Cardiology: A new strategy for cardiac protection

It may be possible to treat cardiac hypertrophy and injury by using drugs that inhibit a protein called SIRT2.
  1. Esmaa Bouhamida
  2. Hina W Chaudhry  Is a corresponding author
  1. Cardiac Regenerative Medicine Laboratory and the Department of Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, United States

Cardiac hypertrophy is a complicated medical condition that occurs when muscle cells in the heart increase in size in response to pressure overload as they lose the ability to proliferate after birth due to exit from the cell cycle (Chaudhry et al., 2004; Cheng et al., 2007; Mohamed et al., 2018). Cardiac hypertrophy can sometimes arise through physiological adaptation to exercise or pregnancy. However, it can also be pathological – when, for example, it is caused by long-term hypertension – and this can lead to ischemic heart disease, valvular disorders, and heart failure (Frey et al., 2004; Bouhamida et al., 2023; Morciano et al., 2021). Unfortunately, treatment options are limited, and there are relatively few therapies that directly target heart function and remodeling. There is a need, therefore, to better understand the molecular mechanisms that trigger cardiac hypertrophy, so that researchers can develop new therapeutic approaches that can prevent or slow down the development of this condition and the heart diseases it causes.

Now, in eLife, Hossein Ardehali and colleagues at the Northwestern University School of Medicine – including Xiaoyan Yang, Hsiang-Chun Chang and Yuki Tatekoshi as joint first authors – report the results of experiments on mice that shed light on the molecular mechanisms involved in cardiac hypertrophy (Yang et al., 2023). In particular, they focus on the regulation of a transcription factor known as NRF2 by a protein called SIRT2, which is a member of the Sirtuin family of signaling proteins.

Sirtuin proteins are involved in a wide range of cellular processes, such as aging, cell death, inflammation, and mitochondrial biogenesis (Baur et al., 2012; Preyat and Leo, 2013; Pinton et al., 2007). Recent studies have also suggested that SIRT2 has a role in cardiac hypertrophy (Tang et al., 2017) and heart failure (Sarikhani et al., 2018), although the precise nature of this role has remained unclear. Yang et al. employed a range of different molecular biology and immunogenetics methods to verify gene and protein expression levels, and performed a range of in vitro and in vivo studies, including experiments on mice that lacked the genes for SIRT2 and NRF2.

The researchers showed that SIRT2 was expressed in the heart of wild-type mice, and that the expression of SIRT2 was higher in mice that had been subjected to trans-aortic constriction. They also found increased levels of SIRT2 in hearts explanted from patients with end-stage heart failure due to dilated cardiomyopathy, and in hearts from patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Moreover, Yang et al. found that mice deficient in the gene for SIRT2 displayed improved cardiac function in response to pressure overload and ischemia/reperfusion injury. These mice also showed reduced levels of various markers for heart failure following cardiac injury: further, this effect was not gender specific.

Consistent with these results, when short interfering RNA was used to downregulate Sirt2 mRNA in in vitro experiments on neonatal cardiac cells taken from rats, the researchers observed a protective effect against stress-induced cell death. Overall, the results suggest that SIRT2 has a detrimental effect when the heart has been subjected to pressure overload or ischemia/reperfusion injury, and that deletion of the gene for SIRT2 protects against cardiac hypertrophy and ischemic injury.

Yang et al. then went on to identify one of the mechanisms by which SIRT2 deficiency helps protect the heart. This mechanism involved NRF2, a transcription factor that activates genes that code for various antioxidative enzymes and other proteins that protect cells against harmful agents. The researchers found that a lack of SIRT2 triggers the activation of this transcription factor, and increases the transfer of NRF2 from the cytoplasm to the cell nucleus, which leads to higher levels of antioxidants being expressed in the nucleus (Figure 1). Moreover, deletion of the gene for NRF2 can reverse the protection provided by the deletion of the gene for SIRT2. Finally, the researchers went on to show that the in vivo administration of AGK2 – a drug that selectively inhibits SIRT2 – improved cardiac remodeling and protected the heart against cardiac hypertrophy.

Sirt2 deletion protects the heart against cardiac hypertrophy and injury.

(A) Pathological cardiac hypertrophy is associated with increased levels of a signaling protein called SIRT2. (B) Deleting the gene for SIRT2 in mice leads to higher levels of a transcription factor called NRF2 in the nucleus; NRF2 then activates various antioxidant proteins that protect the heart against cardiac hypertrophy and ischemic injury. (C). In vivo administration of a drug called AGK2 also protects the heart because it inhibits SIRT2. NRF2: nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2; SIRT2: sirtuin 2.

Image credit: Figure created by EB using BioRender.

