The mature oocyte from which a child arises contains essentially all the molecules of the zygote, as the sperm provides almost nothing that lasts except a set of chromosomes and a centriole. This overwhelmingly maternal endowment includes not only rejuvenated cellular constituents but in many species vital developmental information that will initiate, pattern, and guide embryonic development. It has recently become clear that the oocyte-forming events that begin during the mother’s fetal development take place within a highly stereotyped cellular environment - the germline cyst - a multicellular structure that appears to have originated at the dawn of animal evolution, but which for years was studied mostly in Drosophila and other insects. How cysts support Drosophila and mammalian oocyte production by defining nurse cells (NCs) as well as oocytes, mediating organelle transfer, establishing the oocyte-specific organellar aggregate known as the Balbiani body (Bb) and possibly contributing to successful embryonic development will be reviewed here.

Studies of mammalian reproductive biology have well established the basic picture of how mammalian oocytes are formed and cyclically controlled (Edson et al., 2009; Richards and Pangas, 2010; Lesch and Page, 2012; Capel, 2017; Wu and Dean, 2020). Germ cells are initially specified by Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP) signaling during early gastrulation (Lawson et al., 1999; review Monsivais et al., 2017), after which they reprogram epigenetic marks (Sanford et al., 1987; Reik and Surani, 2015; Nicholls and Page, 2021; Saitou and Hayashi, 2021) and migrate to the gonads to initiate gamete production. A perplexing feature of mammalian oogenesis has been the large fraction of female germ cells that die rather than forming oocytes, especially during perinatal stages, suggesting that most germ cells are defective in some way and need to be culled (discussed in Tilly, 2001; Grive, 2020).

Studies of oogenesis in other animals, especially experimentally advantageous invertebrate models, allowed systematic analyses to genetically define genes important for gametogenesis (Nüsslein-Volhard, 2022; Schüpbach and Wieschaus, 1991; Hengartner and Horvitz, 1994; Dosch et al., 2004; Kimble and Crittenden, 2007; Strome and Lehmann, 2007). Widely conserved core genes (such as Vasa, Nanos, Piwi, Tudor, etc.) underlying the biology of all animal germ cells were identified (Fierro-Constaín et al., 2017; Sundby et al., 2021; Mercer et al., 2021) as well as hundreds of other maternally expressed genes, both conserved and more rapidly evolving, that contribute to oocyte production and early embryogenesis (Elis et al., 2018; Whittle and Extavour, 2019).

Developmental studies of the relatively simple and easily studied Drosophila ovary provided a cellular basis for understanding the genetic regulation of oogenesis (reviews: King, 1970; Mahowald and Kambysellis, 1980; Spradling, 1993). In particular, they highlighted the central role of a conserved cellular structure known as the germline cyst (reviews: Telfer, 1975; de Cuevas et al., 1997). Germline cysts are groups of germ cells interconnected by distinctive intercellular bridges (IBs) that are generated using synchronous mitotic divisions with incomplete cytokinesis (Figure 1A). In Drosophila and other insects, the IBs later acquire additional proteins and actin to support their expansion into large ‘ring canals’ (Robinson and Cooley, 1996). Cysts produced in this manner appear to be nearly universal in male gametogenesis and are found during early steps of oocyte production in diverse major animal groups including higher insects with complete metamorphosis where they persist longer and are most easily studied (Giardina, 1901; Wilson, 1925; Büning, 1994; Matova and Cooley, 2001; Lu et al., 2017). Many other invertebrates use interconnected syncytial cellular structures within their gonad for similar purposes that are built using a variant of the cyst formation program (Swiatek et al., 2009; Seidel et al., 2018; Świątek and Urbisz, 2019). However, cyst utilization has not been detected in females from some phylogenetic groups, a condition termed ‘panoistic.’ While in some panoistic species cyst formation early in development may have been overlooked, many such groups appear to have secondarily lost cyst production during evolution (Büning, 1994).

Figure 1

Download asset Open asset

Drosophila oogenesis begins in the germarium (Figure 1B) at the tip of each ovariole that houses germline stem cells (GSCs). The first step downstream from a GSC is germline cyst formation. Cysts then participate in all the key developmental processes of early oogenesis including meiosis, oocyte specification, patterning, and Bb formation. Cysts influence these events by first acquiring an asymmetric cytoskeletal structure (Figure 1C–F) known as ‘the fusome’ (meaning ‘spindle derived’). This microtubule (MT)-dependent organelle grows with each successive mitotic division, interconnects all cyst cells, mediates germ cell cycle synchronization, and is essential for oocyte specification (Telfer, 1975; Lin et al., 1994). All cyst-forming divisions are asymmetric, with the older cell inheriting a larger amount of fusome than its daughter (Figure 1C; de Cuevas and Spradling, 1998). The central spindle MTs that initially arrest cytokinesis appear to be incorporated into the fusome in a polarized manner, allowing directed movement of cellular components toward the future oocyte to begin shortly after cyst completion (reviews: Spradling et al., 1997; Milas and Telley, 2022). Fusome MTs are stabilized by tubulin acetylation, the spectraplakin protein Shot, and the CAMSAP protein Patronin (Röper and Brown, 2004; Nashchekin et al., 2021). A simple and sufficient model is that fusome MT minus ends orient toward the older fusome segment as new segments attach following each cyst division cycle to generate a finished fusome-associated network capable of transporting cargos from any cyst cell toward the initial cell (Figure 1D).

The detailed molecular organization of fusome components remains incompletely understood, and some of the more than 20 identified fusome proteins change as cysts develop in the germarium (Lighthouse et al., 2008). Fusome-specific isoforms of several Adducin-like proteins produced by the hu-li tai shao (hts) gene (Petrella et al., 2007) and alpha-Spectrin are essential to prevent fusome dispersal, suggesting that these proteins play different roles in this non-membrane bound organelle than they do when associated with plasma membranes (de Cuevas et al., 1996). The presence of the Skp, Cullin, F-box containing (SCF) complex in the fusome controlling CycA and CycE turnover promotes the fusome’s ability to regulate germ cell cycles (Lilly et al., 2000; Ohlmeyer and Schüpbach, 2003). Finally, fusome-associated Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) proteins and vesicles provide ER connectivity between all cyst cells (Figure 1E; Snapp et al., 2004). A working model of fusome structure is shown (Figure 1F), in which its known components are proposed to be embedded in a Spectrin and Hts-fusome-dependent matrix (tan) that excludes ribosomes and most organelles, possibly due to phase separation.

Cysts carry out important roles during meiosis. Following four rounds of cyst-forming mitotic divisions, meiotic entry takes place, for which cyst cells have already been preparing their chromosomes (Christophorou et al., 2013; Rubin et al., 2016; Gyuricza et al., 2016). As meiotic prophase ensues, one cell is elaborated as the oocyte based on asymmetric fusome-mediated transfer from the other 15 cyst cells of RNAs, and likely other materials (see Hinnant et al., 2020). The transferring cells become a second cyst cell type known as nurse cells (NCs). NCs protect the oocyte by producing piRNAs (Guzzardo et al., 2013; Wang and Lin, 2021), promote oocyte growth and help to establish oocyte polarity and developmental patterning (review: Milas and Telley, 2022).

Somatic cells provide vital support to the developing germ cells throughout the germarium, often in response to germ cell Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF) and Notch signals. They communicate extensively among themselves and through signals to germ cells, along with humoral insulin, steroid and other hormonal signals, to coordinate all the early events of pre-follicular oogenesis with the nutritional environment (reviews: Laws and Drummond-Barbosa, 2017; Tu et al., 2021; Milas and Telley, 2022). Somatic cells also cause germline cysts to become oriented with respect to the anterior-posterior (a/p) axis of the ovariole starting in the germarium, which likely facilitates follicle formation and eventually ovulation (Godt and Tepass, 1998; González-Reyes and St Johnston, 1998).

Genetic studies strongly validate the importance of cysts and the fusome in specifying and producing oocytes. Mutations or treatments that disrupt cyst structure, the fusome, or MT-dependent transfer generate mostly NCs, fail to produce normal oocytes, and are female sterile (Koch and Spitzer, 1983; Yue and Spradling, 1992; Mach and Lehmann, 1997). Indeed production of a viable Drosophila oocyte without a cyst and NC transfer has never been documented (Schüpbach and Wieschaus, 1991; de Cuevas et al., 1997). In every species, the number of oocytes and NCs produced per cyst represents a fundamental parameter of female gamete development. Generally, a cyst of 2ⁿ cells produces only 1 oocyte and 2ⁿ–1 NCs (‘the 2ⁿ rule’). Production of more oocytes is usually associated with the fragmentation of the initial cyst into smaller cysts that then each follow the 2ⁿ rule (Figure 1G; see Yamauchi and Yoshitake, 1982). How panoistic species are able to dispense with such an ingrained system while maintaining essentially the same sequence of developmental events remains an important issue.

