Proteome-wide systems genetics identifies UFMylation as a regulator of skeletal muscle function

  1. Jeffrey Molendijk
  2. Ronnie Blazev
  3. Richard J Mills
  4. Yaan-Kit Ng
  5. Kevin I Watt
  6. Daryn Chau
  7. Paul Gregorevic
  8. Peter J Crouch
  9. James BW Hilton
  10. Leszek Lisowski
  11. Peixiang Zhang
  12. Karen Reue
  13. Aldons J Lusis
  14. James Hudson
  15. David E James
  16. Marcus M Seldin
  17. Benjamin L Parker  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Melbourne, Australia
  2. QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Australia
  3. University of California, Irvine, United States
  4. University of Sydney, Australia
  5. University of California, Los Angeles, United States

Abstract

Improving muscle function has great potential to improve the quality of life. To identify novel regulators of skeletal muscle metabolism and function, we performed a proteomic analysis of gastrocnemius muscle from 73 genetically distinct inbred mouse strains, and integrated the data with previously acquired genomics and >300 molecular/phenotypic traits via quantitative trait loci mapping and correlation network analysis. These data identified thousands of associations between protein abundance and phenotypes and can be accessed online (https://muscle.coffeeprot.com/) to identify regulators of muscle function. We used this resource to prioritize targets for a functional genomic screen in human bioengineered skeletal muscle. This identified several negative regulators of muscle function including UFC1, an E2 ligase for protein UFMylation. We show UFMylation is up-regulated in a mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, a disease that involves muscle atrophy. Furthermore, in vivo knockdown of UFMylation increased contraction force, implicating its role as a negative regulator of skeletal muscle function.

Data availability

The proteomics data generated in this study are deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE (Perez-Riverol et al., 2019) under the identifiers PXD032729, PXD034913 and PXD035170. The code used for downstream analysis of proteomic data can be found at: https://github.com/JeffreyMolendijk/skeletal_muscle.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jeffrey Molendijk

    Department of Anatomy and Physiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6575-504X
  2. Ronnie Blazev

    Department of Anatomy and Physiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Richard J Mills

    QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Yaan-Kit Ng

    Department of Anatomy and Physiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Kevin I Watt

    Department of Anatomy and Physiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Daryn Chau

    Department of Biological Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Paul Gregorevic

    Department of Anatomy and Physiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Peter J Crouch

    Department of Anatomy and Physiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7777-4747
  9. James BW Hilton

    Department of Biochemistry and Pharmacology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Leszek Lisowski

    Children's Medical Research Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Peixiang Zhang

    Department of Human Genetics/Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Karen Reue

    Department of Human Genetics/Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Aldons J Lusis

    Department of Human Genetics/Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. James Hudson

    QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. David E James

    School of Life and Environmental Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    David E James, Senior editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5946-5257
  16. Marcus M Seldin

    Department of Biological Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8026-4759
  17. Benjamin L Parker

    Department of Anatomy and Physiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    For correspondence
    ben.parker@unimelb.edu.au
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1818-2183

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1184363)

  • Karen Reue
  • Marcus M Seldin
  • Benjamin L Parker

National Institute of Health (HL147883)

  • Aldons J Lusis

National Institute of Health (DK117850)

  • Aldons J Lusis

Weary Dunlop Foundation (NA)

  • Benjamin L Parker

The ALS Association (21-DDC-574)

  • Paul Gregorevic
  • Peter J Crouch

National Health and Medical Research Council (APP2009642)

  • Benjamin L Parker

National Health and Medical Research Council (APP2013189)

  • Richard J Mills

National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1156562)

  • Paul Gregorevic
  • Benjamin L Parker

National Institute of Health (HL138193)

  • Marcus M Seldin

National Institute of Health (DK130640)

  • Marcus M Seldin

National Institute of Health (DK097771)

  • Marcus M Seldin

National Institute of Health (GM115318)

  • Karen Reue

National Institute of Health (AG070959)

  • Aldons J Lusis

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All rAAV6 intramuscular injection mouse experiments were approved by The University of Melbourne Animal Ethics Committee (AEC ID1914940) and conformed to the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia guidelines regarding the care and use of experimental animals. All studies involving the use of SOD1G37R mice and non-transgenic littermates were approved by a University of Melbourne Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee (approval #2015124) and conformed with guidelines of the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.