The cardioprotective effect of SIRT2 has been the subject of debate and controversy, and the findings by Yang et al. are inconsistent with some previous reports. For example, one study demonstrated that mice with SIRT2 deficiency exhibit enhanced pathological cardiac hypertrophy (Sarikhani et al., 2018), while another reported that SIRT2 deletion induced aging-dependent and angiotensin II-mediated pathological cardiac hypertrophy (Tang et al., 2017). However, Yang et al. demonstrated the deletion of SIRT2 has a cardioprotective effect regardless of whether SIRT2 is deleted from all cells or specifically from those of the heart. Moreover, they provided a new molecular mechanism for the protective effect of SIRT2 deletion, and also identified a potential therapeutic approach through the selective inhibition of SIRT2.

Possible explanations for the differences between previous studies and the latest work could be the genetic background of the mice, the different approaches used to target the gene for SIRT2, or the different methods to mimic cardiac hypertrophy.

References

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Esmaa Bouhamida

    Esmaa Bouhamida is in the Cardiac Regenerative Medicine Laboratory and the Department of Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States

    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4683-8864
  2. Hina W Chaudhry

    Hina W Chaudhry is in the Cardiac Regenerative Medicine Laboratory and the Department of Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States

    For correspondence
    hina.chaudhry@mssm.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6111-9852

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published:

Copyright

© 2023, Bouhamida and Chaudhry

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 510
    views
  • 44
    downloads
  • 0
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Esmaa Bouhamida
  2. Hina W Chaudhry
(2023)
Cardiology: A new strategy for cardiac protection
eLife 12:e93239.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.93239
  1. Further reading

Further reading

    1. Medicine
    Gabriel O Heckerman, Eileen Tzng ... Adrienne Mueller
    Research Article

    Background: Several fields have described low reproducibility of scientific research and poor accessibility in research reporting practices. Although previous reports have investigated accessible reporting practices that lead to reproducible research in other fields, to date, no study has explored the extent of accessible and reproducible research practices in cardiovascular science literature.

    Methods: To study accessibility and reproducibility in cardiovascular research reporting, we screened 639 randomly selected articles published in 2019 in three top cardiovascular science publications: Circulation, the European Heart Journal, and the Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC). Of those 639 articles, 393 were empirical research articles. We screened each paper for accessible and reproducible research practices using a set of accessibility criteria including protocol, materials, data, and analysis script availability, as well as accessibility of the publication itself. We also quantified the consistency of open research practices within and across cardiovascular study types and journal formats.

    Results: We identified that fewer than 2% of cardiovascular research publications provide sufficient resources (materials, methods, data, and analysis scripts) to fully reproduce their studies. Of the 639 articles screened, 393 were empirical research studies for which reproducibility could be assessed using our protocol, as opposed to commentaries or reviews. After calculating an accessibility score as a measure of the extent to which an article makes its resources available, we also showed that the level of accessibility varies across study types with a score of 0.08 for Case Studies or Case Series and 0.39 for Clinical Trials (p = 5.500E-5) and across journals (0.19 through 0.34, p = 1.230E-2). We further showed that there are significant differences in which study types share which resources.

    Conclusion: Although the degree to which reproducible reporting practices are present in publications varies significantly across journals and study types, current cardiovascular science reports frequently do not provide sufficient materials, protocols, data, or analysis information to reproduce a study. In the future, having higher standards of accessibility mandated by either journals or funding bodies will help increase the reproducibility of cardiovascular research.

    Funding: Authors Gabriel Heckerman, Arely Campos-Melendez, and Chisomaga Ekwueme were supported by an NIH R25 grant from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (R25HL147666). Eileen Tzng was supported by an AHA Institutional Training Award fellowship (18UFEL33960207).

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Medicine
    Pengbo Chen, Bo Li ... Xinfeng Zheng
    Research Article

    Background:

    It has been reported that loss of PCBP2 led to increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and accelerated cell aging. Knockdown of PCBP2 in HCT116 cells leads to significant downregulation of fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2). Here, we tried to elucidate the intrinsic factors and potential mechanisms of bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (BMSCs) aging from the interactions among PCBP2, ROS, and FGF2.

    Methods:

    Unlabeled quantitative proteomics were performed to show differentially expressed proteins in the replicative senescent human bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (RS-hBMSCs). ROS and FGF2 were detected in the loss-and-gain cell function experiments of PCBP2. The functional recovery experiments were performed to verify whether PCBP2 regulates cell function through ROS/FGF2-dependent ways.

    Results:

    PCBP2 expression was significantly lower in P10-hBMSCs. Knocking down the expression of PCBP2 inhibited the proliferation while accentuated the apoptosis and cell arrest of RS-hBMSCs. PCBP2 silence could increase the production of ROS. On the contrary, overexpression of PCBP2 increased the viability of both P3-hBMSCs and P10-hBMSCs significantly. Meanwhile, overexpression of PCBP2 led to significantly reduced expression of FGF2. Overexpression of FGF2 significantly offset the effect of PCBP2 overexpression in P10-hBMSCs, leading to decreased cell proliferation, increased apoptosis, and reduced G0/G1 phase ratio of the cells.

    Conclusions:

    This study initially elucidates that PCBP2 as an intrinsic aging factor regulates the replicative senescence of hBMSCs through the ROS-FGF2 signaling axis.

    Funding:

    This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82172474).