Dynamics of co-substrate pools can constrain and regulate metabolic fluxes

  1. Robert West
  2. Hadrien Delattre
  3. Elad Noor
  4. Elisenda Feliu  Is a corresponding author
  5. Orkun Soyer  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Warwick, United Kingdom
  2. Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel
  3. University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Abstract

Cycling of co-substrates, whereby a metabolite is converted among alternate forms via different reactions, is ubiquitous in metabolism. Several cycled co-substrates are well known as energy and electron carriers (e.g. ATP and NAD(P)H), but there are also other metabolites that act as cycled co-substrates in different parts of central metabolism. Here, we develop a mathematical framework to analyse the effect of co-substrate cycling on metabolic flux. In the cases of a single reaction and linear pathways, we find that co-substrate cycling imposes an additional flux limit on a reaction, distinct to the limit imposed by the kinetics of the primary enzyme catalysing that reaction. Using analytical methods, we show that this additional limit is a function of the total pool size and turnover rate of the cycled co-substrate. Expanding from this insight and using simulations, we show that regulation of these two parameters can allow regulation of flux dynamics in branched and coupled pathways. To support these theoretical insights, we analysed existing flux measurements and enzyme levels from the central carbon metabolism and identified several reactions that could be limited by the dynamics of co-substrate cycling. We discuss how the limitations imposed by co-substrate cycling provide experimentally testable hypotheses on specific metabolic phenotypes. We conclude that measuring and controlling co-substrate dynamics is crucial for understanding and engineering metabolic fluxes in cells.

Data availability

All data and models are made available via a dedicated repository (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7565439) and the following Github page: https://github.com/OSS-Lab/CoSubstrateDynamics/tree/v1.0.0

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Robert West

    School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Warwick, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Hadrien Delattre

    School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Warwick, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Elad Noor

    Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Elisenda Feliu

    Department of Mathematics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    For correspondence
    efeliu@math.ku.dk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7205-6511
  5. Orkun Soyer

    School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Warwick, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    O.Soyer@warwick.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9504-3796

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/T010150/1))

  • Robert West
  • Hadrien Delattre
  • Orkun Soyer

Novo Nordisk (F18OC0052483)

  • Elisenda Feliu

Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (GBMF9200)

  • Orkun Soyer

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2023, West et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 984
    views
  • 206
    downloads
  • 2
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Robert West
  2. Hadrien Delattre
  3. Elad Noor
  4. Elisenda Feliu
  5. Orkun Soyer
(2023)
Dynamics of co-substrate pools can constrain and regulate metabolic fluxes
eLife 12:e84379.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84379

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84379

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Saugat Poudel, Jason Hyun ... Bernhard O Palsson
    Research Article

    The Staphylococcus aureus clonal complex 8 (CC8) is made up of several subtypes with varying levels of clinical burden; from community-associated methicillin-resistant S. aureus USA300 strains to hospital-associated (HA-MRSA) USA500 strains and ancestral methicillin-susceptible (MSSA) strains. This phenotypic distribution within a single clonal complex makes CC8 an ideal clade to study the emergence of mutations important for antibiotic resistance and community spread. Gene-level analysis comparing USA300 against MSSA and HA-MRSA strains have revealed key horizontally acquired genes important for its rapid spread in the community. However, efforts to define the contributions of point mutations and indels have been confounded by strong linkage disequilibrium resulting from clonal propagation. To break down this confounding effect, we combined genetic association testing with a model of the transcriptional regulatory network (TRN) to find candidate mutations that may have led to changes in gene regulation. First, we used a De Bruijn graph genome-wide association study to enrich mutations unique to the USA300 lineages within CC8. Next, we reconstructed the TRN by using independent component analysis on 670 RNA-sequencing samples from USA300 and non-USA300 CC8 strains which predicted several genes with strain-specific altered expression patterns. Examination of the regulatory region of one of the genes enriched by both approaches, isdH, revealed a 38-bp deletion containing a Fur-binding site and a conserved single-nucleotide polymorphism which likely led to the altered expression levels in USA300 strains. Taken together, our results demonstrate the utility of reconstructed TRNs to address the limits of genetic approaches when studying emerging pathogenic strains.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    Masaaki Uematsu, Jeremy M Baskin
    Tools and Resources

    Plasmid construction is central to life science research, and sequence verification is arguably its costliest step. Long-read sequencing has emerged as a competitor to Sanger sequencing, with the principal benefit that whole plasmids can be sequenced in a single run. Nevertheless, the current cost of nanopore sequencing is still prohibitive for routine sequencing during plasmid construction. We develop a computational approach termed Simple Algorithm for Very Efficient Multiplexing of Oxford Nanopore Experiments for You (SAVEMONEY) that guides researchers to mix multiple plasmids and subsequently computationally de-mixes the resultant sequences. SAVEMONEY defines optimal mixtures in a pre-survey step, and following sequencing, executes a post-analysis workflow involving sequence classification, alignment, and consensus determination. By using Bayesian analysis with prior probability of expected plasmid construction error rate, high-confidence sequences can be obtained for each plasmid in the mixture. Plasmids differing by as little as two bases can be mixed as a single sample for nanopore sequencing, and routine multiplexing of even six plasmids per 180 reads can still maintain high accuracy of consensus sequencing. SAVEMONEY should further democratize whole-plasmid sequencing by nanopore and related technologies, driving down the effective cost of whole-plasmid sequencing to lower than that of a single Sanger sequencing run.