Continuous muscle, glial, epithelial, neuronal, and hemocyte cell lines for Drosophila research

  1. Nikki Coleman-Gosser
  2. Yanhui Hu
  3. Shiva Raghuvanshi
  4. Shane Stitzinger
  5. Weihang Chen
  6. Arthur Luhur
  7. Daniel Mariyappa
  8. Molly Josifov
  9. Andrew Zelhof
  10. Stephanie E Mohr
  11. Norbert Perrimon  Is a corresponding author
  12. Amanda Simcox  Is a corresponding author
  1. The Ohio State University, United States
  2. Harvard Medical School, United States
  3. Indiana University, United States
  4. Harvard Medical School, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, United States

Abstract

Expression of activated Ras, RasV12, provides Drosophila cultured cells with a proliferation and survival advantage that simplifies the generation of continuous cell lines. Here we used lineage restricted RasV12 expression to generate continuous cell lines of muscle, glial, and epithelial cell type. Additionally, cell lines with neuronal and hemocyte characteristics were isolated by cloning from cell cultures established with broad RasV12 expression. Differentiation with the hormone ecdysone caused maturation of cells from mesoderm lines into active muscle tissue and enhanced dendritic features in neuronal-like lines. Transcriptome analysis showed expression of key cell-type specific genes and the expected alignment with single cell sequencing and in situ data. Overall, the technique has produced in vitro cell models with characteristics of glia, epithelium, muscle, nerve, and hemocyte. The cells and associated data are available from the Drosophila Genomic Resource Center.

Data availability

Sequencing data have been deposited in GEO under accession code GSE219105.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Nikki Coleman-Gosser

    Department of Molecular Genetics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Yanhui Hu

    Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Shiva Raghuvanshi

    Department of Molecular Genetics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Shane Stitzinger

    Department of Molecular Genetics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Weihang Chen

    Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Arthur Luhur

    Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Daniel Mariyappa

    Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4775-1656
  8. Molly Josifov

    Department of Molecular Genetics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2899-7186
  9. Andrew Zelhof

    Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Stephanie E Mohr

    Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9639-7708
  11. Norbert Perrimon

    Harvard Medical School, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    perrimon@genetics.med.harvard.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7542-472X
  12. Amanda Simcox

    Department of Molecular Genetics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, United States
    For correspondence
    simcox.1@osu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5572-7042

Funding

National Institutes of Health Office of the Director (R24 OD019847)

  • Stephanie E Mohr
  • Norbert Perrimon
  • Amanda Simcox

National Institutes of Health (P40OD010949)

  • Andrew Zelhof

National Institutes of Health (P41 GM132087)

  • Andrew Zelhof

National Science Foundation (IOS 1419535)

  • Amanda Simcox

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • Norbert Perrimon

Women & Philanthropy at the Ohio State University (Grant)

  • Amanda Simcox

National Science Foundation (Support while serving at the National Science Foundation)

  • Amanda Simcox

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication. Any opinion, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 2,256
    views
  • 377
    downloads
  • 1
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Nikki Coleman-Gosser
  2. Yanhui Hu
  3. Shiva Raghuvanshi
  4. Shane Stitzinger
  5. Weihang Chen
  6. Arthur Luhur
  7. Daniel Mariyappa
  8. Molly Josifov
  9. Andrew Zelhof
  10. Stephanie E Mohr
  11. Norbert Perrimon
  12. Amanda Simcox
(2023)
Continuous muscle, glial, epithelial, neuronal, and hemocyte cell lines for Drosophila research
eLife 12:e85814.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85814

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85814

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Bhumil Patel, Maryke Grobler ... Needhi Bhalla
    Research Article

    Meiotic crossover recombination is essential for both accurate chromosome segregation and the generation of new haplotypes for natural selection to act upon. This requirement is known as crossover assurance and is one example of crossover control. While the conserved role of the ATPase, PCH-2, during meiotic prophase has been enigmatic, a universal phenotype when pch-2 or its orthologs are mutated is a change in the number and distribution of meiotic crossovers. Here, we show that PCH-2 controls the number and distribution of crossovers by antagonizing their formation. This antagonism produces different effects at different stages of meiotic prophase: early in meiotic prophase, PCH-2 prevents double-strand breaks from becoming crossover-eligible intermediates, limiting crossover formation at sites of initial double-strand break formation and homolog interactions. Later in meiotic prophase, PCH-2 winnows the number of crossover-eligible intermediates, contributing to the designation of crossovers and ultimately, crossover assurance. We also demonstrate that PCH-2 accomplishes this regulation through the meiotic HORMAD, HIM-3. Our data strongly support a model in which PCH-2’s conserved role is to remodel meiotic HORMADs throughout meiotic prophase to destabilize crossover-eligible precursors and coordinate meiotic recombination with synapsis, ensuring the progressive implementation of meiotic recombination and explaining its function in the pachytene checkpoint and crossover control.

    1. Cell Biology
    Jingjing Li, Xinyue Wang ... Vincent Archambault
    Research Article

    In animals, mitosis involves the breakdown of the nucleus. The reassembly of a nucleus after mitosis requires the reformation of the nuclear envelope around a single mass of chromosomes. This process requires Ankle2 (also known as LEM4 in humans) which interacts with PP2A and promotes the function of the Barrier-to-Autointegration Factor (BAF). Upon dephosphorylation, BAF dimers cross-bridge chromosomes and bind lamins and transmembrane proteins of the reassembling nuclear envelope. How Ankle2 functions in mitosis is incompletely understood. Using a combination of approaches in Drosophila, along with structural modeling, we provide several lines of evidence that suggest that Ankle2 is a regulatory subunit of PP2A, explaining how it promotes BAF dephosphorylation. In addition, we discovered that Ankle2 interacts with the endoplasmic reticulum protein Vap33, which is required for Ankle2 localization at the reassembling nuclear envelope during telophase. We identified the interaction sites of PP2A and Vap33 on Ankle2. Through genetic rescue experiments, we show that the Ankle2/PP2A interaction is essential for the function of Ankle2 in nuclear reassembly and that the Ankle2/Vap33 interaction also promotes this process. Our study sheds light on the molecular mechanisms of post-mitotic nuclear reassembly and suggests that the endoplasmic reticulum is not merely a source of membranes in the process, but also provides localized enzymatic activity.