Evidence that developing mammalian male and female germ cells become connected by IBs was found beginning in the 1950s using electron microscopy (Burgos and Fawcett, 1955; review, Gondos, 1973), and similar findings were reported in Xenopus (al-Mukhtar and al-Mukhtar and Webb, 1971; Coggins, 1973). It was clear that the bridges were formed by incomplete cytokinesis and were only present during pre-follicular stages in females but persisted much longer in male gametes. A function in synchronization was proposed, but the presence of NCs was considered unlikely. Mouse primordial germ cells were eventually shown to undergo synchronized mitotic divisions to generate cell clusters up to 32 cells and preferentially containing 2ⁿ cells (Figure 1C; Pepling and Spradling, 1998). The authors concluded that the cyst mechanism was conserved in mice based on comparisons of Drosophila, Xenopus, and mouse early germ cells (review: Pepling et al., 1999).

Xenopus oogonia were found to develop in 16 cell cysts (Kloc et al., 2004a) interconnected much like in Drosophila. However, due to the rarity of apoptotic germ cells, Kloc et al., 2004a concluded that all 16 cyst cells become oocytes. We now know that in mouse and Drosophila, NCs do not turn over primarily by apoptosis. Ovarian germline cysts containing up to 32 cells were subsequently discovered in the fish Medaka (Nakamura et al., 2010). Medaka ovaries contain ‘germinal cradles’ tipped with GSCs whose daughters immediately enter the cyst formation program, much like a Drosophila germarium. Medaka ovarian cysts form by 3–5 rounds of synchronous divisions, persist for a period to time, undergo some cell death, and produce oocytes in follicles (Nakamura et al., 2011). Similar cysts were also observed in zebrafish ovaries (Marlow and Mullins, 2008; Beer and Draper, 2013; Bertho et al., 2021).

The cellular products of individual cysts are very difficult to analyze by observation alone. Vertebrate ovaries may contain thousands of closely packed germ cells whose interconnections are nearly impossible to reconstruct even using confocal microscopy. Lei and Spradling, 2013a overcame this problem in mouse oogenesis by sparsely lineage marking individual migrating Primordial Germ Cells (PGCs) at E10.5, just as they were reaching the fetal ovary. This usually caused just one founder germ cell per ovary to be labeled, which produced one initial cyst of about 30 cells. Over the ensuing 10 days, about 4–6 labeled germ cells from the clone survived to become oocytes within 4–6 individual primordial follicles. Closer study showed that the initial cyst first fragmented into about 4–6 smaller derivative cysts by the time of meiotic onset, possibly in a programmed manner (Figure 2A). This suggested that each derivative cyst specifies one oocyte with the remaining cells functioning as NCs that turn over by the time primordial follicles finish forming around P5. Similar lineage marking will likely be necessary to characterize the fate of cyst cells in most species.

Figure 2

Download asset Open asset

While the existence of vertebrate female germline cysts became clear, their functional importance remained controversial. Mutation of Tex14, encoding an important IB component and putative kinase known to function in cytokinesis, disrupted IB stability and caused male sterility, but females continued to produce fertile eggs in reduced numbers (Greenbaum et al., 2009; Greenbaum et al., 2011). A favored viewpoint remained that unlike Drosophila, female vertebrate cysts are not essential, lack NCs, do not transfer organelles but simply produce uniform oogonial cells that either die or became oocytes (Kloc et al., 2004a).

However, ongoing studies of the mouse showed that this view is incorrect. Cyst cells in each of the smaller cysts derived from a PGC, when lineage marked, could be seen to consist of NCs and an oocyte (Figure 2A). Organelles begin to move and accumulate in just one of the connected cells (Lei and Spradling, 2016). The transferring cells become reduced in size, while the receiving cell grows and gradually takes on the appearance of an oocyte as the transferred centrosomes and organelles build up in its cytoplasm. The distinct nature of NCs and oocytes was further revealed by their cell type-specific patterns of gene expression even while they remain connected (Figure 2B). After transfer, the NCs turn over, but they use a novel pathway of programmed cell death originally characterized in Drosophila termed ‘developmental cell death’ (Mondragon et al., 2019; Lebo and McCall, 2021) rather than apoptosis (Niu and Spradling, 2022). Thus, mouse cysts contain NCs and transfer most of their cytoplasm, centrosomes, and other organelles to an oocyte.

Further work demonstrated that the effects of Tex14 mutation do not contradict the view that cysts play an essential role in mammalian oogenesis. Applying single germ cell lineage tracing to Tex14 mutant ovaries showed that the fertility of Tex14^-/- animals is not due to oocyte production in the absence of cysts but because cyst production continues in the absence of stable IBs (Ikami et al., 2021). Without Tex14, cytokinesis still arrests, but due to IB instability, a reduced number of smaller cysts with a variety of structures are generated. Some Tex14 mutant cysts become linked by membrane holes, like older normal cysts. These cysts still develop both cell types and NCs transfer cytoplasm to generate functional oocytes. Strikingly, the loss of Tex14 dramatically accelerates the timing of NC organelle transfer, suggesting that Tex14 controls the organelle transfer schedule (Ikami et al., 2021). Loss of Tex14 also alters and accelerates the onset of the normal spatial pattern of meiotic initiation (Soygur et al., 2021).

These insights provide a physiological explanation for the longstanding mystery of extensive germ cell loss during mouse fetal and early juvenile development (Tilly, 2001; Grive, 2020). Most germ cell organelles and cytoplasm are transferred to surviving oocytes prior to NC death (Figure 2C), so little biosynthetic investment and time are actually lost, while completed oocytes are highly stable (Figure 2D).

However, the structure of the initial mouse cyst and its pathways of processing to yield 4–6 oocytes still remain difficult to precisely reconstruct. Based on lineage marking, cyst intermediates appear to vary, suggesting that oocytes might develop from cysts of very different size. Yet relatively little variation is seen in the volume of oocytes in newly formed primordial follicles. It remains difficult to determine whether particular lineage-marked germ cells derived from a common progenitor retain a connection sufficient for cytoplasmic transfer, possibly even after moving some distance apart. Conversely, large clusters of adjacent marked sister germ cells may not all still be functionally connected. Because the number of transferred centrosomes observed in P1 oocytes and P5 oocyte size appears less variable than cyst interconnection patterns, we favor a model (Figure 2A) where cyst structure and breakdown are largely programmed by internal cyst asymmetries that arise during cyst formation and ensure structural similarity. However, individual PGCs do vary in the final number of oocytes produced (Lei and Spradling, 2013a), indicating that cyst breakdown is significantly less stereotyped in mouse than in Drosophila. Some reduced efficiency may have been an acceptable cost of increasing oocyte output per PGC by fragmenting the starting cyst.

Careful study of lineage-marked sisters derived from one PGC revealed another surprising observation. Starting at E14.5, every 2 days 5–6 of the labeled PGC daughters not destined to become oocytes begin to transfer their cytoplasm, causing them to shrink into small cell remnants, before commencing programmed cell death (Figure 2A; Niu and Spradling, 2022). The first such NCs that become ‘activated’ for cytoplasmic transfer tend to be located at the edges of the cyst and have few connections to other cells. Later rounds move closer to the central cells with the most interconnections. Thus, mouse NC cytoplasmic dumping and cell death do not happen all at once, like in Drosophila, but are spread out over an approximately 10-day period. This behavior made it possible to identify stage-specific gene expression in activated NCs and oocytes using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq).

Immediately after cysts have formed by E14.5, both NCs and oocytes express largely the same genes characterized in previous studies analyzing total female germ cells. However, as the first NCs activate cytoplasmic transfer during leptotene/zygotene, their gene expression changes sufficiently to be separately characterized using scRNAseq. The ‘E14.5 NCs’ in these clusters contain strikingly less mRNA on average than the other leptotene/zygotene germ cells, confirming their NC identity. 2 days later, the leptotene/zygotene class of NCs has turned over, but a new group of pachytene NCs, ‘E16.5 NCs,’ with low average RNA content is observed whose gene expression differs from both the majority of pachytene cells and the earlier leptotene/zygotene NCs. Likewise, distinct gene expression is observed in dipolotene E18.5 NCs and in dictyate P1 NCs. Oocyte and unactivated NC gene expression coincides from E14.5 to E18.5, and beginning in P1 pure oocyte clusters can be sequenced.

Some highlights of NC and oocyte gene expression identified by scRNAseq are summarized in Table 1 (full data: see Niu and Spradling, 2022). The functional significance of the differentially expressed NC and oocyte genes has not yet been tested in cell type-specific knockout mice. However, some promising candidate genes that may contribute to germline cyst breakdown could be identified based on previous studies in whole animal mutants (Table 1).

