Organelle proteomic profiling reveals lysosomal heterogeneity in association with longevity

  1. Yong Yu  Is a corresponding author
  2. Shihong M Gao
  3. Youchen Guan
  4. Pei-Wen Hu
  5. Qinghao Zhang
  6. Jiaming Liu
  7. Bentian Jing
  8. Qian Zhao
  9. David M Sabatini
  10. Monther Abu-Remaileh
  11. Sung Yun Jung
  12. Meng C Wang  Is a corresponding author
  1. Xiamen University, China
  2. Baylor College of Medicine, HHMI, United States
  3. Baylor College of Medicine, United States
  4. Independent, United States
  5. Stanford University, United States

Abstract

Lysosomes are active sites to integrate cellular metabolism and signal transduction. A collection of proteins associated with the lysosome mediate these metabolic and signaling functions. Both lysosomal metabolism and lysosomal signaling have been linked to longevity regulation; however, how lysosomes adjust their protein composition to accommodate this regulation remains unclear. Using deep proteomic profiling, we systemically profiled lysosome-associated proteins linked with four different longevity mechanisms. We discovered the lysosomal recruitment of AMPK and nucleoporin proteins and their requirements for longevity in response to increased lysosomal lipolysis. Through comparative proteomic analyses of lysosomes from different tissues and labeled with different markers, we further elucidated lysosomal heterogeneity across tissues as well as the increased enrichment of the Ragulator complex on Cystinosin positive lysosomes. Together, this work uncovers lysosomal proteome heterogeneity across multiple scales and provides resources for understanding the contribution of lysosomal protein dynamics to signal transduction, organelle crosstalk and organism longevity.

Data availability

The mass spectrometry data for protein identification have been deposited via the MASSIVE repository (MSV000090909) to the Proteome X change Consortium (http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org) with the dataset identifier PXD038865.Analysis code for Figure 6D, 6F and Figure 6-figure supplement 1 is included in the Supplementary code.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Yong Yu

    State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
    For correspondence
    yuy@xmu.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9821-9726
  2. Shihong M Gao

    Developmental Biology Graduate Program, Baylor College of Medicine, HHMI, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Youchen Guan

    Molecular and Cellular Biology Graduate Program, Baylor College of Medicine, HHMI, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Pei-Wen Hu

    Huffington Center on Aging, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Qinghao Zhang

    Huffington Center on Aging, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Jiaming Liu

    State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Bentian Jing

    State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Qian Zhao

    Huffington Center on Aging, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. David M Sabatini

    Independent, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Monther Abu-Remaileh

    Department of Chemical Engineering and Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Sung Yun Jung

    Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Meng C Wang

    Huffington Center on Aging, Baylor College of Medicine, HHMI, Houston, United States
    For correspondence
    wmeng@bcm.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5898-6007

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • Meng C Wang

National Natural Science Foundation of China (32071146)

  • Yong Yu

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2024, Yu et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,434
    views
  • 755
    downloads
  • 7
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Yong Yu
  2. Shihong M Gao
  3. Youchen Guan
  4. Pei-Wen Hu
  5. Qinghao Zhang
  6. Jiaming Liu
  7. Bentian Jing
  8. Qian Zhao
  9. David M Sabatini
  10. Monther Abu-Remaileh
  11. Sung Yun Jung
  12. Meng C Wang
(2024)
Organelle proteomic profiling reveals lysosomal heterogeneity in association with longevity
eLife 13:e85214.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85214

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85214

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Yajun Zhai, Peiyi Liu ... Gongzheng Hu
    Research Article

    Discovering new strategies to combat the multidrug-resistant bacteria constitutes a major medical challenge of our time. Previously, artesunate (AS) has been reported to exert antibacterial enhancement activity in combination with β-lactam antibiotics via inhibition of the efflux pump AcrB. However, combination of AS and colistin (COL) revealed a weak synergistic effect against a limited number of strains, and few studies have further explored its possible mechanism of synergistic action. In this article, we found that AS and EDTA could strikingly enhance the antibacterial effects of COL against mcr-1- and mcr-1+ Salmonella strains either in vitro or in vivo, when used in triple combination. The excellent bacteriostatic effect was primarily related to the increased cell membrane damage, accumulation of toxic compounds and inhibition of MCR-1. The potential binding sites of AS to MCR-1 (THR283, SER284, and TYR287) were critical for its inhibition of MCR-1 activity. Additionally, we also demonstrated that the CheA of chemosensory system and virulence-related protein SpvD were critical for the bacteriostatic synergistic effects of the triple combination. Selectively targeting CheA, SpvD, or MCR using the natural compound AS could be further investigated as an attractive strategy for the treatment of Salmonella infection. Collectively, our work opens new avenues toward the potentiation of COL and reveals an alternative drug combination strategy to overcome COL-resistant bacterial infections.

    1. Cell Biology
    Tamás Visnovitz, Dorina Lenzinger ... Edit I Buzas
    Short Report

    Recent studies showed an unexpected complexity of extracellular vesicle (EV) biogenesis pathways. We previously found evidence that human colorectal cancer cells in vivo release large multivesicular body-like structures en bloc. Here, we tested whether this large EV type is unique to colorectal cancer cells. We found that all cell types we studied (including different cell lines and cells in their original tissue environment) released multivesicular large EVs (MV-lEVs). We also demonstrated that upon spontaneous rupture of the limiting membrane of the MV-lEVs, their intraluminal vesicles (ILVs) escaped to the extracellular environment by a ‘torn bag mechanism’. We proved that the MV-lEVs were released by ectocytosis of amphisomes (hence, we termed them amphiectosomes). Both ILVs of amphiectosomes and small EVs separated from conditioned media were either exclusively CD63 or LC3B positive. According to our model, upon fusion of multivesicular bodies with autophagosomes, fragments of the autophagosomal inner membrane curl up to form LC3B positive ILVs of amphisomes, while CD63 positive small EVs are of multivesicular body origin. Our data suggest a novel common release mechanism for small EVs, distinct from the exocytosis of multivesicular bodies or amphisomes, as well as the small ectosome release pathway.