Emergence of power-law distributions in protein-protein interaction networks through study bias

  1. David B Blumenthal  Is a corresponding author
  2. Marta Lucchetta
  3. Linda Kleist
  4. Sándor P Fekete
  5. Markus List  Is a corresponding author
  6. Martin H Schaefer  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
  2. European Institute of Oncology, Italy
  3. Technische Universität Braunschweig, Germany
  4. Technical University of Munich, Germany

Abstract

Degree distributions in protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks are believed to follow a power law (PL). However, technical and study bias affect the experimental procedures for detecting PPIs. For instance, cancer-associated proteins have received disproportional attention. Moreover, bait proteins in large-scale experiments tend to have many false-positive interaction partners. Studying the degree distributions of thousands of PPI networks of controlled provenance, we address the question if PL distributions in observed PPI networks could be explained by these biases alone. Our findings are supported by mathematical models and extensive simulations and indicate that study bias and technical bias suffice to produce the observed PL distribution. It is, hence, problematic to derive hypotheses about the topology of the true biological interactome from the PL distributions in observed PPI networks. Our study casts doubt on the use of the PL property of biological networks as a modeling assumption or quality criterion in network biology.

Data availability

We analyzed only previously published data for this work. To facilitate reproducibility, we deposited the used datasets at https://zenodo.org/record/8288898.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. David B Blumenthal

    Department Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
    For correspondence
    david.b.blumenthal@fau.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8651-750X
  2. Marta Lucchetta

    Department of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Linda Kleist

    Department of Computer Science, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Sándor P Fekete

    Department of Computer Science, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Markus List

    Data Science in Systems Biology, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
    For correspondence
    markus.list@tum.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Martin H Schaefer

    Department of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
    For correspondence
    martin.schaefer@ieo.it
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7503-6364

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (031L0309A)

  • David B Blumenthal

Klaus Tschira Stiftung (00.003.2024)

  • David B Blumenthal
  • Markus List
  • Martin H Schaefer

Fondazione AIRC per la ricerca sul cancro ETS (MFAG 21791)

  • Martin H Schaefer

Fondazione AIRC per la ricerca sul cancro ETS (Bridge Grant n. 29162)

  • Martin H Schaefer

Ministero della Salute (Ricerca Corrente)

  • Martin H Schaefer

Ministero della Salute (5x1000 funds)

  • Martin H Schaefer

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2024, Blumenthal et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 344
    views
  • 87
    downloads
  • 0
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. David B Blumenthal
  2. Marta Lucchetta
  3. Linda Kleist
  4. Sándor P Fekete
  5. Markus List
  6. Martin H Schaefer
(2024)
Emergence of power-law distributions in protein-protein interaction networks through study bias
eLife 13:e99951.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.99951

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.99951

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Peng Li, Sree Pulugulla ... Warren J Leonard
    Short Report

    Transcription factor partners can cooperatively bind to DNA composite elements to augment gene transcription. Here, we report a novel protein-DNA binding screening pipeline, termed Spacing Preference Identification of Composite Elements (SPICE), that can systematically predict protein binding partners and DNA motif spacing preferences. Using SPICE, we successfully identified known composite elements, such as AP1-IRF composite elements (AICEs) and STAT5 tetramers, and also uncovered several novel binding partners, including JUN-IKZF1 composite elements. One such novel interaction was identified at CNS9, an upstream conserved noncoding region in the human IL10 gene, which harbors a non-canonical IKZF1 binding site. We confirmed the cooperative binding of JUN and IKZF1 and showed that the activity of an IL10-luciferase reporter construct in primary B and T cells depended on both this site and the AP1 binding site within this composite element. Overall, our findings reveal an unappreciated global association of IKZF1 and AP1 and establish SPICE as a valuable new pipeline for predicting novel transcription binding complexes.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Rachael Kuintzle, Leah A Santat, Michael B Elowitz
    Research Article

    The Notch signaling pathway uses families of ligands and receptors to transmit signals to nearby cells. These components are expressed in diverse combinations in different cell types, interact in a many-to-many fashion, both within the same cell (in cis) and between cells (in trans), and their interactions are modulated by Fringe glycosyltransferases. A fundamental question is how the strength of Notch signaling depends on which pathway components are expressed, at what levels, and in which cells. Here, we used a quantitative, bottom-up, cell-based approach to systematically characterize trans-activation, cis-inhibition, and cis-activation signaling efficiencies across a range of ligand and Fringe expression levels in Chinese hamster and mouse cell lines. Each ligand (Dll1, Dll4, Jag1, and Jag2) and receptor variant (Notch1 and Notch2) analyzed here exhibited a unique profile of interactions, Fringe dependence, and signaling outcomes. All four ligands were able to bind receptors in cis and in trans, and all ligands trans-activated both receptors, although Jag1-Notch1 signaling was substantially weaker than other ligand-receptor combinations. Cis-interactions were predominantly inhibitory, with the exception of the Dll1- and Dll4-Notch2 pairs, which exhibited cis-activation stronger than trans-activation. Lfng strengthened Delta-mediated trans-activation and weakened Jagged-mediated trans-activation for both receptors. Finally, cis-ligands showed diverse cis-inhibition strengths, which depended on the identity of the trans-ligand as well as the receptor. The map of receptor-ligand-Fringe interaction outcomes revealed here should help guide rational perturbation and control of the Notch pathway.