Browse Inside eLife

Michael Eisen, eLife’s Editor-in-Chief, reflects on lessons learned from a recent peer-review trial, and describes how eLife aims to make peer review more effective.

We share the results from a recent cross-journal test of a minimum standards reporting checklist for the life sciences.

A new approach to peer review resulted in a moderately higher acceptance rate, with all the issues raised by reviewers addressed by the authors in the vast majority of revised submissions.

We explore what happened when nine eLife Reviewing Editors explicitly included early-career reviewers in the review process.

A recording of the recent webinar, where Dr. Ulrich Dirnagl discussed the scientific ritual of significance testing.

In two separate webinars, successful science entrepreneurs discussed how to convert your discovery and passion into a prospering business.

Watch the full proceedings of a workshop on reproducibility and data reuse in life sciences, co-organised with SciLifeLab

Researchers from Denmark, Greece, India, the United Kingdom and the United States receive grants to present their work at meetings around the world.

Over the past 12 months, more than 5,000 researchers participated in eLife’s consultative peer-review process, evaluating more than 2,600 full submissions.

Help us paint a clearer picture of research practices today.