Balancing true and false detection of intermittent sensory targets by adjusting the inputs to the evidence accumulation process
- University College Dublin, Ireland
- Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
Abstract
Decisions about noisy stimuli are widely understood to be made by accumulating evidence up to a decision bound that can be adjusted according to task demands. However, relatively little is known about how such mechanisms operate in continuous monitoring contexts requiring intermittent target detection. Here, we examined neural decision processes underlying detection of 1-second coherence-targets within continuous random dot motion, and how they are adjusted across contexts with Weak, Strong, or randomly Mixed Weak/Strong targets. Our prediction was that decision bounds would be set lower when Weak targets are more prevalent. Behavioural hit and false alarm rate patterns were consistent with this, and were well-captured by a bound-adjustable leaky accumulator model. However, Beta-band EEG signatures of motor preparation contradicted this, instead indicating lower bounds in the Strong-target context. We thus tested two alternative models in which decision bound dynamics were constrained directly by Beta measurements, respectively featuring leaky accumulation with adjustable leak, and non-leaky accumulation of evidence referenced to an adjustable sensory-level criterion. We found that the latter model best explained both behaviour and neural dynamics, highlighting novel means of decision policy regulation and the value of neurally-informed modelling.
Data availability
Code to recreated the Random Dot Motion task utilising Psychtoolbox is publicly available at https://github.com/AnnaCGeuzebroek/Context-Dependent-Detection. All code to recreated the behavioural and EEG data analysis as well as the modelling code can be found at https://github.com/AnnaCGeuzebroek/Continuous-Behavioural-Modelling. Pre-processed anonymised EEG and behavioural data is uploaded at OSFhttps://osf.io/yjvku/?view_only=7ed5aee5d09a4d5ca13de1ba169b0588
Article and author information
Author details
Anna Catharina Geuzebroek
Redmond G O'Connell
Funding
Science Fundation Ireland (15/CDA/3591)
- Anna Catharina Geuzebroek
- Simon P Kelly
Wellcome Trust (219572/Z/19/Z)
- Anna Catharina Geuzebroek
- Simon P Kelly
Horizon 2020 European Research Council Consolidator Grant Ind (865474)
- Redmond G O'Connell
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Ethics
Human subjects: All participants gave written consent prior to their participation and were compensated for their time with €25. The UCD Human Research Ethics Committee for Life Sciences approved all experimental procedures in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (LS-16-76-Craddock).
Copyright
© 2023, Geuzebroek et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 422
- views
-
- 65
- downloads
-
- 1
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Balancing true and false detection of intermittent sensory targets by adjusting the inputs to the evidence accumulation process
eLife 12:e83025.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83025
Further reading
-
- Neuroscience
Combining electrophysiological, anatomical and functional brain maps reveals networks of beta neural activity that align with dopamine uptake.
-
- Neuroscience
During rest and sleep, memory traces replay in the brain. The dialogue between brain regions during replay is thought to stabilize labile memory traces for long-term storage. However, because replay is an internally-driven, spontaneous phenomenon, it does not have a ground truth - an external reference that can validate whether a memory has truly been replayed. Instead, replay detection is based on the similarity between the sequential neural activity comprising the replay event and the corresponding template of neural activity generated during active locomotion. If the statistical likelihood of observing such a match by chance is sufficiently low, the candidate replay event is inferred to be replaying that specific memory. However, without the ability to evaluate whether replay detection methods are successfully detecting true events and correctly rejecting non-events, the evaluation and comparison of different replay methods is challenging. To circumvent this problem, we present a new framework for evaluating replay, tested using hippocampal neural recordings from rats exploring two novel linear tracks. Using this two-track paradigm, our framework selects replay events based on their temporal fidelity (sequence-based detection), and evaluates the detection performance using each event's track discriminability, where sequenceless decoding across both tracks is used to quantify whether the track replaying is also the most likely track being reactivated.