Multiple genes are expressed specifically in newly forming oocytes and carry out functions important for oocyte development (review: Wu and Dean, 2020). Several tested genes in this class, including the key oocyte transcription factor Nobox, already express oocyte specifically (at the protein level) in cysts as early as E18.5 that still contain NC (Figure 2B, Table 1). In Nobox^-/- animals, cysts do not breakdown completely like in wild type (Rajkovic et al., 2004), suggesting that oocyte-specific Nobox expression within late cysts promotes normal breakdown, possibly by causing the oocyte to send transfer-promoting signals to its remaining NCs.

Changes in the expression of Tex14 within activated NCs may also contribute to cytoplasmic transfer. Tex14 expression levels in activated NCs fall three- to fourfold at E14.5 and E16.5 relative to pro-oocytes (Table 1). Reduced levels of Tex14 may accelerate transfer in the affected NCs, consistent with Tex14’s apparent role as a local transfer repressor (Ikami et al., 2021). Par family polarity protein mRNAs, including those encoding Pard3, Pard3b, Pard6a, Pard6b, and Mark3, are also downregulated in activated NCs (Pard6b, Table 1). Reduced Par expression may destabilize the NC cytoskeleton to facilitate cytoplasmic transfer into the oocyte.

Several genes upregulated in NCs may also promote cyst breakdown. The Follistatin (Fst) gene encodes an activin signaling regulator that is expressed about fourfold higher in activated E14.5 NCs than in pro-oocytes and unactivated NCs (Table 1). Fst exists in three isoforms, and whereas a global Follistatin deletion is embryonic-lethal, conditional ablation of all but the shortest isoform, FST288, identified essential roles of Fst in oogenesis (Kimura et al., 2011). In female FST288-only mice, cysts fail to breakdown on schedule, with breakdown prolonged by several days. Excess primordial follicles are generated that subsequently turn over rapidly, leading to premature ovarian failure. Interestingly, E16.5 NCs (Table 1) upregulate (3×) the level of a closely related gene, Follistatin-like 1.

Another gene promoting cyst breakdown is p27Kip1 (Cdkn1b) which is upregulated 2.9-fold in wild type E14.5 NCs compared to other E14.5 germ cells (Table 1). p27Kip1 mutation increases the number of primordial follicles that are formed (Rajareddy et al., 2007) as well as the number of ‘multi-oocyte’ follicles (Pérez-Sanz et al., 2013); both phenotypes indicate that cysts in the mutant did not breakdown normally. Like in Fst mutants, in p27Kip1 mutant animals, the excess and multi-oocyte follicles are defective, and few survive to produce offspring. An important caveat is that both Fst and p27Kip1 are expressed at much higher levels in granulosa cells surrounding cysts than in their transferring NCs, indicating that these genes may promote cyst breakdown by acting in somatic cells.

The studies reviewed here show that oocytes develop in germline cysts within species from diverse phylogenetic groups stretching back to the beginning of animal life more than 500 million years ago. Such conservation of a complex developmental pathway involving multiple cells of two cell types produced by a conserved stereotyped process is highly unusual and suggests that cysts serve an important purpose that has changed little over animal history. What might that purpose be?

One critically important role of the oocyte is to ensure that germ cells are fully restored in quality and do not retain damage that could progressively increase over multiple generations. Germ cells are well known to harbor systems that preserve their nuclear genomes (Bergero et al., 2021; Cao and Pocock, 2022). They also utilize mechanisms that select for and preserve undamaged mitochondrial DNA (Lieber et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2020; review Cox et al., 2021). Less is known about how damage to other cellular components is repaired. Studies in yeast show that meiosis is critically important for rejuvenation of cellular damage acquired during cellular aging. Of particular importance, during sporulation potentially damaging materials such as protein aggregates, aberrant nuclear pores, and excised rDNA circles are excluded from the four spore products, whose aging clock is concomitantly reset (Unal et al., 2011; Goodman et al., 2020).

Cysts are strong candidates to provide similar benefits to animal germlines, also in association with meiosis. Residual cytoplasm and organelles within NCs are destroyed by proteolysis and physically excluded from entering the oocyte. This provides an opportunity, at least in theory, for female germ cells to offload and purge themselves of materials each generation that have become too damaged or risky to repair. Thus, rather than simply promoting oocyte growth, oogenesis in cysts containing NCs may be a vitally important safety valve to prevent a multi-generational decline in oocyte quality. Such a decline might be underway even though the first post-cyst generation animals still appear grossly normal. Unlike somatic cells, which need only last one generation, germ cells must continue to function in perpetuity, which makes defects more difficult to test. It would not be surprising if germ cells housed unique structures and processes to support this major longevity challenge not seen in somatic cells.

A second reason that oocyte production in cysts may have been conserved relates to the oocyte’s preparations for embryonic development. Encoding and selectively utilizing genomic information to specify and produce a complex multicellular animal represent the most complex and sophisticated process known. Many vertebrate and invertebrate oocytes contribute not only rejuvenated cellular materials but also patterning information in the form of specified embryonic axes that guide early embryonic development. Evo-Devo comparisons of genomes, genes, and developmental pathways have revealed an underlying genetic similarity in how animal embryos, tissues, and their germ cells develop within different species, consistent with evidence that animals constitute a monophyletic group stretching back to a common animal ancestor (Fierro-Constaín et al., 2017; De Robertis and Tejeda-Muñoz, 2022).

It is plausible to consider that the germline cyst, the earliest conserved multicellular assembly on the developmental pathway of most major animal groups, contributes to the oocyte’s ability to launch embryonic development. Oocytes are currently believed to contribute less patterning information to mouse and mammalian embryonic development than do the oocytes of other well-studied animals such as Drosophila and lower vertebrates (Beddington and Robertson, 1999; Gardner and Davies, 2003; Innocenti et al., 2022), raising the question of whether patterning functions of cysts would be conserved in mammals.

If oocytes make a conserved developmental contribution, it is likely to involve early embryo asymmetry or patterning. An organelle known as the Balbiani body has long been of interest in developmental biology because its position in the early follicle relative to the oocyte nucleus (known as the germinal vesicle - GV) prefigures the animal/vegetal embryonic axis in diverse animal species including many vertebrates (Figure 3A; Wilson, 1925). A human Bb was observed more than 100 years ago as a large oocyte organelle cluster centered around a ‘cytocentrum’ in primordial follicles (Figure 3A and B; van der Stricht, 1923; Raven, 1961; Hertig, 1968; Kloc et al., 2004b). Similar Bb structures are found in mouse (Figure 3C; Pepling et al., 2007; Kloc et al., 2008), Drosophila (Mahowald and Strassheim, 1970), Xenopus (Kloc et al., 2004a), zebrafish (Elkouby et al., 2016), and even in panoistic insects (Tworzydlo et al., 2014).

Figure 3

Download asset Open asset

The germline cyst contributes essentially to Bb formation in Drosophila (Cox and Spradling, 2003), mouse (Lei and Spradling, 2016), and probably many other species. Before the onset of meiosis or Bb appearance, the germline cyst’s polarity has been established, and at meiotic onset, this polarity mediates MT-dependent transport of materials that specify the oocyte(s) and begin to generate a Bb(s). During zygotene to dictyate meiotic stages, centrosomes and other organelles undergo MT-dependent transport from NCs to the oocyte (Cox and Spradling, 2003; Cox and Spradling, 2006; Lei and Spradling, 2016; Niu and Spradling, 2022). In mouse, the transported centrosomes coalesce in the oocyte and generate the cytocentrum (Figure 3D and E) consisting of pericentriolar material surrounded by Golgi membranes (Figure 3E and F). The cytocentrum, whose formation requires tubulin gene function (Niu and Spradling, 2022), nucleates a large MT aster (Figure 3G) on which oocyte organelles associate to form the Bb (Lei and Spradling, 2016; Niu and Spradling, 2022).

Thus, MTs play critical roles in Bb production by transporting organelles to the oocyte from NCs, forming the cytocentrum, and organizing oocyte organelles into a characteristic Bb structure on nucleated MTs. MT disruption at any stage in this process abolishes Bb formation. In Drosophila, the number of mitochondria in the Bb can even be manipulated over a wide range by mutating MT motors or the two Milton mitochondrial transport adaptor protein isoforms expressed in oocytes (Cox and Spradling, 2006).

NC centriole migration to the oocyte prior to follicle formation was originally described in Drosophila (Mahowald and Strassheim, 1970). NC centrioles move along the fusome and arrive at the oocyte as the follicle begins to form at the onset of stage 1 then rapidly move to the posterior where they aggregate as revealed by EM (Mahowald and Strassheim, 1970) and by gamma-tubulin staining (Grieder et al., 2000). The aggregated centrioles may represent a Drosophila analog of the cytocentrum. As stage 1 continues, the posterior MTOC forms (Theurkauf et al., 1993) and the Bb coalesces (Cox and Spradling, 2003).

