1. Immunology and Inflammation

Defining cell type-specific immune responses in a mouse model of allergic contact dermatitis by single-cell transcriptomics

  1. Youxi Liu
  2. Meimei Yin
  3. Xiaoting Mao
  4. Shuai Wu
  5. Shuangping Wei
  6. Shujun Heng
  7. Yichun Yang
  8. Jinwen Huang
  9. Zhuolin Guo
  10. Chuan Li
  11. Chao Ji
  12. Liu Hu  Is a corresponding author
  13. Wenjie Liu  Is a corresponding author
  14. Ling-juan Zhang  Is a corresponding author
  1. State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Xiamen University, China
  2. Zhejiang Yangshengtang Institute of Natural Medication Co Ltd, China
  3. State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, School of Life Sciences, Xiamen University, China
  4. Yang Sheng Tang (Anji) Cosmetics Co Ltd, China
  5. Department of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, China
  6. Department of Dermatology, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, China
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.94698.3
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Youxi Liu
  2. Meimei Yin
  3. Xiaoting Mao
  4. Shuai Wu
  5. Shuangping Wei
  6. Shujun Heng
  7. Yichun Yang
  8. Jinwen Huang
  9. Zhuolin Guo
  10. Chuan Li
  11. Chao Ji
  12. Liu Hu
  13. Wenjie Liu
  14. Ling-juan Zhang
(2024)
Defining cell type-specific immune responses in a mouse model of allergic contact dermatitis by single-cell transcriptomics
eLife 13:RP94698.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.94698.3
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

eLife assessment

This important study uses single-cell RNA-seq to obtain a more granular understanding of cell subsets within allergic contact dermatitis in a model system with DNFB. The convincing data revela unique subpopulations of dermal fibroblasts as key responders to interferon gamma and likely as mediators of dermatitis. This study has many novel aspects and provides a unique resource as well.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.94698.3.sa0

Abstract

Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), a prevalent inflammatory skin disease, is elicited upon repeated skin contact with protein-reactive chemicals through a complex and poorly characterized cellular network between immune cells and skin resident cells. Here, single-cell transcriptomic analysis of the murine hapten-elicited model of ACD reveals that upon elicitation of ACD, infiltrated CD4+ or CD8+ lymphocytes were primarily the IFNγ-producing type 1 central memory phenotype. In contrast, type 2 cytokines (IL4 and IL13) were dominantly expressed by basophils, IL17A was primarily expressed by δγ T cells, and IL1β was identified as the primary cytokine expressed by activated neutrophils/monocytes and macrophages. Furthermore, analysis of skin resident cells identified a sub-cluster of dermal fibroblasts with preadipocyte signature as a prominent target for IFNγ+ lymphocytes and dermal source for key T cell chemokines CXCL9/10. IFNγ treatment shifted dermal fibroblasts from collagen-producing to CXCL9/10-producing, which promoted T cell polarization toward the type-1 phenotype through a CXCR3-dependent mechanism. Furthermore, targeted deletion of Ifngr1 in dermal fibroblasts in mice reduced Cxcl9/10 expression, dermal infiltration of CD8+ T cell, and alleviated ACD inflammation in mice. Finally, we showed that IFNγ+ CD8+ T cells and CXCL10-producing dermal fibroblasts co-enriched in the dermis of human ACD skin. Together, our results define the cell type-specific immune responses in ACD, and recognize an indispensable role of dermal fibroblasts in shaping the development of type-1 skin inflammation through the IFNGR-CXCR3 signaling circuit during ACD pathogenesis.

Introduction

Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), one of the most common skin inflammatory diseases, is affecting 15–20% of the world population (Vocanson et al., 2009). It is a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction triggered by repeated skin contact with protein-reactive chemicals with low molecular weight, such as haptens. A typical hapten-induced ACD reaction involves a sensitization phase, followed by an elicitation phase. In the sensitization phase, high doses of low-molecular-weight haptens (<500 Da) penetrate through the skin stratum corneum and are captured by Langerhans cells and dendritic cells, which process these antigens and present them to naïve T cells in the skin-draining lymph nodes, priming and clonally expanding the hapten-specific T cells systemically (Kaplan et al., 2012). In the elicitation phase, skin re-exposure to haptens (even at low doses) triggers the activation of hapten-specific T cells and a cascade of inflammatory reactions, generally, 24–72 hr after exposure (Manresa, 2021).

Hapten-triggered innate immune response involves the release of a panel of proinflammatory cytokines and/or chemokines, such as IL1β, TNFα, CXCL9/10, CCL17, and CCL20, which contribute to T cell trafficking to the skin (Kaplan et al., 2012; Meller et al., 2007; Dufour et al., 2002). Most of the T cells are recruited by chemokines in an antigen-non-specific manner, but when the recruited T cells encounter specific antigen, T cells proliferate and are activated locally, initiating the inflammatory cascade and promoting the influx and/or activation of cytotoxic cells (CD8+ T cells and natural killer T cells), mast cells (MCs) and M1-polarized inflammatory macrophages (MACs) (Vocanson et al., 2009; Dufour et al., 2002; Chai et al., 2022). Both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are involved in inflammatory responses, and CD8+ T cells are considered the main effector cells (Chai et al., 2022; Vocanson et al., 2006). Recruited lymphocytes secrete a panel of inflammatory cytokines, such as IFNγ, IL4, IL13 and IL17, which act on skin-resident cells such as keratinocytes, upregulating the expression of adhesion molecules and cytokines/chemokines, thereby recruiting more T cells, macrophages, mast cells to the affected site (Kaplan et al., 2012). However, the cell-type-specific immune response driving ACD pathology still remains poorly defined.

Dermal fibroblasts (dFBs), the main resident cell type in skin dermis, are highly heterogeneous, and can be classified based on their anatomical location (Huang et al., 2022). By single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq), we have recently classified dFBs into distinct non-adipogenic and adipogenic sub-groups, and defined several dermal adipocyte lineage cells (Sun et al., 2023). The primary function of dFBs is to provide structural support for the skin by producing extracellular matrix (ECM) molecules, such as collagen and proteoglycans (Huang et al., 2022), and emerging new studies have recognized that dFBs also have important innate immune functions. We have shown that adipogenic dFBs fight against bacterial infections by producing antimicrobial peptides (Zhang et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2015). In addition, a recent study identified a dFB subset that is involved in activating cytotoxic CD8+ T cells during vitiligo pathogenesis (Xu et al., 2022). However, how dFBs are involved in the inflammatory circuit with lymphocytes during ACD pathogenesis remains largely unexplored.

In this study, ACD was induced in mice by sequential application of 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB), and this is the most commonly used murine model for ACD (Manresa, 2021; Karsak et al., 2007; Miyake et al., 2022). In-depth scRNA-seq analysis was performed to characterize of how cytokines associated with ACD were differentially expressed by various immune or skin resident cells. In addition to immune cells, we performed in-depth analysis of the immune response of dFBs. Furthermore, the interaction between dFBs and T cells was investigated by in vitro and in vivo approaches. Finally, human ACD skin samples were analyzed to validate the clinical relevance of our observations in mice. Results from this study provide a better understanding of the cell-type specific immune responses underlying ACD pathogenesis, and unravel the previously unknown role of dFBs in shaping the type 1 immune response in ACD.

Results

Characterization of mouse allergic skin immune response by single cell RNA transcriptomic analysis

Mice were first sensitized to hapten by applying high dose of DNFB to dorsal skin, and 6 days after sensitization, ACD was elicited by applying a low dose of DNFB to the ears (Figure 1A; Manresa, 2021). The development of skin erythema and thickening peaked at ~24 hr and lasted until ~60 hr post-treatment (p.t.) (Figure 1—figure supplement 1A and B). Histological analyses showed that the skin dermis drastically expanded at 24 hr p.t., and the dermis became heavily infiltrated with mononuclear cells by 60 hr p.t. (Figure 1—figure supplement 1C).

Figure 1 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
Characterization of mouse allergic skin immune response by single cell RNA transcriptomic analysis.

(A) Overview of the experimental setting. Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD)-like skin inflammation was triggered by sequential sensitization and elicitation of ACD by topical application of 1% or 0.2% DNFB on dorsal or ear skin as indicated. Ear skin was collected at 60 hr post-elicitation for analyses. (B) tSNE plots showing the distribution of various cell clusters marked by a color code. (C) Bubble plots showing the expression of marker genes for each cell cluster. Abbreviations: dFB, dermal fibroblast; MC, mast cell; MAC, macrophage; BF, basophil; NEU, neutrophil; Mon, monocytes; VSMC, vascular smooth muscle cell; PC, pericytes; KC, keratinocyte; EC, endothelial cell; SC, Schwann cell. (D) tSNE plots showing how cells were differentially distributed in control and ACD skin samples. Red lines circle key immune cell populations. (E) Stacked bar graph showing the percentage of each cell cluster in the control and ACD samples. (F) qRT-PCR analysis showing the expression of indicated genes (n=4–6/group). (G) Violin plots showing the expression of indicated genes in the control and ACD samples.

