Abstract
Riboswitches are non-coding RNA elements that can specifically sense ligands and regulate gene expression. A recent report introduced a type of riboswitch known as the guanidine-IV riboswitch, which responds to guanidine levels and controls the transcription of downstream genes. However, there is currently a lack of clarity regarding the mechanism by which the riboswitch senses guanidine and undergoes conformational changes. This lack of understanding has impeded the application of this riboswitch. Therefore, our study aimed to address this gap by investigating the conformational changes that occur in a guanidine-IV riboswitch RNA. We examined the aptamer, terminator, and full-length riboswitch using single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer (smFRET). Our findings indicated that the aptamer portion was more sensitive to guanidine compared to the terminator and full-length riboswitch. Additionally, we mimicked the structural changes in the guanidine-IV riboswitch that occur during transcription at a single-nucleotide and single-molecule level using Position-specific Labelling of RNA (PLOR) and smFRET. The results showed that guanidine caused a less pronounced change in the riboswitch RNA after transcribing 88 nucleotides. Based on our findings, we have proposed a folding model for the guanidine-IV riboswitch in the absence and presence of guanidine.
Impact statement
The guanidine-IV riboswitch’s aptamer domain exhibits a greater sensitivity towards guanidine in comparison to both the terminator and full-length riboswitch. This results in the riboswitch showcasing a narrow transcriptional window that is responsive to ligand binding. And a comprehensive structure-function model for the guanidine-IV riboswitch under both guanidine-free and guanidine-present conditions.
Introduction
Riboswitches, located at the 5′-untranslated region of mRNA, are capable of regulating gene expression through structural changes after binding to their specific ligands (Jones & Ferre-D’Amare, 2017; Mandal & Breaker, 2004; Serganov & Nudler, 2013; Sherlock & Breaker, 2020). A typical riboswitch consists of an aptamer domain and an expression platform. The aptamer domain binds to a specific ligand, leading to structural changes and regulation of gene expression (Garst et al., 2011; Kavita & Breaker, 2023; Winkler & Breaker, 2003). To date, more than 55 classes of riboswitches have been identified that can sense a diverse range of ligands, including small metabolites, anions, cations, amino acids, and nucleotides (Breaker, 2022; McCown et al., 2017). Furthermore, riboswitches responding to the same ligands have been found to exhibit distinct consequences and structures. For instance, there are four types of guanidine riboswitches, namely guanidine-I, guanidine-II, guanidine-III, and guanidine-IV riboswitch, which specifically bind to guanidine. Notably, the guanidine-IV riboswitch differs significantly from other guanidine riboswitches (Battaglia & Ke, 2018; L. Huang et al., 2017; Lin Huang et al., 2017; Lenkeit et al., 2020; Nelson et al., 2017; Salvail et al., 2020). Specifically, the guanidine-IV riboswitch is able to enhance the transcription of mepA by forming an anti-terminator structure upon guanidine binding. This structure plays a crucial role in exporting guanidine and reducing its toxicity in cells, making the guanidine-IV riboswitch a potential target for antibiotics (Kermani et al., 2018). Although the atomic-resolution structures of the guanidine-IV riboswitch have not been solved, it is proposed that a kissing loop (KL) forms in the riboswitch in the presence of guanidine. This KL facilitates the dissociation of the terminator and promotes transcriptional read-through (Lenkeit et al., 2020; Salvail et al., 2020). KL or pseudoknot formation upon ligand binding is a common occurrence in various riboswitches, including adenine, guanine, ZTP, pre-Q1, fluoride, and c-di-AMP riboswitches (Jones & Ferre-D’Amare, 2017; Lenkeit et al., 2020; Salvail et al., 2020). However, the mechanism by which KL affects gene expression in a transcriptional riboswitch, particularly during transcription, remains elusive.
