The Dantu blood group prevents parasite growth in vivo: Evidence from a controlled human malaria infection study

  1. Silvia N Kariuki  Is a corresponding author
  2. Alexander W Macharia
  3. Johnstone Makale
  4. Wilfred Nyamu
  5. Stephen L Hoffman
  6. Melissa C Kapulu
  7. Philip Bejon
  8. Julian C Rayner
  9. Thomas N Williams
  10. On behalf of for the CHMI-SIKA Study Team
  1. Centre for Geographic Medicine Research (Coast), KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kenya
  2. Sanaria Incorporate, United States
  3. Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
  4. Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
  5. Institute for Global Health Innovation, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
5 figures, 4 tables and 2 additional files

Figures

Study design and participant recruitment.
The impact of human genotype on parasite growth.

Following inoculation of volunteers with Pf sporozoites, parasitaemia was monitored by quantitative PCR (y-axis) over the full duration of the study (x-axis). The different panels indicate the specific variants that were studied. The red dots indicate only the individuals that exhibited febrile symptoms and met treatment criteria. The different genotype groups for all the variants are categorised as ‘Homozygous reference’ for individuals with two copies of the reference allele (red lines), ‘Heterozygous’ for individuals with one copy of the reference allele and one copy of the derived allele (green lines), and ‘Homozygous derived’ for individuals with two copies of the derived allele (blue lines). αα/αα, no α-thalassaemia; −α/αα, heterozygous α-thalassaemia; −α/−α, homozygous α-thalassaemia. * For G6PD, male and female were combined as C/CC = normal (wild type hemizygous males and homozygous females), CT = carrier females, and T/TT = G6PD-deficient hemizygous males and homozygous females. All volunteers were typed for all variants, and any one individual may carry a mixture of genotypes – the potential confounding effect of this was controlled for in multivariate analysis. The tables adjacent to each plot show the results from Fisher’s exact tests investigating differences in the proportion of participants that reached the pre-defined treatment threshold of 500 parasites/μl (n) compared to the total number within each genotype category (N).

Figure 3 with 1 supplement
The impact of each gene variant on the requirement for malaria treatment.

The proportion of individuals in each genotype category that required treatment over the course of the controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) study is shown on the y-axis. The number of treated individuals out of the total number in each genotype group is given in parenthesis above the bar graphs, while the p values from the Fisher’s exact tests comparing the differences in proportions of individuals that required treatment across genotype groups are also given above the bar graphs.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1
No differences in anti-schizont antibody levels were found across Dantu genotype groups.

The log-transformed anti-schizont antibody data were compared across Dantu genotype groups using a multivariate model with adjustments for other variant genotypes and location of residence.

Peak parasitaemias were lower in Dantu variant carriers.

Maximum parasitaemia values for individuals across Dantu genotype groups, with dashed line indicating the treatment threshold of 500 parasites/μl. The table below the figure shows the numbers and frequencies of individuals in each genotype category that were PCR-positive over the course of the controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) study. n = the number of participants that were PCR-positive; N = the total number within the genotype category. Statistical comparisons of proportions of PCR-positive individuals across genotype groups and pairwise comparisons between genotype groups were performed using the Fisher’s exact test. Statistical comparisons of maximum and median parasitaemia between genotype groups were performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test, and post-hoc Dunn’s test for pairwise differences between the genotype groups.

Time to treatment was longer in Dantu variant carriers.

The impact of each gene variant on time to treatment was analysed by (a) Kaplan–Meier survival curves, with univariate comparisons across genotype groups performed using the Log-Rank test and (b) multivariate Cox regression models, with each variant genotype coded as zero, one, or two copies of the homozygous derived allele in an additive model, adjusting for the other four malaria-protective variants, anti-schizont antibody concentration, and location of residence. Pairwise analysis compared the time to treatment in the heterozygous- and homozygous-derived genotypes to the homozygous reference genotype.

