Ion channels are pore-forming integral transmembrane proteins essential for all cellular lifeforms (Hille, 1978; Lee et al., 2014). At the plasma membrane, ion channels are responsible for generating long-range bioelectric conduction in excitable eukaryotic cells (e.g. neurons), and within prokaryotic colonies (e.g. bacteria biofilms), and filamentous colonies of archaea (Yang et al., 2021; Prindle et al., 2015; Goaillard and Marder, 2021). Here, they contribute to fundamental vital cell processes including division, signal transduction, and ionic homeostasis (Hille, 1978). In eukaryotic organelle membranes, ion channels are integral to a wide range of functions including energy production (mitochondria), and the maintenance of defining compartmental conditions such as Ca²⁺ gradients (endoplasmic reticulum), pH (lysosome), and redox states (peroxisome) (Stutzmann and Mattson, 2011; Smith and Aitchison, 2013; Li et al., 2019). The conductive states of channels are precisely controlled by their molecular conformations which are unique among their phylogenetic families and subfamilies (Yu et al., 2005). More than 400 human genes encode ion channel subunits, many of which are altered by variants that impact organ function and development (George, 2014a; George, 2014b; Clare, 2010). These so-called ‘Channelopathies’ manifest in various human diseases such as cardiac arrhythmias, neurological conditions, and cystic kidney diseases (Lieve and Wilde, 2015; Kass, 2005). Besides their association with disease-causing variants, channels are important therapeutic targets for treating various pathophysiologies and represent the second largest target among the existing FDA-approved drug portfolio (Overington et al., 2006; Santos et al., 2017; Kaczorowski et al., 2008). However, many members of the so-called ‘dark genome’ of understudied proteins encode putative ion channels that are implicated in human disease but remain resistant to functional characterization (Oprea, 2019). Furthermore, channels which localize to cellular compartments in low quantities present a significant challenge to assay for drug screening purposes (McGivern and Ding, 2020). Thus, these observations warrant the present investigation of a novel methodological approach to characterize ion channel biophysics and pharmacology.

Voltage-clamp electrophysiology incarnated in either planar or glass electrode designs provide direct, real-time and the highest available fidelity measurements of the ion channel conductive states. In the on-cell or inside-out configurations, their opening and closing conformational changes (i.e. gating) are captured as stochastic single-channel currents after forming high-resistance seals (>10 MΩ) at the interface of the electrode against a biological membrane (Neher and Sakmann, 1976). This conventional electrophysiology technique is commonly used to characterize the properties of plasma membrane channels and typically involves either recording from an endogenous cell source or from a cell line expressing the channel transgene (Neher, 1992; Hamill et al., 1981). However, capturing the biophysical properties of organelle channels and those from bacteria can be mired by electrode inaccessibility to inner membranes. As a work around, investigators have employed various channel reconstitution methods which typically consist of several steps (Morera et al., 2007; Leptihn et al., 2011). First, the channel of interest is expressed and immunopurified from a biological cell source, then it is reconstituted into a synthetic or into biologically derived lipid bilayers or vesicles. While there are many examples where heterologous approaches have faithfully reproduced the functional properties of channels from native sources, these preparations are frequently contaminated by endogenous ionophores from the host cell lines, even after purification (Varghese et al., 2006; Pablo et al., 2017).

