Browse Inside eLife

From open science and reproducibility to diversity and career development, eLife Ambassadors remain active on a large number of projects.

FAIRsharing and DataCite have joined forces with a group of publisher representatives, including eLife, to develop criteria for identifying and selecting data repositories.

Bringing a broad range of expertise, 113 researchers join eLife’s editorial board as 12 Reviewing Editors move to the leadership team.

eLife is pleased to announce a new Special Issue, curating the very best research in this field.

Help others to understand your research and make your results standout by learning how to make your figures more informative.

Michael Eisen, eLife’s Editor-in-Chief, reflects on lessons learned from a recent peer-review trial, and describes how eLife aims to make peer review more effective.

We share the results from a recent cross-journal test of a minimum standards reporting checklist for the life sciences.

A new approach to peer review resulted in a moderately higher acceptance rate, with all the issues raised by reviewers addressed by the authors in the vast majority of revised submissions.

We explore what happened when nine eLife Reviewing Editors explicitly included early-career reviewers in the review process.

A recording of the recent webinar, where Dr. Ulrich Dirnagl discussed the scientific ritual of significance testing.