Micro-scale control of oligodendrocyte morphology and myelination by the intellectual disability-linked protein acyltransferase ZDHHC9

Mutations in the ZDHHC9 gene cause XLID (Baker et al., 2015; Raymond et al., 2007; Masurel-Paulet et al., 2014). XLID-associated ZDHHC9 mutations include nonsense mutations and missense mutations affecting key amino acids, as well as splice site mutations, insertions, and deletions that result in frameshifts. Importantly, all these genetic changes are predicted to be loss-of-function. These findings suggest that ZDHHC9 is essential for higher brain function.

Given that many XLID genes are neuronally enriched (Devys et al., 1993; Budreck and Scheiffele, 2007; Toya et al., 2023; Rusconi et al., 2008; Guarnieri et al., 2017; Murphy et al., 2006; Bienvenu et al., 2002), an a priori hypothesis is that ZDHHC9 acts in neurons. However, patients with ZDHHC9 mutations have grossly normal gray matter (GM) but reduced brain white matter (WM) volume, especially in the corpus callosum (CC) (Baker et al., 2015; Raymond et al., 2007; Masurel-Paulet et al., 2014). ZDHHC9 mutations are also linked to cerebral palsy, a condition in which intellectual disability is often associated with WM impairment (WMI) (Jiang et al., 2019; Odding et al., 2006; van Eyk et al., 2019; McMichael et al., 2015). These findings raise the possibility that ZDHHC9 may be crucial for normal WM development and/or proper function of oligodendrocytes (OLs), the myelin-forming CNS glia abundant in WM. Notably, Zdhhc9 knockout (KO) mice exhibit WM volume reductions and seizure-like activity (Kouskou et al., 2018; Shimell et al., 2019), as well as behavioral phenotypes seen in other mouse models of ID (Kouskou et al., 2018). Thus, Zdhhc9 KO mice have the potential to serve as an excellent model for human ZDHHC9 mutations. However, their phenotype is yet to be fully characterized.

ZDHHC9 codes for a protein acyltransferase (PAT), an enzyme that catalyzes the modification of protein cysteine residues with palmitate and related fatty acids. This process, termed palmitoylation (also known as S-palmitoylation or S-acylation), plays a critical role in targeting proteins to specific subcellular membrane locations (Linder and Deschenes, 2007). Nearly 30 years ago, it was reported that major myelin proteins in the nervous system, including Proteolipid protein (PLP), Myelin basic protein (MBP), Myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG), and Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG), are palmitoylated (Bizzozero and Good, 1990; Agrawal et al., 1983). However, at that time, methods were lacking to define the roles of palmitoylation of these proteins in myelin formation and function. Later proteomic studies revealed many other palmitoylated myelin proteins (Kang et al., 2008; Wan et al., 2013; Gorenberg et al., 2022; Edmonds et al., 2017), and an isolated study suggested that palmitoylation targets myelin proteins to the plasma membrane of cultured OLs (Schneider et al., 2005). Despite these findings, little is known regarding how myelin protein palmitoylation is regulated and the functional importance of this process for higher brain function.

We hypothesized that ZDHHC9-dependent palmitoylation plays a critical role in proper myelination and WM formation. Consistent with this notion, we report that ZDHHC9 is the most highly expressed PAT in mouse and human OLs. Moreover, ZDHHC9 localizes to puncta in OL processes that are likely Golgi outposts, whereas other PATs tested and ZDHHC9 XLID mutant forms are restricted to OL cell bodies. These findings may explain why ZDHHC9 loss of function cannot be compensated by other PATs. In mice lacking Zdhhc9, we did not detect changes in OL lineage cell generation or total MBP expression levels, but we found that at the micro-scale Zdhhc9 KO OLs are dysmorphic and myelin ultrastructure is highly abnormal, with both hypo- and hypermyelination of axons in WM tracts. We show that with the help of Golga7, a ZDHHC9 partner protein that also localizes to Golgi outposts, ZDHHC9 robustly palmitoylates the major myelin protein MBP, and that MBP palmitoylation is impaired in Zdhhc9 KO brain. Palmitoyl- and total levels of another myelin protein, Myelin-associated Glycoprotein (MAG) are also affected by Zdhhc9 KO, suggestive of a broader deficit in myelin protein regulation and organization in these mice. Interestingly, the XLID mutant ZDHHC9-P150S still palmitoylates MBP in a Golga7-dependent manner in transfected non-neuronal cells, raising the possibility that impaired subcellular localization in OLs, rather than impaired catalytic activity, may cause or contribute to WM abnormalities in some cases of ZDHHC9-associated XLID. Together, our findings provide new insights into mechanisms of ZDHHC9-associated XLID and the palmitoylation-dependent control of myelination, a process first reported decades ago, but about which almost nothing is known.

Genetic factors are central to intellectual disability (Vorstman and Ophoff, 2013; Vissers et al., 2016), as exemplified by the increasing number of known XLID-associated genes (Renpenning et al., 1962; Amir et al., 1999; Billuart et al., 1998; Neri et al., 2018). However, knowledge of the cellular/molecular processes controlled by XLID-associated gene products is often limited. The cognitive deficits and epilepsy that are hallmarks of ZDHHC9-associated XLID are often ascribed to malformations of neocortical gray matter (Stevenson et al., 2013; Guerrini and Dobyns, 2014; Lim and Crino, 2013; Zhang et al., 2010; Juric-Sekhar and Hevner, 2019). Indeed, ZDHHC9 is expressed in a subset of forebrain neurons (Doyle et al., 2008), and ‘Zdhhc9 knockdown’ primary hippocampal neurons display impaired dendritic branching and an altered ratio of excitatory-to-inhibitory synapses (Shimell et al., 2019). However, there is an increasing appreciation that ID can also result from impaired WM formation and/or function (Shangguan et al., 2019; Wong, 2019; Yu et al., 2008; Spencer et al., 2005; Soldán and Pirko, 2012). Consistent with this notion, both ZDHHC9 and its partner protein Golga7 are far more highly expressed in OLs than in other CNS cell types, in both mice and humans (Figure 1E and F, Zhang et al., 2014; Zeisel et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2016). In support of a key role for ZDHHC9 in normal WM formation and function, we found that Zdhhc9 KO does not affect axon number in the CC, but greatly impacts microscale OL morphology and myelin ultrastructure (Figures 4—6). We recognize that using conventional Zdhhc9 KO mice, in which Zdhhc9 is globally deleted, cannot directly address whether impaired myelination in these mice is due to a cell-autonomous role for ZDHHC9 in OLs, a role for ZDHHC9 in neurons, or a combination of these factors. However, the impaired OL morphology and maturation seen in culture conditions after acute Zdhhc9 loss (Figure 7) supports the first of these possibilities. While a conditional KO mouse could more directly help test the OL-autonomous role of ZDHHC9 in vivo, in this study, we focused on conventional KO mice to more accurately mirror the situation in human patients with ZDHHC9 loss or mutation.