To characterize the cell type-specific immune responses in this DNFB-elicited mouse ACD model, we performed scRNA-seq of control and ACD ear skin samples, and identified up to 30 cell clusters (Figure 1B), which were grouped into several cell types, including chondrocytes, dermal fibroblasts, keratinocytes, T cells, myeloid cells (basophils/BFs, mast cells/MCs, macrophages/MACs, neutrophils/NEUs, monocytes/Mon) and other skin resident cells based on marker gene expression (Figure 1C, Figure 1—figure supplement 1D, and Supplementary file 2). Note that because cluster 27 expressed both neutrophil marker Ly6g (Lee et al., 2013) and monocyte marker Cd14 (Antal-Szalmas et al., 1997), we named this cluster ‘NEU/Mon’. Furthermore, differential cell distribution plots (Figure 1D) showed that lymphocytes and myeloid cells were the main cell types recruited to the skin after elicitation of ACD (Figure 1E).

ACD is an inflammatory skin disease, driven by a complicated cell-cell network mediated by several T cell-associated cytokines, including Th1 cytokine IFNγ, Th2 cytokines IL4, IL13, and Th17 cytokine IL17 (Howie et al., 1996). In addition, IL10 participates in skewing of the Th2 response in a murine model of ACD (Laouini et al., 2003), and IL1β is induced in ACD and potentiates the immune response from both T cells and resident cells (Terui et al., 2021). First, we confirmed that the expression of these cytokines was significantly elevated in ACD compared to that in the control skin samples (Figure 1F and Figure 1—figure supplement 1E and F). scRNA-seq gene expression plots revealed that Ifng, Il17, and Il10 were primarily expressed by T cell sub-clusters as expected; to our surprise, Il4 and Il13 were primarily produced by basophils, and Il1b was detected at the highest levels in the neutrophil/monocyte cluster and at intermediate levels in other myeloid cells, including basophils and macrophages (Figure 1G, Figure 1—figure supplement 1G). Furthermore, we found that the expression of Ifng, but not Il4 or Il17a, was rapidly induced in skin draining lymph nodes at 24 hr after ACD elicitation (Figure 1—figure supplement 1H). This suggests a robust and systemic activation of type 1 memory T cell response in the early stage of ACD, and the migration of these lymphatic memory T cells to the skin may contribute to the exacerbation of skin inflammation.

T cells are primarily polarized to the IFNγ-producing type-1 inflammatory phenotype in ACD

To further define the T cell-specific immune response in ACD, T cell clusters were re-grouped into eight clusters (r0~r7; Figure 2A), which were defined as CD8+, CD4+, Treg, δγT, NKT, NK/ILC1, and ILC2, based on marker gene expression (Figure 2—figure supplement 1A and B). ACD led to a notable increase in the percentage of CD8+, CD4+, Treg, and NK/ILC1, but not in that of δγT and ILC2 cells (Figure 2B). Antigen-specific CD8 or CD4 memory T cells can be classified into CD62hi/CCR7hi/CD28hi/CD27hi/CX3CR1lo central memory T cells (Tcm), CX3CR1hi/Cd28hi/Cd27lo/CD62lo/CCR7lo effector memory T cells (Tem), and CD49ahi/CD103hi/ CD69hi/BLIMP1hi tissue-resident memory T cells (Trm) (Cheon et al., 2023; Martin and Badovinac, 2018; Benichou et al., 2017; Park et al., 2023; Mackay et al., 2013). We observed that in ACD skin, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells predominantly expressed marker genes associated with Tcm including Cd28, Cd27, Ccr7, and S1pr1/Cd62l. In contrast, marker genes associated with Tem (Cx3cr1) and Trm (Itga1/Cd49a, Itgae/Cd103, Cd69 and Prdm1/Blimp1, Cd127/Il7r) were only scarcely expressed in these αβ T cells (Figure 2—figure supplement 1C–D). These results suggest that ACD predominantly triggers a central memory T cell response in the skin.

Figure 2 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
T cells are primarily polarized to the IFNγ-producing type-1 inflammatory phenotype in ACD.

(A) tSNE plots showing cell distribution of the CD45+CD3+ or THY1+ T cell population after re-clustering. (B) Bar graphs showing the percentage of each T cell sub-cluster in the control and the ACD samples. (C) tSNE plots showing cell distribution or the expression of Ifng in the control and the ACD samples. (D) By sample violin plots showing the expression of indicated genes across various T cell sub-clusters. (E) WIKI pathway analysis showing the top upregulated (red) or downregulated (blue) pathways in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in ACD compared to control skin. (F) Volcano plot showing differentially expressed genes in control and ACD samples within the CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. (G–J) FACS plots and/or quantified bar graphs showing the percentage of CD4+ or CD8+ T cells (upper panel in G), or the percentage of IFNγ+IL4/13-, IFNγ-IL4/13+, or IFNγ-IL17A+ cells in CD8+ (middle panel in G) and CD4+ (lower panel in G) T cells in control, ACD (24 hr) and ACD (60 hr) ear skin samples (n=3/group). All error bars indicate mean ± SEM. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001, ns, non-significant.

Furthermore, gene expression plots (Figure 2C–D and Figure 2—figure supplement 1C) showed that Ifng was robustly induced in CD4+, CD8+, and NK/ILC1 T cell clusters, whereas Il10 and Il17a were moderately induced only in the Treg and δγT (r5) cell clusters, respectively. In contrast, Il4 was barely detectable in all T cell subsets. The expression of Ifng, Il17a, and Il10 aligned well with that of key T cell lineage transcription factors (TFs), including Tbx21 (for Th1), Rorc (for Th17), and Foxp3 (for Treg), respectively (Figure 2—figure supplement 1E and F).

GO pathway analysis of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell clusters revealed that chemokine signaling and type II interferon signaling pathways were among the top upregulated, and TGFβ and PI3K-Akt-mTOR signaling were among the top downregulated pathways in ACD compared control (Figure 2E). Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes (Figure 2F) showed that Ifng and several IFN-JAK-STAT-related genes (including Ifitm1/2/3 and Stat1) were among the top upregulated genes in ACD, and genes with reported inhibitory functions for T cell activation and/or Th1 polarization, including Fos (Xiao et al., 2012), Zfp36 (Moore et al., 2018), and Klf4 (An et al., 2011), were among the top downregulated genes in ACD, compared to those in the control.

Next, we aimed to validate the expression of IFNγ in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in ACD. First, a time-dependent increase in Cd4, Cd8 and Ifng transcript levels was observed in the DNFB-elicited ACD skin (Figure 2—figure supplement 1G). FACS analysis (Figure 2G and Figure 2—figure supplement 1H–K) showed that DNFB-elicited ACD resulted in a rapid increase in both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, in which IFNγ expression was significantly induced, whereas IL4/IL13 and/or IL17 expression was inhibited. Together, these results indicate that T cells are primarily polarized to the IFNγ-producing type-1 inflammatory phenotype in DNFB-elicited ACD.

Basophils are major source of type-2 cytokines in ACD

scRNA-seq analysis of myeloid cell clusters showed that ACD led to an increase of basophils, mast cells, neutrophils, and macrophages (Figure 3A). Violin plot analyses of cytokines across major skin or immune cell types confirmed that Il4 was primarily expressed by basophils and mast cells, whereas Il1b was primarily expressed by neutrophils and macrophages (Figure 3B and Figure 3—figure supplement 1A).

Figure 3 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
Characterization of myeloid cell activation in ACD.

(A) Stacked bar graphs showing the percentage of indicated myeloid cell populations in the control and the ACD samples. (B) Violin plots showing the expression of indicated genes across major skin resident and immune cells as indicated. (C) Gene expression plot showing differentially expressed genes in basophils (BF, blue dots) and mast cells (MC, red dots) within the ACD sample. (D) qRT-PCR analysis of indicated genes in ear skin samples (n=6~8/group). (E–F) FACS plots (E) and quantified bar graphs (F) showing the percentage of IL4/13+ mast cells or basophils within all viable cells in ear skin samples (n=3/group). (G) qRT-PCR analysis of indicated genes in ear skin samples (n=6~8/group). (H) Gene expression plot showing differentially expressed genes in control and ACD samples within the macrophage cell cluster. (I) GO pathway analysis of the upregulated genes (red) or downregulated genes (blue) in macrophage population after ACD elicitation. (J–M) FACS plots (J) and quantified bar graphs (K–M) (n=3/group) showing the percentage of CD11B+Ly6G+ neutrophils (NEU) in all cells (K), the percentage of Ly6C+ or Ly6C- cells within CD11B+F4/80+ macrophages (L), or the percentage of inflammatory monocytes (M) (see FACS plots in Figure 3—figure supplement 1G), near skin samples. Unstained (UN) plot was shown as negative gating control. All error bars indicate mean ± SEM. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001, ns, non-significant.