The functional role of centriole migration in Drosophila for generating the posterior MTOC has remained uncertain, and this MTOC is likely non-centriolar MTOC (ncMTOC; Bolívar et al., 2001; Nashchekin et al., 2021). Moreover, disruption of the centriolar replication factor SAS-4 eliminates centrioles but does not block oogenesis (Stevens et al., 2007), possibly because peri-centriolar material sufficient for posterior MTOC formation is still available in the oocyte (Zhao et al., 2012). Centriole migration may have other functions as well (Braun et al., 2021). Centriole migration was blocked by targeted alteration of the APC/C-specific E2 ligase Vihar, which caused premature polo kinase degradation and centriole destabilization in the oocyte without altering the fusome. Without centriole migration, the oocyte still formed but could not be maintained due to ectopic MT nucleation in NCs that probably interfered with NC to oocyte transport. Thus, relocating NC centrioles to the oocyte may help establish and maintain a stable MT cytoskeleton in both cell types.

The fact that centrosome/centriole migration has been conserved between Drosophila and mouse argues strongly that this process serves an important function. We suggest that these migrations act as a switch to activate new ncMTOC formation that organizes the Bb and defines the Bb-GV axis that presages the Drosophila a/p axis. In mouse oocytes, centrioles are not observed in the finished mouse cytocentrum by EM, which contains a pericentrin-rich core and is flanked by prominent stacked Golgi membranes that define its edges (Figure 3E and F). Based on its size and shape, we propose that the mouse cytocentrum activates a powerful ncMTOC on cytocentrum-associated Golgi membranes (Figure 3G and H). Likewise, Drosophila centriole migration may activate ncMTOC activity at the oocyte posterior, where Golgi elements cluster (Cox and Spradling, 2003).

A variety of cells and fibroblast cell lines in addition to a centriolar MTOC have a second, Golgi-associated ncMTOC (Rios, 2014; Valenzuela et al., 2020). Golgi-nucleated MTOCs utilize Cdk5rap2, which binds to the gamma-tubulin ring complex, as well as tubulin polymerization promoting protein (TPPP) family members. Both Cdk5rap2 and TPPP3 are expressed in dictyate mouse oocytes based on scRNAseq. Additionally, CAMSAP proteins bind and stabilize Golgi-nucleated MT minus ends, including the mouse oocyte-expressed CAMSAP1, a Patronin ortholog. In cultured cells, loss of the centriolar MTOC can cause Golgi-dependent MT nucleation to become predominant (Gavilan et al., 2018; Martin and Akhmanova, 2018; Chen et al., 2022).

Studies in Xenopus (Kloc et al., 2004b; King et al., 2005) and zebrafish (Jamieson-Lucy and Mullins, 2019) showed that germ granules and mRNAs become localized within the oocyte Bb throughout stage 1 after follicle formation. They are subsequently transported to the vegetal pole cortex and undergo subsequent waves of vegetal or animal pole localization, where they persist and play essential roles in oocyte patterning and germ-cell formation in the early embryo. Some of the mRNAs initially deposited at the vegetal pole are later reoriented to define the future dorsal-ventral (d/v) axis (reviewed in Langdon and Mullins, 2011; Colozza and De Robertis, 2014; King et al., 2005). A similar sequence of events takes place in Drosophila oocytes on a greatly accelerated time scale, perhaps consistent with the much more rapid development of Drosophila oocytes generally. Oskar and orb/CPEB mRNAs move along the fusome and briefly associate with the Bb as it initially forms, before moving to the oocyte posterior (Cox and Spradling, 2003). Like in Xenopus, some originally posterior mRNAs such as gurken mRNA are later reoriented to establish the d/v axis, a process that in Drosophila occurs long after the Bb has dispersed and that involves further changes in the MT cytoskeleton, including new ncMTOCs (Milas and Telley, 2022).

Genetic analysis of Bb formation in zebrafish identified the buckyball gene, which does not affect initial Bb formation, but is essential for Bb persistence and for oocyte patterning (Marlow and Mullins, 2008; Elkouby and Mullins, 2017). Buckyball and Xvelo, its Xenopus ortholog (Claussen and Pieler, 2004; Boke et al., 2016), are predicted to be intrinsically disordered proteins (Brangwynne et al., 2009; Han et al., 2012; Seydoux, 2018). Formation of phase-separated compartments might stabilize the initial Bb, allowing it to persist for long periods and carry out its multiple functions in mRNA and germ granule localization.

Whether the mammalian oocyte, like Drosophila, zebrafish, and Xenopus oocytes, contributes developmentally significant information to the early embryo has long been a question of interest (Beddington and Robertson, 1999; Gardner and Davies, 2003; Wu and Dean, 2020; Innocenti et al., 2022). The strong conservation in mouse oocytes of events associated with oocyte polarization, including development within a cyst, centrosome transfer from NCs, and centrosome assembly into a cytocentrum and Bb that defines a Bb-GV axis, suggests that these processes continue to play a significant role. Efforts to identify localized mRNAs arising in Bb-stage oocytes that move to the oocyte cortex have not been successful. Many challenges in comparing mammalian oocyte development to those in other groups are due to viviparity, which significantly delays embryonic development and patterning relative to non-eutherians, in favor of extraembryonic tissue growth needed to establish a maternal trophic connection (O’Farrell et al., 2004; Maltepe and Fisher, 2015). It is plausible that a new pathway evolved to transduce into the embryo the long-conserved patterning role for the polarized oocyte.

One clue may lie in the mammalian-specific genes that constitute the subcortical maternal complex (SCMC) (Wu and Dean, 2020) whose formation parallels that of the Bb. Depletion of SCMC components causes maternal infertility due to embryo arrest at cleavage stages (Li et al., 2010). One SCMC component, Floped, localizes to the apical part of the cell and cell cortex and is involved in establishing apical/basal polarity. Another Padi6 contributes to the cytoskeletal organization and is a component of ‘cytoplasmic lattices’ that form in the oocyte (Capco and McGaughey, 1986; Esposito et al., 2007). These structures persist in the early embryo and might transmit patterning information, although such a connection acting beyond the 2cell stage has not been demonstrated.

Another possibility is that the mammalian oocyte imprints embryonic pattern information onto a stable extracellular structure such as the zona pellucida (ZP) lying just outside the oocyte surface. The Drosophila oocyte carries out such a strategy to transduce the oocyte dorsal/ventral (d/v) axis to the fly embryo (review: Stein and Stevens, 2014; Merkle et al., 2020). Germ cell signals to the follicle cells cause them to alter the structure of the vitelline membrane that lies just outside the oocyte plasma membrane, with d/v asymmetry. These signals are later read out after fertilization by proteolysis, bind to oocyte surface receptors, and establish the d/v axis in the embryo (see: Nüsslein-Volhard, 2022).

Mouse extraembryonic endoderm (EE) represents a possible target since these cells plays a major role in patterning the inner cell mass by migrating anteriorly and forming the anterior visceral endoderm (AVE; reviewed in Stower and Srinivas, 2018). Gene expression in AVE cells establishes an a/p axis in the epiblast. It is currently not well understood what causes particular EE cells to migrate at an appropriate time and location to establish the AVE.

We propose that patterning information from the Balbinai body-containing early mouse oocyte is transferred locally to extracellular matrix (ECM) and forming zona pellucida. There is extensive evidence of secretory activity from the Bb-associated Golgi membranes of mouse oocytes at P4 (Lei and Spradling, 2016) and molecular evidence that granulosa cells synthesize ECM proteins at this time (Niu and Spradling, 2020a). It is plausible that asymmetries established in the ZP are read out in the embryo and program a limited number of precursor EE cells in the early embryo to become AVE precursors that establish the embryonic a/p axis. Regardless of exact mechanistic details, the ancient connection between the Bb-GV axis and the a/p axis may not have been lost at the time of eutherian evolution but modified to continue to provide its long-conserved role.

The story of how insights into the central roles of germline cysts were achieved contains a timely message. We would be ignorant today of the fundamental role of cysts in vertebrate and mammalian oogenesis had not studies of a wide range of organisms been supported and valued, especially of invertebrates and insects. Because evolution has conserved so much of animal biology, what matters in basic science is to study processes in systems that are favorable to advancing our understanding, while the particular species or group analyzed is intrinsically of less importance.

Sequence data are available in the GEO database (GSE136441; Niu and Spradling, 2020b).