It is perhaps surprising that, despite the clear changes in OL morphogenesis, we did not detect changes in overall numbers of OPCs or OLs in Zdhhc9 KO mice. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that such changes could be revealed by different methods. In addition, different OL subtypes express different subsets of other marker genes (Soldán and Pirko, 2012) and it remains possible that Zdhhc9 loss preferentially directs OL maturation towards or away from one or more of these subtypes. Furthermore, we cannot exclude the possibility that assessment of other brain regions might also reveal differences in OPC and/or OL numbers in Zdhhc9 KO mice. Lastly, we also note that acute Zdhhc9 loss in cultured OLs causes more striking phenotypes than seen with KO mice in vivo. However, it is not uncommon for acute knockdown to cause more dramatic effects than germline KO, possibly due to longer-term compensatory mechanisms in vivo (George et al., 2015; Elias et al., 2006). Together, though, our findings suggest that OL and WM abnormalities could significantly contribute to ZDHHC9-associated XLID.

We also recognize that although Zdhhc9 loss affects OL morphology both in vitro and in vivo, the specific nature of these changes differs between the two systems (compare Figures 4 and 7). However, several non-mutually exclusive factors could account for these differences. First, morphology in vivo may well be influenced by the axons and/or other extrinsic components around each OL that are not present in our primary cultures. Second, OL growth in vivo is highly 3-dimensional, whereas growth in culture is largely 2-dimensional – it may be difficult to support formation of spheroids (by definition, a 3-dimensional structure) in the latter situation. Finally, ZDHHC9 is absent in vivo from the beginning of development until the time points examined, whereas in our cultured OL experiments, Zdhhc9 shRNA is virally delivered to OPC cultures at DIV2 and likely acutely affects Zdhhc9 expression predominantly in committed OLs (following the switch to differentiation medium at DIV3). These differences may also affect the ability of other PATs or, potentially, palmitoylation-independent subcellular processes, to compensate for Zdhhc9 loss. Further experiments, perhaps involving longitudinal imaging of the development of fluorescently labeled OLs in the two systems, could provide more insights into how Zdhhc9 loss affects OL morphological elaboration.

Based on behavioral milestones, patients with ZDHHC9-associated XLID have been diagnosed as young as two years of age (Schirwani et al., 2018), suggesting that ZDHHC9 is important for higher brain function during early development. Consistent with this notion, we observed dysmyelination (both hyper and hypomyelination) in P30 mice, approximately equivalent to a 3-year-old human (Dutta and Sengupta, 2016). These findings suggest that the myelin abnormalities observed in adult Zdhhc9 KO mice (Figure 6) are due to impaired initial myelination, rather than impaired myelin maintenance, and further support the use of Zdhhc9 KO mice as a model for human ZDHHC9-associated XLID.

Although difficult to prove causation in a global, conventional KO line, the myelin abnormalities in Zdhhc9 KO mice are also associated with behavioral impairments that have some overlap with human patients with ZDHHC9-associated XLID. Most notably, Zdhhc9 KO mice have seizures, reminiscent of the rolandic epilepsy reported in many human patients with ZDHHC9 mutation (Baker et al., 2015; Shimell et al., 2019). Zdhhc9 KO mice also have impaired latency to reach a hidden platform in the Morris Water Maze (MWM), a task designed to assess spatial learning (Kouskou et al., 2018). However, the KO mice do not differ significantly in reference memory in a subsequent probe trial, suggesting that, despite the increased latency, they do learn the location of the platform as effectively as wt (Kouskou et al., 2018). In addition, performance in both the open field and in an elevated plus maze (EPM, in which the KO mice spend significantly more time in the open arms) suggests that Zdhhc9 KO mice also have decreased levels of anxiety (Kouskou et al., 2018). Decreased anxiety is reported in several other mouse models of ID (Zang et al., 2009; Samaco et al., 2008; Escorihuela et al., 1998; Peier et al., 2000; Altafaj et al., 2001). Finally, Zdhhc9 KO mice spend significantly less time on a hanging wire task (Kouskou et al., 2018), a phenotype consistent with hypotonia, a phenotype also reported in patients with ZDHHC9 mutation (Raymond et al., 2007; Masurel-Paulet et al., 2014; Han et al., 2017). Like reduced anxiety, hypotonia is seen in several human neurodevelopmental conditions and relevant mouse models (see Kouskou et al., 2018 and references therein for a fuller discussion). While either OL-specific conditional KO of Zdhhc9 or OL-specific rescue in a KO background would be required to determine causation. However, these findings are consistent with a model in which the impaired myelination in the absence of Zdhhc9 causes behavioral abnormalities reminiscent not just of ZDHHC9 mutation in humans, but also in other forms of ID.

Zdhhc9 is also expressed at higher levels than other PATs in OLs (Figure 1C, E and F), potentially explaining much of the impact of Zdhhc9 loss in these cells. However, it is also intriguing that ZDHHC9wt localization in OLs differs markedly from that of other PATs examined, and of three ZDHHC9 XLID mutants (Figure 2). These findings suggest that specific subcellular localization of ZDHHC9wt is central to the role of this PAT in OLs and explain why other PATs, and ZDHHC9 XLID mutant forms cannot compensate for loss of ZDHHC9wt. This notion is further supported by our findings that the XLID-associated P150S and, to a lesser extent, R96W mutant forms of ZDHHC9 are still capable of palmitoylating MBP in cotransfected cells. Indeed, despite its reduced catalytic activity in an in vitro assay (Mitchell et al., 2014), ZDHHC9-P150S does not differ significantly from ZDHHC9wt in its ability to palmitoylate MBP, or to autopalmitoylate, in our cell-based assay. This residual autopalmitoylation, which was also observed in Mitchell et al., 2014, suggests that ZDHHC9-P150S might still be capable of palmitoylating MBP and/or other substrates in OLs, if it were to be targeted to the correct subcellular location. Impaired subcellular targeting thus represents an additional possible contributory factor, not mutually exclusive with impaired catalytic activity, to explain impairments in ZDHHC9-associated XLID. More broadly, these results emphasize the importance of precise subcellular localization in palmitoylation-dependent regulation, a key take home message from prior studies by ourselves and others e.g., (George et al., 2015; Zhang and Thomas, 2024; Furne et al., 2006).