Basophils and mast cells have similar functions and developmental processes, and both cell types express the high-affinity Fc receptor for IgE (FceR1a), the activation of which triggers degranulation and release of proteases, histamine, and a panel of proinflammatory cytokines (Hamey et al., 2021). Volcano plots of genes expressed by mast cells (Cd11b-Cma1+Fcer1a+) and basophils (Cd11b+Mcpt8+Fcer1a+) showed that, in comparison, basophils expressed higher levels of cytokines/chemokines, such as Il4, Il13, and Il6, and mast cells expressed higher levels of Ccl2 and Ccl7 (Figure 3C), revealing their differential immune responses in ACD.

Next, we aimed to validate the involvement of BFs and MCs in the DNFB-elicited type 2 immune response. First, the expression levels of Mcpt8 (BF marker), but not Cma1 (MC marker), were elevated in a time-dependent manner upon ACD-elicitation (Figure 3D). FACS analysis of BFs and MCs, based on the surface expression of CD11B and FcεR1a (Figure 3E and F and Figure 3—figure supplement 1B), showed that ACD triggered a rapid increase in the percentage of IL4/IL13-producing CD11B+ FcεR1a+ BFs as early as 24 hr post-elicitation. In contrast, there was only a moderate and delayed increase in IL4/IL13-producing CD11B- FcεR1a+ MCs after ACD-elicitation (Figure 3E and F). In addition, immunostaining analysis showed that elicitation of ACD led to dermal infiltration of both FcεR1a+ TPSB- BFs and FcεR1a+ TPSB+ MCs, in which Th2 cytokines were primarily co-localized (Figure 3—figure supplement 1C).

Characterization of the immune responses of neutrophils, monocytes and macrophages in ACD

Time-dependent induction of Il1b and recruitment of CD68+ MAC and Ly6G+ NEU after ACD elicitation was confirmed by qRT-PCR analysis (Figure 3G). Sc-RNAseq revealed that S100a8/9, Il1b, and Cxcl2 were among the most highly expressed genes in the neutrophil/monocyte cell cluster (Figure 3—figure supplement 1D), and Il1b was among the top inducible genes in Cd68+ + after ACD elicitation (Figure 3H). Interestingly, genes associated with immunosuppressive or M2 MACs (Cd74, H2-Ab, and Ccl24) were among the most downregulated genes in MACs after ACD elicitation (Figure 3H). Furthermore, GO pathway analysis identified ‘cellular response to IFNγ’ as the top upregulated pathway, and ‘lipid metabolic’ and ‘actin cytoskeleton organization’ as the top downregulated pathways in MACs after elicitation of ACD (Figure 3I). Anti-inflammatory function of M2 MACs is fueled by fatty acid oxidation (Batista-Gonzalez et al., 2019), and changes in actin organization and cell shape are hallmarks of MAC activation (McWhorter et al., 2013). These results provide insights into the mechanisms underlying myeloid activation in ACD.

FACS analysis of NEUs, monocytes, and MACs based on protocol reported by Rahman et al., 2017 confirmed that elicitation of ACD led to a time-dependent increase in NEU recruitment and a shift of MACs from a resting (Ly6Clo) to an inflammatory (Ly6Chi) state (Figure 3J–L and Figure 3—figure supplement 1E and F). In contrast, elicitation of ACD led to a transient influx of monocytes peaking at 24 hr post treatment (Figure 3M, Figure 3—figure supplement 1G). Together, these data suggest that IL1β may be a key effector molecule executing the proinflammatory function of NEUs, MONs and MACs, and that IFNγ may play an upstream role in activating MACs during ACD pathogenesis.

Characterization of the immune response of dermal fibroblasts

Although dermal fibroblasts are the main resident cell type in the skin dermis (Huang et al., 2022), their role in regulating ACD remains largely unexplored. PDGFRA, a well-characterized skin pan-fibroblast marker (Lynch and Watt, 2018; Driskell et al., 2013), was used to identified dFBs, and Pdgfra+ dFBs were reclustered into seven sub-clusters (r0 to r6) (Figure 4A). According to dFB and/or adipocyte-lineage cell marker gene profiles reported by our or others’ work (Sun et al., 2023; Driskell et al., 2013; Plikus et al., 2021; Joost et al., 2020; Zachara et al., 2022; Schwalie et al., 2018), the dFB sub-clusters are defined as Mfap5+Dlk1+Ly6a+adipocyte progenitors (AP in r2), Fmo2+Ly6a+adipose regulatory cells (Areg in r6), Ly6a+Lpl+Apoe+Icam1+preadipocytes (pAd, in r1 and r5), Ly6alo or Lrig1+ + or papillary dFBs (RET/PAP in r0), and Ly6aloTrps1hi peri-follicular dFBs (including dermal papilla cells, r4; Figure 4B, Figure 4—figure supplement 1A).

Figure 4 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
Characterization of the immune response of dermal fibroblasts in ACD.

(A) tSNE plots showing cell distribution of the Pdgfra+ dermal fibroblasts after re-clustering. (B) Bubble plots showing the expression of marker genes for each dFB cell cluster. Abbreviations: AP, adipocyte progenitors; Areg, adipogenesis-regulatory cells; pAd, preadipocytes; RET/PAP, reticular and/or papillary dFBs; pF, peri-follicular dFBs. (C) Violin plots showing the expression of indicated genes across various dFB sub-populations in the control and the ACD samples. (D) SCENIC analysis showing the top enriched transcriptional factors in various dFB clusters. (E) GO pathway analysis of the upregulated genes (red) or downregulated genes (blue) in the r5 dFB cluster after ACD elicitation. (F) Volcano plot showing differentially expressed genes in control and ACD samples within the r5 dFB cluster. (G) Violin plots showing the expression of indicated genes across various cell populations in the control and the ACD samples. (H) Frozen sections of control and ACD ear skin samples were subjected to immunostaining analysis using antibodies against CXCL9 (green) and PDGFRA (red). Nuclei were counter stained by DAPI (blue). Dermal CXCL9+ or PDGFRA- cells were highlighted by either red- or green-dotted lines in the zoom-in panel. Scale bar, 200 μm. Zoom-in image is shown on the right-hand side. (I–J) Quantified results showing the fluorescent intensity (arbitrary unit, AU) of CXCL9, CXCL10 or PDGFRA in the dermal CXCL9/10+ cells or PDGFRA- cells shown in (H) or Figure 4—figure supplement 1G (n=5~6/group). All error bars indicate mean ± SEM. *p<0.05, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001, ns, non-significant.

Bubble plots and violin plots showed that ACD elicitation led to an increase of the expression of a panel of IFN-inducible genes (Cxcl9, Cxcl10, Stat1), accompanied with a loss of the expression of pAd signature genes (Lpl, Apoe) and a panel of ECM genes (Col1a1, Col3a1) in the r5 pAd cluster (Figure 4C and Figure 4—figure supplement 1B and C). In addition, scenic TF analysis revealed that the dFB_r5 cluster was specifically enriched with several TFs downstream of the interferon pathway (Stat1, Irf1, and Irf7; Figure 4D). Furthermore, GO pathway analysis of dFB_r5 cells showed that pathways including response to virus, cellular response to IFNγ, and positive regulation of T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity were among the top upregulated pathways, whereas ECM organization was among the top downregulated pathways in ACD compared to control (Figure 4E). Accordingly, volcano gene expression plots of dFB_r5 cluster showed that Cxcl9, Cxcl10, Ccl2, Stat1, and other antiviral genes were the top upregulated genes, whereas ECM genes were the top downregulated genes in ACD compared to control (Figure 4F).

Violin plots of major skin and immune cell types showed that inflammatory genes related to the IFNGR pathway (Stat1, Cxcl9, Cxcl10) were expressed at highest levels in the dFB_r5 cluster, whereas Ifng and Cxcr3 (receptor for CXCL9/10 ligands) was mainly expressed by T cells (Figure 4G and Figure 4—figure supplement 1D). qRT-PCR validated the time-dependent induction of chemokines after ACD elicitation (Figure 4—figure supplement 1E). Co-immunostaining analyses showed that CXCL9+ or CXCL10+ cells co-expressed PDGFRA in the lower dermis where PLIN1+ adipocytes are enriched of ACD skin samples (Figure 4H–J and Figure 4—figure supplement 1F–H), supporting that dFB is the major cell source for CXCL9/10 in ACD. In addition, phosphor-STAT1 (pSTAT1), a key signaling molecule activated by IFNγ, was detected primarily in PDGFRA+Ly6A+ pAds located within the lower dermis (Figure 4—figure supplement 1I and J). Furthermore, in ACD skin dermis, CXCL9 expression largely co-localized with ICAM1 (Figure 4—figure supplement 1K), a marker for committed pAds (Merrick et al., 2019). This further confirms that CXCL9 is specifically induced in the pAd subset of dFBs. Together, we have identified a cluster of dFB with pAd signature as a cellular source of T cell chemokines CXCL9/10 in ACD, suggesting that dFBs may play a role in the development of type-1 immune response by interacting with T cells.

