Antisense, but not sense, repeat expanded RNAs activate PKR/eIF2α-dependent ISR in C9ORF72 FTD/ALS

  1. Janani Parameswaran
  2. Nancy Zhang
  3. Elke Braems
  4. Kedamawit Tilahun
  5. Devesh C Pant
  6. Keena Yin
  7. Seneshaw Asress
  8. Kara Heeren
  9. Anwesha Banerjee
  10. Emma Davis
  11. Samantha L Schwartz
  12. Graeme L Conn
  13. Gary J Bassell
  14. Ludo Van Den Bosch
  15. Jie Jiang  Is a corresponding author
  1. Department of Cell Biology, Emory University, United States
  2. Department of Neurosciences, Experimental Neurology and Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Belgium
  3. Center for Brain & Disease Research, Laboratory of Neurobiology, VIB, Campus Gasthuisberg, Belgium
  4. Department of Neurology, Emory University, United States
  5. Department of Biochemistry, Emory University, United States
8 figures, 1 table and 1 additional file

Figures

Figure 1 with 2 supplements
C9ORF72 antisense C4G2 expanded repeats activate PKR/eIF2α-dependent integrated stress response and cause neuronal toxicity.

(A) Schematic illustration of the in_(C4G2)75 repeat construct including 6× stop codons, 450 bp of human intronic sequences at the N-terminus and 3× protein tags at the C- terminus of the repeats to monitor the DPR proteins in each frame. (B) Representative images of antisense RNA foci in HEK293T cells and in primary cortical neurons expressing in_(C4G2)75 detected by RNA FISH. Red, foci; blue, DAPI; magenta, MAP2. (C) Kaplan–Meier curves showing increased risk of cell death in in_(C4G2)75-expressing primary cortical neurons compared with neurons expressing 2 repeats. Statistical analyses were performed using Mantel–Cox test (replicated three times with similar results). (D, E) Immunoblotting analysis of phosphorylated PKR (p-PKR) and total PKR in HEK293T cells expressing in_(C4G2)75 or 2 repeats. p-PKR levels were detected using anti-p-PKR (T446) and normalized to total PKR. GAPDH was used as a loading control. Error bars represent SD (n = 3 independent experiments). Statistical analyses were performed using Student’s t-test. (F, G) Immunoblotting analysis of phosphorylated eIF2α (p-eIF2α) and total eIF2α in HEK293T cells expressing in_(C4G2)75 or 2 repeats. p-eIF2α levels were detected using anti-phosphor eIF2α (Ser51) and normalized to total eIF2α. GAPDH was used as a loading control. Error bars represent SD (n = 3 independent experiments). Statistical analyses were performed using Student’s t-test. (H, I) Immunoblotting analysis of p-PKR and p-eIF2α in HEK293T cells expressing in_(C4G2)75, with or without co-expression of wild type PKR, or treatment of a PKR inhibitor, C16. Error bars represent SD (n = 3 independent experiments). Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. Scale bars: 10 µm (neurons), 20 µm (HEK293T).

Figure 1—figure supplement 1
C9ORF72 C4G2 repeat expanded repeats produce antisense DPR proteins in HEK293T cells and primary neurons.

(A) Representative images of DPR protein staining in HEK293T expressing in_(C4G2)75 repeats using DPR antibodies. Red, GP, PA, and PR; blue, DAPI. (B) Immunoblotting of DPR proteins in HEK293T expressing in_(C4G2)75 repeats using TAG antibodies. GAPDH was used as a loading control. (C) Representative images of DPR protein staining in primary neurons expressing in_(C4G2)75 repeats using DPR antibodies. Red, GP, PA, and PR; blue, DAPI; MAP2, magenta. Scale bars, 10 µm (neurons), 20 µm (HEK293T).

Figure 1—figure supplement 2
C9ORF72 C4G2 repeat expanded repeats activate PKR/eIF2α-dependent integrated stress response in SH-SY5Y cells.

(A) Immunoblotting of p-PERK in HEK293T cells expressing in_(C4G2)75 or (C4G2)2 repeats. Phosphorylated PERK levels were quantified and normalized to total PERK. GAPDH was used as a loading control. Error bars represent SD (n = 2 independent experiments). Statistical analyses were performed using Student’s t-test. (B, C) Immunoblotting of p-PKR and p-eIF2α in SH-SY5Y cells expressing (C4G2)75 or (C4G2)2 repeats. p-PKR (T446) and p-eIF2α (Ser51) were normalized to total PKR and eIF2α, respectively. GAPDH was used as a loading control. Error bars represent SD (n = 2 independent experiments). Statistical analyses were performed using Student’s t-test.

C9ORF72 antisense C4G2 expanded repeats inhibit global protein synthesis and induce stress granule assembly.