What, then, is the identity of the puncta in OL subcellular processes to which ZDHHC9wt can localize, but which other PATs and ZDHHC9 XLID mutants cannot? Our immunostaining results with subcellular organelle markers suggest that these puncta represent Golgi outposts or satellites, and that ZDHHC9’s key partner Golga7 also localizes to this location (Figure 2, Figure 2—figure supplement 2A; Govind et al., 2021; Fu et al., 2019). Golgi outposts have long been known in neurons (Horton and Ehlers, 2003), and we previously reported that ZDHHC9 localizes to such structures in primary hippocampal neurons (Shimell et al., 2019). Golgi outposts were also recently described in OLs (Wang and Gleeson, 2020). However, the function of these structures in OLs remains to be fully determined, so the role(s) of ZDHHC9 at this subcellular organelle is challenging to infer. Nonetheless, we speculate that ZDHHC9 could be involved in either or both of the best-described roles of Golgi outposts, protein glycosylation and microtubule nucleation, for the following reasons. First, ZDHHC9-positive Golgi outposts in OL processes are also positive for the enzyme Mannosidase II, suggesting they represent sites at which protein glycosylation is regulated (Figure 2—figure supplement 2B). In addition, although ZDHHC9 colocalization with TPPP, a protein implicated in microtubule nucleation, is less apparent (Figure 2—figure supplement 2C), knockout/knockdown of either ZDHHC9 (Figures 4 and 7) or TPPP (Fu et al., 2019) affects branching and complexity of OL processes, a process that involves microtubule nucleation. However, more investigation is needed to determine the functions of Golgi outposts in OLs, in order to define the associated contribution of ZDHHC9.

Another intriguing question is whether and how the loss of ZDHHC9 action at Golgi outposts might contribute to the myelination deficits we observed in Zdhhc9 KO mice (Figures 5 and 6). Our sparse genetic labeling studies revealed that Zdhhc9 KO OL processes are distended, with numerous spheroid-like swellings (Figure 5). We reason that these spheroids are enclosed by the OL lipid membrane because if the membrane were ruptured, the EGFP signal would likely diffuse. This, in turn suggests that the caliber of the OL process at the position of the spheroid is grossly abnormal, i.e., the membrane has hyper-expanded. Given that OL membrane growth during myelination extends in two directions, i.e., spiral growth to the axonal surface and longitudinal growth along the axon, it is possible that spheroid-like structures are formed by uneven myelin growth. We recognize that we cannot yet conclude whether and how spheroid formation might relate to the myelination deficit in Zdhhc9 KO mice that we observe by EM (Figure 6). However, it is not inconceivable that the hypo- and hypermyelination of Zdhhc9 KO axons seen in single-plane EM cross-sections (Figure 6) represents this same distension phenotype, observed using a different method. Although beyond our current technical abilities, we speculate that EM-based reconstruction in three dimensions would reveal regions of both hypo- and hypermyelination of individual callosal axons in Zdhhc9 KO mice.

How, though, might Zdhhc9 loss cause dysmyelination? Several myelin proteins are palmitoylated, and we found that a ZDHHC9/Golga7 complex palmitoylates the major myelin protein MBP and that MBP palmitoylation is reduced in forebrain WM of Zdhhc9 KO mice (Figure 8). Given that palmitoylation can sort proteins to the myelin membrane (Schneider et al., 2005), the simplest explanation might be that impaired palmitoylation of MBP, and potentially other myelin proteins, in the absence of ZDHHC9 affects myelin structure per se. It would be of considerable interest to investigate whether and how Zdhhc9 loss alters the distribution of specific MBP splice variants. However, the anti-MBP antibody used in this study recognizes all forms of MBP, not just the specific splice variants whose palmitoylation is affected by Zdhhc9 loss. Specifically assessing nanoscale distribution of these splice variants would require a way (e.g. anti-MBP splice form-specific antibodies that are compatible with immuno-EM) to distinguish these variants from other, non-palmitoylated forms of MBP. Developing such an antibody could greatly facilitate future studies of nanoscale MBP distribution in the presence and absence of ZDHHC9.

We also observed slight but significant reductions in palmitoyl- and total levels of MAG in the absence of ZDHHC9 (Figure 8—figure supplement 1A and B), which may also contribute to impaired myelination. In contrast, ZDHHC9 loss did not alter palmitoyl- or total levels of Cadm4, a myelin protein whose palmitoylation is ascribed to the Golgi-localized PAT ZDHHC3 (Chang et al., 2022; Figure 8—figure supplement 1C and D). This latter finding suggests that, although ZDHHC9 loss may affect additional myelin proteins, gross, widespread dysregulation of myelin protein levels and/or palmitoylation in the absence of ZDHHC9 is unlikely. Importantly, several mutant forms of ZDHHC9 fail to localize to Golgi outposts in OLs and lead to XLID, even when showing apparently normal catalytic activity. This latter observation is consistent with a model in which ZDHHC9 action at OL Golgi outposts is critical for normal myelination. An additional factor to consider, however, is that the key ZDHHC9 substrate(s) may not be the myelin proteins themselves, but rather other proteins that act at Golgi outposts to direct myelin proteins to the correct region of the myelin membrane and/or to ensure uniform distribution of myelin proteins within that membrane. Another non-mutually exclusive possibility is that ZDHHC9 acts at Golgi outposts but indirectly, for example, to drive the expression of myelin protein genes. A comparison of WT and Zdhhc9 KO palmitoyl-proteomes could help determine which of these possibilities (which are not mutually exclusive) best accounts for impaired myelination in the absence of ZDHHC9.

Interestingly, despite their marked differences in basal catalytic activity (as assessed by autopalmitoylation), wt and all XLID forms of ZDHHC9 appear to show enhanced activity (measured by both auto- and MBP palmitoylation) in the presence of Golga7, suggesting that the association with Golga7 (which also localizes to Golgi outposts) is central to ZDHHC9 activity. This model is also highly consistent with the biased expression of Golga7 in OLs, compared to other CNS cell types (Figure 1E and F). Moreover, XLID-associated mutant forms of ZDHHC9 also show reduced protein stability and are impaired in their ability to form complexes with Golga7 (also known as Golgi Complex Protein 16 kDa; GCP16)(Nguyen et al., 2023). ZDHHC9 XLID mutations may thus affect ZDHHC9 trafficking to Golgi outposts per se, but alternatively, or in addition, may decrease formation/stabilization of ZDHHC9/Golga7 complexes at these locations. Either or both of these mechanisms, which are not mutually exclusive, may contribute to impaired MBP palmitoylation and/or myelination deficits caused by ZDHHC9 mutation.

In summary, we reveal an unexpectedly non-heterogeneous expression of Zdhhc9 in both mice and humans, with biased expression in mature OLs. Moreover, within OLs, WT ZDHHC9 localizes uniquely compared to other PATs examined, and to XLID-associated forms of ZDHHC9. Although we did not detect changes in overall OL numbers or gross myelin staining, we found that Zdhhc9 loss greatly impairs OL morphology and myelination at the microscale. These findings provide new insights into mechanisms of ZDHHC9-associated XLID and into other conditions marked by WMI.

