Insights into early animal evolution form the genome of the xenacoelomorph worm Xenoturbella bocki

  1. Philipp H Schiffer  Is a corresponding author
  2. Paschalis Natsidis
  3. Daniel J Leite
  4. Helen E Robertson
  5. François Lapraz
  6. Ferdinand Marlétaz
  7. Bastian Fromm
  8. Liam Baudry
  9. Fraser Simpson
  10. Eirik Høye
  11. Anne C Zakrzewski
  12. ‪Paschalia Kapli
  13. Katharina J Hoff
  14. Steven Mueller
  15. Martial Marbouty
  16. Heather Marlow
  17. Richard R Copley
  18. Romain Koszul
  19. Peter Sarkies
  20. Maximilian J Telford  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Cologne, Germany
  2. University College London, United Kingdom
  3. Durham University, United Kingdom
  4. Université Côte d'Azur, France
  5. UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Norway
  6. Institut Pasteur, France
  7. University of Greifswald, Germany
  8. University of Chicago, United States
  9. Sorbonne Université, France
  10. University of Oxford, United Kingdom

Abstract

The evolutionary origins of Bilateria remain enigmatic. One of the more enduring proposals highlights similarities between a cnidarian-like planula larva and simple acoel-like flatworms. This idea is based in part on the view of the Xenacoelomorpha as an outgroup to all other bilaterians which are themselves designated the Nephrozoa (protostomes and deuterostomes). Genome data can provide important comparative data and help to understand the evolution and biology of enigmatic species better. Here we assemble and analyse the genome of the simple, marine xenacoelomorph Xenoturbella bocki, a key species for our understanding of early bilaterian evolution. Our highly contiguous genome assembly of X. bocki has a size of ~111 Mbp in 18 chromosome like scaffolds, with repeat content and intron, exon and intergenic space comparable to other bilaterian invertebrates. We find X. bocki to have a similar number of genes to other bilaterians and to have retained ancestral metazoan synteny. Key bilaterian signalling pathways are also largely complete and most bilaterian miRNAs are present. Overall, we conclude that X. bocki has a complex genome typical of bilaterians, which does not reflect the apparent simplicity of its body plan that has been so important to proposals that the Xenacoelomorpha are the simple sister group of the rest of the Bilateria.

Data availability

All read sets (RNA and DNA derived) used in this study will be made available with the publication of this manuscript on the SRA database under the BioProject ID PRJNA864813. Hi-C reads are deposited under SAMN30224387, RNA-Seq under SAMN35083895. The genome assemblies of X. bocki (ERS12565994, ERA16814408) and the Chlamydia sp. (ERS12566084, ERA16814775) are deposited under PRJEB55230 at ENA.Supplementary online material (described in the manuscript) has be made available on Zenodo: doi:10.5281/zenodo.6962271

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Philipp H Schiffer

    Institute of Zoology, University of Cologne, Köln, Germany
    For correspondence
    philipp.schiffer@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6776-0934
  2. Paschalis Natsidis

    Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Daniel J Leite

    Department of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9966-4760
  4. Helen E Robertson

    Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. François Lapraz

    Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9209-2018
  6. Ferdinand Marlétaz

    Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Bastian Fromm

    UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0352-3037
  8. Liam Baudry

    Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Fraser Simpson

    Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Eirik Høye

    UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Anne C Zakrzewski

    Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. ‪Paschalia Kapli

    Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Katharina J Hoff

    Institute for Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Steven Mueller

    Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Martial Marbouty

    Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1668-8423
  16. Heather Marlow

    Division of Biological Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Richard R Copley

    Laboratoire de Biologie du Dé veloppement de Villefranche-sur-mer, Sorbonne Université, Villefranche-sur-mer, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Romain Koszul

    Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3086-1173
  19. Peter Sarkies

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0279-6199
  20. Maximilian J Telford

    Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    m.telford@ucl.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3749-5620

Funding

European Research Council (ERC-2012-AdG 322790)

