Arpin deficiency increases actomyosin contractility and vascular permeability

  1. Department of Molecular Biomedicine CINVESTAV-IPN, IPN Avenue 2508, 07360 Mexico City, Mexico
  2. Department of Infectomics and Molecular Pathogenesis CINVESTAV-IPN, IPN Avenue 2508, 07360 Mexico City, Mexico
  3. Department of Biochemistry, CINVESTAV-IPN, IPN Avenue 2508, 07360 Mexico City, Mexico
  4. Laboratorio de Patogénesis Molecular, Facultad de Estudios Superiores de Iztacala, UNAM, 54090 Tlalnepantla de Baz, Mexico

Editors

  • Reviewing Editor
    Christopher Huang
    University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
  • Senior Editor
    Christopher Huang
    University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Summary:
The data clearly demonstrate that arpin is important for vessel barrier function, yet its genetic loss via a CRISPR strategy was not lethality, but led to viable animals in C57Blk strain at 12 weeks of age, albeit with leaky blood vessels. Pharmacological approaches were employed to demonstrate that loss of arpin led to ROCK1-dependent stress fiber formation that promoted increased permeability.

Strengths:
The results clearly demonstrate that arpin is expressed in the endothelium of blood vessels and its deficiency leads to leaky blood vessels in in vivo and in vitro models.

Weaknesses:
They conclude vessel leak was not related to enhanced Arp2/3 function through arpin deficiency, but no direct evidence of Arp2/3 activity is provided to support this conclusion. Instead, the authors concluded that ROCK1 activity was elevated in arpin knockdown cells and caused robust stress fiber formation. This idea could be strengthened by testing if ROCK1 inhibition by pharmacological block in arpin KO mice leads to less vascular leakage while pharmacological inhibition of Arp2/3 does not attenuate increased vessel permeability.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

Summary:
The authors have taken their previous finding that arpin is important for epithelial junctions and extended this to endothelial cells. They find that the positive effects of arpin on endothelial junctions are not dependent on Arp2/3 activity but instead on suppression of actinomyosin contractility.

Strengths:
The study uses standard approaches to test each of the components in the model. The quality of the experimental work is good and the amount of experimental evidence is sufficient to support this straightforward story.

Weaknesses:
The major weakness is that the story is a simple extension of the previous work on arpin and junctions in epithelial cells. The additional information is that the effects are not via Arp2/3 directly, but instead through an increase in actinomyosin contractility. However, the connection between arpin and increased ROCK activity is not revealed.

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  2. Wellcome Trust
  3. Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
  4. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation