Nucleotide-level linkage of transcriptional elongation and polyadenylation

  1. Joseph V Geisberg
  2. Zarmik Moqtaderi
  3. Nova Fong
  4. Benjamin Erickson
  5. David L Bentley
  6. Kevin Struhl  Is a corresponding author
  1. Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, United States
  2. RNA Bioscience Initiative, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, United States
8 figures and 2 additional files

Figures

Figure 1 with 2 supplements
Isoforms in yeast 3’ untranslated regions (UTRs) are clustered.

(A) Polyadenylation profile of ATG27, a typical yeast gene, illustrating that major isoforms appear in clusters (represented as C1, C2, and C3 in red lettering). (B) Frequency distribution of …

Figure 1—figure supplement 1
Frequency distributions of naturally occurring and randomized clusters as a function of different cluster definitions.

Cluster definition was altered to reflect either lower (n≤3; top left) or higher (n≤5, top right; n≤6, bottom left; n≤7, bottom right) maximal isoform spacing relative to the cluster definition used …

Figure 1—figure supplement 2
Pol II elongation rate does not affect isoform clustering in 3’ untranslated regions (UTRs).

(Left panel) Frequency distribution of clusters (all isoforms in cluster ≤4 nt apart) containing the indicated number of isoforms in either the randomized or genomic population. The number and …

Figure 2 with 1 supplement
Pol II elongation rate drives poly(A) cluster formation.

(A) Examples of poly(A) profiles in which ‘slower’/wild-type (WT) major isoform ratios (purple) decrease more rapidly within clusters than between clusters. Individual isoforms are defined by the …

Figure 2—figure supplement 1
The link between Pol II elongation rate and poly(A) cluster formation is independent of exact cluster definition.

Median relative ratios (downstream/upstream isoform) of genome-wide ‘slower’/wild-type Pol II utilization at major isoform pairs as a function of nucleotide spacing either within clusters (circles) …

Figure 3 with 1 supplement
Pol II elongation rate drives poly(A) cluster formation.

(A) Example poly(A) profile in which ‘faster’/wild-type (WT) major isoform ratios (purple) increase more rapidly within clusters than between clusters. Clusters and inter-cluster regions are …

Figure 3—figure supplement 1
The link between Pol II elongation rate and poly(A) cluster formation is independent of exact cluster definition.

Median relative ratios (downstream/upstream isoform) of genome-wide ‘faster’/wild-type Pol II utilization at major isoform pairs as a function of nucleotide spacing either within clusters (circles) …

Figure 4 with 2 supplements
Poly(A) cluster formation is also linked to Pol II elongation rate in human cell lines.

(A) An example of a poly(A) profile in which R749H/wild-type (WT) major isoform ratios (purple) decrease more rapidly within a cluster than between clusters. Clusters and inter-cluster regions are …

Figure 4—figure supplement 1
Correlation of wild-type (WT) or R749H Pol II biological replicates.

Axes in bottom left panels represent log10 of isoform reads. Each pairwise comparison panel contains >49,000 (WT) or >32,000 (R749H) isoforms with non-zero reads in both replicates. Upper right …

Figure 4—figure supplement 2
The link between Pol II elongation rate and poly(A) cluster formation is independent of the exact cluster definition in mammalian cells.

Median relative ratios (downstream/upstream isoform) of genome-wide R749H/wild-type (WT) Pol II utilization at major isoform pairs as a function of nucleotide spacing either within clusters …

Cluster-independent link between Pol II elongation rate and poly(A) formation.

(A) Median utilization difference (downstream isoform mutant/wild-type expression ratio minus upstream isoform mutant/wild-type expression ratio) is plotted for either ‘slower’/wild-type (gray bars) …

GC-rich region just downstream of isoform clusters.

(A) GC content in a region downstream of clusters is correlated to cluster slopes in ‘slow’/wild-type (upper left), ‘slower’/wild-type (bottom left), ‘fast’/wild-type (top left), and …

Figure 7 with 1 supplement
Pol II occupancy and AT composition at either READS poly(A) or decoy intronic AATAAA sites in human HEK293 cell lines harboring either wild-type (‘WT’) or slow (‘R749H’) Pol II variants.

(A) eNETseq signal for WT (black; right axis) and R749H (red; right axis) at 2989 READS poly(A) sites (≥20 reads/site in both WT and R749H). Percent AT composition is in blue with the scale on the …

Figure 7—figure supplement 1
Correlation of eNETseq biological replicates at poly(A) and decoy intronic AATAAA sites.

For the wild-type Pol II (‘WT’; left panels) and R749H (right panels) cell lines, the log2 of the total number of eNETseq reads at each site ±100 nt is plotted for each replicate. Pearson …

Schematic of the link between Pol II elongation rate and poly(A) formation.

(A) Nucleotide-level link between Pol II elongation and cleavage/polyadenylation (CpA). As the Pol II machinery (dark blue) elongates the nascent RNA one nucleotide at a time, upstream sequences of …

Additional files

Download links