Global analysis of contact-dependent human-to-mouse intercellular mRNA and lncRNA transfer in cell culture

  1. Sandipan Dasgupta
  2. Daniella Y Dayagi
  3. Gal Haimovich  Is a corresponding author
  4. Emanuel Wyler
  5. Tsviya Olender
  6. Robert H Singer
  7. Markus Landthaler
  8. Jeffrey E Gerst  Is a corresponding author
  1. Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel
  2. Max Delbruck Center for Molecular Medicine, Switzerland
  3. Albert Einstein College of Medicine, United States

Abstract

Full-length mRNAs transfer between adjacent mammalian cells via direct cell-to-cell connections called tunneling nanotubes (TNTs). However, the extent of mRNA transfer at the transcriptome-wide level (the 'transferome') is unknown. Here, we analyzed the transferome in an in vitro human-mouse cell co-culture model using RNA-sequencing. We found that mRNA transfer is non-selective, prevalent across the human transcriptome, and that the amount of transfer to mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) strongly correlates with the endogenous level of gene expression in donor human breast cancer cells. Typically, <1% of endogenous mRNAs undergo transfer. Non-selective, expression-dependent RNA transfer was further validated using synthetic reporters. RNA transfer appears contact-dependent via TNTs, as exemplified for several mRNAs. Notably, significant differential changes in the native MEF transcriptome were observed in response to co-culture, including the upregulation of multiple cancer and cancer-associated fibroblast-related genes and pathways. Together, these results lead us to suggest that TNT-mediated RNA transfer could be a phenomenon of physiological importance under both normal and pathogenic conditions.

Data availability

The processed RNA sequencing files have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) Database under the accession number GSE185002

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sandipan Dasgupta

    Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Daniella Y Dayagi

    Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2310-2416
  3. Gal Haimovich

    Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
    For correspondence
    gal.haimovich@weizmann.ac.il
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3360-5108
  4. Emanuel Wyler

    Berlin Institute of Medical Systems Biology and Systems Biology, Max Delbruck Center for Molecular Medicine, Zurich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9884-1806
  5. Tsviya Olender

    Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Robert H Singer

    Department of Anatomy and Structural Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    Robert H Singer, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6725-0093
  7. Markus Landthaler

    Berlin Institute for Medical Systems Biology, Max Delbruck Center for Molecular Medicine, Zurich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Jeffrey E Gerst

    Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
    For correspondence
    jeffrey.gerst@weizmann.ac.il
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8411-6881

Funding

German-Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and Development (I-1461-412.13/2018)

  • Markus Landthaler
  • Jeffrey E Gerst

US-Israel Binational Science Foundation-National Science Foundation (2015846)

  • Robert H Singer
  • Jeffrey E Gerst

Joel and Mady Dukler Fund for Cancer Research

  • Jeffrey E Gerst

Jean-Jacques Brunschwig Fund for the Molecular Genetics of Cancer

  • Jeffrey E Gerst

Moross Integrated Cancer Center

  • Jeffrey E Gerst

Kekst Family Institute for Medical Genetics

  • Jeffrey E Gerst

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Gene W Yeo, University of California, San Diego, United States

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: November 28, 2021 (view preprint)
  2. Received: September 20, 2022
  3. Accepted: May 29, 2023
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: May 30, 2023 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: June 9, 2023 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2023, Dasgupta et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,891
    views
  • 165
    downloads
  • 2
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Sandipan Dasgupta
  2. Daniella Y Dayagi
  3. Gal Haimovich
  4. Emanuel Wyler
  5. Tsviya Olender
  6. Robert H Singer
  7. Markus Landthaler
  8. Jeffrey E Gerst
(2023)
Global analysis of contact-dependent human-to-mouse intercellular mRNA and lncRNA transfer in cell culture
eLife 12:e83584.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83584

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83584

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Julian JA Hoving, Elizabeth Harford-Wright ... Alison C Lloyd
    Research Article Updated

    Collective cell migration is fundamental for the development of organisms and in the adult for tissue regeneration and in pathological conditions such as cancer. Migration as a coherent group requires the maintenance of cell–cell interactions, while contact inhibition of locomotion (CIL), a local repulsive force, can propel the group forward. Here we show that the cell–cell interaction molecule, N-cadherin, regulates both adhesion and repulsion processes during Schwann cell (SC) collective migration, which is required for peripheral nerve regeneration. However, distinct from its role in cell–cell adhesion, the repulsion process is independent of N-cadherin trans-homodimerisation and the associated adherens junction complex. Rather, the extracellular domain of N-cadherin is required to present the repulsive Slit2/Slit3 signal at the cell surface. Inhibiting Slit2/Slit3 signalling inhibits CIL and subsequently collective SC migration, resulting in adherent, nonmigratory cell clusters. Moreover, analysis of ex vivo explants from mice following sciatic nerve injury showed that inhibition of Slit2 decreased SC collective migration and increased clustering of SCs within the nerve bridge. These findings provide insight into how opposing signals can mediate collective cell migration and how CIL pathways are promising targets for inhibiting pathological cell migration.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Marcos Moreno-Aguilera, Alba M Neher ... Carme Gallego
    Research Article Updated

    Alternative RNA splicing is an essential and dynamic process in neuronal differentiation and synapse maturation, and dysregulation of this process has been associated with neurodegenerative diseases. Recent studies have revealed the importance of RNA-binding proteins in the regulation of neuronal splicing programs. However, the molecular mechanisms involved in the control of these splicing regulators are still unclear. Here, we show that KIS, a kinase upregulated in the developmental brain, imposes a genome-wide alteration in exon usage during neuronal differentiation in mice. KIS contains a protein-recognition domain common to spliceosomal components and phosphorylates PTBP2, counteracting the role of this splicing factor in exon exclusion. At the molecular level, phosphorylation of unstructured domains within PTBP2 causes its dissociation from two co-regulators, Matrin3 and hnRNPM, and hinders the RNA-binding capability of the complex. Furthermore, KIS and PTBP2 display strong and opposing functional interactions in synaptic spine emergence and maturation. Taken together, our data uncover a post-translational control of splicing regulators that link transcriptional and alternative exon usage programs in neuronal development.