Transcriptional regulation of SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 by SP1
Peer review process
This article was accepted for publication as part of eLife's original publishing model.
History
- Version of Record published
- Accepted
- Preprint posted
- Received
Decision letter
-
Frank L van de VeerdonkReviewing Editor; Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Netherlands
-
Jos W van der MeerSenior Editor; Radboud University Medical Centre, Netherlands
Our editorial process produces two outputs: (i) public reviews designed to be posted alongside the preprint for the benefit of readers; (ii) feedback on the manuscript for the authors, including requests for revisions, shown below. We also include an acceptance summary that explains what the editors found interesting or important about the work.
Decision letter after peer review:
Thank you for submitting your article "Transcription regulation of SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 by Sp1: a potential therapeutic target" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by 2 peer reviewers, and the evaluation has been overseen by a Reviewing Editor and Jos van der Meer as the Senior Editor.
The reviewers have discussed their reviews with one another, and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this to help you prepare a revised submission.
Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):
Language: I suggest moderate changes to the English language.
Line 103: Colchicine is used for more than just acute gout and familial Mediterranean fever. More correct would be to write "used for the treatment of (auto-)inflammatory disorders such as acute gout or familial Mediterranean fever"
Figure 2C: For the experiment carried out for Figure 2C, we should know whether cells not infected by SARS-CoV-2 but that are merely in the vicinity of infected cells also express increased p-Sp1. If only cells with active infection of SARS-CoV-2 express increased p-Sp1, this would not add to the spread of the infection (as these cells are already infected). Please add similar experiments in which SARS-CoV-2 virus is also stained (be it by RNAscope or by protein staining).
Discussion: The discussion lacks a "limitations" section, please add this.
Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):
The authors sought to identify the transcription factors that regulate ACE2 expression. The phenotype of Sp1 and HNF4α was mild in the study, and direct evidence that shows PI3K/AKT inhibitors work through Sp1 was lacking.
Sp1 inhibitor was used to demonstrate the antiviral activity in vivo. It would be more convincing to have genetic data besides pharmacological inhibitors due to specificity concerns.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85985.sa1Author response
Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):
Language: I suggest moderate changes to the English language.
Line 103: Colchicine is used for more than just acute gout and familial Mediterranean fever. More correct would be to write "used for the treatment of (auto-)inflammatory disorders such as acute gout or familial Mediterranean fever"
We really appreciate this reviewer’s preciseness. Amended.
Figure 2C: For the experiment carried out for Figure 2C, we should know whether cells not infected by SARS-CoV-2 but that are merely in the vicinity of infected cells also express increased p-Sp1. If only cells with active infection of SARS-CoV-2 express increased p-Sp1, this would not add to the spread of the infection (as these cells are already infected). Please add similar experiments in which SARS-CoV-2 virus is also stained (be it by RNAscope or by protein staining).
We appreciate the concerns of the reviewer. In response to the reviewer’s suggestion, we detected the expression of p-SP1 and SARS-CoV-2 N protein in HPAEpiCs by immunofluorescence. We found that p-SP1 levels were increased only in cells infected with SARS-CoV-2, but not in non-infected cells (Author response image 1). One may speculate that SARS-CoV-2 cell entry induces the phosphorylation of SP1 to up-regulate the expression of ACE2, leading to more infectious viruses in infected cells. The virus uses the cell to make more viruses. Thus, adjacent cells are at increased risk of virus infection. By contrast, inhibition of ACE2 expression by inhibiting the phosphorylation of SP1 reduces the spread of the virus between cells.
Discussion: The discussion lacks a "limitations" section, please add this.
Amended. In response to the reviewer’s comments, we added the sentences “This study has several limitations. Firstly, although SP1 was identified as a pivotal transcription factor in modulating ACE2 expression via the action of colchicine and MithA, neither of these compounds currently qualify as a candidate for the treatment of COVID-19. Primarily used to treat several types of cancer, including testicular cancer…” in Discussion of revised manuscript (Lines 329-342).
Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):
The authors sought to identify the transcription factors that regulate ACE2 expression. The phenotype of Sp1 and HNF4α was mild in the study, and direct evidence that shows PI3K/AKT inhibitors work through Sp1 was lacking.
