Measuring electrophysiological properties of retinogeniculate synapses.
(A) Inferring the number of RGC inputs of dLGN relay neurons by measuring stimulation-response curves. To measure relay neuron responses, we prepared acute brain slices from a tilted parasagittal plane in P30 mice (38). These slice preparations preserved a long segment of the optic tract and a high level of connectivity between RGC axons and dLGN relay neurons (38). We placed a stimulating electrode on the optic tract and patch-clamped individual dLGN relay neurons with a recording electrode. We stimulated the optic tract with a series of gradually increasing currents and recorded excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) in relay neurons. At low stimulation intensity, no RGC axons were activated. As the stimulus increased, more and more RGC axons were recruited. As different RGC axons have different excitation thresholds, RGC axons were excited one at a time. Whenever a stimulus activated an RGC axon that did not respond to lower stimuli, a step increase in the relay neuron response was detected, and the increment corresponded to the EPSC evoked by the newly recruited RGC axon. We can therefore infer the number of RGC inputs innervating the relay neuron being recorded by counting the number of steps in the response curve of that relay neuron. t: time. Stim.: stimulation intensity. (B-C) Inferring the number of release sites from RGC inputs by measuring paired-pulse response ratio (PPR). We stimulated the optic tract with two stimuli separated by a short interval and recorded EPSCs in dLGN relay neurons. The stimulus intensity was chosen to evoke maximum response in the relay neuron. In wildtype mice (B), the first stimulus triggers the release of a significant fraction of the readily releasable pool (RRP) of neurotransmitters (black dots), evoking a strong response (left). At the time of the second stimulus, the RRP does not have sufficient time to recover and remains depleted, resulting in a weaker second response (right). PPR can be calculated from this experiment by dividing the peak amplitude of the second response with that of the first. PPR is small in wildtype animals. In caspase-3 deficient mice (C), if the number of release sites is increased compared to wildtype animals, the RRP should be larger (left), and a smaller fraction of the RRP is released during the first stimulus, leaving more neurotransmitters available for the second stimulus (right), thereby enhancing the second response and PPR. Note that in this model, we made two assumptions. The first assumption is that the average size of the RRP in one release site is similar in Casp3+/+ and Casp3−/− mice, which is supported by the comparable fiber fractions (FFs) in the two groups of animals (see Fig. S8E). The second assumption is that the number of neurotransmitters released during the first stimulus is similar in Casp3+/+ and Casp3−/− mice (4 dots in the illustration), which is supported by the comparable maximum EPSCs in the two groups of animals (see Fig. S8B-C).