(A) Immunoblotting of puromycin in HEK293T cells expressing in_(C4G2)75 or 2 repeats. Cells were incubated with puromycin for 30 min before harvesting. The level of puromycin was normalized to GAPDH. Error bars represent SD (n = 3 independent experiments). Statistical analyses were performed using Student’s t-test (B) Representative images and (C) quantification of primary neurons expressing either (C4G2)75 or 2 repeats stained with anti-puromycin (red), anti-FLAG (green), DAPI (blue), and MAP2 (magenta). The puromycin intensity was quantified using ImageJ. Error bars represent SD (n = 40–50 neurons/group; similar results were obtained from two independent experiments). Statistical analyses were performed using Student’s t-test. (D) Representative images of G3BP1 and FMRP staining in HEK293T cells expressing in_(C4G2)75 and in_(C4G2)2 repeats. (E) Quantification of antisense foci-positive cells with G3BP1 and FMRP granules. Error bars represent SD (n = 150 cells/condition and three independent experiments). Statistical analyses were performed using Student’s t-test. Scale bars, 10 µm (neurons), 20 µm (HEK293T).

Figure 3 with 1 supplement
Antisense C4G2 repeat expanded RNAs activate the PKR/eIF2α pathway independent of DPR proteins.

(A) (Top) Schematic illustration of (C4G2)75 repeats without the human intronic sequences. 3× protein tags were included at the C- terminus of the repeats to monitor the DPR proteins in each frame. (Bottom) Schematic illustration of antisense (C4G2)108RO repeats with stop codons inserted in every 12 repeats to prevent the translation of DPR proteins from all reading frames. (B) Immunoblotting of DPR proteins in HEK293T cells expressing in_(C4G2)75, (C4G2)75, or 2 repeats. DPR protein levels were detected using anti-FLAG (frame with GP), anti-MYC (frame with PR), and anti-HA (frame with PA). GAPDH was used as a loading control. (C) mRNA levels were measured by quantitative qPCR in cell expressing in_(C4G2)75, (C4G2)75, or 2 repeats. Error bars represent SD (n = 3). (D, E) Immunoblotting of p-PKR and p-eIF2α in HEK293T cells expressing in_(C4G2)75, (C4G2)75, (C4G2)108RO, or 2 repeats. p-PKR (T446) and p-eIF2α (Ser51) were normalized to total PKR and eIF2α, respectively. GAPDH was used as a loading control. Error bars represent SD (n = 3 independent experiments). Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. (F, G) Representative images (F) and quantitation (G) of p-eIF2α in primary neurons expressing antisense (C4G2)108RO or 2 repeats in the presence and absence of PKR siRNA. Scale bars, 10 µm.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1
Antisense DPR proteins do not activate PKR/eIF2α-dependent integrated stress response.

(A) Representative images and (B) quantification of p-eIF2α staining in HEK293T cells expressing in_(C4G2)75, PR50, PA50, or GP80. Green, GP, PA, or PR; red, p-eIF2α; blue, DAPI. Error bars represent SD (n = 2 independent experiments). (C) Representative images of antisense RNA foci in HEK293T cells expressing in_(C4G2)75, (C4G2)75 or (C4G2)108RO repeats. Foci were detected by RNA FISH. Red, foci; blue, DAPI. (D) Immunoblotting of DPR proteins in HEK293T cells expressing in_(C4G2)75, (C4G2)75 and (C4G2)108RO repeats. DPR protein levels were detected using anti-PR and anti-GP antibodies. GAPDH was used as a loading control. (E) Representative images of antisense RNA foci in primary cortical neurons expressing (C4G2)108 detected by RNA FISH. Red, foci; blue, DAPI; Green, MAP2. (F) Immunoblotting and (G) quantification of PKR in primary neurons expressing (C4G2)2 and (C4G2)108RO together with control or PKR siRNA. PKR were normalized to GADPH. Error bars represent SD. (H) The levels of PKR and p-eIF2α (Ser51) in HEK293T cells expressing (C4G2)108RO together with control or PKR siRNA. PKR and p-eIF2α (Ser51) were normalized to GADPH and total eIF2α, respectively. Error bars represent SD (n = 2 independent experiments). Statistical analyses were performed using Student’s t-test. (I) Representative images and quantification of puromycin staining in HEK293T cells expressing (C4G2)108RO together with control or PKR siRNA. Error bars represent SD (n = 3 independent experiments). mApple was co-transfected to identify cells with (C4G2)108RO expression. Statistical analyses were performed using Student’s t-test. Scale bars, 20 µm (HEK293T), 10 µm (neurons).

Antisense C4G2 repeat expanded RNAs themselves induce stress granules and lead to neuronal toxicity.