To address this, we have developed a completely synthetic method to assay ion channel biophysics. The approach combines advances in cell-free protein expression (CFE) and reconstitution of the synthetic channel protein into giant unilamellar vesicles (GUV) where their single-channel properties can be measured using voltage-clamp electrophysiology (Shimizu and Ueda, 2010; Kuruma et al., 2005; Jacobs and Kamat, 2022). CFE is a form of in vitro protein synthesis, utilizing purified cellular machinery (ribosomes, tRNAs, enzymes, cofactors, etc.) needed to directly transcribe and translate user-supplied DNA plasmid encoding an ion channel. The unmodified channel proteins are reconstituted into GUVs— cell-sized model membrane systems derived from electrolysis of synthetic lipid mixtures. To validate this method, we characterized PKD2 and PKD2L1, two members of the polycystin subfamily of transient receptor potential (TRP) ion channels. PKD2 and PKD2L1 are highly homologous subunits with six transmembrane segments and shared overall protein folding when structurally assembled as homotetrameric channels (Shen et al., 2016; Grieben et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2020; Wilkes et al., 2017; Hulse et al., 2018; Su et al., 2018). Polycystin subunits can also form heteromeric ion channel complexes with several members of the TRP family and traffic to the primary cilia and endoplasmic reticulum organelle membranes (Esarte Palomero et al., 2023). Both features present challenges for experimentalists to functionally characterize these unique channel properties within their endogenous cell membranes. The medical and biological importance of polycystins is underscored by PKD2 variants associated with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, and this channel’s role in fertility and conferring right–left symmetry in embryonic development (Wu et al., 1998; Gao et al., 2003; Tanaka et al., 2023). While PKD2L1 variants have yet to be linked to human disease, its loss of expression results in epilepsy susceptibility and autism-like features in mice (Vien et al., 2023; Yao et al., 2016). In this report, we stepwise express and confirm protein expression of polycystin channels using the CFE method; reconstitute channel protein in GUVs containing distinct lipid components; assess correct membrane orientation using self-labeling saturated N-heterocyclic building blocks (SNAP) protein chemistry and evaluate channel properties using electrophysiology (Vo et al., 2013). Outcomes define a novel reductionist and generalizable approach to study ion channels resistant to biophysical characterization.

We began by carrying out CFE in vitro synthesis of PKD2L1 protein in the presence and absence of lipid vesicles. Plasmid DNA encoding human PKD2L1 with C-terminally tagged green fluorescent protein (PKD2L1-GFP) was added to the cell-free expression components (PURExpress, New England Biolabs) and induced protein translation by heat (Figure 1A, see methods). Each reaction produced 8 ± 3.5 ng/μl of synthetic channel protein as estimated by a standardized GFP absorbance assay (Figure 1—figure supplement 1A). The synthetically derived channel protein identity was confirmed using two methods. First, by western blot of the cell-free reaction where the PKD2L1-GFP protein was sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS–PAGE) gel separated from the reactants and detected by an anti-GFP monoclonal antibody (Figure 1B). Second, the PKD2L1 protein was confirmed by mass spectroscopy with 46% coverage (Figure 1—figure supplement 1B, C). Since polycystins are transmembrane proteins, we hypothesize that channel membrane incorporation would be facilitated by including lipid substrates into the CFE reaction. Thus, we compared channel synthesis in the presence or absence of small unilamellar vesicles (SUVs) comprised of 1,2-diphytanoyl-sn-glycero-phosphocholine (DPhPC; 4ME16:0PC) and cholesterol (Figure 1A). We monitored PKD2L1-GFP protein production over time through fluorescence which is dependent on complete channel translation and correct GFP folding (Müller-Lucks et al., 2012). We observed a dramatic increase in fluorescence output which plateaued after 3 hr when CFEs reactions were supplemented with SUVs— an effect not observed in water-supplement (H₂O) control reactions (Figure 1C; Klammt et al., 2006). Minimal changes in fluorescence were detected when a control plasmid (Ctrl) encoding a non-fluorescent protein (dihydrofolate reductase) was used in the reaction. Polycystin channels function as tetramers, thus we examined CFE-derived PKD2L1 oligomeric assembly in SUVs using fluorescence-detection size-exclusion chromatography (FSEC). As controls, we tested recombinant (cell-derived) GFP and GFP-tagged polycystin proteins which produced monodispersed peaks in the fluorescent signal which provided a reference for their respective elution times off the column (Figure 1—figure supplement 1D). Although not as robust, the fluorescence signal from CFE + SUV-derived PKD2L1 protein produced a symmetrical peak at the expected elution time of channel tetramers, along with fractions which may correspond to unassembled protomers (Figure 1—figure supplement 1E). Taken together, these results demonstrate the feasibility of synthesizing full-length polycystin channels using the cell-free expression system, and the enhancement of transmembrane protein synthesis and channel assembly through lipid vesicle incorporation during these reactions.

