Abstract

The voltage-gated sodium (NaV) channel NaV1.7 has been identified as a potential novel analgesic target due to its involvement in human pain syndromes. However, clinically available NaV channel blocking drugs are not selective among the nine NaV channel subtypes, NaV1.1-NaV1.9. Moreover, the two currently known classes of NaV1.7 subtype-selective inhibitors (aryl- and acylsulfonamides) have undesirable characteristics that may limit their development. To this point understanding of the structure-activity relationships of the acylsulfonamide class of NaV1.7 inhibitors, exemplified by the clinical development candidate GDC-0310, has been based solely on a single co-crystal structure of an arylsulfonamide inhibitor bound to voltage-sensing domain 4 (VSD4). To advance inhibitor design targeting the NaV1.7 channel, we pursued high-resolution ligand-bound NaV1.7-VSD4 structures using cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM). Here, we report that GDC-0310 engages the NaV1.7-VSD4 through an unexpected binding mode orthogonal to the arylsulfonamide inhibitor class binding pose, which identifies a previously unknown ligand binding site in NaV channels. This finding enabled the design of a novel hybrid inhibitor series that bridges the aryl- and acylsulfonamide binding pockets and allows for the generation of molecules with substantially differentiated structures and properties. Overall, our study highlights the power of cryo-EM methods to pursue challenging drug targets using iterative and high-resolution structure-guided inhibitor design This work also underscores an important role of the membrane bilayer in the optimization of selective NaV channel modulators targeting VSD4.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. The NaV1.7-NaVPas/GNE-3565 coordinates and cryo-EM maps were deposited in the PDB entry ID 8F0R and EMDB entry ID EMD-28778, respectively. The NaV1.7-NaVPas/GDC-0310 coordinates and cryo-EM maps were deposited in the PDB entry ID 8F0Q and EMDB entry ID EMD-28777, respectively. The NaV1.7-NaVPas bound to the hybrid molecule 2 (GNE-9296) coordinates and cryo-EM maps were deposited in the PDB entry ID 8F0S and EMDB entry ID EMD-28779, respectively. The NaV1.7-NaVPas bound to the hybrid molecule 4 (GNE-1305) coordinates and cryo-EM maps were deposited in the PDB entry ID 8F0P and EMDB entry ID EMD-28776, respectively.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Marc Kschonsak

    Structural Biology, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Christine C Jao

    Structural Biology, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Christopher P Arthur

    Structural Biology, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Alexis L Rohou

    Structural Biology, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Philippe Bergeron

    Discovery Chemistry, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Daniel F Ortwine

    Discovery Chemistry, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Steven J McKerrall

    Discovery Chemistry, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. David H Hackos

    Neuroscience, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Lunbin Deng

    Neuroscience, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Jun Chen

    Biochemical and Cellular Pharmacology, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Tianbo Li

    Biochemical and Cellular Pharmacology, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    Tianbo Li, Genentech employee.
  12. Peter S Dragovich

    Discovery Chemistry, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Matthew Volgraf

    Discovery Chemistry, Genentech, Inc, South San Francsico, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Matthew R Wright

    Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Jian Payandeh

    Structural Biology, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, United States
    For correspondence
    jpayandeh@exelixis.com
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. Claudio Ciferri

    Structural Biology, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, United States
    For correspondence
    ciferri.claudio@gene.com
    Competing interests
    Claudio Ciferri, MK, CCJ, ALR, DFO, DHH, LD, JC, PSD, MW, CC and JCT are Genentech employees. All authors declare no competing financial interest..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0804-2411
  17. John C Tellis

    Discovery Chemistry, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, United States
    For correspondence
    tellis.john@gene.com
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

Funding

Genentech

  • Marc Kschonsak
  • Christine C Jao
  • Christopher P Arthur
  • Alexis L Rohou
  • Philippe Bergeron
  • Daniel F Ortwine
  • Steven J McKerrall
  • David H Hackos
  • Lunbin Deng
  • Jun Chen
  • Tianbo Li
  • Matthew Volgraf
  • Matthew R Wright
  • Jian Payandeh
  • Claudio Ciferri
  • John C Tellis

N/A

Reviewing Editor

  1. Jon T Sack, University of California, Davis, United States

Version history

  1. Received: October 12, 2022
  2. Preprint posted: November 10, 2022 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: March 27, 2023
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: March 28, 2023 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: April 18, 2023 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2023, Kschonsak et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,134
    views
  • 502
    downloads
  • 5
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Marc Kschonsak
  2. Christine C Jao
  3. Christopher P Arthur
  4. Alexis L Rohou
  5. Philippe Bergeron
  6. Daniel F Ortwine
  7. Steven J McKerrall
  8. David H Hackos
  9. Lunbin Deng
  10. Jun Chen
  11. Tianbo Li
  12. Peter S Dragovich
  13. Matthew Volgraf
  14. Matthew R Wright
  15. Jian Payandeh
  16. Claudio Ciferri
  17. John C Tellis
(2023)
Cryo-EM reveals an unprecedented binding site for NaV1.7 inhibitors enabling rational design of potent hybrid inhibitors
eLife 12:e84151.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84151

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84151

Further reading

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Sebastian Jojoa-Cruz, Adrienne E Dubin ... Andrew B Ward
    Research Advance

    The dimeric two-pore OSCA/TMEM63 family has recently been identified as mechanically activated ion channels. Previously, based on the unique features of the structure of OSCA1.2, we postulated the potential involvement of several structural elements in sensing membrane tension (Jojoa-Cruz et al., 2018). Interestingly, while OSCA1, 2, and 3 clades are activated by membrane stretch in cell-attached patches (i.e. they are stretch-activated channels), they differ in their ability to transduce membrane deformation induced by a blunt probe (poking). Here, in an effort to understand the domains contributing to mechanical signal transduction, we used cryo-electron microscopy to solve the structure of Arabidopsis thaliana (At) OSCA3.1, which, unlike AtOSCA1.2, only produced stretch- but not poke-activated currents in our initial characterization (Murthy et al., 2018). Mutagenesis and electrophysiological assessment of conserved and divergent putative mechanosensitive features of OSCA1.2 reveal a selective disruption of the macroscopic currents elicited by poking without considerable effects on stretch-activated currents (SAC). Our results support the involvement of the amphipathic helix and lipid-interacting residues in the membrane fenestration in the response to poking. Our findings position these two structural elements as potential sources of functional diversity within the family.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Tien M Phan, Young C Kim ... Jeetain Mittal
    Research Article

    The heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) family is a crucial component of heterochromatin with diverse functions in gene regulation, cell cycle control, and cell differentiation. In humans, there are three paralogs, HP1α, HP1β, and HP1γ, which exhibit remarkable similarities in their domain architecture and sequence properties. Nevertheless, these paralogs display distinct behaviors in liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS), a process linked to heterochromatin formation. Here, we employ a coarse-grained simulation framework to uncover the sequence features responsible for the observed differences in LLPS. We highlight the significance of the net charge and charge patterning along the sequence in governing paralog LLPS propensities. We also show that both highly conserved folded and less-conserved disordered domains contribute to the observed differences. Furthermore, we explore the potential co-localization of different HP1 paralogs in multicomponent assemblies and the impact of DNA on this process. Importantly, our study reveals that DNA can significantly reshape the stability of a minimal condensate formed by HP1 paralogs due to competitive interactions of HP1α with HP1β and HP1γ versus DNA. In conclusion, our work highlights the physicochemical nature of interactions that govern the distinct phase-separation behaviors of HP1 paralogs and provides a molecular framework for understanding their role in chromatin organization.