1. 1. al-Mukhtar KA
   2. Webb AC

   (1971) An ultrastructural study of primordial germ cells, oogonia and early oocytes in Xenopus laevis

   Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology 26:195–217.

   https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.26.2.195

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Beddington RSP
   2. Robertson EJ

   (1999) Axis development and early asymmetry in mammals

   Cell 96:195–209.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80560-7

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Beer RL
   2. Draper BW

   (2013) Nanos3 maintains germline stem cells and expression of the conserved germline stem cell gene NANOS2 in the zebrafish ovary

   Developmental Biology 374:308–318.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2012.12.003

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Bergero R
   2. Ellis P
   3. Haerty W
   4. Larcombe L
   5. Macaulay I
   6. Mehta T
   7. Mogensen M
   8. Murray D
   9. Nash W
   10. Neale MJ
   11. O’Connor R
   12. Ottolini C
   13. Peel N
   14. Ramsey L
   15. Skinner B
   16. Suh A
   17. Summers M
   18. Sun Y
   19. Tidy A
   20. Rahbari R
   21. Rathje C
   22. Immler S

   (2021) Meiosis and beyond-understanding the mechanistic and evolutionary processes shaping the germline genome

   Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 96:822–841.

   https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12680

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Bertho S
   2. Clapp M
   3. Banisch TU
   4. Bandemer J
   5. Raz E
   6. Marlow FL

   (2021) Zebrafish dazl regulates cystogenesis and germline stem cell specification during the primordial germ cell to germline stem cell transition

   Development 148:dev187773.

   https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.187773

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Boke E
   2. Ruer M
   3. Wühr M
   4. Coughlin M
   5. Lemaitre R
   6. Gygi SP
   7. Alberti S
   8. Drechsel D
   9. Hyman AA
   10. Mitchison TJ

   (2016) Amyloid-Like self-assembly of a cellular compartment

   Cell 166:637–650.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.06.051

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Bolívar J
   2. Huynh JR
   3. López-Schier H
   4. González C
   5. St Johnston D
   6. González-Reyes A

   (2001) Centrosome migration into the Drosophila oocyte is independent of bicd and egl, and of the organisation of the microtubule cytoskeleton

   Development 128:1889–1897.

   https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.128.10.1889

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Brangwynne CP
   2. Eckmann CR
   3. Courson DS
   4. Rybarska A
   5. Hoege C
   6. Gharakhani J
   7. Jülicher F
   8. Hyman AA

   (2009) Germline P granules are liquid droplets that localize by controlled dissolution/condensation

   Science 324:1729–1732.

   https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172046

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Braun AL
   2. Meghini F
   3. Villa-Fombuena G
   4. Guermont M
   5. Fernandez-Martinez E
   6. Qian Z
   7. Dolores Martín-Bermudo M
   8. González-Reyes A
   9. Glover DM
   10. Kimata Y

   (2021) The careful control of polo kinase by APC/C-ube2c ensures the intercellular transport of germline centrosomes during Drosophila oogenesis

   Open Biology 11:200371.

   https://doi.org/10.1098/rsob.200371

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
10. Book

    1. Büning J

    (1994) The Insect Ovary: Ultrastructure, Previtellogenic Growth and Evolution

    Chapman and Hall.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0741-9

    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Burgos MH
    2. Fawcett DW

    (1955) Studies on the fine structure of the mammalian testis. I. differentiation of the spermatids in the cat (felis domestica)

    The Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology 1:287–300.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.1.4.287

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Cao W
    2. Pocock R

    (2022) Mechanisms of germ cell survival and plasticity in Caenorhabditis elegans

    Biochemical Society Transactions 50:1517–1526.

    https://doi.org/10.1042/BST20220878

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Capco DG
    2. McGaughey RW

    (1986) Cytoskeletal reorganization during early mammalian development: analysis using embedment-free sections

    Developmental Biology 115:446–458.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-1606(86)90265-4

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Capel B

    (2017) Vertebrate sex determination: evolutionary plasticity of a fundamental switch

    Nature Reviews. Genetics 18:675–689.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2017.60

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Chen Z
    2. Wang ZH
    3. Zhang G
    4. Bleck CKE
    5. Chung DJ
    6. Madison GP
    7. Lindberg E
    8. Combs C
    9. Balaban RS
    10. Xu H

    (2020) Mitochondrial DNA segregation and replication restrict the transmission of detrimental mutation

    The Journal of Cell Biology 219:e201905160.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201905160

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Chen F
    2. Wu J
    3. Iwanski MK
    4. Jurriens D
    5. Sandron A
    6. Pasolli M
    7. Puma G
    8. Kromhout JZ
    9. Yang C
    10. Nijenhuis W
    11. Kapitein LC
    12. Berger F
    13. Akhmanova A

    (2022) Self-assembly of pericentriolar material in interphase cells lacking centrioles

    eLife 11:e77892.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77892

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Christophorou N
    2. Rubin T
    3. Huynh JR

    (2013) Synaptonemal complex components promote centromere pairing in pre-meiotic germ cells

    PLOS Genetics 9:e1004012.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004012

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Claussen M
    2. Pieler T

    (2004) Xvelo1 uses a novel 75-nucleotide signal sequence that drives vegetal localization along the late pathway in Xenopus oocytes

    Developmental Biology 266:270–284.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2003.09.043

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Coggins LW

    (1973) An ultrastructural and radioautographic study of early oogenesis in the toad Xenopus laevis

    Journal of Cell Science 12:71–93.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.12.1.71

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Colozza G
    2. De Robertis EM

    (2014) Maternal syntabulin is required for dorsal axis formation and is a germ plasm component in Xenopus

    Differentiation; Research in Biological Diversity 88:17–26.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diff.2014.03.002

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Cox RT
    2. Spradling AC

    (2003) A balbiani body and the fusome mediate mitochondrial inheritance during Drosophila oogenesis

    Development 130:1579–1590.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.00365

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Cox RT
    2. Spradling AC

    (2006) Milton controls the early acquisition of mitochondria by Drosophila oocytes

    Development 133:3371–3377.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.02514

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Cox RT
    2. Poulton J
    3. Williams SA

    (2021) The role of mitophagy during oocyte aging in human, mouse, and Drosophila: implications for oocyte quality and mitochondrial disease

    Reproduction & Fertility 2:R113–R129.

    https://doi.org/10.1530/RAF-21-0060

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
24. 1. de Cuevas M
    2. Lee JK
    3. Spradling AC

    (1996) Alpha-spectrin is required for germline cell division and differentiation in the Drosophila ovary

    Development 122:3959–3968.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.122.12.3959

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
25. 1. de Cuevas M
    2. Lilly MA
    3. Spradling AC

    (1997) Germline cyst formation in Drosophila

    Annual Review of Genetics 31:405–428.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.31.1.405

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
26. 1. de Cuevas M
    2. Spradling AC

    (1998) Morphogenesis of the Drosophila fusome and its implications for oocyte specification

    Development 125:2781–2789.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.125.15.2781

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
27. 1. De Robertis EM
    2. Tejeda-Muñoz N

    (2022) Evo-devo of urbilateria and its larval forms

    Developmental Biology 487:10–20.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2022.04.003

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Dosch R
    2. Wagner DS
    3. Mintzer KA
    4. Runke G
    5. Wiemelt AP
    6. Mullins MC

    (2004) Maternal control of vertebrate development before the midblastula transition: mutants from the zebrafish I

    Developmental Cell 6:771–780.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2004.05.002

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Edson MA
    2. Nagaraja AK
    3. Matzuk MM

    (2009) The mammalian ovary from genesis to revelation

    Endocrine Reviews 30:624–712.

    https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2009-0012

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Elis S
    2. Desmarchais A
    3. Cardona E
    4. Fouchecourt S
    5. Dalbies-Tran R
    6. Nguyen T
    7. Thermes V
    8. Maillard V
    9. Papillier P
    10. Uzbekova S
    11. Bobe J
    12. Couderc JL
    13. Monget P

    (2018) Genes involved in Drosophila melanogaster ovarian function are highly conserved throughout evolution

    Genome Biology and Evolution 10:2629–2642.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evy158

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Elkouby YM
    2. Jamieson-Lucy A
    3. Mullins MC

    (2016) Oocyte polarization is coupled to the chromosomal bouquet, a conserved polarized nuclear configuration in meiosis

    PLOS Biology 14:e1002335.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002335

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Elkouby YM
    2. Mullins MC

    (2017) Coordination of cellular differentiation, polarity, mitosis and meiosis-new findings from early vertebrate oogenesis

    Developmental Biology 430:275–287.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2017.06.029

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Esposito G
    2. Vitale AM
    3. Leijten FPJ
    4. Strik AM
    5. Koonen-Reemst AMCB
    6. Yurttas P
    7. Robben TJAA
    8. Coonrod S
    9. Gossen JA

    (2007) Peptidylarginine deiminase (pad) 6 is essential for oocyte cytoskeletal sheet formation and female fertility

    Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 273:25–31.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2007.05.005

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Fierro-Constaín L
    2. Schenkelaars Q
    3. Gazave E
    4. Haguenauer A
    5. Rocher C
    6. Ereskovsky A
    7. Borchiellini C
    8. Renard E

    (2017) The conservation of the germline multipotency program, from sponges to vertebrates: a stepping stone to understanding the somatic and germline origins

    Genome Biology and Evolution 9:474–488.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evw289

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Gardner RL
    2. Davies TJ

    (2003) The basis and significance of pre-patterning in mammals

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 358:1331–1338.