Figure 1 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

Figure 1—source data 1

Original file for western blot analysis displayed in Figure 1B.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/98534/elife-98534-fig1-data1-v1.zip

Download elife-98534-fig1-data1-v1.zip

Figure 1—source data 2

PDF file containing original western blot for Figure 1B, indicating the relevant bands and treatments.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/98534/elife-98534-fig1-data2-v1.zip

Download elife-98534-fig1-data2-v1.zip

One caveat of membrane protein vesicle reconstitution is the potential for misorientation after lipid integration. To assay channel orientation, we synthesized PKD2L1 with a C-terminal SNAP-tag fusion protein (PKD2L1-SNAP) in SUVs then electroformed them into GUVs for the assay. The SNAP-tag specifically reacts with fluorescent O₂-benzylcytosine derivatives and, depending on the derivatives membrane permeability, will react with lipid integrated proteins based on the tag’s accessibility (Figure 2—figure supplement 1). GUVs containing CFE synthesized PKD2L1-SNAP were formed by electroformation after passing current through indium tin oxide slides treated with dried SUV-channel protein mixture (Boban et al., 2021). We then added two SNAP fluorescent derivatives, membrane permeable SNAP-Cell Oregon Green (Cell488) and membrane impermeable SNAP-Surface Alexa Fluor 647 (Surface647), to monitor orientation-dependent membrane protein reactivity with the SNAP label (Figure 2A, Figure 2—figure supplement 1). We hypothesized there will be two fluorescent outcomes. First, if all channels orient correctly, then we should see only Cell488 fluorescence with no Surface647 at the membrane (Figure 2A). Second, if the channels are in opposite or in mixed orientations, then we expect to see dual fluorescence of Cell488 and Surface647 (Figure 2B). We imaged over 60 GUVs and found 38.5% of the vesicles exhibited sole Cell488 fluorescence—indicating their correct channel orientation within this population (Figure 2B, C). Importantly, none of the vesicle membranes labeled with both Cell488 and Surface647 while retaining a clear lumen—suggesting that the population of GUVs containing misoriented channels was nominal. In some cases, vesicles can encapsulate dye through compromised integrity or mechanisms other than membrane permeability. This is apparent when fluorescence can be seen in the vesicle lumen, rather than on the membrane (Figure 2C). While the encapsulated fluorescent vesicles account for most of the vesicles imaged, there were no vesicles seen with Cell488 and Surface647 fluorescence at the membrane with a clear lumen (Figure 2B, C). Based on these results, we conclude that our cell-free synthesized PKD2L1 channels are successfully reconstituted in GUVs in the correct orientation, and this preparation is suitable to assay PKD2L1 channels using electrophysiology.