RNA-Seq data files have been uploaded to the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) under accession code PRJEB19341. All other data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

1. 1. Hwang J
   2. Kim J
   3. Kang SH

   (2019) European Nucleotide Archive

   ID PRJEB19341. Age-dependent changes in translational expression of oligodendrocytes.

   https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/PRJEB19341

1. 1. Zhang Y
   2. Chen K
   3. Sloan SA
   4. Bennett ML
   5. Scholze AR
   6. O'Keeffe S
   7. Phatnani HP
   8. Guarnieri P
   9. Caneda C
   10. Ruderisch N
   11. Deng S
   12. Liddelow SA
   13. Zhang C
   14. Daneman R
   15. Maniatis T
   16. Barres BA
   17. Wu JQ

   (2014) Brain RNA-Seq

   ID Musmusculus.csv. Mouse data.

   https://brainrnaseq.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/fe-wp-dataset-120.csv
2. 1. Zhang Y
   2. Chen K
   3. Sloan SA
   4. Bennett ML
   5. Scholze AR
   6. O'Keeffe S
   7. Phatnani HP
   8. Guarnieri P
   9. Caneda C
   10. Ruderisch N
   11. Deng S
   12. Liddelow SA
   13. Zhang C
   14. Daneman R
   15. Maniatis T
   16. Barres BA
   17. Wu JQ

   (2014) Brain RNA-Seq

   ID Homosapiens.csv. Human data.

   https://brainrnaseq.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/fe-wp-dataset-124.csv

1. 1. Agrawal HC
   2. Schmidt RE
   3. Agrawal D

   (1983)

   In vivo incorporation of [3H]palmitic acid into PO protein, the major intrinsic protein of rat sciatic nerve myelin

   The Journal of Biological Chemistry 258:6556–6560.

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Akiyama K
   2. Ichinose S
   3. Omori A
   4. Sakurai Y
   5. Asou H

   (2002) Study of expression of myelin basic proteins (MBPs) in developing rat brain using a novel antibody reacting with four major isoforms of MBP

   Journal of Neuroscience Research 68:19–28.

   https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.10188

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Altafaj X
   2. Dierssen M
   3. Baamonde C
   4. Martí E
   5. Visa J
   6. Guimerà J
   7. Oset M
   8. González JR
   9. Flórez J
   10. Fillat C
   11. Estivill X

   (2001) Neurodevelopmental delay, motor abnormalities and cognitive deficits in transgenic mice overexpressing Dyrk1A (minibrain), a murine model of Down’s syndrome

   Human Molecular Genetics 10:1915–1923.

   https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/10.18.1915

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Amir RE
   2. Van den Veyver IB
   3. Wan M
   4. Tran CQ
   5. Francke U
   6. Zoghbi HY

   (1999) Rett syndrome is caused by mutations in X-linked MECP2, encoding methyl-CpG-binding protein 2

   Nature Genetics 23:185–188.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/13810

   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Baker K
   2. Astle DE
   3. Scerif G
   4. Barnes J
   5. Smith J
   6. Moffat G
   7. Gillard J
   8. Baldeweg T
   9. Raymond FL

   (2015) Epilepsy, cognitive deficits and neuroanatomy in males with ZDHHC9 mutations

   Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology 2:559–569.

   https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.196

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Baumann N
   2. Pham-Dinh D

   (2001) Biology of oligodendrocyte and myelin in the mammalian central nervous system

   Physiological Reviews 81:871–927.

   https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.2001.81.2.871

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Bienvenu T
   2. Poirier K
   3. Friocourt G
   4. Bahi N
   5. Beaumont D
   6. Fauchereau F
   7. Ben Jeema L
   8. Zemni R
   9. Vinet M-C
   10. Francis F
   11. Couvert P
   12. Gomot M
   13. Moraine C
   14. van Bokhoven H
   15. Kalscheuer V
   16. Frints S
   17. Gecz J
   18. Ohzaki K
   19. Chaabouni H
   20. Fryns J-P
   21. Desportes V
   22. Beldjord C
   23. Chelly J

   (2002) ARX, a novel Prd-class-homeobox gene highly expressed in the telencephalon, is mutated in X-linked mental retardation

   Human Molecular Genetics 11:981–991.

   https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/11.8.981

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Billuart P
   2. Bienvenu T
   3. Ronce N
   4. des Portes V
   5. Vinet MC
   6. Zemni R
   7. Crollius HR
   8. Carrié A
   9. Fauchereau F
   10. Cherry M
   11. Briault S
   12. Hamel B
   13. Fryns J-P
   14. Beldjord C
   15. Kahn A
   16. Moraine C
   17. Chelly J

   (1998) Oligophrenin-1 encodes a rhoGAP protein involved in X-linked mental retardation

   Nature 392:923–926.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/31940

   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Bizzozero OA
   2. Good LK

   (1990) Myelin proteolipid protein contains thioester-linked fatty acids

   Journal of Neurochemistry 55:1986–1992.

   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1990.tb05786.x

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Blanc M
    2. David F
    3. Abrami L
    4. Migliozzi D
    5. Armand F
    6. Bürgi J
    7. van der Goot FG

    (2015) SwissPalm: Protein Palmitoylation database

    F1000Research 4:261.

    https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6464.1

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Budreck EC
    2. Scheiffele P

    (2007) Neuroligin-3 is a neuronal adhesion protein at GABAergic and glutamatergic synapses

    The European Journal of Neuroscience 26:1738–1748.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05842.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
12. Preprint

    1. Chang JZY
    2. Nie C
    3. Lu Y
    4. Ren F
    5. Cao X
    6. Li J
    7. Wang C
    8. Yang C
    9. Li T
    10. Liang Y
    11. Qi S
    12. Kang X

    (2022) DHHC3 Mediated Cadm4 palmitoylation regulates myelination in CNS

    bioRxiv.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.09.23.509146

    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Collura KM
    2. Niu J
    3. Sanders SS
    4. Montersino A
    5. Holland SM
    6. Thomas GM

    (2020) The palmitoyl acyltransferases ZDHHC5 and ZDHHC8 are uniquely present in DRG axons and control retrograde signaling via the Gp130/JAK/STAT3 pathway

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 295:15427–15437.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA120.013815

    • Google Scholar
14. 1. DeFlitch L
    2. Gonzalez-Fernandez E
    3. Crawley I
    4. Kang SH

    (2022) Age and Alzheimer’s disease-related oligodendrocyte changes in hippocampal subregions

    Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience 16:847097.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2022.847097

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Devys D
    2. Lutz Y
    3. Rouyer N
    4. Bellocq JP
    5. Mandel JL

    (1993) The FMR-1 protein is cytoplasmic, most abundant in neurons and appears normal in carriers of a fragile X premutation

    Nature Genetics 4:335–340.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ng0893-335

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Doyle JP
    2. Dougherty JD
    3. Heiman M
    4. Schmidt EF
    5. Stevens TR
    6. Ma G
    7. Bupp S
    8. Shrestha P
    9. Shah RD
    10. Doughty ML
    11. Gong S
    12. Greengard P
    13. Heintz N

    (2008) Application of a translational profiling approach for the comparative analysis of CNS cell types

    Cell 135:749–762.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.10.029

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Dutta S
    2. Sengupta P

    (2016) Men and mice: Relating their ages

    Life Sciences 152:244–248.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2015.10.025

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Edmonds MJ
    2. Geary B
    3. Doherty MK
    4. Morgan A

