivocally discriminated from neurons, regardless of their reactivity state, and a tiered strategy allowed for further distinguishing activated from non-activated cell states, albeit with lower accuracy. Thus, morphological single-cell profiling provides a means to quantify cell composition in complex mixed neural cultures and holds promise for use in the quality control of iPSC-derived cell culture models.