Tables

Table 1
The proportion of participants reaching the pre-defined treatment parasitaemia threshold of 500 parasites/μl by genotype category.
VariantGenotypen/N%p value overallp value homozygous reference vs. heterozygousp value homozygous reference vs. homozygous derived
Dantu rs186873296Non-Dantu (AA)25/11122.50.010.0041
Heterozygous (AG)0/270.0
Dantu homozygous (GG)0/30.0
G6PD +202 rs1050828Homozygous reference (C/CC)20/11018.20.5050.7390.463
Heterozygous (CT)4/1723.5
Homozygous derived (T/TT)1/156.7
ABO rs8176719Non-O13/6420.30.5170.517-
O12/7516.0
α-thalassaemiaHomozygous reference (αα/αα)6/4812.50.4080.3280.29
Heterozygous (−α/αα)14/7020.0
Homozygous derived (−α/−α)5/2123.8
ATP2B4 rs4951074Homozygous reference (GG)11/6217.70.87610.749
Heterozygous (AG)11/5719.3
Homozygous derived (AA)3/2313.0
  1. n = the number of participants that reached the pre-defined treatment threshold of 500 parasites/μl and were treated; N = the total number within each genotype category; αα/αα, no α-thalassaemia; −α/αα, heterozygous α-thalassaemia; −α/−α, homozygous α-thalassaemia. * For G6PD, male and female were combined as C/CC = normal (wild type hemizygous males and homozygous females), CT = carrier females, and T/TT = G6PD -deficient hemizygous males and homozygous females. We used the Fisher’s exact test to investigate differences in the proportions of individuals that reached the pre-defined treatment threshold of 500 parasites/μl, both for global comparisons across genotype groups, and for separate comparisons between genotype pairs, where the proportion of individuals that reached the treatment threshold of 500 parasites/μl in the heterozygous- and homozygous -derived genotypes were compared to the homozygous reference genotype.

Table 2
The numbers and frequencies of individuals who received treatment before day 21 by genotypic category.
VariantGenotypen/N%Overall p valueHomozygous reference vs. heterozygousHomozygous reference vs. homozygous derived
Dantu rs186873296Non-Dantu (AA)49/11144.10.100.130.26
Heterozygous (AG)7/2725.9
Dantu homozygous (GG)0/30.0
G6PD +202 rs1050828*Homozygous reference (C/CC)46/11041.80.281.000.16
Heterozygous (CT)7/1741.2
Homozygous derived (T/TT)3/1520.0
ABO rs8176719Non-O28/6443.80.39-0.39
O27/7536.0
α-thalassaemiaHomozygous reference (αα/αα)19/4839.60.790.850.79
Heterozygous (−α/αα)30/7042.9
Homozygous derived (−α/−α)7/2133.3
ATP2B4 rs4951074Homozygous reference (GG)26/6241.90.611.000.45
Heterozygous (AG)23/5740.4
Homozygous derived (AA)7/2330.4
Table 3
The association between each gene variant and the requirement for treatment after challenge.
Overall comparison across genotype groupsHomozygous reference vs. heterozygousHomozygous reference vs. homozygous derived
VariantOdds ratios95% CIp-valueOdds ratios95% CIp valueOdds ratios95% CIp value
Dantu rs1868732960.170.04–0.550.0070.200.04–0.830.0390NA – Inf0.990
G6PD +202 rs10508280.600.28–1.190.1571.710.41–6.590.4420.170.02–0.970.074
ABO rs81767190.400.15–1.030.0640.540.18–1.560.259---
α-thalassaemia0.910.46–1.730.7660.970.31–3.040.9570.870.18–3.220.758
ATP2B4 rs49510740.840.43–1.630.6190.530.17–1.580.2660.570.10–2.580.491
Author response table 1
Dantu genotype groupBelow 500 parasites/ulAbove 500 parasites/ulSum
Non-Dantu (AA)8625111
Dantu Heterozygote (AG)27027
Dantu Homozygote303

Additional files

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Silvia N Kariuki
  2. Alexander W Macharia
  3. Johnstone Makale
  4. Wilfred Nyamu
  5. Stephen L Hoffman
  6. Melissa C Kapulu
  7. Philip Bejon
  8. Julian C Rayner
  9. Thomas N Williams
  10. On behalf of for the CHMI-SIKA Study Team
(2023)
The Dantu blood group prevents parasite growth in vivo: Evidence from a controlled human malaria infection study
eLife 12:e83874.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83874