    (2017) Analysis of the brain palmitoyl-proteome using both acyl-biotin exchange and acyl-resin-assisted capture methods

    Scientific Reports 7:3299.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03562-7

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Elias GM
    2. Funke L
    3. Stein V
    4. Grant SG
    5. Bredt DS
    6. Nicoll RA

    (2006) Synapse-specific and developmentally regulated targeting of AMPA receptors by a family of MAGUK scaffolding proteins

    Neuron 52:307–320.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.09.012

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Escorihuela RM
    2. Vallina IF
    3. Martı́nez-Cué C
    4. Baamonde C
    5. Dierssen M
    6. Tobeña A
    7. Flórez J
    8. Fernández-Teruel A

    (1998) Impaired short- and long-term memory in Ts65Dn mice, a model for Down syndrome

    Neuroscience Letters 247:171–174.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(98)00317-6

    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Fang C
    2. Deng L
    3. Keller CA
    4. Fukata M
    5. Fukata Y
    6. Chen G
    7. Lüscher B

    (2006) GODZ-mediated palmitoylation of GABA(A) receptors is required for normal assembly and function of GABAergic inhibitory synapses

    The Journal of Neuroscience 26:12758–12768.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4214-06.2006

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Fitzner D
    2. Schneider A
    3. Kippert A
    4. Möbius W
    5. Willig KI
    6. Hell SW
    7. Bunt G
    8. Gaus K
    9. Simons M

    (2006) Myelin basic protein-dependent plasma membrane reorganization in the formation of myelin

    The EMBO Journal 25:5037–5048.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601376

    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Fu MM
    2. McAlear TS
    3. Nguyen H
    4. Oses-Prieto JA
    5. Valenzuela A
    6. Shi RD
    7. Perrino JJ
    8. Huang TT
    9. Burlingame AL
    10. Bechstedt S
    11. Barres BA

    (2019) The golgi outpost protein TPPP nucleates microtubules and is critical for myelination

    Cell 179:132–146.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.08.025

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Furne C
    2. Corset V
    3. Hérincs Z
    4. Cahuzac N
    5. Hueber A-O
    6. Mehlen P

    (2006) The dependence receptor DCC requires lipid raft localization for cell death signaling

    PNAS 103:4128–4133.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507864103

    • Google Scholar
25. 1. George J
    2. Soares C
    3. Montersino A
    4. Beique JC
    5. Thomas GM

    (2015) Palmitoylation of LIM Kinase-1 ensures spine-specific actin polymerization and morphological plasticity

    eLife 4:e06327.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06327

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Gong S
    2. Zheng C
    3. Doughty ML
    4. Losos K
    5. Didkovsky N
    6. Schambra UB
    7. Nowak NJ
    8. Joyner A
    9. Leblanc G
    10. Hatten ME
    11. Heintz N

    (2003) A gene expression atlas of the central nervous system based on bacterial artificial chromosomes

    Nature 425:917–925.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02033

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Gorenberg EL
    2. Massaro Tieze S
    3. Yücel B
    4. Zhao HR
    5. Chou V
    6. Wirak GS
    7. Tomita S
    8. Lam TT
    9. Chandra SS

    (2022) Identification of substrates of palmitoyl protein thioesterase 1 highlights roles of depalmitoylation in disulfide bond formation and synaptic function

    PLOS Biology 20:e3001590.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001590

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Govind AP
    2. Jeyifous O
    3. Russell TA
    4. Yi Z
    5. Weigel AV
    6. Ramaprasad A
    7. Newell L
    8. Ramos W
    9. Valbuena FM
    10. Casler JC
    11. Yan J-Z
    12. Glick BS
    13. Swanson GT
    14. Lippincott-Schwartz J
    15. Green WN

    (2021) Activity-dependent Golgi satellite formation in dendrites reshapes the neuronal surface glycoproteome

    eLife 10:e68910.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68910

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Greaves J
    2. Salaun C
    3. Fukata Y
    4. Fukata M
    5. Chamberlain LH

    (2008) Palmitoylation and membrane interactions of the neuroprotective chaperone cysteine-string protein

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 283:25014–25026.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M802140200

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Greer JM
    2. Denis B
    3. Sobel RA
    4. Trifilieff E

    (2001) Thiopalmitoylation of myelin proteolipid protein epitopes enhances immunogenicity and encephalitogenicity

    Journal of Immunology 166:6907–6913.

    https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.166.11.6907

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Guarnieri FC
    2. Pozzi D
    3. Raimondi A
    4. Fesce R
    5. Valente MM
    6. Delvecchio VS
    7. Van Esch H
    8. Matteoli M
    9. Benfenati F
    10. D’Adamo P
    11. Valtorta F

    (2017) A novel SYN1 missense mutation in non-syndromic X-linked intellectual disability affects synaptic vesicle life cycle, clustering and mobility

    Human Molecular Genetics 26:4699–4714.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddx352

    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Guerrini R
    2. Dobyns WB

    (2014) Malformations of cortical development: clinical features and genetic causes

    The Lancet. Neurology 13:710–726.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70040-7

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Han JY
    2. Lee IG
    3. Shin S
    4. Kim M
    5. Jang JH
    6. Park J

    (2017) The first patient with sporadic X-linked intellectual disability with de novo ZDHHC9 mutation identified by targeted next-generation sequencing

    European Journal of Medical Genetics 60:499–503.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmg.2017.07.002

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Heo D
    2. Ling JP
    3. Molina-Castro GC
    4. Langseth AJ
    5. Waisman A
    6. Nave K-A
    7. Möbius W
    8. Wong PC
    9. Bergles DE

    (2022) Stage-specific control of oligodendrocyte survival and morphogenesis by TDP-43

    eLife 11:e75230.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75230

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Horton AC
    2. Ehlers MD

    (2003) Dual modes of endoplasmic reticulum-to-golgi transport in dendrites revealed by live-cell imaging

    The Journal of Neuroscience 23:6188–6199.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-15-06188.2003

    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Jiang H
    2. Li X
    3. Jin C
    4. Wang M
    5. Liu C
    6. Chan KC
    7. Yang J

    (2019) Early diagnosis of spastic cerebral palsy in infants with periventricular white matter injury using diffusion tensor imaging

    AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology 40:162–168.

    https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5914

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Juric-Sekhar G
    2. Hevner RF

    (2019) Malformations of cerebral cortex development: molecules and mechanisms

    Annual Review of Pathology 14:293–318.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-012418-012927

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Kang R
    2. Wan J
    3. Arstikaitis P
    4. Takahashi H
    5. Huang K
    6. Bailey AO
    7. Thompson JX
    8. Roth AF
    9. Drisdel RC
    10. Mastro R
    11. Green WN
    12. Yates AR
    13. Davis NG
    14. El-Husseini A

    (2008) Neural palmitoyl-proteomics reveals dynamic synaptic palmitoylation

    Nature 456:904–909.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07605

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Kang SH
    2. Fukaya M
    3. Yang JK
    4. Rothstein JD
    5. Bergles DE