Interaction between dermal fibroblasts and T cells via the IFNγ-CXCL10-CXCR3 signaling axis

A subset of IFNγ-responsive dFBs has been identified to recruit and activate CD8+ cytotoxic T cells during the pathogenesis of vitiligo (Xu et al., 2022). By comparing these active vitiligo mouse dFBs with the active ACD pAds (dFB_r5), we found that these two cell populations are enriched with highly similar IFNγ-inducible genes (Figure 5—figure supplement 1A and Supplementary file 3), suggesting that the IFNγ-responsive pAds may also contribute to the activation of type 1T cells in the context of ACD.

We next aimed to validate the interaction between dFBs and T cells. First, violin plots showed that among all other dFB clusters, the Pdgfra +Ly6A+Icam1+dFB_r5 pAds exhibited the highest expression levels of Ifngr1 and Ifngfr2, along with Stat1, Cxcl9, and Cxcl10 (Figure 5—figure supplement 1B). IFNGR1 plays a dominant role in ligand binding, while IFNGR2 is primarily responsible for activating the downstream JAK-STAT1 signaling; therefore both receptor subunits are required for the functional IFNγ signaling (Green et al., 2017). Additionally, an unbiased IFNγ-IFNGR signaling network analysis revealed that elicitation of ACD enabled IFNγ production from CD4+/CD8+ or ILC1/NK T cells, acting on IFNGR expressed on the dFB-r5 cluster (Figure 5A).

Figure 5 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
Interaction between dFBs and T cells via the IFNG-CXCL10-CXCR3 signaling axis in ACD.

(A) Circle plot from cell-chat analysis showing the inferred intercellular communication network for IFNγ-IFNGR signaling in the control and the ACD cells. (B–C) Primary neonatal dFBs were treated with IFNγ, IL4 or IL17A for 48 hr and subjected to RNA-seq analysis. (B) Venn diagram comparing genes up-regulated by IFNγ, IL4. (C) GO pathway analysis of the genes upregulated only by IFNγ. (D) Primary dFBs were treated with IFNγ for 8 hr or 48 hr, and control or IFNγ treated samples were subjected to qRT-PCR analysis of Cxcl9, Cxcl10, Stat1, Apoe, and Col1a1 mRNA expression (n=~3/group). (E–H E) Experiment scheme for collection of IFNγ-primed dFB conditioned medium (dFBIFNγ-CM) or control dFBctrl-CM to stimulate naive T cells. (F) ELISA analysis showing protein levels of CXCL10 in dFBctrl-CM and dFBIFNγ-CM (n=3/group). (G–H) Naive T lymphocytes stimulated without (G) or with CD3/28-Ab (H) were treated with dFBctrl-CM or dFBIFNγ-CM with or w/o CXCR3 neutralizing antibody, and cell supernatants were collected for ELISA analysis of IFNγ protein expression (n=3/group). All error bars indicate mean ± SEM. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001, ns, non-significant.

To define the IFNγ-dependent immune response in dFBs and to determine how dFBs respond differently to IFNγ compared to other T cell-derived cytokines, primary dFBs were stimulated with IFNγ, IL4, or IL17A. Transcriptomic venn diagram analysis showed that IFNγ uniquely upregulated the expression of a large pool of genes, including several antiviral- or IFNγ pathway-related genes (Figure 5B–C and Supplementary files 4-5). Time course analysis showed that IFNγ treatment robustly induced the expression of Cxcl9, Cxcl10, Stat1, and Ccl2 as early as 8 hr post-treatment, and suppressed the expression of lipogenesis (Apoe) and ECM (Col1a1) genes in a delayed manner (Figure 5B and Figure 5—figure supplement 1C). These in vitro changes in dFBs highly correlated with the transcriptomic change of the r5_dFB cluster upon ACD elicitation. Additionally, Cxcr3 was specifically induced in T cells in ACD (Figure 5—figure supplement 1D), suggesting that IFNGR-dependent activation of dFBs may in turn promotes T cell recruitment/activation by producing CXCL9/10, which act on T cells via CXCR3.

CXCR3 is required for optimal generation of IFNG-secreting type 1T cells (Groom et al., 2012). Next, to determine whether IFNγ-primed dFBs can directly promote T cell activation through the CXCL9/10-CXCR3 axis, we established an in vitro co-culture system between primary dFBs and naïve lymphocytes (Figure 5E). ELISA confirmed that IFNγ-primed dFBs secreted high level of CXCL10 (Figure 5F), and conditioned medium from unstimulated control or IFNγ-primed dFBs (dFBctrl-CM or dFBIFNγ-CM) was then added to primary lymphocytes with or without CD3/CD28-antibody costimulation. We found that in the absence of CD3/CD28 antibody, dFBIFNγ-CM significantly enhanced IFNγ production from naïve T cells, and blocking CXCR3 signaling by adding a CXCR3 neutralizing antibody inhibited this effect (Figure 5G). Interestingly, in the presence of CD3/CD28 antibody, we found that compared to blank DMEM, dFBctrl-CM inhibited IFNγ expression and promoted T cell polarization towards the IL4-producing type-2 phenotype, whereas dFBIFNγ-CM downregulated IL4 expression and restored the ability of stimulated T cells to produce IFNγ (Figure 5H and Figure 5—figure supplement 1E). In addition, the effect dFBIFNγ-CM was partially reversed by adding a CXCR3 neutralizing antibody (Figure 5H and Figure 5—figure supplement 1E). These results indicate that IFNγ-primed dFBs are capable to shift the T1/T2 polarization balance towards type-1 effector phenotype by activating the CXCR3 pathway during T cell activation.

Targeted deletion of Ifngr in dermal fibroblasts inhibited the development of type-1 skin inflammation in ACD

To validate the role of IFNGR in activating dFB, we generated tamoxifen (TAM)-inducible fibroblast-specific Ifngr1 knockout mice by crossing Ifngr1flox/flox mice with Pdgfra-cre/ERT mice (Xu et al., 2022), termed as ‘Ifngr1FB-iKO’ mice (Figure 6A). TAM application to Ifngr1FB-iKO mice specifically ablated the expression of IFNGR1 in PDGFRA+ dFBs, but not in other PDGFRA- dermal cells (Figure 6C and Figure 6—figure supplement 1A and B). As a result, DNFB-mediated development of skin eczema (Figure 6D and E), dermal cell infiltration (Figure 6F), induction of Cxcl9/10, Cxcr3, Ifng, Cd8a and other inflammatory genes (Figure 6G and Figure 6—figure supplement 1C), expression of CXCL9 in ICAM1+ pAds (Figure 6—figure supplement 1D–E), and dermal infiltration of CD8+ T cells (Figure 6 H and I) were significantly inhibited in the Ifngr1FB-iKO mice. These results demonstrate that targeted deletion of IFNγ receptor signaling in dermal fibroblasts inhibited the development of type-1 skin inflammation in ACD.

Figure 6 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
Targeted deletion of Ifngr in dFBs inhibited the development of type-1 skin inflammation in ACD.

(A) Tamoxifen-inducible targeted deletion of Ifngr1 in PDGFRA+ fibroblasts (Ifngr1FB-iKO) was achieved by crossing Ifngr1f/f and Pdgfra-cre/ERT mice, and mice were subjected to DNFB-induced ACD model as indicated. (B) Multiplex-PCR-based genotyping using allele specific primers yields DNA products having sizes specific for the wild-type and Ifngr1-floxed alleles. Lower gel shows gene products for Cre and/or internal product control (IPC) as indicated. (C) Skin samples were immunostained with IFNGR1 (green) and PDGFRA (blue), and nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (white). Scale, 100 μm. (D–E) Representative ear skin images (D) for each group at 60 hours after ACD elicitation. Br graphs (E) showing quantified Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores for each group (n=6–12/group). (F) H&E staining of skin sections for each group at 60 hours after ACD elicitation. (G) qRT-PCR analysis of the mRNA expression levels of indicated genes (ratios to HK gene Tbp were shown, n=3–4/group). (H–I) Immunostaining (H) of skin sections with anti-CD8 (red) and anti-PDGFRA (blue) antibodies, and nuclei were counter stained by DAPI (white). Zoom-in images were shown in the lower panel. Quantified results (I) showing the # of CD8+ T cells per 1 mm2 of dermal area in ACD skin (n=7~9/group). All error bars indicate mean ± SEM. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.

