Volume electron microscopy reveals unique laminar synaptic characteristics in the human entorhinal cortex

Abstract

The entorhinal cortex (EC) plays a pivotal role in memory function and spatial navigation, connecting the hippocampus with the neocortex. The EC integrates a wide range of cortical and subcortical inputs, but its synaptic organization in the human brain is largely unknown. We used volume electron microscopy to perform a 3D analysis of the microanatomical features of synapses in all layers of the medial EC (MEC) from the human brain. Using this technology, 12,974 synapses were fully 3D reconstructed at the ultrastructural level. The MEC presented a distinct set of synaptic features, differentiating this region from other human cortical areas. Furthermore, ultrastructural synaptic characteristics within the MEC was predominantly similar, although layers I and VI exhibited several synaptic characteristics that were distinct from other layers. The present study constitutes an extensive description of the synaptic characteristics of the neuropil of all layers of the EC, a crucial step to better understand the connectivity of this cortical region, in both health and disease.

Data availability

Most data are available in the main text or the supplementary files. Raw data used for analysis are provided in Supplementary File 4.Stack of images are available at BossDB.org as project page:https://10.60533/boss-2024-ekc7The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are published in the EBRAINS Knowledge Graph:https://doi.org/10.25493/3GMJ-FEZhttps://doi.org/10.25493/QGH8-MTShttps://doi.org/10.25493/CSB1-Q07

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sergio Plaza-Alonso

    Instituto Cajal (CSIC), Madrid, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Nicolas Cano-Astorga

    Instituto Cajal (CSIC), Madrid, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Javier DeFelipe

    Instituto Cajal (CSIC), Madrid, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5484-0660
  4. Lidia Alonso-Nanclares

    Instituto Cajal (CSIC), Madrid, Spain
    For correspondence
    aidil@cajal.csic.es
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2649-7097

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (PID2021-127924NB-I00)

  • Javier DeFelipe

CSIC Interdisciplinary Thematic Platform (Cajal Blue Brain)

  • Javier DeFelipe

European Union's Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (Grant Agreement No. 945539 (Human Brain Project SGA3))

  • Javier DeFelipe

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (PRE2019-089228)

  • Nicolas Cano-Astorga

Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (FPU19/00007)

  • Sergio Plaza-Alonso

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: Human brain tissue was obtained from 3 autopsies with no recorded neurological or psychiatric alterations (supplied by Unidad Asociada Neuromax, Laboratorio de Neuroanatomía Humana, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, Spain). The consent of the individuals was obtained and the sampling procedure was approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee of the Albacete University Hospital. The tissue was obtained following national laws and international ethical and technical guidelines on the use of human samples for biomedical research purposes. Human brain tissue from the same subjects has been used in previous studies (Cano-Astorga et al., 2021, 2023; Domínguez-Álvaro et al., 2021a; Montero-Crespo et al., 2020).

Copyright

© 2025, Plaza-Alonso et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 358
    views
  • 64
    downloads
  • 0
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.96144

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Song Chang, Beilin Zheng ... Liping Yu
    Research Article

    Multisensory object discrimination is essential in everyday life, yet the neural mechanisms underlying this process remain unclear. In this study, we trained rats to perform a two-alternative forced-choice task using both auditory and visual cues. Our findings reveal that multisensory perceptual learning actively engages auditory cortex (AC) neurons in both visual and audiovisual processing. Importantly, many audiovisual neurons in the AC exhibited experience-dependent associations between their visual and auditory preferences, displaying a unique integration model. This model employed selective multisensory enhancement for the auditory-visual pairing guiding the contralateral choice, which correlated with improved multisensory discrimination. Furthermore, AC neurons effectively distinguished whether a preferred auditory stimulus was paired with its associated visual stimulus using this distinct integrative mechanism. Our results highlight the capability of sensory cortices to develop sophisticated integrative strategies, adapting to task demands to enhance multisensory discrimination abilities.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Brian DePasquale, Carlos D Brody, Jonathan W Pillow
    Research Article Updated

    Accumulating evidence to make decisions is a core cognitive function. Previous studies have tended to estimate accumulation using either neural or behavioral data alone. Here, we develop a unified framework for modeling stimulus-driven behavior and multi-neuron activity simultaneously. We applied our method to choices and neural recordings from three rat brain regions—the posterior parietal cortex (PPC), the frontal orienting fields (FOF), and the anterior-dorsal striatum (ADS)—while subjects performed a pulse-based accumulation task. Each region was best described by a distinct accumulation model, which all differed from the model that best described the animal’s choices. FOF activity was consistent with an accumulator where early evidence was favored while the ADS reflected near perfect accumulation. Neural responses within an accumulation framework unveiled a distinct association between each brain region and choice. Choices were better predicted from all regions using a comprehensive, accumulation-based framework and different brain regions were found to differentially reflect choice-related accumulation signals: FOF and ADS both reflected choice but ADS showed more instances of decision vacillation. Previous studies relating neural data to behaviorally inferred accumulation dynamics have implicitly assumed that individual brain regions reflect the whole-animal level accumulator. Our results suggest that different brain regions represent accumulated evidence in dramatically different ways and that accumulation at the whole-animal level may be constructed from a variety of neural-level accumulators.