    (2010) NG2+ CNS glial progenitors remain committed to the oligodendrocyte lineage in postnatal life and following neurodegeneration

    Neuron 68:668–681.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2010.09.009

    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Kang SH
    2. Li Y
    3. Fukaya M
    4. Lorenzini I
    5. Cleveland DW
    6. Ostrow LW
    7. Rothstein JD
    8. Bergles DE

    (2013) Degeneration and impaired regeneration of gray matter oligodendrocytes in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    Nature Neuroscience 16:571–579.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3357

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Kerkenberg N
    2. Wachsmuth L
    3. Zhang M
    4. Schettler C
    5. Ponimaskin E
    6. Faber C
    7. Baune BT
    8. Zhang W
    9. Hohoff C

    (2021) Brain microstructural changes in mice persist in adulthood and are modulated by the palmitoyl acyltransferase ZDHHC7

    European Journal of Neuroscience 54:5951–5967.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15415

    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Kouskou M
    2. Thomson DM
    3. Brett RR
    4. Wheeler L
    5. Tate RJ
    6. Pratt JA
    7. Chamberlain LH

    (2018) Disruption of the Zdhhc9 intellectual disability gene leads to behavioural abnormalities in a mouse model

    Experimental Neurology 308:35–46.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2018.06.014

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
43. 1. Laux T
    2. Fukami K
    3. Thelen M
    4. Golub T
    5. Frey D
    6. Caroni P

    (2000) GAP43, MARCKS, and CAP23 modulate PI(4,5)P(2) at plasmalemmal rafts, and regulate cell cortex actin dynamics through a common mechanism

    The Journal of Cell Biology 149:1455–1472.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.149.7.1455

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Lim KC
    2. Crino PB

    (2013) Focal malformations of cortical development: new vistas for molecular pathogenesis

    Neuroscience 252:262–276.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.07.037

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
45. 1. Linder ME
    2. Deschenes RJ

    (2007) Palmitoylation: policing protein stability and traffic

    Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology 8:74–84.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2084

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Masurel-Paulet A
    2. Kalscheuer VM
    3. Lebrun N
    4. Hu H
    5. Levy F
    6. Thauvin-Robinet C
    7. Darmency-Stamboul V
    8. El Chehadeh S
    9. Thevenon J
    10. Chancenotte S
    11. Ruffier-Bourdet M
    12. Bonnet M
    13. Pinoit J-M
    14. Huet F
    15. Desportes V
    16. Chelly J
    17. Faivre L

    (2014) Expanding the clinical phenotype of patients with a ZDHHC9 mutation

    American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A 164A:789–795.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.36348

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
47. 1. McMichael G
    2. Bainbridge MN
    3. Haan E
    4. Corbett M
    5. Gardner A
    6. Thompson S
    7. van Bon BWM
    8. van Eyk CL
    9. Broadbent J
    10. Reynolds C
    11. O’Callaghan ME
    12. Nguyen LS
    13. Adelson DL
    14. Russo R
    15. Jhangiani S
    16. Doddapaneni H
    17. Muzny DM
    18. Gibbs RA
    19. Gecz J
    20. MacLennan AH

    (2015) Whole-exome sequencing points to considerable genetic heterogeneity of cerebral palsy

    Molecular Psychiatry 20:176–182.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2014.189

    • Google Scholar
48. 1. Mikhaylova M
    2. Bera S
    3. Kobler O
    4. Frischknecht R
    5. Kreutz MR

    (2016) A dendritic golgi satellite between ERGIC and retromer

    Cell Reports 14:189–199.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.024

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Mitchell DA
    2. Hamel LD
    3. Reddy KD
    4. Farh L
    5. Rettew LM
    6. Sanchez PR
    7. Deschenes RJ

    (2014) Mutations in the X-linked intellectual disability gene, zDHHC9, alter autopalmitoylation activity by distinct mechanisms

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 289:18582–18592.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M114.567420

    • Google Scholar
50. 1. Murphy JA
    2. Jensen ON
    3. Walikonis RS

    (2006) BRAG1, a Sec7 domain-containing protein, is a component of the postsynaptic density of excitatory synapses

    Brain Research 1120:35–45.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.08.096

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
51. 1. Muzumdar MD
    2. Tasic B
    3. Miyamichi K
    4. Li L
    5. Luo L

    (2007) A global double-fluorescent Cre reporter mouse

    Genesis 45:593–605.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/dvg.20335

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
52. 1. Neri G
    2. Schwartz CE
    3. Lubs HA
    4. Stevenson RE

    (2018) X-linked intellectual disability update 2017

    American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A 176:1375–1388.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.38710

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
53. 1. Nguyen PL
    2. Greentree WK
    3. Kawate T
    4. Linder ME

    (2023) GCP16 stabilizes the DHHC9 subfamily of protein acyltransferases through a conserved C-terminal cysteine motif

    Frontiers in Physiology 14:1167094.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1167094

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
54. 1. Niu J
    2. Sanders SS
    3. Jeong H-K
    4. Holland SM
    5. Sun Y
    6. Collura KM
    7. Hernandez LM
    8. Huang H
    9. Hayden MR
    10. Smith GM
    11. Hu Y
    12. Jin Y
    13. Thomas GM

    (2020) Coupled control of distal axon integrity and somal responses to axonal damage by the palmitoyl acyltransferase ZDHHC17

    Cell Reports 33:108365.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108365

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
55. 1. Noritake J
    2. Fukata Y
    3. Iwanaga T
    4. Hosomi N
    5. Tsutsumi R
    6. Matsuda N
    7. Tani H
    8. Iwanari H
    9. Mochizuki Y
    10. Kodama T
    11. Matsuura Y
    12. Bredt DS
    13. Hamakubo T
    14. Fukata M

    (2009) Mobile DHHC palmitoylating enzyme mediates activity-sensitive synaptic targeting of PSD-95

    Journal of Cell Biology 186:147–160.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200903101

    • Google Scholar
56. 1. Odding E
    2. Roebroeck ME
    3. Stam HJ

    (2006) The epidemiology of cerebral palsy: incidence, impairments and risk factors

    Disability and Rehabilitation 28:183–191.

    https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280500158422

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
57. 1. Ohno Y
    2. Kihara A
    3. Sano T
    4. Igarashi Y

    (2006) Intracellular localization and tissue-specific distribution of human and yeast DHHC cysteine-rich domain-containing proteins

    Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1761:474–483.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2006.03.010

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
58. 1. Ori-McKenney KM
    2. Jan LY
    3. Jan YN

    (2012) Golgi outposts shape dendrite morphology by functioning as sites of acentrosomal microtubule nucleation in neurons

    Neuron 76:921–930.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.008

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
59. 1. Peier AM
    2. McIlwain KL
    3. Kenneson A
    4. Warren ST
    5. Paylor R
    6. Nelson DL

    (2000) (Over)correction of FMR1 deficiency with YAC transgenics: behavioral and physical features