We appreciate the concerns of the reviewer. In response to the reviewer’s suggestion, we tested the effect of SP1 knockdown or overexpression on ACE2 expression in the presence or absence of PI3K inhibitors in HPAEpiCs. We found that ACE2 expression was decreased in both PI3K inhibitor-treated cells and HPAEpiCs subjected to SP1 knockdown (Author response image 2A and 2B). In contrast, SP1 overexpression significantly increased the expression of ACE2 in HPAEpiCs (Author response image 2C and 2D). In addition, SP1 knockdown did not affect the expression of ACE2 in PI3K inhibitor-treated cells (Author response image 2A and 2B), whereas SP1 overexpression rescued the expression of ACE2 in PI3K inhibitor-treated cells (Author response image 2C and 2D). Similar results were observed by immunofluorescent staining of ACE2 in HPAEpiCs (Author response image 2E and 2F). These results indicate that the PI3K/AKT pathway regulates the expression of ACE2 through SP1.
Sp1 inhibitor was used to demonstrate the antiviral activity in vivo. It would be more convincing to have genetic data besides pharmacological inhibitors due to specificity concerns.
We appreciate the concerns of the reviewer. In response to the reviewer’s suggestion, we detected the p-SP1 levels in lung and trachea of hamsters infected with SARS-CoV-2 after colchicine and MithA treatment. SARS-CoV-2 increased the levels of p-SP1 in the lung and trachea of hamsters, while treatment of either colchicine or MithA reduced the levels of p-SP1 in the lung and trachea of hamsters infected with SARS-CoV-2. We have included these data in the revised manuscript (see revised Figure 6B in the section of Results of revised manuscript).
References
Brevini, T., Maes, M., Webb, G. J., John, B. V., Fuchs, C. D., Buescher, G., et al. (2022). FXR inhibition may protect from SARS-CoV-2 infection by reducing ACE2. Nature, 615(7950), 134-142.
Chen, J., Fan, J., Chen, Z., Zhang, M., Peng, H., Liu, J., et al. (2021). Nonmuscle myosin heavy chain IIA facilitates SARS-CoV-2 infection in human pulmonary cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(50), e2111011118.
Chiu, L., Lo, C. H., Shen, M., Chiu, N., Aggarwal, R., Lee, J., et al. (2021). Colchicine use in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 16(12), e0261358.
Drosos, A. A., Pelechas, E., Drossou, V., & Voulgari, P. V. (2022). Colchicine against SARS-CoV-2 infection: what is the evidence? Rheumatology and Therapy, 9(2), 379-389.
Elshafei, M. N., El-Bardissy, A., Khalil, A., Danjuma, M., Mubasher, M., Abubeker, I. Y., et al. (2021). Colchicine use might be associated with lower mortality in COVID-19 patients: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Clinical Investigation, 51(9), e13645.
Group, R. C. (2021). Colchicine in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (RECOVERY): a randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 9(12), 1419-1426.
Mikolajewska, A., Fischer, A. L., Piechotta, V., Mueller, A., Metzendorf, M. I., Becker, M., et al. (2021). Colchicine for the treatment of COVID-19. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 10(10), Cd015045.
Qiao, Y. Y., Wang, X. M., Mannan, R., Pitchiaya, S., Zhang, Y. P., Wotring, J. W., et al. (2021). Targeting transcriptional regulation of SARS-CoV-2 entry factors ACE2 and TMPRSS2. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(1), e2021450118.
Samelson, A. J., Tran, Q. D., Robinot, R., Carrau, L., Rezelj, V. V., Kain, A. M., et al. (2022). BRD2 inhibition blocks SARS-CoV-2 infection by reducing transcription of the host cell receptor ACE2. Nature Cell Biology, 24(1), 24-34.
Samuel, R. M., Majd, H., Richter, M. N., Ghazizadeh, Z., Zekavat, S. M., Navickas, A., et al. (2020). Androgen signaling regulates SARS-CoV-2 receptor levels and is associated with severe COVID-19 symptoms in men. Cell Stem Cell, 27(6), 876-889.e812.
Shen, X. R., Geng, R., Li, Q., Chen, Y., Li, S. F., Wang, Q., et al. (2022). ACE2-independent infection of T lymphocytes by SARS-CoV-2. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy 7(1), 83.
Yeung, M. L., Teng, J. L. L., Jia, L., Zhang, C., Huang, C., Cai, J., et al. (2021). Soluble ACE2-mediated cell entry of SARS-CoV-2 via interaction with proteins related to the renin-angiotensin system. Cell, 184(8), 2212-2228.e2212.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85985.sa2