Figure 2 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

Native and transgene expressed PKD2L1 channels conduct monovalent cations, thus we established symmetric potassium ion (K⁺) recording conditions to measure synthetic polycystin currents from GUVs. GUVs containing PKD2L1 were voltage clamped using 4–7 MΩ resistance (R) glass electrodes in the inside-out membrane patch configuration (Figure 3A). Single-channel events were frequently observed while establishing high-resistance seals (R > 10 GΩ); however, the majority of PKD2L1 GUV patches were unstable during voltage steps and these results were excluded from the final analysis. We hypothesize that patch instability and low seal resistance likely results from over-incorporation of PKD2L1 tetramers into the GUV membranes, as supported by the FSEC data. In addition, membrane instability was not observed from empty GUV recordings, suggesting that opening of incorporated CFE synthesized polycystins is likely responsible for patch destabilization. From the stable recordings, two magnitudes of single channels were readily observed from GUVs containing PKD2L1, suggesting unique full and sub-conductance states (Figure 3B, C and Table 1). In some recordings, only one conductance predominates, which can be estimated from recordings from individual GUVs (Figure 3—figure supplement 1A, B). While in other recordings, both full (FC) and sub-conductive (SC) states can be identified by histogram analysis of the unitary current (Figure 3—figure supplement 1C, D). Importantly, no single-channel events were observed from GUVs (N = 11) derived from CFE reactions with the empty plasmid—indicating that the measured conductance is not due to contaminates from lipid or cell-free reagents (Figure 3B). To assess the selectivity of the synthetic PKD2L1 pore, we substituted the pipette K⁺ charge carrier for methyl-D-glucamine ions (NMDG⁺). We did not observe any outward single-channel currents (i.e. toward the bath), indicating the large cation was not permeable through PKD2L1 which is consistent with previous reports (Figure 3D, E; DeCaen et al., 2016; Ng et al., 2019). To determine the feasibility of using this approach to assess the function of other polycystin channels, we followed the same steps to assay PKD2 channel biophysics. As observed in our PKD2L1 results, unitary single-channel currents of synthetic PKD2 channels reconstituted in GUVs yield sub- and full conductances, which were terminated by substitution of K⁺ with NMDG⁺ in the electrode (Figure 4A–C; Figure 3—figure supplement 1E–H). To compare the properties of the synthetic and biologically derived channels, we recorded native PKD2L1 and PKD2 channel single-channel currents from the primary cilia membranes of hippocampal neurons and inner medullary collecting duct (IMCD) cell line, respectively (Figure 4—figure supplement 1; Vien et al., 2023; Kleene and Kleene, 2017; Liu et al., 2018). Like the synthetic PKD2 and PKD2L1 channels, native polycystins produced sub- and full K⁺ conductances with inward currents having the greater magnitudes. Here, the synthetic PKD2L1 GUV conductance approximates the native full and sub-conductances recorded from hippocampal primary cilia membranes cultured from neonatal mice (ARL13B-EGFP^tg). However, the PKD2 K⁺ conductance magnitudes recorded from IMCD cilia were significantly smaller than those assayed using the CFE–GUV synthetic system (Table 1). These differences might arise from the lack of post-translational modifications (e.g. phosphorylation and N-glycosylation) to the synthetic PKD2 peptides, which are normally found in biologically derived channels (Su et al., 2018; Cai et al., 1999; Newby et al., 2002). In addition, the GUVs are comprised of synthetic lipids which does not reflect the composition of organelle (cilia or ER) membranes of the cell (Nakatsu, 2015). Thus, while retaining the native ion selectivity and ion channel functionality despite their cell-free origin, synthetic PKD2 has different conductance magnitudes compared to cell-derived channels, which presents a limitation of using this approach to recapitulating physiological channel functions.

Figure 3 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

Figure 4 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

In summary, we have established a synthetic approach to assay ion channel biophysics using two polycystin members to validate our method. Previously CFE has been used to study membrane protein integration, drug delivery, and the study of actin dynamics (Jacobs and Kamat, 2022; Noireaux and Liu, 2020; Göpfrich et al., 2019). The novelty of our approach rests with the adaptation of CFE-derived channels and their GUV reconstitution to carry out single-channel electrophysiology experiments. The described method represents a highly reductionist approach to assay channel function which can be generalized to other channels resistant to characterization using traditional electrophysiology approaches. Furthermore, the CFE–GUV electrophysiology method can be leveraged for future inquiry into lipid-channel regulation and effects of channel subunit composition. PKD2-related protomers form heteromeric complexes (e.g. PKD1–PKD2; PKD1L1–PKD2L1) with PKD1-related polycystins which are notoriously difficult to assay using traditional electrophysiology techniques (as reviewed) (Esarte Palomero et al., 2023). Using the CFE method to co-synthesize and GUV reconstitute these subunits presents a potential avenue to assay their function with patch clamp recordings. The approach may be further developed into high throughput drug screening assays using cation reporters (e.g. Fura derivatives) or multi-well planer electrophysiology instruments (Zhou et al., 2021; Yu et al., 2016). With our pipette patch electrodes, we observed considerable instability of our high resistant seals when the bath solutions were exchanged. Thus, future work could explore alternative membrane compositions (e.g. additional cholesterol) and stabilizing cationic conditions (internal CsF) to mitigate this effect. The folding and membrane integration of many ion channels require their association with stabilizing chaperone proteins produced in cells (Li et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2023; Bai et al., 2018). Thus, while the co-expression of chaperones with these channels using the CFS + GUV system is likely required for their functionality, the approach may also be leveraged to study chaperone-assisted folding in vitro.

Data reported in this paper is deposited and available without restriction at the NU library ARCH (https://doi.org/10.21985/n2-4hs8-6j16).