    Human Molecular Genetics 9:1145–1159.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/9.8.1145

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
60. 1. Pinner AL
    2. Tucholski J
    3. Haroutunian V
    4. McCullumsmith RE
    5. Meador-Woodruff JH

    (2016) Decreased protein S-palmitoylation in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia

    Schizophrenia Research 177:78–87.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2016.01.054

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
61. 1. Raymond FL
    2. Tarpey PS
    3. Edkins S
    4. Tofts C
    5. O’Meara S
    6. Teague J
    7. Butler A
    8. Stevens C
    9. Barthorpe S
    10. Buck G
    11. Cole J
    12. Dicks E
    13. Gray K
    14. Halliday K
    15. Hills K
    16. Hinton J
    17. Jones D
    18. Menzies A
    19. Perry J
    20. Raine K
    21. Shepherd R
    22. Small A
    23. Varian J
    24. Widaa S
    25. Mallya U
    26. Moon J
    27. Luo Y
    28. Shaw M
    29. Boyle J
    30. Kerr B
    31. Turner G
    32. Quarrell O
    33. Cole T
    34. Easton DF
    35. Wooster R
    36. Bobrow M
    37. Schwartz CE
    38. Gecz J
    39. Stratton MR
    40. Futreal PA

    (2007) Mutations in ZDHHC9, which encodes a palmitoyltransferase of NRAS and HRAS, cause X-linked mental retardation associated with a Marfanoid habitus

    American Journal of Human Genetics 80:982–987.

    https://doi.org/10.1086/513609

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
62. 1. Renpenning H
    2. Gerrard JW
    3. Zaleski WA
    4. Tabata T

    (1962)

    Familial sex-linked mental retardation

    Canadian Medical Association Journal 87:954–956.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
63. 1. Rusconi L
    2. Salvatoni L
    3. Giudici L
    4. Bertani I
    5. Kilstrup-Nielsen C
    6. Broccoli V
    7. Landsberger N

    (2008) CDKL5 expression is modulated during neuronal development and its subcellular distribution is tightly regulated by the C-terminal tail

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 283:30101–30111.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M804613200

    • Google Scholar
64. 1. Samaco RC
    2. Fryer JD
    3. Ren J
    4. Fyffe S
    5. Chao H-T
    6. Sun Y
    7. Greer JJ
    8. Zoghbi HY
    9. Neul JL

    (2008) A partial loss of function allele of methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 predicts a human neurodevelopmental syndrome

    Human Molecular Genetics 17:1718–1727.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddn062

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
65. 1. Sánchez-Gómez MV
    2. Serrano MP
    3. Alberdi E
    4. Pérez-Cerdá F
    5. Matute C

    (2018) Isolation, expansion, and maturation of oligodendrocyte lineage cells obtained from rat neonatal brain and optic nerve

    Methods in Molecular Biology 1791:95–113.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7862-5_8

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
66. 1. Sanders SS
    2. Parsons MP
    3. Mui KKN
    4. Southwell AL
    5. Franciosi S
    6. Cheung D
    7. Waltl S
    8. Raymond LA
    9. Hayden MR

    (2016) Sudden death due to paralysis and synaptic and behavioral deficits when Hip14/Zdhhc17 is deleted in adult mice

    BMC Biology 14:108.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-016-0333-7

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
67. 1. Schindelin J
    2. Arganda-Carreras I
    3. Frise E
    4. Kaynig V
    5. Longair M
    6. Pietzsch T
    7. Preibisch S
    8. Rueden C
    9. Saalfeld S
    10. Schmid B
    11. Tinevez J-Y
    12. White DJ
    13. Hartenstein V
    14. Eliceiri K
    15. Tomancak P
    16. Cardona A

    (2012) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis

    Nature Methods 9:676–682.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2019

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
68. 1. Schirwani S
    2. Wakeling E
    3. Smith K
    4. Balasubramanian M
    5. DDD Study

    (2018) Expanding the molecular basis and phenotypic spectrum of ZDHHC9-associated X-linked intellectual disability

    American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A 176:1238–1244.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.38683

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
69. 1. Schneider A
    2. Länder H
    3. Schulz G
    4. Wolburg H
    5. Nave K-A
    6. Schulz JB
    7. Simons M

    (2005) Palmitoylation is a sorting determinant for transport to the myelin membrane

    Journal of Cell Science 118:2415–2423.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.02365

    • Google Scholar
70. 1. Shangguan H
    2. Su C
    3. Ouyang Q
    4. Cao B
    5. Wang J
    6. Gong C
    7. Chen R

    (2019) Kabuki syndrome: novel pathogenic variants, new phenotypes and review of literature

    Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 14:255.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-019-1219-x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
71. 1. Shimell JJ
    2. Shah BS
    3. Cain SM
    4. Thouta S
    5. Kuhlmann N
    6. Tatarnikov I
    7. Jovellar DB
    8. Brigidi GS
    9. Kass J
    10. Milnerwood AJ
    11. Snutch TP
    12. Bamji SX

    (2019) The X-linked intellectual disability gene zdhhc9 is essential for dendrite outgrowth and inhibitory synapse formation

    Cell Reports 29:2422–2437.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.10.065

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
72. 1. Soldán M
    2. Pirko I

    (2012) Biogenesis and significance of central nervous system myelin

    Seminars in Neurology 32:009–014.

    https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1306381

    • Google Scholar
73. 1. Sousa VH
    2. Miyoshi G
    3. Hjerling-Leffler J
    4. Karayannis T
    5. Fishell G

    (2009) Characterization of Nkx6-2-derived neocortical interneuron lineages

    Cerebral Cortex 19 Suppl 1:i1–i10.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhp038

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
74. 1. Spencer MD
    2. Gibson RJ
    3. Moorhead TWJ
    4. Keston PM
    5. Hoare P
    6. Best JJK
    7. Lawrie SM
    8. Johnstone EC

    (2005)

    Qualitative assessment of brain anomalies in adolescents with mental retardation

    AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology 26:2691–2697.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
75. 1. Stevenson RE
    2. Schwartz CE
    3. Rogers RC

    (2013) Malformations among the X-linked intellectual disability syndromes

    American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A 161A:2741–2749.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.36179

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
76. 1. Swarthout JT
    2. Lobo S
    3. Farh L
    4. Croke MR
    5. Greentree WK
    6. Deschenes RJ
    7. Linder ME

    (2005) DHHC9 and GCP16 constitute a human protein fatty acyltransferase with specificity for H- and N-Ras

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 280:31141–31148.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M504113200

    • Google Scholar
77. 1. Thomas GM
    2. Hayashi T
    3. Chiu SL
    4. Chen CM
    5. Huganir RL

    (2012) Palmitoylation by DHHC5/8 targets GRIP1 to dendritic endosomes to regulate AMPA-R trafficking

    Neuron 73:482–496.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.11.021

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
78. 1. Toya A
    2. Fukada M
    3. Aoki E
    4. Matsuki T
    5. Ueda M
    6. Eda S
    7. Hashizume Y
    8. Iio A
    9. Masaki S
    10. Nakayama A