    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1322

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Gavilan MP
    2. Gandolfo P
    3. Balestra FR
    4. Arias F
    5. Bornens M
    6. Rios RM

    (2018) The dual role of the centrosome in organizing the microtubule network in interphase

    EMBO Reports 19:e45942.

    https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201845942

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Giardina A

    (1901)

    Origine dell’ oocite e delle cellule nutrici nel dytiscus

    Internationale Monatsschrift Fur Anatomie Und Physiologie 18:417–484.

    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Godt D
    2. Tepass U

    (1998) Drosophila oocyte localization is mediated by differential cadherin-based adhesion

    Nature 395:387–391.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/26493

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Gondos B

    (1973) Intercellular bridges and mammalian germ cell differentiation

    Differentiation 1:177–182.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-0436.1973.tb00112.x

    • Google Scholar
40. 1. González-Reyes A
    2. St Johnston D

    (1998) Patterning of the follicle cell epithelium along the anterior-posterior axis during Drosophila oogenesis

    Development 125:2837–2846.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.125.15.2837

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Goodman JS
    2. King GA
    3. Ünal E

    (2020) Cellular quality control during gametogenesis

    Experimental Cell Research 396:112247.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2020.112247

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Greenbaum MP
    2. Iwamori N
    3. Agno JE
    4. Matzuk MM

    (2009) Mouse TEX14 is required for embryonic germ cell intercellular bridges but not female fertility

    Biology of Reproduction 80:449–457.

    https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.108.070649

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
43. 1. Greenbaum MP
    2. Iwamori T
    3. Buchold GM
    4. Matzuk MM

    (2011) Germ cell intercellular bridges

    Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 3:a005850.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a005850

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Grieder NC
    2. de Cuevas M
    3. Spradling AC

    (2000) The fusome organizes the microtubule network during oocyte differentiation in Drosophila

    Development 127:4253–4264.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.127.19.4253

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
45. 1. Grive KJ

    (2020) Pathways coordinating oocyte attrition and abundance during mammalian ovarian reserve establishment

    Molecular Reproduction and Development 87:843–856.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.23401

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Guzzardo PM
    2. Muerdter F
    3. Hannon GJ

    (2013) The piRNA pathway in flies: highlights and future directions

    Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 23:44–52.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2012.12.003

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Gyuricza MR
    2. Manheimer KB
    3. Apte V
    4. Krishnan B
    5. Joyce EF
    6. McKee BD
    7. McKim KS

    (2016) Dynamic and stable cohesins regulate synaptonemal complex assembly and chromosome segregation

    Current Biology 26:1688–1698.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.05.006

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
48. 1. Han TW
    2. Kato M
    3. Xie S
    4. Wu LC
    5. Mirzaei H
    6. Pei J
    7. Chen M
    8. Xie Y
    9. Allen J
    10. Xiao G
    11. McKnight SL

    (2012) Cell-Free formation of RNA granules: bound RNAs identify features and components of cellular assemblies

    Cell 149:768–779.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.016

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Hengartner MO
    2. Horvitz HR

    (1994) Programmed cell death in Caenorhabditis elegans

    Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 4:581–586.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-437x(94)90076-f

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
50. 1. Hertig AT

    (1968) The primary human oocyte: some observations on the fine structure of Balbiani’s vitelline body and the origin of the annulate lamellae

    The American Journal of Anatomy 122:107–137.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/aja.1001220107

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
51. 1. Hinnant TD
    2. Merkle JA
    3. Ables ET

    (2020) Coordinating proliferation, polarity, and cell fate in the Drosophila female germline

    Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 8:19.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.00019

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
52. 1. Ikami K
    2. Nuzhat N
    3. Abbott H
    4. Pandoy R
    5. Haky L
    6. Spradling AC
    7. Tanner H
    8. Lei L

    (2021) Altered germline cyst and oocyte differentiation in tex14 mutant mice

    Biology Open 10:bio058807.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.058807

    • Google Scholar
53. 1. Innocenti F
    2. Fiorentino G
    3. Cimadomo D
    4. Soscia D
    5. Garagna S
    6. Rienzi L
    7. Ubaldi FM
    8. Zuccotti M
    9. SIERR

    (2022) Maternal effect factors that contribute to oocytes developmental competence: an update

    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 39:861–871.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02434-y

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
54. 1. Jamieson-Lucy A
    2. Mullins MC

    (2019) The vertebrate balbiani body, germ plasm, and oocyte polarity

    Current Topics in Developmental Biology 135:1–34.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.ctdb.2019.04.003

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
55. 1. Kimble J
    2. Crittenden SL

    (2007) Controls of germline stem cells, entry into meiosis, and the sperm/oocyte decision in Caenorhabditis elegans

    Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 23:405–433.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cellbio.23.090506.123326

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
56. 1. Kimura F
    2. Bonomi LM
    3. Schneyer AL

    (2011) Follistatin regulates germ cell nest breakdown and primordial follicle formation

    Endocrinology 152:697–706.

    https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2010-0950

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
57. Book

    1. King RC

    (1970)

    Ovarian Development in Drosophila melanogaster

    Academic Press.

    • Google Scholar
58. 1. King ML
    2. Messitt TJ
    3. Mowry KL

    (2005) Putting rnas in the right place at the right time: RNA localization in the frog oocyte

    Biology of the Cell 97:19–33.

    https://doi.org/10.1042/BC20040067

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
59. 1. Kloc M
    2. Bilinski S
    3. Dougherty MT
    4. Brey EM
    5. Etkin LD

    (2004a) Formation, architecture and polarity of female germline cyst in Xenopus

    Developmental Biology 266:43–61.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2003.10.002

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
60. 1. Kloc M
    2. Bilinski S
    3. Etkin LD

    (2004b) The balbiani body and germ cell determinants: 150 years later

    Current Topics in Developmental Biology 59:1–36.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0070-2153(04)59001-4

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
61. 1. Kloc M
    2. Jaglarz M
    3. Dougherty M
    4. Stewart MD
    5. Nel-Themaat L
    6. Bilinski S

    (2008) Mouse early oocytes are transiently polar: three-dimensional and ultrastructural analysis

    Experimental Cell Research 314:3245–3254.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2008.07.007

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
62. 1. Koch EA
    2. Spitzer RH

    (1983) Multiple effects of colchicine on oogenesis in Drosophila: induced sterility and switch of potential oocyte to nurse-cell developmental pathway

    Cell and Tissue Research 228:21–32.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00206261

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
63. 1. Langdon YG
    2. Mullins MC

    (2011) Maternal and zygotic control of zebrafish dorsoventral axial patterning

    Annual Review of Genetics 45:357–377.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-110410-132517

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
64. 1. Laws KM
    2. Drummond-Barbosa D

    (2017) Control of germline stem cell lineages by diet and physiology

    Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation 59:67–99.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44820-6_3

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
65. 1. Lawson KA
    2. Dunn NR
    3. Roelen BA
    4. Zeinstra LM
    5. Davis AM
    6. Wright CV
    7. Korving JP
    8. Hogan BL

    (1999) Bmp4 is required for the generation of primordial germ cells in the mouse embryo

    Genes & Development 13:424–436.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.13.4.424

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
66. 1. Lebo DPV
    2. McCall K

    (2021) Murder on the ovarian express: a tale of non-autonomous cell death in the Drosophila ovary

    Cells 10:1454–1473.

    https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10061454

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
67. 1. Lei L
    2. Spradling AC

    (2013a) Female mice lack adult germ-line stem cells but sustain oogenesis using stable primordial follicles

    PNAS 110:8585–8590.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1306189110

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
68. 1. Lei L
    2. Spradling AC

    (2013b) Mouse primordial germ cells produce cysts that partially fragment prior to meiosis

    Development 140:2075–2081.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.093864

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
69. 1. Lei L
    2. Spradling AC

    (2016) Mouse oocytes differentiate through organelle enrichment from sister cyst germ cells

    Science 352:95–99.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad2156

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
70. 1. Lesch BJ
    2. Page DC

    (2012) Genetics of germ cell development

    Nature Reviews. Genetics 13:781–794.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3294

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
71. 1. Li L
    2. Zheng P
    3. Dean J

    (2010) Maternal control of early mouse development

    Development 137:859–870.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.039487

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
72. 1. Lieber T
    2. Jeedigunta SP
    3. Palozzi JM
    4. Lehmann R
    5. Hurd TR