1. 1. Larmore M
   2. DeCaen P

   (2024) Arch

   Larmore_et_al_2024_A synthetic method to assay polycystin ion channel biophysics.

   https://doi.org/10.21985/n2-4hs8-6j16

1. 1. Bai X
   2. Li K
   3. Yao L
   4. Kang XL
   5. Cai SQ

   (2018) A forward genetic screen identifies chaperone CNX-1 as A conserved biogenesis regulator of ERG K+ channels

   Journal of General Physiology 150:1189–1201.

   https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.201812025

   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Boban Z
   2. Mardešić I
   3. Subczynski WK
   4. Raguz M

   (2021) Giant unilamellar vesicle electroformation: What to use, what to avoid, and how to quantify the results

   Membranes 11:860.

   https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11110860

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Cai Y
   2. Maeda Y
   3. Cedzich A
   4. Torres VE
   5. Wu G
   6. Hayashi T
   7. Mochizuki T
   8. Park JH
   9. Witzgall R
   10. Somlo S

   (1999) Identification and characterization of polycystin-2, the PKD2 gene product

   The Journal of Biological Chemistry 274:28557–28565.

   https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.40.28557

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Chen Z
   2. Mondal A
   3. Abderemane-Ali F
   4. Jang S
   5. Niranjan S
   6. Montaño JL
   7. Zaro BW
   8. Minor DL Jr

   (2023) EMC chaperone-Ca_V structure reveals an ion channel assembly intermediate

   Nature 619:410–419.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06175-5

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Clare JJ

   (2010) Targeting voltage-gated sodium channels for pain therapy

   Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs 19:45–62.

   https://doi.org/10.1517/13543780903435340

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
6. 1. DeCaen PG
   2. Delling M
   3. Vien TN
   4. Clapham DE

   (2013) Direct recording and molecular identification of the calcium channel of primary cilia

   Nature 504:315–318.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12832

   • Google Scholar
7. 1. DeCaen PG
   2. Liu X
   3. Abiria S
   4. Clapham DE

   (2016) Atypical calcium regulation of the PKD2-L1 polycystin ion channel

   eLife 5:e13413.

   https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13413

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Delling M
   2. DeCaen PG
   3. Doerner JF
   4. Febvay S
   5. Clapham DE

   (2013) Primary cilia are specialized calcium signalling organelles

   Nature 504:311–314.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12833

   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Esarte Palomero O
   2. Larmore M
   3. DeCaen PG

   (2023) Polycystin channel complexes

   Annual Review of Physiology 85:425–448.

   https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physiol-031522-084334

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Gao Z
    2. Ruden DM
    3. Lu X

    (2003) PKD2 cation channel is required for directional sperm movement and male fertility

    Current Biology 13:2175–2178.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2003.11.053

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
11. 1. George AL

    (2014a) Lessons learned from genetic testing for channelopathies

    The Lancet. Neurology 13:1068–1070.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70123-1

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
12. 1. George AL

    (2014b) Recent genetic discoveries implicating ion channels in human cardiovascular diseases

    Current Opinion in Pharmacology 15:47–52.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coph.2013.11.011

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Goaillard JM
    2. Marder E

    (2021) Ion channel degeneracy, variability, and covariation in neuron and circuit resilience

    Annual Review of Neuroscience 44:335–357.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-092920-121538

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Göpfrich K
    2. Haller B
    3. Staufer O
    4. Dreher Y
    5. Mersdorf U
    6. Platzman I
    7. Spatz JP

    (2019) One-pot assembly of complex giant unilamellar vesicle-based synthetic cells

    ACS Synthetic Biology 8:937–947.

    https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.9b00034

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Grieben M
    2. Pike ACW
    3. Shintre CA
    4. Venturi E
    5. El-Ajouz S
    6. Tessitore A
    7. Shrestha L
    8. Mukhopadhyay S
    9. Mahajan P
    10. Chalk R
    11. Burgess-Brown NA
    12. Sitsapesan R
    13. Huiskonen JT
    14. Carpenter EP

    (2017) Structure of the polycystic kidney disease TRP channel Polycystin-2 (PC2)

    Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 24:114–122.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.3343

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Hamill OP
    2. Marty A
    3. Neher E
    4. Sakmann B
    5. Sigworth FJ

    (1981) Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches

    Pflugers Archiv 391:85–100.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00656997

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Hille B

    (1978) Ionic channels in excitable membranes. Current problems and biophysical approaches

    Biophysical Journal 22:283–294.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(78)85489-7

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Hulse RE
    2. Li Z
    3. Huang RK
    4. Zhang J
    5. Clapham DE

