The clinical pharmacology of tafenoquine in the radical cure of Plasmodium vivax malaria: an individual patient data meta-analysis

  1. James A Watson  Is a corresponding author
  2. Robert J Commons
  3. Joel Tarning
  4. Julie A Simpson
  5. Alejandro Llanos Cuentas
  6. Marcus VG Lacerda
  7. Justin A Green
  8. Gavin CKW Koh
  9. Cindy S Chu
  10. François H Nosten
  11. Richard N Price
  12. Nicholas PJ Day
  13. Nicholas J White  Is a corresponding author
  1. Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Viet Nam
  2. Charles Darwin University, Australia
  3. Mahidol University, Thailand
  4. University of Melbourne, Australia
  5. Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Peru
  6. Tropical Medicine Foundation, Brazil
  7. GlaxoSmithKline, United Kingdom
  8. Northwick Park Hospital, United Kingdom

Abstract

Tafenoquine is a newly licensed antimalarial drug for the radical cure of Plasmodium vivax malaria. The mechanism of action and optimal dosing are uncertain. We pooled individual data from 1,102 patients and 72 healthy volunteers studied in the pre-registration trials. We show that tafenoquine dose is the primary determinant of efficacy. Under an Emax model, we estimate the currently recommended 300mg dose in a 60kg adult (5mg/kg) results in 70% of the maximal obtainable hypnozoiticidal effect. Increasing the dose to 7.5mg/kg (i.e. 450mg) would result in 90% reduction in the risk of P. vivax recurrence. After adjustment for dose, the tafenoquine terminal elimination half-life, and day 7 methaemoglobin concentration, but not the parent compound exposure, were also associated with recurrence. These results suggest that the production of oxidative metabolites is central to tafenoquine's hypnozoiticidal efficacy. Clinical trials of higher tafenoquine doses are needed to characterise their efficacy, safety and tolerability.

Data availability

The data used in this study can be accessed by submitting a research proposal via www.ClinicalStudyDataRequest.com using the following study codes: GSK-TAF112582; GSK-200951; GSK-TAF116564. Decisions to share data with independent researchers is made via an Independent Review Panel. All code used to process the data is available on https://github.com/jwatowatson/Tafenoquine-efficacy

Article and author information

Author details

  1. James A Watson

    Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
    For correspondence
    james@tropmedres.ac
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5524-0325
  2. Robert J Commons

    Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia
    Competing interests
    Robert J Commons, has received an Emerging Leader Investigator Grant (1194702) from the Australian National Health & Medical Research Council. The author has no other competing interests to declare..
  3. Joel Tarning

    Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
    Competing interests
    Joel Tarning, Joel Tarning has participated on the Novartis Malaria Advisory Council (payments made to their institution) and acts as an ASCPT Infectious Diseases steering committee member. The author has no other competing interests to declare..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4566-4030
  4. Julie A Simpson

    Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2660-2013
  5. Alejandro Llanos Cuentas

    Instituto de Medicina Tropical, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Marcus VG Lacerda

    Tropical Medicine Foundation, Manuas, Brazil
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Justin A Green

    GlaxoSmithKline, Brentford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Justin A Green, was formerly an employee of GlaxoSmithKline who funded the pre-registration studies of tafenoquine. The author holds stock in GlaxoSmithKline. The author has no other competing interests to declare..
  8. Gavin CKW Koh

    Department of Infectious Diseases, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Gavin CKW Koh, was formerly an employee of GlaxoSmithKline who funded the pre-registration studies of tafenoquine. The author holds stock in GlaxoSmithKline. The author has no other competing interests to declare..
  9. Cindy S Chu

    Shoklo Malaria Research Unit, Mahidol University, Mae Sot, Thailand
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. François H Nosten

    Shoklo Malaria Research Unit, Mahidol University, Mae Sot, Thailand
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7951-0745
  11. Richard N Price

    Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2000-2874
  12. Nicholas PJ Day

    Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2309-1171
  13. Nicholas J White

    Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
    For correspondence
    nickw@tropmedres.ac
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1897-1978

Funding

Wellcome Trust (223253/Z/21/Z)

  • James A Watson

Wellcome Trust (093956/Z/10/C)

  • Nicholas J White

Australian NHMRC (1194702)

  • Robert J Commons

Wellcome Trust (200909)

  • Richard N Price

Australian NHMRC (1196068)

  • Julie A Simpson

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Urszula Krzych, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, United States

Ethics

Human subjects: Anonymised individual patient data were obtained via ClinicalStudyDataRequest.com following approval of a research proposal from the Independent Review Panel.Re-use of existing, appropriately anonymised, human data does not require ethical approval under the Oxford Tropical Research Ethics Committee regulations (OxTREC).

Version history

  1. Received: September 13, 2022
  2. Preprint posted: September 15, 2022 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: November 21, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: December 6, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: December 6, 2022 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2022, Watson et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,608
    views
  • 195
    downloads
  • 19
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. James A Watson
  2. Robert J Commons
  3. Joel Tarning
  4. Julie A Simpson
  5. Alejandro Llanos Cuentas
  6. Marcus VG Lacerda
  7. Justin A Green
  8. Gavin CKW Koh
  9. Cindy S Chu
  10. François H Nosten
  11. Richard N Price
  12. Nicholas PJ Day
  13. Nicholas J White
(2022)
The clinical pharmacology of tafenoquine in the radical cure of Plasmodium vivax malaria: an individual patient data meta-analysis
eLife 11:e83433.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83433

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83433

Further reading

    1. Epidemiology and Global Health
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    James A Watson, Robert J Commons ... Nicholas J White

    In our recent paper on the clinical pharmacology of tafenoquine (Watson et al., 2022), we used all available individual patient pharmacometric data from the tafenoquine pre-registration clinical efficacy trials to characterise the determinants of anti-relapse efficacy in tropical vivax malaria. We concluded that the currently recommended dose of tafenoquine (300 mg in adults, average dose of 5 mg/kg) is insufficient for cure in all adults, and a 50% increase to 450 mg (7.5 mg/kg) would halve the risk of vivax recurrence by four months. We recommended that clinical trials of higher doses should be carried out to assess their safety and tolerability. Sharma and colleagues at the pharmaceutical company GSK defend the currently recommended adult dose of 300 mg as the optimum balance between radical curative efficacy and haemolytic toxicity (Sharma et al., 2024). We contend that the relative haemolytic risks of the 300 mg and 450 mg doses have not been sufficiently well characterised to justify this opinion. In contrast, we provided evidence that the currently recommended 300 mg dose results in sub-maximal efficacy, and that prospective clinical trials of higher doses are warranted to assess their risks and benefits.

    1. Epidemiology and Global Health
    Zhanwei Du, Lin Wang ... Lauren A Meyers
    Short Report Updated

    Paxlovid, a SARS-CoV-2 antiviral, not only prevents severe illness but also curtails viral shedding, lowering transmission risks from treated patients. By fitting a mathematical model of within-host Omicron viral dynamics to electronic health records data from 208 hospitalized patients in Hong Kong, we estimate that Paxlovid can inhibit over 90% of viral replication. However, its effectiveness critically depends on the timing of treatment. If treatment is initiated three days after symptoms first appear, we estimate a 17% chance of a post-treatment viral rebound and a 12% (95% CI: 0–16%) reduction in overall infectiousness for non-rebound cases. Earlier treatment significantly elevates the risk of rebound without further reducing infectiousness, whereas starting beyond five days reduces its efficacy in curbing peak viral shedding. Among the 104 patients who received Paxlovid, 62% began treatment within an optimal three-to-five-day day window after symptoms appeared. Our findings indicate that broader global access to Paxlovid, coupled with appropriately timed treatment, can mitigate the severity and transmission of SARS-Cov-2.