Activation of dermal T cells and fibroblasts in human ACD skin samples

Finally, to determine whether these observations in mice are of human relevance, human ACD skin biopsies were collected for analysis. Co-immunostaining of IFNγ with CD4 and CD8 revealed that numerous CD8+ IFNγ+ T cells were present in the dermal micro-vascular structures, which are known to be enriched with mesenchymal stem cells (Russell-Goldman and Murphy, 2020), in ACD skin, but not in healthy control skin (Figure 7A, Figure 7—figure supplement 1A). In addition, within these dermal structures, IFNγ was detected exclusively from CD8+ T cells (Figure 7B). In contrast, infiltration of CD4+ T cells was not observed, suggesting that CD8+ T cells are the major IFNγ-producing cells in the human ACD skin.

Figure 7 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
Activation of dermal T cells and fibroblasts in human ACD skin samples.

(A) Skin sections from healthy control (HC) or ACD human skin samples were immunostained with antibodies against CD4 (green), CD8 (blue), and IFNγ (red) (representative of n=4/group). Nuclei were counter stained by DAPI (white). Scale bar, 200 μm. Zoom-in image is shown on the right-hand side. (B) Upper panel is the zoom-in images from panel A. Lower panel is the quantified intensity profiles of CD8 (blue) and IFNγ (red) from left to right of the images marked by yellow dashed boxes. (C) Skin sections from healthy control (HC) or ACD human skin samples were subjected to Masson’s staining, in which collagen bundles were stained in blue. (D) Skin sections from healthy control (HC) or ACD human skin samples were immunostained with antibodies against CD8 (red) and PDGFRA (blue), and representative images of dermal lobular structures were shown (representative of n=4/group). (E) Skin sections from healthy control (HC) or ACD human skin samples were immunostained with CXCL10 (green) and PDGFRA (blue). Scale bar, 200 μm. Zoom-in image is shown on the right-hand side (F) Upper panel is the zoom-in images from panel E. Lower panel is the quantified intensity profiles of PDGFRA (blue) and CXCL10 (green) from left to right of the images marked by yellow dashed boxes.

We have shown that ACD led to decrease collagen expression in dFBs (Figure 4). To determine how collagen was altered in human ACD, skin sections were subjected to Masson’s staining to visualize collagen bundles in blue (Figure 7C). In line with our mouse data, collagen bundles were thinner and disorganized within the dermal micro-vascular structures where immune cells were heavily infiltrated in human ACD skin compared to healthy control skin sections (Figure 7C). In mouse ACD model, we showed that IFNGFR-mediated activation of dFBs promotes the infiltration and activation of CD8+ T cells to skin dermis (Figure 6). Here, co-immunostaining of PDGFRA and CD8 revealed that CD8+ T cells were infiltrated around the PDGFRA+ dermal fibroblasts within the dermal micro-vascular structure in ACD skin (Figure 7D). Furthermore, PDGFRA+ dermal fibroblasts within these micro-vascular structures expressed CXCL10 (Figure 7E and F, Figure 7—figure supplement 1B). This human dFB population correlated with the dFB-r5 cluster we identified in the murine DNFB-elicited ACD skin, in which Cxcl9/10 were strongly induced and collagen genes were inhibited.

Discussion

In contrast to other inflammatory skin diseases, such as atopic dermatitis (mainly involving a Th2 immune response) and psoriasis (mainly involving a Th17 immune response), ACD results from a complex but poorly defined inter-connected network between the Th1, Th2, and Th17 pathways. In this study, we provide a comprehensive single-cell analysis of the cellular interaction network of key T cell cytokines and/or chemokines in a DNFB-induced mouse model of ACD. We found that CD4+and CD8+ lymphocytes are primarily polarized towards the IFNγ-producing type 1 central memory phenotype. In contrast, type 2 cytokines (IL4 and IL13) are primarily produced by basophils. Interestingly, our study identified a cluster of dermal fibroblasts with pAd signature as a dermal source for key T cell chemokines CXCL9/10. Targeted deletion of Ifngr1 in dermal fibroblasts reduced DNFB-induced infiltration of CD8+ T cell to the skin, the expression of Cxcl9, Cxcl10, and Ifng, and alleviated the development of ACD in mice. The results unravel a previously unrecognized role of dFBs/pAds in regulating type-1 skin inflammation.

In line with our findings, targeting type-1 immune response has emerged as effective therapeutic approach against allergic skin diseases (Wongchang et al., 2023; Liu et al., 2023; Wu et al., 2021). Interferon signaling, including IFNγ signaling, has been identified as a highly enriched pathway during nickel-induced contact allergy in humans (Wisgrill et al., 2021). Additionally, comparisons between sodium lauryl sulfate-irritated and nickel-sensitized skin samples revealed that nickel-sensitized samples were uniquely enriched with pathways related to T-cell activation, including JAK-STAT signaling, natural killer cell mediated cytotoxicity and T cell receptor signaling (Wisgrill et al., 2021). Furthermore, Ifng knockout mice failed to elicit contact hypersensitivity to urushiol (Wakabayashi et al., 2005), supporting that IFNγ plays a pivotal role in ACD pathogenesis.

CXCL9, CXCL10 and interferon-related pathways are recognized as potential major hallmarks that distinguish allergic-induced from irritant-induced skin inflammation (Lefevre et al., 2021). A study investigating the differential involvement of chemokines in chemical-induced allergic skin responses compared to irritant skin responses showed that CXCL9 and CXCL10 were among the top five chemokines that were uniquely upregulated in hapten-induced skin allergic inflammation but were absent in inflammation triggered by irritants (Meller et al., 2007). Cxcl10 knockout mice display an impaired contact hypersensitivity response, characterized by reduced inflammatory cell infiltrates in the skin and reduced T cell activation and proliferative response (Dufour et al., 2002). CD4+ and CD8+ T cells showed a dose-dependent migration response to CXCL10 in vitro, and adoptive transfer of CXCL10-primed leukocytes isolated from hapten-sensitized mice increased skin inflammation after hapten challenge in vivo (Meller et al., 2007).

The role of dermal fibroblasts in ACD is poorly understood. Our results identified a cluster of CXCL9/10-producing dFBs/pAds in ACD, and showed that targeted deletion of Ifngr1 in PDGFRA+ dFB not only reduced DNFB-induced Cxcl9/10 production but also reduced trafficking of CD8+ T cells to affected skin sites. These results suggest that an inflammatory amplification circuit may exist between T cells and dFBs through the IFNγ–IFNGR and CXCL9/10-CXCR3 signaling network, providing a better understanding of the mechanism of action underlying IFNγ- and/or CXCL9/10-driven allergic skin inflammation. In line with our results, a recent study by Prof. Chen’s group revealed the emerging roles of dFBs in the development of autoimmune diseases. They identified a subset of IFNγ-responsive dFBs which are required to recruit and activate CD8+ cytotoxic T cells during the pathogenesis of vitiligo (Xu et al., 2022). In response to paracrine IFNγ signaling, dFBs orchestrate autoimmune CD8+ T cells through secreted chemokines, including CXCL9 and CXCL10. Furthermore, the authors showed that anatomically distinct fibroblast subsets with differential IFNγ responses are the key determinants of body-level patterns of lesions in vitiligo, highlighting dFB subpopulations as therapeutic targets for vitiligo and other autoimmune diseases. While our results reveal that the cellular interaction between lymphocytes and dFBs promotes ACD pathology, a recent study shows that the innate δγ T cells interact with CD8+ T cells through the IFNγ – IFNGR pathway to restrain the proliferative and effector potential of CD8+ T cells (Muñoz-Ruiz et al., 2023), suggesting that activation of IFNGR signaling may either promote or inhibit type-1 effector immune response in a cell-type-specific manner.

In the murine model of ACD, the initial sensitization phase involves exposing mouse skin to a high dose of DNFB to prime memory T cells in lymphoid organs, and this is followed by a later challenge/elicitation phase, during which the mice are re-exposed to a lower dose of DNFB in a different area of the skin, distal from the original sensitization site (Vocanson et al., 2009; Manresa, 2021). Our results indicate that the type-1 inflammation observed upon ACD elicitation is predominantly driven by memory T cells recruited from lymphoid organs, rather than by skin resident memory T cells. However, other studies have shown that when the later elicitation phase is conducted on the same skin area as the initial sensitization, it results in a rapid allergen-induced skin inflammatory response, that is primarily mediated by IL17A-producing and IFNγ-producing CD8+ skin resident memory T cells (Wongchang et al., 2023; Murata and Hayashi, 2020; Gadsbøll et al., 2020; Schmidt, 2017). These studies suggest that Trm cells establish a long-lasting local memory during the initial sensitization, and upon re-exposure to the hapten in the same skin area, these site-specific Trm cells can rapidly contribute to a robust type-1 skin inflammatory response.