    (2018) Cryo-EM structure of the polycystin 2-l1 ion channel

    eLife 7:e36931.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36931

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Jacobs ML
    2. Kamat NP

    (2022) Cell-free membrane protein expression into hybrid lipid/polymer vesicles

    Methods in Molecular Biology 2433:257–271.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1998-8_16

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Kaczorowski GJ
    2. McManus OB
    3. Priest BT
    4. Garcia ML

    (2008) Ion channels as drug targets: the next GPCRs

    The Journal of General Physiology 131:399–405.

    https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.200709946

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Kass RS

    (2005) The channelopathies: novel insights into molecular and genetic mechanisms of human disease

    Journal of Clinical Investigation 115:1986–1989.

    https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI26011

    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Klammt C
    2. Schwarz D
    3. Löhr F
    4. Schneider B
    5. Dötsch V
    6. Bernhard F

    (2006) Cell-free expression as an emerging technique for the large scale production of integral membrane protein

    The FEBS Journal 273:4141–4153.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-4658.2006.05432.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Kleene NK
    2. Kleene SJ

    (2012) A method for measuring electrical signals in A primary cilium

    Cilia 1:17.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-2530-1-17

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Kleene SJ
    2. Kleene NK

    (2017) The native TRPP2-dependent channel of murine renal primary cilia

    American Journal of Physiology. Renal Physiology 312:F96–F108.

    https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00272.2016

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Kuruma Y
    2. Nishiyama K-I
    3. Shimizu Y
    4. Müller M
    5. Ueda T

    (2005) Development of a minimal cell-free translation system for the synthesis of presecretory and integral membrane proteins

    Biotechnology Progress 21:1243–1251.

    https://doi.org/10.1021/bp049553u

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Lee A
    2. Fakler B
    3. Kaczmarek LK
    4. Isom LL

    (2014) More than a pore: Ion channel signaling complexes

    The Journal of Neuroscience 34:15159–15169.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3275-14.2014

    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Leptihn S
    2. Thompson JR
    3. Ellory JC
    4. Tucker SJ
    5. Wallace MI

    (2011) In vitro reconstitution of eukaryotic ion channels using droplet interface bilayers

    Journal of the American Chemical Society 133:9370–9375.

    https://doi.org/10.1021/ja200128n

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Li K
    2. Jiang Q
    3. Bai X
    4. Yang YF
    5. Ruan MY
    6. Cai SQ

    (2017) Tetrameric Assembly of K+ Channels Requires ER-Located Chaperone Proteins

    Molecular Cell 65:52–65.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2016.10.027

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Li P
    2. Gu M
    3. Xu H

    (2019) Lysosomal ion channels as decoders of cellular signals

    Trends in Biochemical Sciences 44:110–124.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2018.10.006

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Lieve KVV
    2. Wilde AAM

    (2015) Inherited ion channel diseases: a brief review

    Europace 17 Suppl 2:ii1–ii6.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euv105

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
31. Preprint

    1. Liu X
    2. Vien T
    3. Duan J
    4. Sheu SH
    5. DeCaen PG
    6. Clapham DE

    (2017) PKD2 Is an Essential Ion Channel Subunit in the Primary Cilium of the Renal Collecting Duct Epithelium

    bioRxiv.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/215814

    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Liu X
    2. Vien T
    3. Duan J
    4. Sheu SH
    5. DeCaen PG
    6. Clapham DE

    (2018) Polycystin-2 is an essential ion channel subunit in the primary cilium of the renal collecting duct epithelium

    eLife 7:e33183.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.33183

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
33. 1. McGivern JG
    2. Ding M

    (2020) Ion channels and relevant drug screening approaches

    SLAS Discovery 25:413–419.

    https://doi.org/10.1177/2472555220921108

    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Morera FJ
    2. Vargas G
    3. González C
    4. Rosenmann E
    5. Latorre R

    (2007) Ion-channel reconstitution

    Methods in Molecular Biology 400:571–585.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-519-0_38

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Müller-Lucks A
    2. Bock S
    3. Wu B
    4. Beitz E

    (2012) Fluorescent in situ folding control for rapid optimization of cell-free membrane protein synthesis