  • Philipp H Schiffer
  • Helen E Robertson
  • Anne C Zakrzewski
  • Steven Mueller
  • Maximilian J Telford

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (434028868)

  • Philipp H Schiffer

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/R016240/1)

  • Paschalis Natsidis
  • Maximilian J Telford

Leverhulme Trust (RPG-2018-302)

  • Daniel J Leite
  • Maximilian J Telford

HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions (764840 IGNITE)

  • Paschalis Natsidis
  • Maximilian J Telford

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2024, Schiffer et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,117
    views
  • 243
    downloads
  • 1
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Philipp H Schiffer
  2. Paschalis Natsidis
  3. Daniel J Leite
  4. Helen E Robertson
  5. François Lapraz
  6. Ferdinand Marlétaz
  7. Bastian Fromm
  8. Liam Baudry
  9. Fraser Simpson
  10. Eirik Høye
  11. Anne C Zakrzewski
  12. ‪Paschalia Kapli
  13. Katharina J Hoff
  14. Steven Mueller
  15. Martial Marbouty
  16. Heather Marlow
  17. Richard R Copley
  18. Romain Koszul
  19. Peter Sarkies
  20. Maximilian J Telford
(2024)
Insights into early animal evolution form the genome of the xenacoelomorph worm Xenoturbella bocki
eLife 13:e94948.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.94948

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.94948

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Pierre Barrat-Charlaix, Richard A Neher
    Research Article

    As pathogens spread in a population of hosts, immunity is built up, and the pool of susceptible individuals are depleted. This generates selective pressure, to which many human RNA viruses, such as influenza virus or SARS-CoV-2, respond with rapid antigenic evolution and frequent emergence of immune evasive variants. However, the host’s immune systems adapt, and older immune responses wane, such that escape variants only enjoy a growth advantage for a limited time. If variant growth dynamics and reshaping of host-immunity operate on comparable time scales, viral adaptation is determined by eco-evolutionary interactions that are not captured by models of rapid evolution in a fixed environment. Here, we use a Susceptible/Infected model to describe the interaction between an evolving viral population in a dynamic but immunologically diverse host population. We show that depending on strain cross-immunity, heterogeneity of the host population, and durability of immune responses, escape variants initially grow exponentially, but lose their growth advantage before reaching high frequencies. Their subsequent dynamics follows an anomalous random walk determined by future escape variants and results in variant trajectories that are unpredictable. This model can explain the apparent contradiction between the clearly adaptive nature of antigenic evolution and the quasi-neutral dynamics of high-frequency variants observed for influenza viruses.

    1. Ecology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Rebecca D Tarvin, Jeffrey L Coleman ... Richard W Fitch
    Research Article

    Understanding the origins of novel, complex phenotypes is a major goal in evolutionary biology. Poison frogs of the family Dendrobatidae have evolved the novel ability to acquire alkaloids from their diet for chemical defense at least three times. However, taxon sampling for alkaloids has been biased towards colorful species, without similar attention paid to inconspicuous ones that are often assumed to be undefended. As a result, our understanding of how chemical defense evolved in this group is incomplete. Here, we provide new data showing that, in contrast to previous studies, species from each undefended poison frog clade have measurable yet low amounts of alkaloids. We confirm that undefended dendrobatids regularly consume mites and ants, which are known sources of alkaloids. Thus, our data suggest that diet is insufficient to explain the defended phenotype. Our data support the existence of a phenotypic intermediate between toxin consumption and sequestration — passive accumulation — that differs from sequestration in that it involves no derived forms of transport and storage mechanisms yet results in low levels of toxin accumulation. We discuss the concept of passive accumulation and its potential role in the origin of chemical defenses in poison frogs and other toxin-sequestering organisms. In light of ideas from pharmacokinetics, we incorporate new and old data from poison frogs into an evolutionary model that could help explain the origins of acquired chemical defenses in animals and provide insight into the molecular processes that govern the fate of ingested toxins.