Infiltration of basophils into inflammatory sites has been demonstrated in several allergic diseases, including atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis and asthma (Miyake and Karasuyama, 2017) however, basophils are often regarded as minor relatives of mast cells and have long been neglected in immunological studies. Using several independent approaches, including scRNA-seq, FACS and immunostaining, we showed that basophils rapidly infiltrated the skin dermis and were the primary source of Th2 cytokines (IL4 and IL13) in DNFB-elicited ACD skin. In line with our report, a recently published scRNA-seq study of an ovalbumin (OVA)-sensitized murine skin model also unexpectedly found that mast cells/basophils, rather than T cells, are the major source of IL4 and IL13 (Xu et al., 2022). Another recent study showed that basophil-mediated type-2 immune response is mediated by IL3-produced by T cells in the hapten-induced ACD mouse model (Hachem et al., 2023). Future studies investigating cellular interactions between basophils and dFBs will advance our understanding of the basophil chemotaxis mechanism and the role of basophils in skin allergic inflammation.

Our study has a few limitations. CXCR3 is preferentially expressed on type 1T cells and plays pivotal role in the T cell trafficking and IFNγ production (Groom et al., 2012). Our in vitro study is limited by only focusing on CXCL9/10-CXCR3 axis involvement in IFNγ production without studying its role in driving T cell migration. Secondly, although we have showed that the active ACD pAd (r5) and the active IFNγ-responsive vitiligo dFBs (Xu et al., 2022) are enriched a highly similar panel of IFNγ-inducible genes, our study is limited by the use of only one skin inflammation model. Future studies are still needed to determine whether this fibroblast-T cell axis may be broadly applied to other ACD models or to other type-1 immune response-related inflammatory skin diseases.

Taken together, our findings highlight a central role of type-1 immune response in driving ACD-like skin inflammation in both mice and human, and indicate that dermal fibroblasts are not just structural cells but also play a viscous role in amplifying type-1 inflammation in skin dermis. The interaction between T cells and dFBs may be potential therapeutic targets for allergic skin reactions. Furthermore, because IFNγ plays a central role in host defense, anti-tumor immunity, and autoimmunity (Kwon, 2018; Pollard et al., 2013), results from our study suggest that tissue-resident fibroblasts may play a role in shaping the development of type-1 immune response in other diseases, such as infectious diseases (such as herpes simplex), cancer, and autoimmune disorders, such as psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, and systemic lupus erythematosus.

Materials and methods

Animals and animal cares

Request a detailed protocol

ICR or C57BL/6 mice used in this study were purchased from GemPharmatech (Nanjing, China), then bred and maintained in standard pathogen free (SPF) environment of the Laboratory Animal Center in Xiamen University. C57BL/6J-Ifngr1flox/flox (Stock No: T009548) was originally purchased from GemPharmatech (Nanjing, China) and Pdgfra-creERT (Stock No: 018280) mice were originally purchased from Jackson laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME, USA). The tamoxifen-inducible Ifngr1 conditional knockout mice were generated by breeding Ifngr1flox/flox with Pdgfra-cre/ERT mice. Pdgfra-creERT; Ifngr1flox/flox male mice (n=4/group) were daily administrated intraperitoneally with tamoxifen (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) solution (20 mg/mL stock solution dissolved in corn oil (Aladdin, Shanghai, China)) at 75 mg/kg body weight from post-sensitization day 3 to day 8. All mice were bred and maintained in standard pathogen free environment of the Laboratory Animal Center in Xiamen University, and all animal experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Xiamen University. (protocol code XMULAC20190090).

DNFB-induced mouse model of ACD

Request a detailed protocol

DNFB-induced ACD mouse model was carried out according to published protocol (Manresa, 2021). For sensitization, the dorsal skin of 7~8 weeks old male ICR mice (n=8) was first painted with 25 μL 1.0% DNFB (dissolved in 4:1 mixture of acetone and olive oil) (Xilongs, Shenzhen, China). Six days after sensitization, to elicit ACD, 20 μL 0.2% DNFB was painted to each ear, and ear skin samples were collected at 24 hr or 60 hr post-elicitation for analysis. For treatments, 250 μL undiluted birch sap extract (BSE) was topically applied to ear skin from 12 hr post-elicitation, three times a day, and ear skin samples were collected at 60 hr post-elicitation. 1% Hydrocortisone (HC) ointment (Aveeno, Johnson & Johnson, Maidenhead, Berkshire, UK) was used as the positive group, and dH2O was used as the vehicle control.

Human skin sample collection and analysis

Request a detailed protocol

Fresh adult human full thickness skin biopsies, from age and sex matched healthy and ACD donors were collected by the department of dermatology at the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University. ACD disorder was diagnosed based on their clinical appearance, history and treatment history. All ACD samples analyzed in this study were consistent with clinical and pathological criteria for ACD patients. All sample acquisitions were approved and regulated by Medical Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University (reference number No. 2020[146]). The informed consent was obtained from all subjects prior to surgical procedures. Upon collection, these samples were directly fixed with paraformaldehyde (PFA) then proceed for paraffin embedding for histological or immunofluorescent analyses.

Single-cell RNA library preparation, sequencing and data process

Request a detailed protocol

Ear skin biopsies were collected from control or DNFB-elicited skin, and skin biopsies were minced and digested with collagenase D and DNase1 to isolate single skin cells as previously described (Sun et al., 2023). Dead cells were removed using DeadCell Removal kit (Miltenyi Biotic,130-090-101) according to manufacturer’s instruction. Live cells were counted using a hemocytometer and resuspended in 2% BSA at a concentration of 3000 cells/uL. All three samples were loaded on a 10 x Genomics GemCode Single-cell instrument that generates single-cell Gel Bead-In-EMlusion GEMs. Barcoded, full-length cDNAs were reverse-transcribed from polyadenylated mRNA. Silane magnetic beads were used to remove leftover biochemical reagents and primers from post GEM reaction mixture. Next, libraries were generated and sequenced from the cDNAs with Chromium Next GEM Single Cell 3’ Reagent Kits v 2. cDNA libraries were sequenced on an Illumina Novaseq6000 platform (Illumina). The raw sequencing data was demultiplexed and aligned to the reference genome mm10-1.2.0 using Cell Ranger v3.0.2 pipiline (10 x Genomics). The generated raw gene expression matrix was converted into Seurat objects using the R package Seurat v2.0. To remove doublets and poor-quality cells, we utilized the following procedures to control for cell quality:>200 genes/cell,<5000 genes/cell;>25,000 unique molecular identifiers(UMIs); and <8% mitochondrial gene expression. Low quality cells and outliers were discarded, and only ～ 18,241 viable cells were used for downstream analysis. These included ~9871 cells – control;~8370 cells – DNFB-elicited ACD. Unsupervised clustering and gene expression were visualized with the Seurat 2.0 on R studio, and assignment of cell clusters was based on expression of validated marker genes. Single cell RNA libraries construction, sequencing and bioinformatic analysis was assisted by GENE DENOVO Inc (Guangzhou, China).

Cell-chat signaling network analysis

Request a detailed protocol

R package CellChat 1.3.0 (Jin et al., 2021) was used to evaluate the potential cell-cell communication between dFB subclusters and other cell types, especially immune cells, during ACD pathogenesis. The scRNA-seq data was imported to implement CellChat platform in R software. The process includes projecting the gene expression data onto protein-protein interaction (PPI) network, then assigning a probability value to infer biological cell-cell communication network, and calculating the centrality indicator of interacting network to identify the role / contribution of each cell population in distinct signaling pathways. The number and strength of identified cell-cell communication is displayed through hierarchical graphs, circle charts, heatmaps, etc. to visualize single or multiple signaling pathways.

Flow cytometry analysis and cell sorting

Request a detailed protocol

FACS procedure of dermal fibroblasts and immune cells was modified from previously established or reported methods (Sun et al., 2023; Zhang et al., 2019). Skin tissues were digested with collagenase D (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and Dnase 1 (Solarbio, Beijing, China) to prepare single cell suspension. Cell mixture was then filtered through 30 μm filter and treated with red blood cell lysis buffer. For analyzing cytokine expression in skin-derived T cells, isolated skin cells were first cultured in vitro in the presence of PMA (50 ng/ml) (yeasen, Shanghai, China) and lonomycin (500 ng/ml) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 2 hr and Golgi-plug (1:1000) (BD biosciences, California, USA) for additional 1 hr prior to being subjected to FACS analysis. Briefly, freshly isolated mouse skin cells were first stained with zombie violet viability dye (BioLegend, #423114) to label dead cells. Cells were then blocked with anti-mouse CD16/32 (eBioscience, #14016185), followed by staining with an antibody cocktail for T cells containing PECy7-CD45 (BioLegend, #147704), PerCP-Cy5.5-CD8 (eBioscience, #45-0081-82), and APC-CD4 (BioLegend, #100516), an antibody cocktail for basophils and mast cells containing PECy7-CD11B (Biolegend, #101216), PE-FcεR1α (BioLegend, #134307) and APC-c-kit (BioLegend, #135108), or an antibody cocktail for immune cells containing FITC-Ly6G (eBioscience, #11593182), PE-F4/80 (eBioscience, #12480182), APC-CD11C (BioLegend, #117310), AF700-MHCII (eBioscience, #56532182), PerCP-Cy5.5-Ly6C (BioLegend, #128012), PECy7-CD11B (Biolegend, #101216), APC-Cy7-CD3 (BioLegend, #100222). To stain intracellular proteins in immune cells, stained cells were then fixed and permeabilized using the intracellular fixation and permeabilization buffer set (eBioscience, #00-8333-56) and stained by FITC-IL4 (BioLegend, #504109), FITC-IL13 (eBioscience, #53-7133-82), AF700-IFNG (BioLegend, #505824), PE-IL17A (eBioscience, #12-7177-81). FACS analysis for protein expression of each cell marker was performed by the Thermo Attune NxT machine and analyzed by FlowJo V10 software. Dead cells stained positive with zombie violet dye were excluded from the analyses.

