Gut Health: When diet meets genetics
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) encompasses a group of conditions – including ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease – characterized by chronic gut inflammation. Quality of life can be significantly negatively impacted by these conditions, and they can also increase the risk of colorectal cancer. How and why IBD emerges remains poorly understood.
Our digestive system constantly adapts to what we eat, with different foods triggering changes to the way our gut cells express their genes. Factors like diet, genetics and the environment can all play a role in causing gut inflammation, which can become chronic and result in damage (Huang et al., 2017; Enriquez et al., 2022). In particular, the global rise in IBD incidence has been partly linked to increased consumption of fat-rich diets (Maconi et al., 2010; Hou et al., 2011). However, while studies in mice have shown that such diets can increase gut inflammation (Wang et al., 2023), in humans the effects vary among individuals (Zeevi et al., 2015). Understanding how genes and diet interact during early gut inflammation is therefore crucial to understand how IBD starts and to pinpoint the genes involved. It can be difficult to conduct this work due to the wide genetic diversity among humans and the challenges of creating controlled environments to study them in.
Systems genetics is an approach that allows scientists to dissect how various environmental and genetic factors work together to influence disease susceptibility and other traits (Seldin et al., 2019). It relies on ‘libraries’ of mice strains, such as the BXD recombinant inbred family, which have been created to have well-documented genetic differences (Ashbrook et al., 2021). By exposing this ‘genetic reference population’ to various controlled settings, it becomes possible to precisely examine interactions between genes and the environment.
Now, in eLife, Maroun Sleiman, Johan Auwerx of the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne and colleagues – including Xiaoxu Li as first author – report that a systems genetics approach to studying the relationship between a fat-rich diet and gut inflammation can identify candidate genes that might influence susceptibility to IBD in humans (Li et al., 2023).
First, Li et al. fed 52 BXD mouse strains with either a regular or fat-rich diet. Analyzing the gene expression profiles of the mice guts showed that overall, the fat-rich diet led to increased expression of genes involved in inflammatory pathways. However, much like in humans, the mice strains displayed diverse gene expression profiles. In fact, several strains were resistant to dietary changes, demonstrating that genetic differences can override the effect of diet.
Next, Li et al. compared the gene expression profiles of the BXD mice fed the fat-rich diet with existing datasets from mice and humans with IBD. On average, the genes dysregulated in IBD and in BXD mice were the same, indicating that the fat-rich diet had led to IBD-like gut inflammation. Individually, the gene expression of each strain could be used to classify the strain as as ‘susceptible’, ‘intermediate’, or ‘resistant’ to IBD-like inflammation.
Finally, network modelling approaches were used to group genes that are co-expressed or tend to work together in BXD mice. In animals fed fat-rich diets, some of the resulting ‘modules’ were enriched with genes that are dysregulated in IBD, with two containing genes involved in regulating gut inflammation. Li et al. then used three criteria to identify genes within the modules that might be key to IBD inflammation. Based on the existing human datasets, genetic variants of two of the genes that met these criteria – Epha6 and Muc4 – are also associated with ulcerative colitis, suggesting they could be key to regulating gut inflammation (Figure 1).
The findings, obtained using a powerful combination of systems genetics and pre-published datasets, help to shed light on how genetic makeup and diet dictate vulnerability to IBD. The work also provides a dataset that can be used to generate new ideas for future research, which is important for developing better preventive and treatment strategies for gut-related inflammatory disorders. It also remains to be seen whether the candidate genes identified using this approach can be used to manipulate vulnerability to gut inflammation.
References
-
Dietary intake and risk of developing inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review of the literatureAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology 106:563–573.https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2011.44
-
Pre-illness changes in dietary habits and diet as a risk factor for inflammatory bowel disease: a case-control studyWorld Journal of Gastroenterology 16:4297–4304.https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i34.4297
-
Systems genetics applications in metabolism researchNature Metabolism 1:1038–1050.https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-019-0132-x
-
Intestinal cell type-specific communication networks underlie homeostasis and response to Western dietThe Journal of Experimental Medicine 220:e20221437.https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20221437
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2023, Chella Krishnan
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 845
- views
-
- 81
- downloads
-
- 0
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Computational and Systems Biology
- Neuroscience
Hypothalamic kisspeptin (Kiss1) neurons are vital for pubertal development and reproduction. Arcuate nucleus Kiss1 (Kiss1ARH) neurons are responsible for the pulsatile release of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH). In females, the behavior of Kiss1ARH neurons, expressing Kiss1, neurokinin B (NKB), and dynorphin (Dyn), varies throughout the ovarian cycle. Studies indicate that 17β-estradiol (E2) reduces peptide expression but increases Slc17a6 (Vglut2) mRNA and glutamate neurotransmission in these neurons, suggesting a shift from peptidergic to glutamatergic signaling. To investigate this shift, we combined transcriptomics, electrophysiology, and mathematical modeling. Our results demonstrate that E2 treatment upregulates the mRNA expression of voltage-activated calcium channels, elevating the whole-cell calcium current that contributes to high-frequency burst firing. Additionally, E2 treatment decreased the mRNA levels of canonical transient receptor potential (TPRC) 5 and G protein-coupled K+ (GIRK) channels. When Trpc5 channels in Kiss1ARH neurons were deleted using CRISPR/SaCas9, the slow excitatory postsynaptic potential was eliminated. Our data enabled us to formulate a biophysically realistic mathematical model of Kiss1ARH neurons, suggesting that E2 modifies ionic conductances in these neurons, enabling the transition from high-frequency synchronous firing through NKB-driven activation of TRPC5 channels to a short bursting mode facilitating glutamate release. In a low E2 milieu, synchronous firing of Kiss1ARH neurons drives pulsatile release of GnRH, while the transition to burst firing with high, preovulatory levels of E2 would facilitate the GnRH surge through its glutamatergic synaptic connection to preoptic Kiss1 neurons.
-
- Computational and Systems Biology
Degree distributions in protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks are believed to follow a power law (PL). However, technical and study bias affect the experimental procedures for detecting PPIs. For instance, cancer-associated proteins have received disproportional attention. Moreover, bait proteins in large-scale experiments tend to have many false-positive interaction partners. Studying the degree distributions of thousands of PPI networks of controlled provenance, we address the question if PL distributions in observed PPI networks could be explained by these biases alone. Our findings are supported by mathematical models and extensive simulations and indicate that study bias and technical bias suffice to produce the observed PL distribution. It is, hence, problematic to derive hypotheses about the topology of the true biological interactome from the PL distributions in observed PPI networks. Our study casts doubt on the use of the PL property of biological networks as a modeling assumption or quality criterion in network biology.