    PLOS ONE 7:e42186.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042186

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Nakatsu F

    (2015) A phosphoinositide code for primary cilia

    Developmental Cell 34:379–380.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2015.08.008

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Neher E
    2. Sakmann B

    (1976) Single-channel currents recorded from membrane of denervated frog muscle fibres

    Nature 260:799–802.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/260799a0

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Neher E

    (1992) Ion channels for communication between and within cells

    Science 256:498–502.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1373906

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Newby LJ
    2. Streets AJ
    3. Zhao Y
    4. Harris PC
    5. Ward CJ
    6. Ong ACM

    (2002) Identification, characterization, and localization of a novel kidney polycystin-1-polycystin-2 complex

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 277:20763–20773.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M107788200

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Ng LCT
    2. Vien TN
    3. Yarov-Yarovoy V
    4. DeCaen PG

    (2019) Opening TRPP2 (PKD2L1) requires the transfer of gating charges

    PNAS 116:15540–15549.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1902917116

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Noireaux V
    2. Liu AP

    (2020) The new age of cell-free biology

    Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 22:51–77.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-092019-111110

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Oprea TI

    (2019) Exploring the dark genome: implications for precision medicine

    Mammalian Genome 30:192–200.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-019-09809-0

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
43. 1. Overington JP
    2. Al-Lazikani B
    3. Hopkins AL

    (2006) How many drug targets are there?

    Nature Reviews. Drug Discovery 5:993–996.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd2199

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Pablo JL
    2. DeCaen PG
    3. Clapham DE

    (2017) Progress in ciliary ion channel physiology

    The Journal of General Physiology 149:37–47.

    https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.201611696

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
45. 1. Prindle A
    2. Liu J
    3. Asally M
    4. Ly S
    5. Garcia-Ojalvo J
    6. Süel GM

    (2015) Ion channels enable electrical communication in bacterial communities

    Nature 527:59–63.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15709

    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Santos R
    2. Ursu O
    3. Gaulton A
    4. Bento AP
    5. Donadi RS
    6. Bologa CG
    7. Karlsson A
    8. Al-Lazikani B
    9. Hersey A
    10. Oprea TI
    11. Overington JP

    (2017) A comprehensive map of molecular drug targets

    Nature Reviews. Drug Discovery 16:19–34.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd.2016.230

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Shen PS
    2. Yang X
    3. DeCaen PG
    4. Liu X
    5. Bulkley D
    6. Clapham DE
    7. Cao E

    (2016) The Structure of the Polycystic Kidney Disease Channel PKD2 in Lipid Nanodiscs

    Cell 167:763–773.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.048

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
48. 1. Shimizu Y
    2. Ueda T

    (2010) PURE technology

    Methods in Molecular Biology 607:11–21.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-331-2_2

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Smith JJ
    2. Aitchison JD

    (2013) Peroxisomes take shape

    Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology 14:803–817.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3700

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
50. 1. Stutzmann GE
    2. Mattson MP

    (2011) Endoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+) handling in excitable cells in health and disease

    Pharmacological Reviews 63:700–727.

    https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.110.003814

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
51. 1. Su Q
    2. Hu F
    3. Liu Y
    4. Ge X
    5. Mei C
    6. Yu S
    7. Shen A
    8. Zhou Q
    9. Yan C
    10. Lei J
    11. Zhang Y
    12. Liu X
    13. Wang T

    (2018) Cryo-EM structure of the polycystic kidney disease-like channel PKD2L1

    Nature Communications 9:1192.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03606-0

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
52. 1. Tanaka Y
    2. Morozumi A
    3. Hirokawa N

    (2023) Nodal flow transfers polycystin to determine mouse left-right asymmetry

    Developmental Cell 58:1447–1461.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2023.06.002

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
53. 1. Varghese A
    2. Tenbroek EM
    3. Coles J
    4. Sigg DC

    (2006) Endogenous channels in HEK cells and potential roles in HCN ionic current measurements

    Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology 90:26–37.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2005.05.002

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
54. 1. Vien TN
    2. Wang J
    3. Ng LCT
    4. Cao E
    5. DeCaen PG

    (2020) Molecular dysregulation of ciliary polycystin-2 channels caused by variants in the TOP domain

    PNAS 117:10329–10338.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1920777117