Histology, collagen trichrome staining, toluidine blue and immunohistochemistry (IHC)

Request a detailed protocol

Staining was performed on either paraffin sections or frozen sections as described previously (Zhang et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2019). Histology was assessed by Hematoxylin and Eosin (HE) staining solutions, and collagen was stained by the Masson’s Trichrome Stain Kit (Solarbio, Beijing, China). For IHC, fixed sections were permeabilized with 0.1% saponin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and blocked in 5% BSA, and blocked sections were incubated with primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight followed by appropriate 488-, Cy5 or Cy3-coupled secondary antibodies in the dark for 4 hr at 4 °C. Finally, sections were mounted by ProLong Gold Antifade Mountant with DAPI (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cleveland, OH, USA). All images were taken with Aperio VERSA Brightfield, Fluorescence Digital Pathology Scanner or Leica TCS SP8 White Light Laser Confocal Microscope, and processed by photoshop and/or Aperio ImageScope software (Leica Biosystems, Nußloch, Germany). Specific vendors, species, catalog # and dilution information for all antibodies used for IHC is listed here: rabbit anti-CXCL9/MIG (Proteintech, cat # 22355–1-AP, 1:50), rabbit anti-CXCL10/IP10 (Proteintech, cat # 10937–1-AP, 1:50), goat anti-PDGFRA (R&D system, cat # AF1062-SP, 1:100; used for mouse skin staining), anti-IFNGR1(Abcam, cat # ab280353, 1:100), rat PE anti- CD8a (BioLegend, cat # 100708, 1:100), rabbit anti-CD4 (CST, cat # 25229 S, 1:100), Alexa Fluor 488 anti-IFN-γ (BioLegend, cat # 505813, 1:100), rat anti-PDGFRA (eBioscience, cat # 14-1401-82, 1:100; used for human skin staining), armenian hamster PE anti-FcεRIα (BioLegend, cat # 134307, 1:100), rabbit anti-TPSB (Abcam, cat # ab188766, 1:100), Alexa Fluor 488 anti-IL4 (BioLegend, cat # 504109, 1:100), Alexa Fluor 488 anti-IL13 (eBioscience, cat # 53-7133-82, 1:100), rabbit anti-pSTAT1 (CST, cat # 9167 S, 1:100), rat anti-LY6A (R&D system, cat # MAB1226, 1:100). Secondary antibodies were used: Cy3 anti-goat IgG (cat # 705-165-147), Alexa Fluor 488 anti-rabbit IgG (cat # 711-545-152), Alexa Fluor 647 anti-goat IgG (cat # 705-606-147), Alexa Fluor 647 anti-rabbit IgG (cat # 711-606-152), Alexa Fluor 647 anti-rat IgG (cat # 712-606-150). All secondary antibodies mentioned above were purchased from Jackson ImmunoResearch and used at dilution of 1:250.

Quantitative reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) analyses

Request a detailed protocol

Total cellular RNA was extracted using the RNAExpress Total RNA Kit (NCM，Suzhou, China) and 500 ng of RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA using HiScript III Q RT SuperMix kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). Quantitative, realtime PCR was performed on the Qtower real time system (Analytikjena, Ilmenau OT Langewiesen • Germany) using SYBR Green Mix (Bimake, Houston, Texas, USA). All of the primers used with SYBR green were designed to span at least one exon to minimize the possibility of nonspecific amplification from the genomic DNA. The expression of Tbp gene (TATA-Box Binding Protein) was used as a housekeeping gene to normalize data for the expression of mouse genes. Specific primer sequences are shown in Supplementary file 1.

Bulk RNA sequencing and bioinformatic analysis

Request a detailed protocol

Total cellular RNA were extracted using TRIzol reagent (Sigma,T9424) and RNAExpress Total RNA Kit (NCM, M050). RNA quality was analyzed by bioanalyzer and RNA samples with RIN value >7 were used for sequencing. Next generation sequencing library preparations were constructed according to the manufacturer’s protocol (NEBNext Ultra RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina). The poly(A) mRNA isolation was performed using NEBNext Poly(A) mRNA Magnetic Isolation Module (NEB). The mRNA fragmentation and priming were performed using NEBNext First Strand Synthesis Reaction Buffer and NEBNext Random Primers. First strand cDNA was synthesized using ProtoScript II Reverse Transcriptase and the second-strand cDNA was synthesized using Second Strand Synthesis Enzyme Mix. The purified double-stranded cDNA was then treated with End Prep Enzyme Mix to repair both ends and add a dA-tailing in one reaction, followed by a T-A ligation to add adaptors to both ends. Size selection of Adaptor-ligated DNA was then performed using AxyPrep Mag PCR Clean-up (Axygen), and fragments of ~420 bp (with the approximate insert size of 300 bp) were recovered. Each sample was then amplified by PCR. The PCR products were cleaned up using AxyPrep Mag PCR Clean-up (Axygen), validated using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies), and quantified by Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer (Invitrogen). Then libraries with different indexs were multiplexed and loaded on an Illumina Navoseq instrument for sequencing using a 2x150 paired-end (PE) configuration according to manufacturer’s instructions. The sequences were processed and analyzed by GENEWIZ. Venn diagrams between gene sets were made by BioVenn. The top enriched genes in the active IFNγ-responsive vitiligo dFBs were from the published vitiligo study (Xu et al., 2022). KEGG and gene ontology (GO) pathway analysis for differentially expressed genes and correlation analysis between single cell RNA-seq with bulk RNA-seq were performed by R package clusterProfile 3.12.0.

Cell extract preparation and ELISA assay

Request a detailed protocol

Skin biopsies were lysed in a lysis buffer supplemented with completed proteinase inhibitor cocktail (Apexbio, Houston, USA) to maximally preserve protein modifications as described previously (Zhang et al., 2021). Lysates were homogenized by sonication using digital sonifier FS- 350T (Sxsonic, Shanghai, China) followed by centrifugation to remove DNA and cell debris. Protein concentrations were measured by BCA protein assay kit. Protein lysates were subjected to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using mouse DuoSet ELISA commercial kits (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), following manufacturer instructions.

Primary culture of mouse dermal fibroblasts

Request a detailed protocol

Primary mouse dermal fibroblasts were isolated from mouse skin as described previously (Zhang et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2019). Isolated cells were plated on culture dish in growth medium (DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and antibiotics/antimycotics) in a humidified incubator at 5% CO2 and 37 °C under sterile conditions. Cells from the first passage were replated at 1x105 /mL for in vitro assays. For in vitro IFNγ treatment, dFBs were treated with either recombinant mouse IFNγ (5 ng/ml, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) for 8 or 24 hr before being subjected to qRT-PCR or ELISA analysis.

Dermal fibroblasts and T cells co-culture

Request a detailed protocol

To collected IFNγ-primed dFB conditioned medium (CM), primary dFBs were treated with IFNγ (5 ng/ml, R&D Systems) or PBS control for 2 hr, cells were washed twice with PBS then replenished with fresh medium without IFNγ for additional 48 hr, and CM was collected for the subsequent co-culture experiment with T cells. Primary lymphocytes isolated from skin draining lymph nodes from adult C57BL/6 mice were cultured on plates precoated with anti-mouse α-CD3 (3 μg/ml, Biolegend, #100340) and anti-mouse α-CD28 (3 μg/ml, Biolegend, #102116) in RPMI medium supplemented with 10% FBS with or without dFB-CM. After 4 days, medium was collected for ELISA analysis. To neutralize CXCR3, T cells were pretreated with anti-CXCR3 neutralizing antibody (10 μg/ml, Biolegend, #126526) or control IgG antibody (10 μg/ml, Biolegend, #400902) for 30 min before adding dFB-CM. For treatments, T cells were pretreated with 5% undiluted BSE for 30 min before adding dFB-CM and 5% dH2O was used as the vehicle control.

Statistical analysis

Request a detailed protocol

Experiments were repeated at least three times with similar results and were statistically analyzed by GraphPad Prism 8 software. For experiments with two groups, statistical significance was determined using Student’s unpaired two-tailed t-test. For experiments with more than two groups, one-way ANOVA multiple comparison test was performed as indicated in the legend. A p value of<0.05 was considered statistically significant (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001).

