Using light and X-ray scattering to untangle complex neuronal orientations and validate diffusion MRI

  1. Miriam Menzel  Is a corresponding author
  2. David Gräßel
  3. Ivan Rajkovic
  4. Michael M Zeineh
  5. Marios Georgiadis  Is a corresponding author
  1. Delft University of Technology, Netherlands
  2. Forschungszentrum Jülich, Germany
  3. SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, United States
  4. Stanford Medicine, United States

Abstract

Disentangling human brain connectivity requires an accurate description of nerve fiber trajectories, unveiled via detailed mapping of axonal orientations. However, this is challenging because axons can cross one another on a micrometer scale. Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) can be used to infer axonal connectivity because it is sensitive to axonal alignment, but it has limited spatial resolution and specificity. Scattered light imaging (SLI) and small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) reveal axonal orientations with microscopic resolution and high specificity, respectively. Here, we apply both scattering techniques on the same samples and cross-validate them, laying the groundwork for ground-truth axonal orientation imaging and validating dMRI. We evaluate brain regions that include unidirectional and crossing fibers in human and vervet monkey brain sections. SLI and SAXS quantitatively agree regarding in-plane fiber orientations including crossings, while dMRI agrees in the majority of voxels with small discrepancies. We further use SAXS and dMRI to confirm theoretical predictions regarding SLI determination of through-plane fiber orientations. Scattered light and X-ray imaging can provide quantitative micrometer 3D fiber orientations with high resolution and specificity, facilitating detailed investigations of complex fiber architecture in the animal and human brain.

Data availability

All data generated and analyzed in this study are included in the manuscript and supporting figures. The corresponding high-resolution images and parameter maps have been deposited in Zenodo under DOI:10.5281/zenodo.7208998.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Miriam Menzel

    Department of Imaging Physics, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
    For correspondence
    m.menzel@tudelft.nl
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6042-7490
  2. David Gräßel

    Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine INM-1, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3228-8048
  3. Ivan Rajkovic

    Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Michael M Zeineh

    Department of Radiology, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Marios Georgiadis

    Department of Radiology, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, United States
    For correspondence
    mariosg@stanford.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Helmholtz Association (Supercomputing and Modeling for the Human Brain)

  • Miriam Menzel

Helmholtz Association (Helmholtz Doctoral Prize 2019)

  • Miriam Menzel

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (Human Brain Project SGA3,945539)

  • Miriam Menzel
  • David Gräßel

Klaus Tschira Stiftung (Klaus Tschira Boost Fund)

  • Miriam Menzel

National Institutes of Health (R01AG061120-01)

  • Michael M Zeineh

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Amy FD Howard, University of Oxford, United Kingdom

Ethics

Animal experimentation: The vervet monkey brain tissue was obtained in accordance with the Wake Forest Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC #A11-219). Euthanasia procedures conformed to the AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals. All animal procedures were in accordance with the National Institutes of Health guidelines for the use and care of laboratory animals and in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines.

Human subjects: The human brain tissue was obtained from the Stanford ADRC Biobank, which follows procedures of the Stanford Medicine IRB-approved protocol #33727, including a written informed brain donation consent of the subject or their next of kin or legal representative.

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: October 4, 2022 (view preprint)
  2. Received: October 7, 2022
  3. Accepted: May 2, 2023
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: May 11, 2023 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: June 6, 2023 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2023, Menzel et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 883
    views
  • 161
    downloads
  • 2
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Miriam Menzel
  2. David Gräßel
  3. Ivan Rajkovic
  4. Michael M Zeineh
  5. Marios Georgiadis
(2023)
Using light and X-ray scattering to untangle complex neuronal orientations and validate diffusion MRI
eLife 12:e84024.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84024

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84024

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Zilu Liang, Simeng Wu ... Chao Liu
    Research Article

    People form impressions about others during daily social encounters and infer personality traits from others' behaviors. Such trait inference is thought to rely on two universal dimensions: competence and warmth. These two dimensions can be used to construct a ‘social cognitive map’ organizing massive information obtained from social encounters efficiently. Originating from spatial cognition, the neural codes supporting the representation and navigation of spatial cognitive maps have been widely studied. Recent studies suggest similar neural mechanism subserves the map-like architecture in social cognition as well. Here we investigated how spatial codes operate beyond the physical environment and support the representation and navigation of social cognitive map. We designed a social value space defined by two dimensions of competence and warmth. Behaviorally, participants were able to navigate to a learned location from random starting locations in this abstract social space. At the neural level, we identified the representation of distance in the precuneus, fusiform gyrus, and middle occipital gyrus. We also found partial evidence of grid-like representation patterns in the medial prefrontal cortex and entorhinal cortex. Moreover, the intensity of grid-like response scaled with the performance of navigating in social space and social avoidance trait scores. Our findings suggest a neurocognitive mechanism by which social information can be organized into a structured representation, namely cognitive map and its relevance to social well-being.

    1. Neuroscience
    Alina Tetereva, Narun Pat
    Research Article

    One well-known biomarker candidate that supposedly helps capture fluid cognition is Brain Age, or a predicted value based on machine-learning models built to predict chronological age from brain MRI. To formally evaluate the utility of Brain Age for capturing fluid cognition, we built 26 age-prediction models for Brain Age based on different combinations of MRI modalities, using the Human Connectome Project in Aging (n=504, 36–100 years old). First, based on commonality analyses, we found a large overlap between Brain Age and chronological age: Brain Age could uniquely add only around 1.6% in explaining variation in fluid cognition over and above chronological age. Second, the age-prediction models that performed better at predicting chronological age did NOT necessarily create better Brain Age for capturing fluid cognition over and above chronological age. Instead, better-performing age-prediction models created Brain Age that overlapped larger with chronological age, up to around 29% out of 32%, in explaining fluid cognition. Third, Brain Age missed around 11% of the total variation in fluid cognition that could have been explained by the brain variation. That is, directly predicting fluid cognition from brain MRI data (instead of relying on Brain Age and chronological age) could lead to around a 1/3-time improvement of the total variation explained. Accordingly, we demonstrated the limited utility of Brain Age as a biomarker for fluid cognition and made some suggestions to ensure the utility of Brain Age in explaining fluid cognition and other phenotypes of interest.