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
55. 1. Vien TN
    2. Ta MC
    3. Kimura LF
    4. Onay T
    5. DeCaen PG

    (2023) Primary cilia TRP channel regulates hippocampal excitability

    PNAS 120:e2219686120.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2219686120

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
56. 1. Vo CVT
    2. Mikutis G
    3. Bode JW

    (2013) SnAP reagents for the transformation of aldehydes into substituted thiomorpholines--an alternative to cross-coupling with saturated heterocycles

    Angewandte Chemie 52:1705–1708.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201208064

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
57. 1. Wang Q
    2. Corey RA
    3. Hedger G
    4. Aryal P
    5. Grieben M
    6. Nasrallah C
    7. Baronina A
    8. Pike ACW
    9. Shi J
    10. Carpenter EP
    11. Sansom MSP

    (2020) Lipid Interactions of a Ciliary Membrane TRP Channel: Simulation and Structural Studies of Polycystin-2

    Structure 28:169–184.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2019.11.005

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
58. 1. Wilkes M
    2. Madej MG
    3. Kreuter L
    4. Rhinow D
    5. Heinz V
    6. De Sanctis S
    7. Ruppel S
    8. Richter RM
    9. Joos F
    10. Grieben M
    11. Pike ACW
    12. Huiskonen JT
    13. Carpenter EP
    14. Kühlbrandt W
    15. Witzgall R
    16. Ziegler C

    (2017) Molecular insights into lipid-assisted Ca2+ regulation of the TRP channel Polycystin-2

    Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 24:123–130.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.3357

    • Google Scholar
59. 1. Wu G
    2. D’Agati V
    3. Cai Y
    4. Markowitz G
    5. Park JH
    6. Reynolds DM
    7. Maeda Y
    8. Le TC
    9. Hou H Jr
    10. Kucherlapati R
    11. Edelmann W
    12. Somlo S

    (1998) Somatic inactivation of Pkd2 results in polycystic kidney disease

    Cell 93:177–188.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81570-6

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
60. 1. Yang Y
    2. Wang Z
    3. Gan C
    4. Klausen LH
    5. Bonné R
    6. Kong G
    7. Luo D
    8. Meert M
    9. Zhu C
    10. Sun G
    11. Guo J
    12. Ma Y
    13. Bjerg JT
    14. Manca J
    15. Xu M
    16. Nielsen LP
    17. Dong M

    (2021) Long-distance electron transfer in a filamentous Gram-positive bacterium

    Nature Communications 12:1709.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21709-z

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
61. 1. Yao G
    2. Luo C
    3. Harvey M
    4. Wu M
    5. Schreiber TH
    6. Du Y
    7. Basora N
    8. Su X
    9. Contreras D
    10. Zhou J

    (2016) Disruption of polycystin-L causes hippocampal and thalamocortical hyperexcitability

    Human Molecular Genetics 25:448–458.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddv484

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
62. 1. Yu FH
    2. Yarov-Yarovoy V
    3. Gutman GA
    4. Catterall WA

    (2005) Overview of molecular relationships in the voltage-gated ion channel superfamily

    Pharmacological Reviews 57:387–395.

    https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.57.4.13

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
63. 1. Yu H
    2. Li M
    3. Wang W
    4. Wang X

    (2016) High throughput screening technologies for ion channels

    Acta Pharmacologica Sinica 37:34–43.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/aps.2015.108

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
64. 1. Zhou X
    2. Belavek KJ
    3. Miller EW

    (2021) Origins of Ca(2+) Imaging with Fluorescent Indicators

    Biochemistry 60:3547–3554.

    https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.1c00350

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Megan Larmore

   Department of Pharmacology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, United States

   Contribution

   Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

2. Orhi Esarte Palomero

   Department of Pharmacology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, United States

   Contribution

   Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing - review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2022-3140

3. Neha Kamat

   1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science, Northwestern University, Evanston, United States
   2. Center for Synthetic Biology, Northwestern University, Evanston, United States

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Supervision

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9362-6106

4. Paul G DeCaen

   1. Department of Pharmacology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, United States
   2. Chemistry of Life Processes Institute, Northwestern University, Evanston, United States

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Data curation, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Project administration

   For correspondence

   paul.decaen@northwestern.edu

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8776-983X

• 568

  views

• 47

  downloads

• 0

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.