Data availability

The accession numbers for the raw data files of the scRNA-seq analyses reported in this paper are deposited in the GEO database under accession codes: GSE224848.

The following data sets were generated
    1. Zhang LJ
    (2024) NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus
    ID GSE224848. Defining Cell Type-specific Immune Responses in Allergic Contact Dermatitis by Single-cell Transcriptomics.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE224848

References

    1. Pollard KM
    2. Cauvi DM
    3. Toomey CB
    4. Morris KV
    5. Kono DH
    (2013)
    Interferon-γ and systemic autoimmunity
    Discovery Medicine 16:123–131.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Youxi Liu

    State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft
    Contributed equally with
    Meimei Yin, Xiaoting Mao and Shuai Wu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9084-1588

  2. Meimei Yin

    State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft
    Contributed equally with
    Youxi Liu, Xiaoting Mao and Shuai Wu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3718-1944

  3. Xiaoting Mao

    Zhejiang Yangshengtang Institute of Natural Medication Co Ltd, Hangzhou, China
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology
    Contributed equally with
    Youxi Liu, Meimei Yin and Shuai Wu
    Competing interests
    affiliated with Zhejiang Yangshengtang Institute of Natural Medication Co., Ltd. The author has no other competing interests to declare

  4. Shuai Wu

    State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, School of Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft
    Contributed equally with
    Youxi Liu, Meimei Yin and Xiaoting Mao
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7569-3986

  5. Shuangping Wei

    1. Zhejiang Yangshengtang Institute of Natural Medication Co Ltd, Hangzhou, China
    2. Yang Sheng Tang (Anji) Cosmetics Co Ltd, Zhejiang, China
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    affiliated with Zhejiang Yangshengtang Institute of Natural Medication Co., Ltd. and Yang Sheng Tang (Anji) Cosmetics Co., Ltd. The author has no other competing interests to declare

  6. Shujun Heng

    State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
    Contribution
    Investigation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  7. Yichun Yang

    State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
    Contribution
    Resources, Investigation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  8. Jinwen Huang

    Department of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
    Contribution
    Resources
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  9. Zhuolin Guo

    Department of Dermatology, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
    Contribution
    Investigation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  10. Chuan Li

    Zhejiang Yangshengtang Institute of Natural Medication Co Ltd, Hangzhou, China
    Contribution
    Resources, Funding acquisition, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    affiliated with Zhejiang Yangshengtang Institute of Natural Medication Co., Ltd. The author has no other competing interests to declare

  11. Chao Ji

    Department of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
    Contribution
    Resources
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  12. Liu Hu

    Zhejiang Yangshengtang Institute of Natural Medication Co Ltd, Hangzhou, China
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Resources, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Writing – review and editing
    For correspondence
    lhu@mail.yst.com.cn
    Competing interests
    affiliated with Zhejiang Yangshengtang Institute of Natural Medication Co., Ltd. The author has no other competing interests to declare

  13. Wenjie Liu

    State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Formal analysis, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Project administration, Writing – review and editing
    For correspondence
    wjliu@xmu.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8044-5338

  14. Ling-juan Zhang

    State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Project administration, Writing – review and editing
    For correspondence
    lingjuan.zhang@xmu.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6937-4578

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFC2508100)

  • Ling-juan Zhang

National Natural Science Foundation of China (82373879)

  • Ling-juan Zhang

National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020YFA0112901)

  • Wenjie Liu
  • Ling-juan Zhang

National Natural Science Foundation of China (81971551)

  • Ling-juan Zhang

Xiamen University Double First Class Construction Project (Biology) (DFC2024004)

  • Ling-juan Zhang

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Acknowledgements

We thank the flow-cytometry and microscopic core facility at Xiamen University for aiding with flow-cytometry analysis and imaging studies.

Ethics

All sample acquisitions were approved and regulated by Medical Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University (reference number No. 2020[146]). The informed consent was obtained from all subjects prior to surgical procedures.

All mice were bred and maintained in standard pathogen free environment of the Laboratory Animal Center in Xiamen University, and all animal experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Xiamen University. (protocol code XMULAC20190090).

Version history

  1. Sent for peer review:
  2. Preprint posted:
  3. Reviewed Preprint version 1:
  4. Reviewed Preprint version 2:
  5. Version of Record published:
  6. Version of Record updated:

Cite all versions

You can cite all versions using the DOI https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.94698. This DOI represents all versions, and will always resolve to the latest one.

Copyright

© 2024, Liu, Yin, Mao et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 991
    views
  • 109
    downloads
  • 0
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Youxi Liu
  2. Meimei Yin
  3. Xiaoting Mao
  4. Shuai Wu
  5. Shuangping Wei
  6. Shujun Heng
  7. Yichun Yang
  8. Jinwen Huang
  9. Zhuolin Guo
  10. Chuan Li
  11. Chao Ji
  12. Liu Hu
  13. Wenjie Liu
  14. Ling-juan Zhang
(2024)
Defining cell type-specific immune responses in a mouse model of allergic contact dermatitis by single-cell transcriptomics
eLife 13:RP94698.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.94698.3

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.94698

Categories and tags

Research organism

Further reading

    1. Immunology and Inflammation

    T-follicular helper cells are epigenetically poised to transdifferentiate into T-regulatory type 1 cells

    Josep Garnica, Patricia Sole ... Pere Santamaria
    Research Article

    Chronic antigenic stimulation can trigger the formation of interleukin 10 (IL-10)-producing T-regulatory type 1 (TR1) cells in vivo. We have recently shown that murine T-follicular helper (TFH) cells are precursors of TR1 cells and that the TFH-to-TR1 cell transdifferentiation process is characterized by the progressive loss and acquisition of opposing transcription factor gene expression programs that evolve through at least one transitional cell stage. Here, we use a broad range of bulk and single-cell transcriptional and epigenetic tools to investigate the epigenetic underpinnings of this process. At the single-cell level, the TFH-to-TR1 cell transition is accompanied by both, downregulation of TFH cell-specific gene expression due to loss of chromatin accessibility, and upregulation of TR1 cell-specific genes linked to chromatin regions that remain accessible throughout the transdifferentiation process, with minimal generation of new open chromatin regions. By interrogating the epigenetic status of accessible TR1 genes on purified TFH and conventional T-cells, we find that most of these genes, including Il10, are already poised for expression at the TFH cell stage. Whereas these genes are closed and hypermethylated in Tconv cells, they are accessible, hypomethylated, and enriched for H3K27ac-marked and hypomethylated active enhancers in TFH cells. These enhancers are enriched for binding sites for the TFH and TR1-associated transcription factors TOX-2, IRF4, and c-MAF. Together, these data suggest that the TR1 gene expression program is genetically imprinted at the TFH cell stage.

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Immunology and Inflammation

    ACK1 and BRK non-receptor tyrosine kinase deficiencies are associated with familial systemic lupus and involved in efferocytosis

    Stephanie Guillet, Tomi Lazarov ... Frédéric Geissmann
    Research Article

    Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease, the pathophysiology and genetic basis of which are incompletely understood. Using a forward genetic screen in multiplex families with SLE, we identified an association between SLE and compound heterozygous deleterious variants in the non-receptor tyrosine kinases (NRTKs) ACK1 and BRK. Experimental blockade of ACK1 or BRK increased circulating autoantibodies in vivo in mice and exacerbated glomerular IgG deposits in an SLE mouse model. Mechanistically, NRTKs regulate activation, migration, and proliferation of immune cells. We found that the patients’ ACK1 and BRK variants impair efferocytosis, the MERTK-mediated anti-inflammatory response to apoptotic cells, in human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived macrophages, which may contribute to SLE pathogenesis. Overall, our data suggest that ACK1 and BRK deficiencies are associated with human SLE and impair efferocytosis in macrophages.

    1. Immunology and Inflammation

    Neurotrophic factor Neuritin modulates T cell electrical and metabolic state for the balance of tolerance and immunity

    Hong Yu, Hiroshi Nishio ... Drew Pardoll
    Research Article

    The adaptive T cell response is accompanied by continuous rewiring of the T cell’s electric and metabolic state. Ion channels and nutrient transporters integrate bioelectric and biochemical signals from the environment, setting cellular electric and metabolic states. Divergent electric and metabolic states contribute to T cell immunity or tolerance. Here, we report in mice that neuritin (Nrn1) contributes to tolerance development by modulating regulatory and effector T cell function. Nrn1 expression in regulatory T cells promotes its expansion and suppression function, while expression in the T effector cell dampens its inflammatory response. Nrn1 deficiency in mice causes dysregulation of ion channel and nutrient transporter expression in Treg and effector T cells, resulting in divergent metabolic outcomes and impacting autoimmune disease progression and recovery. These findings identify a novel immune function of the neurotrophic factor Nrn1 in regulating the T cell metabolic state in a cell context-dependent manner and modulating the outcome of an immune response.