    (2019) Mitochondrial fragmentation drives selective removal of deleterious mtDNA in the germline

    Nature 570:380–384.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1213-4

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
73. 1. Lighthouse DV
    2. Buszczak M
    3. Spradling AC

    (2008) New components of the Drosophila fusome suggest it plays novel roles in signaling and transport

    Developmental Biology 317:59–71.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.02.009

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
74. 1. Lilly MA
    2. de Cuevas M
    3. Spradling AC

    (2000) Cyclin A associates with the fusome during germline cyst formation in the Drosophila ovary

    Developmental Biology 218:53–63.

    https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.1999.9570

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
75. 1. Lin H
    2. Yue L
    3. Spradling AC

    (1994) The Drosophila fusome, a germline-specific organelle, contains membrane skeletal proteins and functions in cyst formation

    Development 120:947–956.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.120.4.947

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
76. 1. Lu K
    2. Jensen L
    3. Lei L
    4. Yamashita YM

    (2017) Stay connected: a germ cell strategy

    Trends in Genetics 33:971–978.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2017.09.001

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
77. 1. Mach JM
    2. Lehmann R

    (1997) An egalitarian-bicaudald complex is essential for oocyte specification and axis determination in Drosophila

    Genes & Development 11:423–435.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.11.4.423

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
78. 1. Mahowald AP
    2. Strassheim JM

    (1970) Intercellular migration of centrioles in the germarium of Drosophila melanogaster. An electron microscopic study

    The Journal of Cell Biology 45:306–320.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.45.2.306

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
79. Book

    1. Mahowald AP
    2. Kambysellis MP

    (1980)

    Oogenesis

    In: Mahowald AP, editors. The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila. Academic Press. pp. 1–2.

    • Google Scholar
80. 1. Maltepe E
    2. Fisher SJ

    (2015) Placenta: the forgotten organ

    Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 31:523–552.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100814-125620

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
81. 1. Marlow FL
    2. Mullins MC

    (2008) Bucky ball functions in Balbiani body assembly and animal-vegetal polarity in the oocyte and follicle cell layer in zebrafish

    Developmental Biology 321:40–50.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.05.557

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
82. 1. Martin M
    2. Akhmanova A

    (2018) Coming into focus: mechanisms of microtubule minus-end organization

    Trends in Cell Biology 28:574–588.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2018.02.011

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
83. 1. Matova N
    2. Cooley L

    (2001) Comparative aspects of animal oogenesis

    Developmental Biology 231:291–320.

    https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.2000.0120

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
84. 1. Mercer M
    2. Jang S
    3. Ni C
    4. Buszczak M

    (2021) The dynamic regulation of mrna translation and ribosome biogenesis during germ cell development and reproductive aging

    Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 9:710186.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.710186

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
85. 1. Merkle JA
    2. Wittes J
    3. Schüpbach T

    (2020) Signaling between somatic follicle cells and the germline patterns the egg and embryo of Drosophila

    Current Topics in Developmental Biology 140:55–86.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.ctdb.2019.10.004

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
86. 1. Milas A
    2. Telley IA

    (2022) Polarity events in the Drosophila melanogaster oocyte

    Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 10:895876.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2022.895876

    • Google Scholar
87. 1. Mondragon AA
    2. Yalonetskaya A
    3. Ortega AJ
    4. Zhang Y
    5. Naranjo O
    6. Elguero J
    7. Chung WS
    8. McCall K

    (2019) Lysosomal machinery drives extracellular acidification to direct non-apoptotic cell death

    Cell Reports 27:11–19.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.03.034

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
88. 1. Monsivais D
    2. Matzuk MM
    3. Pangas SA

    (2017) The TGF-β family in the reproductive tract

    Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 9:a022251.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a022251

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
89. 1. Nakamura S
    2. Kobayashi K
    3. Nishimura T
    4. Higashijima S
    5. Tanaka M

    (2010) Identification of germline stem cells in the ovary of the teleost medaka

    Science 328:1561–1563.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185473

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
90. 1. Nakamura S
    2. Kobayashi K
    3. Nishimura T
    4. Tanaka M

    (2011) Ovarian germline stem cells in the teleost fish, medaka (oryzias latipes)

    International Journal of Biological Sciences 7:403–409.

    https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.7.403

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
91. 1. Nashchekin D
    2. Busby L
    3. Jakobs M
    4. Squires I
    5. St Johnston D

    (2021) Symmetry breaking in the female germline cyst

    Science 374:874–879.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abj3125

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
92. 1. Nicholls PK
    2. Page DC

    (2021) Germ cell determination and the developmental origin of germ cell tumors

    Development 148:dev198150.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.198150

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
93. 1. Niu W
    2. Spradling AC

    (2020a) Two distinct pathways of pregranulosa cell differentiation support follicle formation in the mouse ovary

    PNAS 117:20015–20026.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2005570117

    • Google Scholar
94. Data

    1. Niu W
    2. Spradling A

    (authors) (2020b) Single-cell analysis RNA sequencing of prenatal and neonatal gonads/ovaries at E11.5, E12.5, E14.5, E16.5, E18.5, P1 and P5

    NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus. ID GSE136441.

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE136441
95. 1. Niu W
    2. Spradling AC

    (2022) Mouse oocytes develop in cysts with the help of nurse cells

    Cell 185:2576–2590.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2022.05.001

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
96. 1. Nüsslein-Volhard C

    (2022) The Toll gene in Drosophila pattern formation

    Trends in Genetics 38:231–245.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2021.09.006

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
97. 1. O’Farrell PH
    2. Stumpff J
    3. Su TT

    (2004) Embryonic cleavage cycles: how is a mouse like a fly?

    Current Biology 14:R35–R45.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2003.12.022

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
98. 1. Ohlmeyer JT
    2. Schüpbach T

    (2003) Encore facilitates SCF-ubiquitin-proteasome-dependent proteolysis during Drosophila oogenesis

    Development 130:6339–6349.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.00855

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
99. 1. Pepling ME
    2. Spradling AC

    (1998) Female mouse germ cells form synchronously dividing cysts

    Development 125:3323–3328.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.125.17.3323

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
100. 1. Pepling ME
     2. de Cuevas M
     3. Spradling AC

     (1999) Germline cysts: a conserved phase of germ cell development?

     Trends in Cell Biology 9:257–262.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/s0962-8924(99)01594-9

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
101. 1. Pepling ME
     2. Wilhelm JE
     3. O’Hara AL
     4. Gephardt GW
     5. Spradling AC

     (2007) Mouse oocytes within germ cell cysts and primordial follicles contain a balbiani body

     PNAS 104:187–192.

     https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0609923104

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
102. 1. Pérez-Sanz J
     2. Arluzea J
     3. Matorras R
     4. González-Santiago N
     5. Bilbao J
     6. Yeh N
     7. Barlas A
     8. Romin Y
     9. Manova-Todorova K
     10. Koff A
     11. de la Hoz C

     (2013) Increased number of multi-oocyte follicles (mofs) in juvenile p27kip1 mutant mice: potential role of granulosa cells

     Human Reproduction 28:1023–1030.

     https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/des436

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
103. 1. Petrella LN
     2. Smith-Leiker T
     3. Cooley L

     (2007) The ovhts polyprotein is cleaved to produce fusome and ring canal proteins required for Drosophila oogenesis

     Development 134:703–712.

     https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.02766

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
104. 1. Rajareddy S
     2. Reddy P
     3. Du C
     4. Liu L
     5. Jagarlamudi K
     6. Tang W
     7. Shen Y
     8. Berthet C
     9. Peng SL
     10. Kaldis P
     11. Liu K

     (2007) P27Kip1 (cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1B) controls ovarian development by suppressing follicle endowment and activation and promoting follicle atresia in mice

     Molecular Endocrinology 21:2189–2202.

     https://doi.org/10.1210/me.2007-0172

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
105. 1. Rajkovic A
     2. Pangas SA
     3. Ballow D
     4. Suzumori N
     5. Matzuk MM

     (2004) Nobox deficiency disrupts early folliculogenesis and oocyte-specific gene expression

     Science 305:1157–1159.

     https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1099755

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
106. Book

     1. Raven CP

     (1961)

     Oogenesis: The Storage of Developmental Information

     Pergamon Press.

