Proteome-wide systems genetics identifies UFMylation as a regulator of skeletal muscle function

  1. Jeffrey Molendijk
  2. Ronnie Blazev
  3. Richard J Mills
  4. Yaan-Kit Ng
  5. Kevin I Watt
  6. Daryn Chau
  7. Paul Gregorevic
  8. Peter J Crouch
  9. James BW Hilton
  10. Leszek Lisowski
  11. Peixiang Zhang
  12. Karen Reue
  13. Aldons J Lusis
  14. James Hudson
  15. David E James
  16. Marcus M Seldin
  17. Benjamin L Parker  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Melbourne, Australia
  2. QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Australia
  3. University of California, Irvine, United States
  4. University of Sydney, Australia
  5. University of California, Los Angeles, United States

Abstract

Improving muscle function has great potential to improve the quality of life. To identify novel regulators of skeletal muscle metabolism and function, we performed a proteomic analysis of gastrocnemius muscle from 73 genetically distinct inbred mouse strains, and integrated the data with previously acquired genomics and >300 molecular/phenotypic traits via quantitative trait loci mapping and correlation network analysis. These data identified thousands of associations between protein abundance and phenotypes and can be accessed online (https://muscle.coffeeprot.com/) to identify regulators of muscle function. We used this resource to prioritize targets for a functional genomic screen in human bioengineered skeletal muscle. This identified several negative regulators of muscle function including UFC1, an E2 ligase for protein UFMylation. We show UFMylation is up-regulated in a mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, a disease that involves muscle atrophy. Furthermore, in vivo knockdown of UFMylation increased contraction force, implicating its role as a negative regulator of skeletal muscle function.

Data availability

The proteomics data generated in this study are deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE (Perez-Riverol et al., 2019) under the identifiers PXD032729, PXD034913 and PXD035170. The code used for downstream analysis of proteomic data can be found at: https://github.com/JeffreyMolendijk/skeletal_muscle.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jeffrey Molendijk

    Department of Anatomy and Physiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6575-504X
  2. Ronnie Blazev

    Department of Anatomy and Physiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Richard J Mills

    QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Yaan-Kit Ng

    Department of Anatomy and Physiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Kevin I Watt

    Department of Anatomy and Physiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Daryn Chau

    Department of Biological Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Paul Gregorevic

    Department of Anatomy and Physiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Peter J Crouch

    Department of Anatomy and Physiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7777-4747
  9. James BW Hilton

    Department of Biochemistry and Pharmacology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Leszek Lisowski

    Children's Medical Research Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Peixiang Zhang

    Department of Human Genetics/Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Karen Reue

    Department of Human Genetics/Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Aldons J Lusis

    Department of Human Genetics/Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. James Hudson

    QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. David E James

    School of Life and Environmental Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    David E James, Senior editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5946-5257
  16. Marcus M Seldin

    Department of Biological Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8026-4759
  17. Benjamin L Parker

    Department of Anatomy and Physiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    For correspondence
    ben.parker@unimelb.edu.au
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1818-2183

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1184363)

  • Karen Reue
  • Marcus M Seldin
  • Benjamin L Parker

National Institute of Health (HL147883)

  • Aldons J Lusis

National Institute of Health (DK117850)

  • Aldons J Lusis

Weary Dunlop Foundation (NA)

  • Benjamin L Parker

The ALS Association (21-DDC-574)

  • Paul Gregorevic
  • Peter J Crouch

National Health and Medical Research Council (APP2009642)

  • Benjamin L Parker

National Health and Medical Research Council (APP2013189)

  • Richard J Mills

National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1156562)

  • Paul Gregorevic
  • Benjamin L Parker

National Institute of Health (HL138193)

  • Marcus M Seldin

National Institute of Health (DK130640)

  • Marcus M Seldin

National Institute of Health (DK097771)

  • Marcus M Seldin

National Institute of Health (GM115318)

  • Karen Reue

National Institute of Health (AG070959)

  • Aldons J Lusis

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All rAAV6 intramuscular injection mouse experiments were approved by The University of Melbourne Animal Ethics Committee (AEC ID1914940) and conformed to the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia guidelines regarding the care and use of experimental animals. All studies involving the use of SOD1G37R mice and non-transgenic littermates were approved by a University of Melbourne Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee (approval #2015124) and conformed with guidelines of the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.

Copyright

© 2022, Molendijk et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jeffrey Molendijk
  2. Ronnie Blazev
  3. Richard J Mills
  4. Yaan-Kit Ng
  5. Kevin I Watt
  6. Daryn Chau
  7. Paul Gregorevic
  8. Peter J Crouch
  9. James BW Hilton
  10. Leszek Lisowski
  11. Peixiang Zhang
  12. Karen Reue
  13. Aldons J Lusis
  14. James Hudson
  15. David E James
  16. Marcus M Seldin
  17. Benjamin L Parker
(2022)
Proteome-wide systems genetics identifies UFMylation as a regulator of skeletal muscle function
eLife 11:e82951.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82951

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82951

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Sabrina Benas, Ximena Fernandez, Emilio Kropff
    Research Article

    Entorhinal grid cells implement a spatial code with hexagonal periodicity, signaling the position of the animal within an environment. Grid maps of cells belonging to the same module share spacing and orientation, only differing in relative two-dimensional spatial phase, which could result from being part of a two-dimensional attractor guided by path integration. However, this architecture has the drawbacks of being complex to construct and rigid, path integration allowing for no deviations from the hexagonal pattern such as the ones observed under a variety of experimental manipulations. Here, we show that a simpler one-dimensional attractor is enough to align grid cells equally well. Using topological data analysis, we show that the resulting population activity is a sample of a torus, while the ensemble of maps preserves features of the network architecture. The flexibility of this low dimensional attractor allows it to negotiate the geometry of the representation manifold with the feedforward inputs, rather than imposing it. More generally, our results represent a proof of principle against the intuition that the architecture and the representation manifold of an attractor are topological objects of the same dimensionality, with implications to the study of attractor networks across the brain.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Physics of Living Systems
    Divyoj Singh, Sriram Ramaswamy ... Mohd Suhail Rizvi
    Research Article Updated

    Planar cell polarity (PCP) – tissue-scale alignment of the direction of asymmetric localization of proteins at the cell-cell interface – is essential for embryonic development and physiological functions. Abnormalities in PCP can result in developmental imperfections, including neural tube closure defects and misaligned hair follicles. Decoding the mechanisms responsible for PCP establishment and maintenance remains a fundamental open question. While the roles of various molecules – broadly classified into ‘global’ and ‘local’ modules – have been well-studied, their necessity and sufficiency in explaining PCP and connecting their perturbations to experimentally observed patterns have not been examined. Here, we develop a minimal model that captures the proposed features of PCP establishment – a global tissue-level gradient and local asymmetric distribution of protein complexes. The proposed model suggests that while polarity can emerge without a gradient, the gradient not only acts as a global cue but also increases the robustness of PCP against stochastic perturbations. We also recapitulated and quantified the experimentally observed features of swirling patterns and domineering non-autonomy, using only three free model parameters - rate of protein binding to membrane, the concentration of PCP proteins, and the gradient steepness. We explain how self-stabilizing asymmetric protein localizations in the presence of tissue-level gradient can lead to robust PCP patterns and reveal minimal design principles for a polarized system.