Copyright

© 2022, Molendijk et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,757
    views
  • 247
    downloads
  • 11
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jeffrey Molendijk
  2. Ronnie Blazev
  3. Richard J Mills
  4. Yaan-Kit Ng
  5. Kevin I Watt
  6. Daryn Chau
  7. Paul Gregorevic
  8. Peter J Crouch
  9. James BW Hilton
  10. Leszek Lisowski
  11. Peixiang Zhang
  12. Karen Reue
  13. Aldons J Lusis
  14. James Hudson
  15. David E James
  16. Marcus M Seldin
  17. Benjamin L Parker
(2022)
Proteome-wide systems genetics identifies UFMylation as a regulator of skeletal muscle function
eLife 11:e82951.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82951

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82951

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Gabriel Loewinger, Erjia Cui ... Francisco Pereira
    Tools and Resources

    Fiber photometry has become a popular technique to measure neural activity in vivo, but common analysis strategies can reduce the detection of effects because they condense within-trial signals into summary measures, and discard trial-level information by averaging across-trials. We propose a novel photometry statistical framework based on functional linear mixed modeling, which enables hypothesis testing of variable effects at every trial time-point, and uses trial-level signals without averaging. This makes it possible to compare the timing and magnitude of signals across conditions while accounting for between-animal differences. Our framework produces a series of plots that illustrate covariate effect estimates and statistical significance at each trial time-point. By exploiting signal autocorrelation, our methodology yields joint 95% confidence intervals that account for inspecting effects across the entire trial and improve the detection of event-related signal changes over common multiple comparisons correction strategies. We reanalyze data from a recent study proposing a theory for the role of mesolimbic dopamine in reward learning, and show the capability of our framework to reveal significant effects obscured by standard analysis approaches. For example, our method identifies two dopamine components with distinct temporal dynamics in response to reward delivery. In simulation experiments, our methodology yields improved statistical power over common analysis approaches. Finally, we provide an open-source package and analysis guide for applying our framework.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    Veronika Koren, Simone Blanco Malerba ... Stefano Panzeri
    Research Article

    The principle of efficient coding posits that sensory cortical networks are designed to encode maximal sensory information with minimal metabolic cost. Despite the major influence of efficient coding in neuroscience, it has remained unclear whether fundamental empirical properties of neural network activity can be explained solely based on this normative principle. Here, we derive the structural, coding, and biophysical properties of excitatory-inhibitory recurrent networks of spiking neurons that emerge directly from imposing that the network minimizes an instantaneous loss function and a time-averaged performance measure enacting efficient coding. We assumed that the network encodes a number of independent stimulus features varying with a time scale equal to the membrane time constant of excitatory and inhibitory neurons. The optimal network has biologically plausible biophysical features, including realistic integrate-and-fire spiking dynamics, spike-triggered adaptation, and a non-specific excitatory external input. The excitatory-inhibitory recurrent connectivity between neurons with similar stimulus tuning implements feature-specific competition, similar to that recently found in visual cortex. Networks with unstructured connectivity cannot reach comparable levels of coding efficiency. The optimal ratio of excitatory vs inhibitory neurons and the ratio of mean inhibitory-to-inhibitory vs excitatory-to-inhibitory connectivity are comparable to those of cortical sensory networks. The efficient network solution exhibits an instantaneous balance between excitation and inhibition. The network can perform efficient coding even when external stimuli vary over multiple time scales. Together, these results suggest that key properties of biological neural networks may be accounted for by efficient coding.