(A) Representative images of FMRP and G3BP1 staining in HEK293T cells expressing (C4G2)108RO or 2 repeats. (B, C) Quantification of antisense foci-positive cells with FMRP and G3BP1 granules. Error bars represent SD (n = 180 cells/condition and three independent experiments). Statistical analyses were performed using Student’s t-test. (D) Immunoblotting of PKR and p-eIF2α (Ser51) in HEK293T cells expressing (C4G2)108RO together with control or PKR siRNA. GAPDH was used as a loading control. (E) Representative images of FMRP staining in HEK293T cells expressing (C4G2)108 repeats together with either control or PKR siRNA. (F) Quantification of antisense foci-positive cells with FMRP granules. Error bars represent SD (n = 150 cells/condition and three independent experiments). (F) Kaplan–Meier curves showing the risk of cell death in (C4G2)108RO-expressing neurons compared with 2 repeats in the presence and absence of PKR siRNA (replicated three times with similar results). Statistical analyses were performed using Mantel–Cox test (*p<0.05, **p<0.01). Scale bars, 20 µm.

Figure 5 with 1 supplement
Increased levels of phosphorylated PKR and eIF2α in C9FTD/ALS patients.

(A) Representative immunohistochemistry images of phosphorylated PKR staining in control and C9FTD/ALS patient’s frontal cortex (FCX) using anti-p-PKR (T446) (n = 4 per genotype). (B, C) Immunoblotting of p-eIF2α in proteins extracted from control (C1–C6) and C9FTD/ALS patient’s frontal cortex (P1–P6). p-eIF2α (Ser51) was normalized to total eIF2α. GAPDH was used as a loading control. Error bars represent SD (control n = 6 and C9FTD/ALS n = 6). Statistical analyses were performed using unpaired Student’s t-test. Scale bars, 10 µm.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1
Phosphorylated PKR and eIF2α levels are unchanged in C9FTD/ALS iPSC-derived motor neurons.

(A) Immunoblotting and (B) quantification of p-PKR and p-eIF2α in two different lines of iPSC-derived motor neurons of C9FTD/ALS patient and their isogenic controls (38 d post differentiation). P-PKR levels were detected using anti-p-PKR (T446) and normalized to total PKR. P-eIF2α levels were detected using anti-phosphor eIF2α (Ser51) and normalized to total eIF2α. Error bars represent SD (n = 3).

Figure 6 with 1 supplement
Sense G4C2 repeat expanded RNAs cannot activate the PKR/eIF2α pathway.

(A) Immunoblotting of p-PKR and p-eIF2α in HEK293T cells expressing (G4C2)75 or (G4C2)2 repeats. (B) Representative images of sense and antisense RNA foci in HEK293T expressing (G4C2)75 repeats together with either control antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs), ASOs targeting sense G4C2RNAs or ASOs targeting antisense C4G2 repeat expanded RNAs. Foci were detected by RNA FISH. Red, foci; blue, DAPI. (C) Immunoblotting and (D) quantification of p-PKR and p-eIF2α in HEK293T cells expressing (G4C2)75 or (G4C2)2 repeats together with either control ASO or ASOs targeting sense G4C2 repeat expanded RNAs. Phosphorylated PKR levels were detected using anti-p-PKR (phosphor T446) and normalized to total PKR. Phosphorylated eIF2α levels were detected using anti-peIF2α (Ser51) and normalized to total eIF2α. GAPDH was used as a loading control. Error bars represent SD (n = 3 independent experiments). Statistical analyses were performed using unpaired Student’s t-test. (E, F) Immunoblotting of p-PKR and p-eIF2α in HEK293T cells expressing (G4C2)75 or (G4C2)2 repeats together with either control ASO or ASOs targeting antisense G4C2 repeat expanded RNAs. P-PKR (T446) and p-eIF2α (Ser51) were normalized to total PKR and eIF2α, respectively. GAPDH was used as a loading control. Error bars represent SD (n = 3 independent experiments). Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. (G) Representative images and (H) quantification of FMRP and G3BP1 staining in HEK293T cells expressing (G4C2)75 or (G4C2)2 repeats in the presence and absence of antisense ASO2. Error bars represent SD (n = 150 cells/condition and three independent experiments). Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. Scale bars, 20 µm.

Figure 6—figure supplement 1
Sense G4C2 repeat expanded RNAs cannot activate the PKR/eIF2α pathway.

