(a) A simulated example of the Region of Attainable Redaction (ROAR) for , , , () with all points bounded by the shaded region depict a degree of redaction which would not lead to the …
Redaction for | ||
---|---|---|
Endpoint positive | Endpoint negative | |
Experimental group | ||
Control group | ||
Redaction for | ||
Endpoint positive | Endpoint negative | |
Experimental group | ||
Control group |
Statistics for simulated example case | ||
---|---|---|
ROAR statistic () | Calculated ROAR value (simulated data) | Calculated ROAR value (simulated data) |
Total subjects reported | 200 | 200 |
Relative risk (95% CI) | 1.40 (1.11–1.77) | 0.60 (0.46–0.76) |
FOCK point | ||
12 subjects | 12 subjects | |
Experimental redaction tolerance | 9.51% ( = 10 subjects) | 14.32% ( = 14 subjects) |
Control redaction tolerance | 14.32% ( = 16 subjects) | 9.51% ( = 10 subjects) |
Total redaction tolerance | 5.66% (12 subjects) | 5.66% (12 subjects) |
Statistics for large meta-analysis | ||
ROAR statistic () | Calculated ROAR value | |
Total subjects reported | 39,197 | |
Relative risk (95% CI) | 0.85 (0.74–0.97) | |
FOCK point | ||
14 subjects | ||
Experimental redaction tolerance | 0.07% (13 subjects) | |
Control redaction tolerance | 3.21% (649 subjects) | |
Total redaction tolerance | 0.04% (14 subjects) |
FOCK, Fewest Observations/Censored Knowledge; ROAR, Region of Attainable Redaction.
Coefficients for (Table S1) and related identity (Table S2).