     • Google Scholar
107. 1. Reik W
     2. Surani MA

     (2015) Germline and pluripotent stem cells

     Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 7:a019422.

     https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a019422

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
108. 1. Richards JS
     2. Pangas SA

     (2010) The ovary: basic biology and clinical implications

     The Journal of Clinical Investigation 120:963–972.

     https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI41350

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
109. 1. Rios RM

     (2014) The centrosome-golgi apparatus nexus

     Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 369:20130462.

     https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0462

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
110. 1. Robinson DN
     2. Cooley L

     (1996) Stable intercellular bridges in development: the cytoskeleton lining the tunnel

     Trends in Cell Biology 6:474–479.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/0962-8924(96)84945-2

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
111. 1. Röper K
     2. Brown NH

     (2004) A spectraplakin is enriched on the fusome and organizes microtubules during oocyte specification in Drosophila

     Current Biology 14:99–110.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2003.12.056

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
112. 1. Rubin T
     2. Christophorou N
     3. Huynh JR

     (2016) How to pre-pair chromosomes for meiosis

     Cell Cycle 15:609–610.

     https://doi.org/10.1080/15384101.2015.1131524

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
113. 1. Saitou M
     2. Hayashi K

     (2021) Mammalian in vitro gametogenesis

     Science 374:eaaz6830.

     https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz6830

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
114. 1. Sanford JP
     2. Clark HJ
     3. Chapman VM
     4. Rossant J

     (1987) Differences in DNA methylation during oogenesis and spermatogenesis and their persistence during early embryogenesis in the mouse

     Genes & Development 1:1039–1046.

     https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1.10.1039

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
115. 1. Schüpbach T
     2. Wieschaus E

     (1991) Female sterile mutations on the second chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. II. mutations blocking oogenesis or altering egg morphology

     Genetics 129:1119–1136.

     https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/129.4.1119

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
116. 1. Seidel HS
     2. Smith TA
     3. Evans JK
     4. Stamper JQ
     5. Mast TG
     6. Kimble J

     (2018) C. elegans germ cells divide and differentiate in a folded tissue

     Developmental Biology 442:173–187.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2018.07.013

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
117. 1. Seydoux G

     (2018) The P granules of C. elegans: a genetic model for the study of RNA-protein condensates

     Journal of Molecular Biology 430:4702–4710.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2018.08.007

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
118. 1. Snapp EL
     2. Iida T
     3. Frescas D
     4. Lippincott-Schwartz J
     5. Lilly MA

     (2004) The fusome mediates intercellular endoplasmic reticulum connectivity in Drosophila ovarian cysts

     Molecular Biology of the Cell 15:4512–4521.

     https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e04-06-0475

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
119. 1. Soygur B
     2. Jaszczak RG
     3. Fries A
     4. Nguyen DH
     5. Malki S
     6. Hu G
     7. Demir N
     8. Arora R
     9. Laird DJ

     (2021) Intercellular bridges coordinate the transition from pluripotency to meiosis in mouse fetal oocytes

     Science Advances 7:eabc6747.

     https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abc6747

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
120. Book

     1. Spradling A

     (1993)

     Developmental genetics of oogenesis

     In: Bate M, Martinez-Arias A, editors. The Development of Drosophila Melanogaster. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. pp. 1–70.

     • Google Scholar
121. Conference

     1. Spradling AC
     2. de Cuevas M
     3. Drummond-Barbosa D
     4. Keyes L
     5. Lilly M
     6. Pepling M
     7. Xie T

     (1997)

     The Drosophila germarium: stem cells, germ line cysts, and oocytes

     Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology. pp. 25–34.

     • Google Scholar
122. 1. Stein DS
     2. Stevens LM

     (2014) Maternal control of the Drosophila dorsal-ventral body axis

     Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Developmental Biology 3:301–330.

     https://doi.org/10.1002/wdev.138

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
123. 1. Stevens NR
     2. Raposo A
     3. Basto R
     4. St Johnston D
     5. Raff JW

     (2007) From stem cell to embryo without centrioles

     Current Biology 17:1498–1503.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.07.060

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
124. 1. Stower MJ
     2. Srinivas S

     (2018) The head’s tale: anterior-posterior axis formation in the mouse embryo

     Current Topics in Developmental Biology 128:365–390.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.ctdb.2017.11.003

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
125. 1. Stricht O

     (1923)

     Etude comparée des ovules des mammiferes aux differentes periodes de l’ovogenese

     Arch. Biol 33:229–300.

     • Google Scholar
126. 1. Strome S
     2. Lehmann R

     (2007) Germ versus soma decisions: lessons from flies and worms

     Science 316:392–393.

     https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1140846

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
127. 1. Sundby AE
     2. Molnar RI
     3. Claycomb JM

     (2021) Connecting the dots: linking Caenorhabditis elegans small RNA pathways and germ granules

     Trends in Cell Biology 31:387–401.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2020.12.012

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
128. 1. Swiatek P
     2. Kubrakiewicz J
     3. Klag J

     (2009) Formation of germ-line cysts with a central cytoplasmic core is accompanied by specific orientation of mitotic spindles and partitioning of existing intercellular bridges

     Cell and Tissue Research 337:137–148.

     https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-009-0788-8

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
129. 1. Świątek P
     2. Urbisz AZ

     (2019) Architecture and life history of female germ-line cysts in clitellate annelids

     Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation 68:515–551.

     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23459-1_21

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
130. 1. Telfer WH

     (1975) Development and physiology of the oocyte-nurse cell syncytium

     Advances in Insect Physiology 11:223–319.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2806(08)60164-2

     • Google Scholar
131. 1. Theurkauf WE
     2. Alberts BM
     3. Jan YN
     4. Jongens TA

     (1993) A central role for microtubules in the differentiation of Drosophila oocytes

     Development 118:1169–1180.

     https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.118.4.1169

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
132. 1. Tilly JL

     (2001) Commuting the death sentence: how oocytes strive to survive

     Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology 2:838–848.

     https://doi.org/10.1038/35099086

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
133. 1. Tu R
     2. Duan B
     3. Song X
     4. Chen S
     5. Scott A
     6. Hall K
     7. Blanck J
     8. DeGraffenreid D
     9. Li H
     10. Perera A
     11. Haug J
     12. Xie T

     (2021) Multiple niche compartments orchestrate stepwise germline stem cell progeny differentiation

     Current Biology 31:827–839.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.12.024

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
134. 1. Tworzydlo W
     2. Kisiel E
     3. Jankowska W
     4. Bilinski SM

     (2014) Morphology and ultrastructure of the germarium in panoistic ovarioles of a basal “ apterygotous” insect, thermobia domestica

     Zoology 117:200–206.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zool.2014.01.002

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
135. 1. Unal E
     2. Kinde B
     3. Amon A

     (2011) Gametogenesis eliminates age-induced cellular damage and resets life span in yeast

     Science 332:1554–1557.

     https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204349

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
136. 1. Valenzuela A
     2. Meservey L
     3. Nguyen H
     4. Fu MM

     (2020) Golgi outposts nucleate microtubules in cells with specialized shapes

     Trends in Cell Biology 30:792–804.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2020.07.004

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
137. 1. Wang C
     2. Lin H

     (2021) Roles of piRNAs in transposon and pseudogene regulation of germline mRNAs and lncRNAs

     Genome Biology 22:27.

     https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-020-02221-x

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
138. 1. Whittle CA
     2. Extavour CG

     (2019) Contrasting patterns of molecular evolution in metazoan germ line genes

     BMC Evolutionary Biology 19:53.

     https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-019-1363-x

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
139. Book

     1. Wilson EB

     (1925)

     The Cell in Development and Heredity (3rd edition)

     New York: Macmillan Co.

     • Google Scholar
140. 1. Wu D
     2. Dean J

     (2020) Maternal factors regulating preimplantation development in mice

     Current Topics in Developmental Biology 140:317–340.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.ctdb.2019.10.006

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
141. 1. Yamauchi H
     2. Yoshitake N

     (1982) Origin and differentiation of the oocyte-nurse cell complex in the germarium of the earwig, anisolabis maritima borelli (dermaptera: labiduridae)

     International Journal of Insect Morphology and Embryology 11:293–305.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7322(82)90018-6

     • Google Scholar
142. 1. Yue L
     2. Spradling AC

     (1992) Hu-li tai shao, a gene required for ring canal formation during Drosophila oogenesis, encodes a homolog of adducin

     Genes & Development 6:2443–2454.

     https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.6.12b.2443

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
143. 1. Zhao T
     2. Graham OS
     3. Raposo A
     4. St Johnston D

     (2012) Growing microtubules push the oocyte nucleus to polarize the Drosophila dorsal-ventral axis

     Science 336:999–1003.

     https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1219147

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Allan C Spradling

   Carnegie Institution for Science/Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baltimore, United States

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing

   For correspondence

   spradling@carnegiescience.edu

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5251-1801

2. Wanbao Niu

   Carnegie Institution for Science/Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baltimore, United States

   Contribution

   Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

3. Qi Yin

   Carnegie Institution for Science/Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baltimore, United States

   Contribution

   Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

4. Madhulika Pathak

   Carnegie Institution for Science/Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baltimore, United States

   Contribution

   Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

5. Bhawana Maurya

   Carnegie Institution for Science/Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baltimore, United States

   Contribution

   Formal analysis, Writing – review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

• 2,073

  views

• 347

  downloads

• 33

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.