(A) Schematic illustration of the sense (G4C2)75 repeat construct. (B) Quantification of p-PKR and p-eIF2α in HEK293T cells expressing (G4C2)75 or (G4C2)2 repeats. p-PKR (T446) and p-eIF2α (Ser51) were normalized to total PKR and eIF2α, respectively. GAPDH was used as a loading control. Error bars represent SD (n = 2 independent experiments). Statistical analyses were performed using Student’s t-test. (C) Representative images of sense and antisense RNA foci in HEK293T cells expressing sense (G4C2)75 and interrupted antisense (C4G2)108RO repeats. Foci were detected by RNA FISH. Red, foci; blue, DAPI. (D, E) Quantification of RNA foci in HEK293T expressing (G4C2)75 together with either control antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) or ASOs targeting sense G4C2 and antisense C4G2 repeat expanded RNAs. Error bars represent SD (n = 80–100 cells/condition from three independent experiments). (F) Immunoblotting of p-PKR and p-eIF2α in HEK293T cells expressing interrupted sense (G4C2)108RO and control repeats. p-PKR levels were detected using anti-p-PKR (T446) and normalized to total PKR. P-eIF2α levels were detected using anti-phosphor eIF2α (Ser51) and normalized to total eIF2α. Error bars represent. GAPDH was used as a loading control. Error bars represent SD Scale bars, 20 µm (HEK293T).

Figure 7 with 1 supplement
Reduction of PKR mitigates antisense C4G2, but not sense G4C2, RNA- mediated toxicity in zebrafish.

(A) Schematic illustration of splice-blocking morpholino (SB-MO) targeting the exon 3/intron 3 junction in zebrafish eif2ak2 pre-mRNA. The correctly spliced (wild type transcripts) and intron 3 retained transcripts are shown. The translation-blocking morpholino targets the AUG start codon in post-spliced eif2ak2 mRNA. (B) SV2 immunostaining of motor axons in 30 hpf zebrafish embryos injected with GFP control mRNA and antisense (C4G2)70 RNAs. Scale bar = 50 µm. (C, D) Effects of SB-MO on axonal length (C) and branching (D) of zebrafish expressing antisense (C4G2)70 RNAs. Embryos were injected with 0.844 µM GFP mRNA, 0.844 µM antisense (C4G2)70 RNAs, 0.844 µM antisense (C4G2)70 RNAs plus 0.25 mM control morpholino, or 0.844 µM antisense (C4G2)70 RNAs plus 0.25 mM eif2ak2 morpholino. Error bars represent SD (n = 4 independent experiments). Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. (E, F) Effects of SB-MO on axonal length and branching of zebrafish expressing sense (G4C2)70 RNAs. Embryos were injected with 0.844 µM GFP mRNA, 0.844 µc sense (G4C2)70 RNAs, 0.844 µM sense (G4C2)70 RNAs plus 0.25 mM control morpholino or 0.844 µM sense (G4C2)70 RNAs plus 0.25 mM eif2ak2 morpholino. Error bars represent SD (n = 4 independent experiments). Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test.

Figure 7—figure supplement 1
Translation-blocking morpholino of PKR mitigates antisense C4G2 repeat RNA-induced axonopathy in zebrafish.

(A) Dose-dependent knockdown of WT transcripts and increase of transcripts with intron 3 retention as determined by RT-PCR analysis. Eif2ak2 splice variants in non-injected, standard control and eif2ak2 targeting MO-injected embryos 30 hpf are shown. (B, C) Effect of translation-blocking morpholino (TB-MO)-mediated reduction of Eif2ak2 on axonal length (B) and branching (C), using a dose of 0.25 mM for TB-MO and standard control MO in GFP and antisense (C4G2)70 RNAs expressing zebrafish. Error bars represent SD (n = 4 independent experiments). Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test.

Proposed pathogenic mechanisms caused by C9ORF72 antisense C4G2 repeat expanded RNAs.

C9ORF72 antisense C4G2 repeat expanded RNAs activate PKR/eIF2α-dependent integrated stress response and lead to neurotoxicity independent of DPR proteins.

Tables

Table 1
List of controls (C1–C6) and C9FTD/ALS patients (P1–P6) postmortem tissues used in this study.
IDPrimary neuropathological diagnosisAge atonset (years)Age atdeath (years)Sex
C1Control-53F
C2Control-77NA
C3Control-43F
C4Control-57M
C5Control-72F
C6Control-57F
P1FTLD (C9 expansion)5871M
P2ALS (C9 expansion)5457F
P3FTLD (C9 expansion)5766M
P4FTLD (C9 expansion)5867M
P5FTLD (C9 expansion)6266M
P6ALS (C9 expansion)-69NA
  1. ALS: amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Additional files

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Janani Parameswaran
  2. Nancy Zhang
  3. Elke Braems
  4. Kedamawit Tilahun
  5. Devesh C Pant
  6. Keena Yin
  7. Seneshaw Asress
  8. Kara Heeren
  9. Anwesha Banerjee
  10. Emma Davis
  11. Samantha L Schwartz
  12. Graeme L Conn
  13. Gary J Bassell
  14. Ludo Van Den Bosch
  15. Jie Jiang
(2023)
Antisense, but not sense, repeat expanded RNAs activate PKR/eIF2α-dependent ISR in C9ORF72 FTD/ALS
eLife 12:e85902.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85902