Formation and three-dimensional architecture of Leishmania adhesion in the sand fly vector

  1. Ryuji Yanase
  2. Flávia Moreira-Leite
  3. Edward Rea
  4. Lauren Wilburn
  5. Jovana Sádlová
  6. Barbora Vojtkova
  7. Katerina Pružinová
  8. Atsushi Taniguchi
  9. Shigenori Nonaka
  10. Petr Volf
  11. Jack D Sunter  Is a corresponding author
  1. Oxford Brookes University, United Kingdom
  2. Charles University, Czech Republic
  3. Hokkaido University, Japan
  4. National Institute for Basic Biology, Japan

Abstract

Attachment to a substrate to maintain position in a specific ecological niche is a common strategy across biology, especially for eukaryotic parasites. During development in the sand fly vector, the eukaryotic parasite Leishmania adheres to the stomodeal valve, as the specialised haptomonad form. Dissection of haptomonad adhesion is a critical step for understanding the complete life cycle of Leishmania. Nevertheless, haptomonad studies are limited, as this is a technically challenging life cycle form to investigate. Here, we have combined three-dimensional electron microscopy approaches, including serial block face scanning electron microscopy (SBFSEM) and serial tomography to dissect the organisation and architecture of haptomonads in the sand fly. We showed that the attachment plaque contains distinct structural elements. Using time-lapse light microscopy of in vitro haptomonad-like cells, we identified five stages of haptomonad-like cell differentiation, and showed that calcium is necessary for Leishmania adhesion to the surface in vitro. This study provides the structural and regulatory foundations of Leishmania adhesion,which are critical for a holistic understanding of the Leishmania life cycle.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ryuji Yanase

    Department of Biological and Medical Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9419-398X
  2. Flávia Moreira-Leite

    Department of Biological and Medical Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Edward Rea

    Department of Biological and Medical Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Lauren Wilburn

    Department of Biological and Medical Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Jovana Sádlová

    Department of Parasitology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Barbora Vojtkova

    Department of Parasitology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Katerina Pružinová

    Department of Parasitology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Atsushi Taniguchi

    Research Center of Mathematics for Social Creativity, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Shigenori Nonaka

    Laboratory for Spatiotemporal Regulations, National Institute for Basic Biology, Okazaki, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Petr Volf

    Department of Parasitology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1790-1123
  11. Jack D Sunter

    Department of Biological and Medical Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    jsunter@brookes.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2836-9622

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

  • Ryuji Yanase

National Institute for Basic Biology (20-515)

  • Ryuji Yanase

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (Infravec2)

  • Petr Volf

Wellcome Trust (221944/Z20/Z)

  • Jack D Sunter

European Regional Development Fund (CeRaViP)

  • Petr Volf

Czech Science Foundation (GACR 21-15700S)

  • Petr Volf

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2023, Yanase et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,439
    views
  • 170
    downloads
  • 17
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ryuji Yanase
  2. Flávia Moreira-Leite
  3. Edward Rea
  4. Lauren Wilburn
  5. Jovana Sádlová
  6. Barbora Vojtkova
  7. Katerina Pružinová
  8. Atsushi Taniguchi
  9. Shigenori Nonaka
  10. Petr Volf
  11. Jack D Sunter
(2023)
Formation and three-dimensional architecture of Leishmania adhesion in the sand fly vector
eLife 12:e84552.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84552

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84552

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Tomoharu Kanie, Beibei Liu ... Peter K Jackson
    Research Article

    Distal appendages are nine-fold symmetric blade-like structures attached to the distal end of the mother centriole. These structures are critical for formation of the primary cilium, by regulating at least four critical steps: ciliary vesicle recruitment, recruitment and initiation of intraflagellar transport (IFT), and removal of CP110. While specific proteins that localize to the distal appendages have been identified, how exactly each protein functions to achieve the multiple roles of the distal appendages is poorly understood. Here we comprehensively analyze known and newly discovered distal appendage proteins (CEP83, SCLT1, CEP164, TTBK2, FBF1, CEP89, KIZ, ANKRD26, PIDD1, LRRC45, NCS1, CEP15) for their precise localization, order of recruitment, and their roles in each step of cilia formation. Using CRISPR-Cas9 knockouts, we show that the order of the recruitment of the distal appendage proteins is highly interconnected and a more complex hierarchy. Our analysis highlights two protein modules, CEP83-SCLT1 and CEP164-TTBK2, as critical for structural assembly of distal appendages. Functional assays revealed that CEP89 selectively functions in RAB34+ ciliary vesicle recruitment, while deletion of the integral components, CEP83-SCLT1-CEP164-TTBK2, severely compromised all four steps of cilium formation. Collectively, our analyses provide a more comprehensive view of the organization and the function of the distal appendage, paving the way for molecular understanding of ciliary assembly.

    1. Cell Biology
    Tomoharu Kanie, Roy Ng ... Peter K Jackson
    Research Article

    The primary cilium is a microtubule-based organelle that cycles through assembly and disassembly. In many cell types, formation of the cilium is initiated by recruitment of ciliary vesicles to the distal appendage of the mother centriole. However, the distal appendage mechanism that directly captures ciliary vesicles is yet to be identified. In an accompanying paper, we show that the distal appendage protein, CEP89, is important for the ciliary vesicle recruitment, but not for other steps of cilium formation (Tomoharu Kanie, Love, Fisher, Gustavsson, & Jackson, 2023). The lack of a membrane binding motif in CEP89 suggests that it may indirectly recruit ciliary vesicles via another binding partner. Here, we identify Neuronal Calcium Sensor-1 (NCS1) as a stoichiometric interactor of CEP89. NCS1 localizes to the position between CEP89 and a ciliary vesicle marker, RAB34, at the distal appendage. This localization was completely abolished in CEP89 knockouts, suggesting that CEP89 recruits NCS1 to the distal appendage. Similarly to CEP89 knockouts, ciliary vesicle recruitment as well as subsequent cilium formation was perturbed in NCS1 knockout cells. The ability of NCS1 to recruit the ciliary vesicle is dependent on its myristoylation motif and NCS1 knockout cells expressing a myristoylation defective mutant failed to rescue the vesicle recruitment defect despite localizing properly to the centriole. In sum, our analysis reveals the first known mechanism for how the distal appendage recruits the ciliary vesicles.