Spatial determination and prognostic impact of the fibroblast transcriptome in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

  1. Wayne Croft
  2. Hayden Pearce
  3. Sandra Margielewska-Davies
  4. Lindsay Lim
  5. Samantha M Nicol
  6. Fouzia Zayou
  7. Daniel Blakeway
  8. Francesca Marcon
  9. Sarah Powell-Brett
  10. Brinder Mahon
  11. Reena Merard
  12. Jianmin Zuo
  13. Gary Middleton
  14. Keith Roberts
  15. Rachel M Brown
  16. Paul Moss  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Birmingham, United Kingdom
  2. The Francis Crick Institute, United Kingdom
  3. University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma has a poor clinical outcome and responses to immunotherapy are suboptimal. Stromal fibroblasts are a dominant but heterogenous population within the tumor microenvironment and therapeutic targeting of stromal subsets may have therapeutic utility. Here we combine spatial transcriptomics and scRNA-Seq datasets to define the transcriptome of tumor-proximal and tumor-distal cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) and link this to clinical outcome. Tumor-proximal fibroblasts comprise large populations of myofibroblasts, strongly expressed podoplanin, and were enriched for Wnt ligand signaling. In contrast, inflammatory CAFs were dominant within tumor-distal subsets and expressed complement components and the Wnt-inhibitor SFRP2. Poor clinical outcome was correlated with elevated HIF-1a and podoplanin expression whilst expression of inflammatory and complement genes was predictive of extended survival. These findings demonstrate the extreme transcriptional heterogeneity of CAFs and its determination by apposition to tumor. Selective targeting of tumor-proximal subsets, potentially combined with HIF-1a inhibition and immune stimulation, may offer a multi-modal therapeutic approach for this disease.

Data availability

Source Data 1 contains the raw Nanostring nCounter data.

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Wayne Croft

    Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6780-5944
  2. Hayden Pearce

    Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Sandra Margielewska-Davies

    Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5115-470X
  4. Lindsay Lim

    Cancer Research Horizons, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1394-3297
  5. Samantha M Nicol

    Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Fouzia Zayou

    Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Daniel Blakeway

    Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9501-7451
  8. Francesca Marcon

    University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7439-8291
  9. Sarah Powell-Brett

    University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Brinder Mahon

    University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Reena Merard

    University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Jianmin Zuo

    Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Gary Middleton

    Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Keith Roberts

    University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Rachel M Brown

    University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Paul Moss

    Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    p.moss@bham.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6895-1967

Funding

Cancer Research UK (A21135)

  • Wayne Croft
  • Hayden Pearce
  • Sandra Margielewska-Davies
  • Lindsay Lim
  • Samantha M Nicol
  • Fouzia Zayou
  • Daniel Blakeway
  • Francesca Marcon
  • Sarah Powell-Brett
  • Brinder Mahon
  • Reena Merard
  • Jianmin Zuo
  • Gary Middleton
  • Keith Roberts
  • Rachel M Brown
  • Paul Moss

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: Samples were obtained from the Birmingham Human Biomaterials Resource Centre HBRC (HTA Licence 12358) ethically approved North West - Haydock Research Ethics Committee; Ref 20/NW/0001, local ethics number 18-304.

Copyright

© 2023, Croft et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,049
    views
  • 221
    downloads
  • 12
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Wayne Croft
  2. Hayden Pearce
  3. Sandra Margielewska-Davies
  4. Lindsay Lim
  5. Samantha M Nicol
  6. Fouzia Zayou
  7. Daniel Blakeway
  8. Francesca Marcon
  9. Sarah Powell-Brett
  10. Brinder Mahon
  11. Reena Merard
  12. Jianmin Zuo
  13. Gary Middleton
  14. Keith Roberts
  15. Rachel M Brown
  16. Paul Moss
(2023)
Spatial determination and prognostic impact of the fibroblast transcriptome in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
eLife 12:e86125.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.86125

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.86125

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Computational and Systems Biology
    Rosalyn W Sayaman, Masaru Miyano ... Mark A LaBarge
    Research Article Updated

    Effects from aging in single cells are heterogenous, whereas at the organ- and tissue-levels aging phenotypes tend to appear as stereotypical changes. The mammary epithelium is a bilayer of two major phenotypically and functionally distinct cell lineages: luminal epithelial and myoepithelial cells. Mammary luminal epithelia exhibit substantial stereotypical changes with age that merit attention because these cells are the putative cells-of-origin for breast cancers. We hypothesize that effects from aging that impinge upon maintenance of lineage fidelity increase susceptibility to cancer initiation. We generated and analyzed transcriptomes from primary luminal epithelial and myoepithelial cells from younger <30 (y)ears old and older >55 y women. In addition to age-dependent directional changes in gene expression, we observed increased transcriptional variance with age that contributed to genome-wide loss of lineage fidelity. Age-dependent variant responses were common to both lineages, whereas directional changes were almost exclusively detected in luminal epithelia and involved altered regulation of chromatin and genome organizers such as SATB1. Epithelial expression variance of gap junction protein GJB6 increased with age, and modulation of GJB6 expression in heterochronous co-cultures revealed that it provided a communication conduit from myoepithelial cells that drove directional change in luminal cells. Age-dependent luminal transcriptomes comprised a prominent signal that could be detected in bulk tissue during aging and transition into cancers. A machine learning classifier based on luminal-specific aging distinguished normal from cancer tissue and was highly predictive of breast cancer subtype. We speculate that luminal epithelia are the ultimate site of integration of the variant responses to aging in their surrounding tissue, and that their emergent phenotype both endows cells with the ability to become cancer-cells-of-origin and represents a biosensor that presages cancer susceptibility.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Maojin Tian, Le Yang ... Peiqing Zhao
    Research Article

    TIPE (TNFAIP8) has been identified as an oncogene and participates in tumor biology. However, how its role in the metabolism of tumor cells during melanoma development remains unclear. Here, we demonstrated that TIPE promoted glycolysis by interacting with pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2) in melanoma. We found that TIPE-induced PKM2 dimerization, thereby facilitating its translocation from the cytoplasm to the nucleus. TIPE-mediated PKM2 dimerization consequently promoted HIF-1α activation and glycolysis, which contributed to melanoma progression and increased its stemness features. Notably, TIPE specifically phosphorylated PKM2 at Ser 37 in an extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)-dependent manner. Consistently, the expression of TIPE was positively correlated with the levels of PKM2 Ser37 phosphorylation and cancer stem cell (CSC) markers in melanoma tissues from clinical samples and tumor bearing mice. In summary, our findings indicate that the TIPE/PKM2/HIF-1α signaling pathway plays a pivotal role in promoting CSC properties by facilitating the glycolysis, which would provide a promising therapeutic target for melanoma intervention.