Sensory experience controls dendritic structure and behavior by distinct pathways involving degenerins

  1. Sharon Inberg
  2. Yael Iosilevskii
  3. Alba Calatayud-Sanchez
  4. Hagar Setty
  5. Meital Oren-Suissa
  6. Michael Krieg
  7. Benjamin Podbilewicz  Is a corresponding author
  1. Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Israel
  2. Institute of Photonic Sciences, Spain
  3. Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel

Abstract

Dendrites are crucial for receiving information into neurons. Sensory experience affects the structure of these tree-like neurites, which, it is assumed, modifies neuronal function, yet the evidence is scarce, and the mechanisms are unknown. To study whether sensory experience affects dendritic morphology, we use the Caenorhabditis elegans' arborized nociceptor PVD neurons, under natural mechanical stimulation induced by physical contacts between individuals. We found that mechanosensory signals induced by conspecifics and by glass beads affect the dendritic structure of the PVD. Moreover, developmentally isolated animals show a decrease in their ability to respond to harsh touch. The structural and behavioral plasticity following sensory deprivation are functionally independent of each other and are mediated by an array of evolutionarily conserved mechanosensory amiloride-sensitive epithelial sodium channels (degenerins). Calcium imaging of the PVD neurons in a micromechanical device revealed that controlled mechanical stimulation of the body wall produces similar calcium dynamics in both isolated and crowded animals. Our genetic results, supported by optogenetic, behavioral, and pharmacological evidence, suggest an activity-dependent homeostatic mechanism for dendritic structural plasticity, that in parallel controls escape response to noxious mechanosensory stimuli.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file. Strains, plasmids and other reagents are available upon request .

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sharon Inberg

    Department of Biology, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Yael Iosilevskii

    Department of Biology, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Alba Calatayud-Sanchez

    Institute of Photonic Sciences, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Hagar Setty

    Department of Brain Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Meital Oren-Suissa

    Department of Brain Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Michael Krieg

    Institute of Photonic Sciences, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Benjamin Podbilewicz

    Department of Biology, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
    For correspondence
    podbilew@technion.ac.il
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0411-4182

Funding

Israel Science Foundation (442/12)

  • Benjamin Podbilewicz

Israel Science Foundation (257/17)

  • Benjamin Podbilewicz

Adelis Fund (2023479)

  • Benjamin Podbilewicz

Ministry of Science and Technology, Israel (3-13022)

  • Benjamin Podbilewicz

MCIN /AEI /10.13039/501100011033 / FEDER, UE (PID2021-123812OB-I00)

  • Michael Krieg

MCIN /AEI /10.13039/501100011033 / FEDER, UE (CNS2022-135906)

  • Michael Krieg

Human Frontier Science Program (RGP021/2023)

  • Michael Krieg

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2025, Inberg et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 909
    views
  • 130
    downloads
  • 2
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Sharon Inberg
  2. Yael Iosilevskii
  3. Alba Calatayud-Sanchez
  4. Hagar Setty
  5. Meital Oren-Suissa
  6. Michael Krieg
  7. Benjamin Podbilewicz
(2025)
Sensory experience controls dendritic structure and behavior by distinct pathways involving degenerins
eLife 14:e83973.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83973

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83973

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Phillip P Witkowski, Lindsay JH Rondot ... Erie Boorman
    Research Article

    Adaptive behavior in complex environments critically relies on the ability to appropriately link specific choices or actions to their outcomes. However, the neural mechanisms that support the ability to credit only those past choices believed to have caused the observed outcomes remain unclear. Here, we leverage multivariate pattern analyses of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data and an adaptive learning task to shed light on the underlying neural mechanisms of such specific credit assignment. We find that the lateral orbitofrontal cortex (lOFC) and hippocampus (HC) code for the causal choice identity when credit needs to be assigned for choices that are separated from outcomes by a long delay, even when this delayed transition is punctuated by interim decisions. Further, we show when interim decisions must be made, learning is additionally supported by lateral frontopolar cortex (lFPC). Our results indicate that lFPC holds previous causal choices in a ‘pending’ state until a relevant outcome is observed, and the fidelity of these representations predicts the fidelity of subsequent causal choice representations in lOFC and HC during credit assignment. Together, these results highlight the importance of the timely reinstatement of specific causes in lOFC and HC in learning choice-outcome relationships when delays and choices intervene, a critical component of real-world learning and decision making.

    1. Neuroscience
    Lauren J Kreeger, Suraj Honnuraiah ... Lisa Goodrich
    Research Article

    Animals navigate the auditory world by recognizing complex sounds, from the rustle of a predator to the call of a potential mate. This ability depends in part on the octopus cells of the auditory brainstem, which respond to multiple frequencies that change over time, as occurs in natural stimuli. Unlike the average neuron, which integrates inputs over time on the order of tens of milliseconds, octopus cells must detect momentary coincidence of excitatory inputs from the cochlea during an ongoing sound on both the millisecond and submillisecond time scale. Here, we show that octopus cells receive inhibitory inputs on their dendrites that enhance opportunities for coincidence detection in the cell body, thereby allowing for responses both to rapid onsets at the beginning of a sound and to frequency modulations during the sound. This mechanism is crucial for the fundamental process of integrating the synchronized frequencies of natural auditory signals over time.