Multimodal mapping of cell types and projections in the central nucleus of the amygdala

  1. Yuhan Wang
  2. Sabine Krabbe
  3. Mark Eddison
  4. Fredrick E Henry
  5. Greg Fleishman
  6. Andrew L Lemire
  7. Lihua Wang
  8. Wyatt Korff
  9. Paul W Tillberg
  10. Andreas Lüthi
  11. Scott Sternson  Is a corresponding author
  1. Janelia Research Campus, United States
  2. German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Germany
  3. Friedrich Miescher Institute, Switzerland
  4. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, San Diego, United States

Abstract

The central nucleus of the amygdala (CEA) is a brain region that integrates external and internal sensory information and executes innate and adaptive behaviors through distinct output pathways. Despite its complex functions, the diversity of molecularly defined neuronal types in the CEA and their contributions to major axonal projection targets have not been examined systematically. Here, we performed single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-Seq) to classify molecularly defined cell types in the CEA and identified marker genes to map the location of these neuronal types using expansion asisted iterative fluorescence in situ hybridization (EASI-FISH). We developed new methods to integrate EASI-FISH with 5-plex retrograde axonal labeling to determine the spatial, morphological, and connectivity properties of ~30,000 molecularly defined CEA neurons. Our study revealed spatio-molecular organization of the CEA, with medial and lateral CEA associated with distinct molecularly defined cell families. We also found a long-range axon projection network from the CEA, where target regions receive inputs from multiple molecularly defined cell types. Axon collateralization was found primarily among projections to hindbrain targets, which are distinct from forebrain projections. This resource reports marker gene combinations for molecularly defined cell types and axon-projection types, which will be useful for selective interrogation of these neuronal populations to study their contributions to the diverse functions of the CEA.

Data availability

All data generated in this study have been deposited at figshare (https://figshare.com/s/a031a8dfca1b4d25d3de). We also provide an interactive data portal for data visualization at http://multifish-data.janelia.org/. The single-cell RNA-seq dataset generated in this study has been deposited to GEO (Gene Expression Omnibus, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) with accession number GSE213828. Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the lead contacts upon request.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Yuhan Wang

    Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4447-5043
  2. Sabine Krabbe

    German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Mark Eddison

    Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Fredrick E Henry

    Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Greg Fleishman

    Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Andrew L Lemire

    Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0624-3789
  7. Lihua Wang

    Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Wyatt Korff

    Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8396-1533
  9. Paul W Tillberg

    Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2568-2365
  10. Andreas Lüthi

    Friedrich Miescher Institute, Basel, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Scott Sternson

    Department of Neurosciences, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
    For correspondence
    ssternson@health.ucsd.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0835-444X

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • Scott Sternson

Dementia Research Switzerland

  • Sabine Krabbe

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All methods for animal care and use were conducted according to National Institutes of Health guidelines for animal research and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at Janelia Research Campus (Protocol number: 19-174).

Copyright

© 2023, Wang et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,662
    views
  • 946
    downloads
  • 20
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Yuhan Wang
  2. Sabine Krabbe
  3. Mark Eddison
  4. Fredrick E Henry
  5. Greg Fleishman
  6. Andrew L Lemire
  7. Lihua Wang
  8. Wyatt Korff
  9. Paul W Tillberg
  10. Andreas Lüthi
  11. Scott Sternson
(2023)
Multimodal mapping of cell types and projections in the central nucleus of the amygdala
eLife 12:e84262.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84262

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84262

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Jing Li, Chao Ning ... Chuan Zhou
    Research Article

    Female sexual receptivity is essential for reproduction of a species. Neuropeptides play the main role in regulating female receptivity. However, whether neuropeptides regulate female sexual receptivity during the neurodevelopment is unknown. Here, we found the peptide hormone prothoracicotropic hormone (PTTH), which belongs to the insect PG (prothoracic gland) axis, negatively regulated virgin female receptivity through ecdysone during neurodevelopment in Drosophila melanogaster. We identified PTTH neurons as doublesex-positive neurons, they regulated virgin female receptivity before the metamorphosis during the third-instar larval stage. PTTH deletion resulted in the increased EcR-A expression in the whole newly formed prepupae. Furthermore, the ecdysone receptor EcR-A in pC1 neurons positively regulated virgin female receptivity during metamorphosis. The decreased EcR-A in pC1 neurons induced abnormal morphological development of pC1 neurons without changing neural activity. Among all subtypes of pC1 neurons, the function of EcR-A in pC1b neurons was necessary for virgin female copulation rate. These suggested that the changes of synaptic connections between pC1b and other neurons decreased female copulation rate. Moreover, female receptivity significantly decreased when the expression of PTTH receptor Torso was reduced in pC1 neurons. This suggested that PTTH not only regulates female receptivity through ecdysone but also through affecting female receptivity associated neurons directly. The PG axis has similar functional strategy as the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis in mammals to trigger the juvenile–adult transition. Our work suggests a general mechanism underlying which the neurodevelopment during maturation regulates female sexual receptivity.

    1. Neuroscience
    Yoav Ger, Moni Shahar, Nitzan Shahar
    Research Article

    Theoretical computational models are widely used to describe latent cognitive processes. However, these models do not equally explain data across participants, with some individuals showing a bigger predictive gap than others. In the current study, we examined the use of theory-independent models, specifically recurrent neural networks (RNNs), to classify the source of a predictive gap in the observed data of a single individual. This approach aims to identify whether the low predictability of behavioral data is mainly due to noisy decision-making or misspecification of the theoretical model. First, we used computer simulation in the context of reinforcement learning to demonstrate that RNNs can be used to identify model misspecification in simulated agents with varying degrees of behavioral noise. Specifically, both prediction performance and the number of RNN training epochs (i.e., the point of early stopping) can be used to estimate the amount of stochasticity in the data. Second, we applied our approach to an empirical dataset where the actions of low IQ participants, compared with high IQ participants, showed lower predictability by a well-known theoretical model (i.e., Daw’s hybrid model for the two-step task). Both the predictive gap and the point of early stopping of the RNN suggested that model misspecification is similar across individuals. This led us to a provisional conclusion that low IQ subjects are mostly noisier compared to their high IQ peers, rather than being more misspecified by the theoretical model. We discuss the implications and limitations of this approach, considering the growing literature in both theoretical and data-driven computational modeling in decision-making science.