    (2023) The distribution of neuroligin4, an autism-related postsynaptic molecule, in the human brain

    Molecular Brain 16:20.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s13041-023-00999-y

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
79. 1. Valenzuela JI
    2. Perez F

    (2015) Diversifying the secretory routes in neurons

    Frontiers in Neuroscience 9:358.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00358

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
80. 1. van Eyk CL
    2. Corbett MA
    3. Frank MSB
    4. Webber DL
    5. Newman M
    6. Berry JG
    7. Harper K
    8. Haines BP
    9. McMichael G
    10. Woenig JA
    11. MacLennan AH
    12. Gecz J

    (2019) Targeted resequencing identifies genes with recurrent variation in cerebral palsy

    NPJ Genomic Medicine 4:27.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41525-019-0101-z

    • Google Scholar
81. 1. Vissers L
    2. Gilissen C
    3. Veltman JA

    (2016) Genetic studies in intellectual disability and related disorders

    Nature Reviews. Genetics 17:9–18.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3999

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
82. 1. Vorstman JAS
    2. Ophoff RA

    (2013) Genetic causes of developmental disorders

    Current Opinion in Neurology 26:128–136.

    https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0b013e32835f1a30

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
83. 1. Wan J
    2. Roth AF
    3. Bailey AO
    4. Davis NG

    (2007) Palmitoylated proteins: purification and identification

    Nature Protocols 2:1573–1584.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.225

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
84. 1. Wan J
    2. Savas JN
    3. Roth AF
    4. Sanders SS
    5. Singaraja RR
    6. Hayden MR
    7. Yates JR III
    8. Davis NG

    (2013) Tracking brain palmitoylation change: Predominance of glial change in a mouse model of huntington’s disease

    Chemistry & Biology 20:1421–1434.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chembiol.2013.09.018

    • Google Scholar
85. 1. Wang J
    2. Gleeson PA

    (2020) Local secretory trafficking pathways in neurons and the role of dendritic golgi outposts in different cell models

    Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience 13:597391.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2020.597391

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
86. 1. Wong M

    (2019) The role of glia in epilepsy, intellectual disability, and other neurodevelopmental disorders in tuberous sclerosis complex

    Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders 11:30.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s11689-019-9289-6

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
87. 1. Yu C
    2. Li J
    3. Liu Y
    4. Qin W
    5. Li Y
    6. Shu N
    7. Jiang T
    8. Li K

    (2008) White matter tract integrity and intelligence in patients with mental retardation and healthy adults

    NeuroImage 40:1533–1541.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.063

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
88. 1. Zang JB
    2. Nosyreva ED
    3. Spencer CM
    4. Volk LJ
    5. Musunuru K
    6. Zhong R
    7. Stone EF
    8. Yuva-Paylor LA
    9. Huber KM
    10. Paylor R
    11. Darnell JC
    12. Darnell RB

    (2009) A mouse model of the human Fragile X syndrome I304N mutation

    PLOS Genetics 5:e1000758.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000758

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
89. 1. Zeisel A
    2. Hochgerner H
    3. Lönnerberg P
    4. Johnsson A
    5. Memic F
    6. van der Zwan J
    7. Häring M
    8. Braun E
    9. Borm LE
    10. La Manno G
    11. Codeluppi S
    12. Furlan A
    13. Lee K
    14. Skene N
    15. Harris KD
    16. Hjerling-Leffler J
    17. Arenas E
    18. Ernfors P
    19. Marklund U
    20. Linnarsson S

    (2018) Molecular architecture of the mouse nervous system

    Cell 174:999–1014.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.021

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
90. 1. Zhang Y
    2. Zhou Y
    3. Yu C
    4. Lin L
    5. Li C
    6. Jiang T

    (2010) Reduced cortical folding in mental retardation

    AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology 31:1063–1067.

    https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1984

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
91. 1. Zhang Y
    2. Chen K
    3. Sloan SA
    4. Bennett ML
    5. Scholze AR
    6. O’Keeffe S
    7. Phatnani HP
    8. Guarnieri P
    9. Caneda C
    10. Ruderisch N
    11. Deng S
    12. Liddelow SA
    13. Zhang C
    14. Daneman R
    15. Maniatis T
    16. Barres BA
    17. Wu JQ

    (2014) An RNA-Sequencing transcriptome and splicing database of glia, neurons, and vascular cells of the cerebral cortex

    The Journal of Neuroscience 34:11929–11947.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1860-14.2014

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
92. 1. Zhang Y
    2. Sloan SA
    3. Clarke LE
    4. Caneda C
    5. Plaza CA
    6. Blumenthal PD
    7. Vogel H
    8. Steinberg GK
    9. Edwards MSB
    10. Li G
    11. Duncan GA
    12. Cheshier SH
    13. Shuer LM
    14. Chang EF
    15. Grant GA
    16. Gephart MGH
    17. Barres BA

    (2016) Purification and characterization of progenitor and mature human astrocytes reveals transcriptional and functional differences with mouse

    Neuron 89:37–53.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.013

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
93. 1. Zhang X
    2. Thomas GM

    (2024) Recruitment, regulation, and release: Control of signaling enzyme localization and function by reversible S-acylation

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 300:107696.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2024.107696

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Hey-Kyeong Jeong

   Center for Neural Development and Repair, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, United States

   Contribution

   Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft

   Contributed equally with

   Estibaliz Gonzalez-Fernandez

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

2. Estibaliz Gonzalez-Fernandez

   Center for Neural Development and Repair, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, United States

   Contribution

   Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation

   Contributed equally with

   Hey-Kyeong Jeong

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

3. Ilan Crawley

   Center for Neural Development and Repair, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, United States

   Contribution

   Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

4. Julia M Coakley

   Center for Neural Development and Repair, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, United States

   Contribution

   Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

5. Jinha Hwang

   Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

   Contribution

   Data curation, Formal analysis

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

6. Dale DO Martin

   Center for Neural Development and Repair, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, United States

   Present address

   Department of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada

   Contribution

   Investigation, Methodology

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

7. Shernaz X Bamji

   Department of Cellular and Physiological Sciences, Life Sciences Institute and Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

   Contribution

   Resources, Funding acquisition

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0102-9297

8. Jong-Il Kim

   Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

   Contribution

   Supervision

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7240-3744

9. Shin H Kang

   1. Center for Neural Development and Repair, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, United States
   2. Department of Neural Sciences, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, United States

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Supervision, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Funding acquisition, Writing – review and editing

   For correspondence

   shin.kang@temple.edu

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3692-9802

10. Gareth M Thomas

    1. Center for Neural Development and Repair, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, United States
    2. Department of Neural Sciences, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, United States

    Contribution

    Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Project administration, Writing – review and editing

    For correspondence

    gareth.thomas@temple.edu

    Competing interests

    No competing interests declared

    "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3183-8431

• 1,441

  views

• 29

  downloads

• 0

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.