The folding of RNA during transcription plays a critical role in its function, especially in riboswitches involved in gene regulation. Previous studies have investigated the co-transcriptional folding of various riboswitches using different techniques. For instance, Frieda et al. employed the optical-trapping assay to examine the co-transcriptional folding of an adenine riboswitch at the single-molecule resolution (Frieda & Block, 2012). Helmling et al. and Binas et al., on the other hand, used NMR to map the transcriptional intermediates of the 2′-deoxyguanosine (2′-dG) and ZMP riboswitches at the single-nucleotide resolution (Binas et al., 2020; Helmling et al., 2017). Landgraf et al. utilized NMR and computational modeling to identify the ligand-sensing transcriptional window for the c-di-GMP and c-GAMP riboswitches (Landgraf et al., 2022). Hua et al. investigated the co-transcriptional folding of the twister ribozyme and the ZTP riboswitch by mimicking the folding process using helicases to dissociate an RNA-DNA hybrid (Hua et al., 2020; Hua et al., 2018). Uhm et al., Widom et al., and Yadav et al. employed the single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer (smFRET) strategy to study the co-transcriptional folding of the TPP, pre-Q1, and fluoride riboswitches by assembling transcriptional complexes (Uhm et al., 2018; Widom et al., 2018; Yadav et al., 2022). Xue et al. monitored the folding of a growing SAM-VI riboswitch at the single-molecule resolution by FRET (Xue et al., 2023). Despite these previous investigations, there is lack of information regarding the conformational changes and ligand-sensing behavior of the guanidine-IV riboswitch during transcription. In this study, we used position-specific labeling of RNA (PLOR) to introduce a FRET pair, Cy3 and Cy5, at sites 78 and 35, respectively. Subsequently, we examined the ligand and Mg2+ responses of the aptamer domain, terminator/anti-terminator, and full-length guanidine-IV riboswitch using smFRET. Our findings revealed that both guanidine and Mg2+ facilitated the formation of a KL in the aptamer domain and significantly increased the KL-formed conformation in that domain. Interestingly, unlike the aptamer domain, the addition of guanidine and Mg2+ only had a minimal effect on the formation of the KL-formed anti-terminator structure in the terminator/anti-terminator or full-length RNA. Additionally, we mimicked the conformational changes and ligand-sensing behavior from the aptamer domain to the terminator sequence of the guanidine-IV riboswitch during transcription using smFRET and PLOR. The formation of the KL increased as the riboswitch was transcribed up to 88 nucleotides (corresponding to the aptamer), but decreased as the riboswitch was transcribed from 88 to 105 nucleotides (corresponding to the terminator). Based on our data, it became evident that the transcriptional fate did not determined by the terminator sequence, but rather by the aptamer region, which exhibited distinct ligand-sensing abilities.
Results
The construction and characteristics of the guanidine-IV riboswitch
The Clostridium botulinum guanidine-IV riboswitch was investigated in this study. The secondary structures of the guanidine-IV riboswitch are depicted in Figures 1A and 1B. In the absence of the guanidinium cation (Gua+), the terminator consists of the aptamer domain (in black) and poly-U tail (in orange). This terminator is proposed to terminate transcription by dissociating RNA polymerase from the transcription system (Figure 1A). However, in the presence of Gua+, the formation of a KL (in green, Figure 1B) hinders the formation of the complete terminator stem due to steric exclusion. This leads to the formation of the anti-terminator structure and subsequently activates the expression of its downstream genes (Figures 1C and 1D). The full-length riboswitch includes the nucleotides highlighted in blue, in addition to the terminator/anti-terminator region (orange, Figure 1B). In our study, we observed that the transcriptional read-through of the guanidine-IV riboswitch was responsive to Gua+, with an apparent EC50 of approximately 68.7 μM (Figure 1D). This is comparable to the reported KD of approximately 64 μM that was determined by in-line probing (Salvail et al., 2020). Higher read-through efficiencies were detected at higher Gua+ concentrations, as presented in Figure 1D, consistent with previous findings (Lenkeit et al., 2020). In order to probe the structural changes of different domains in the guanidine-IV riboswitch under various conditions, we applied PLOR to introduce Cy3 and Cy5 at sites 78 and 35 in the aptamer (riboG-apt), terminator/anti-terminator (riboG-term), and full-length guanidine-IV riboswitch (riboG). Sites 78 and 35 are close to the KL, making them suitable for monitoring the KL formation at different Mg2+ and Gua+ concentrations.
smFRET revealed the significant effects of Mg2+ and Gua+ on riboG-apt
smFRET is a powerful method that can detect multiple conformations by measuring the energy transfer efficiency (EFRET) of a pair of fluorophores at the single molecule level. This technique has been extensively employed to investigate the conformational dynamics of RNA at the single-molecule level (Manz et al., 2017; Uhm et al., 2018). When the riboG-apt labeled with dual fluorophore-labeled (Figure 2A, Figure 2– figure supplement 1 and 2A) was examined, a single peak (EFRET ∼ 0.2) was observed in the presence of 0 mM Mg2+ and 0 mM Gua+ (Figure 2B and Figure 2– figure supplement 2B). This peak is believed to correspond to the unfolded structure of riboG-apt, where the KL is not formed and thus, the labeled sites are distant from each other. Furthermore, in the presence of 2.0 mM Mg2+, three peaks (EFRET ∼ 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8) were observed, as revealed by hidden Markov modeling (Figure 2C). This suggests the coexistence of at least three structures when 2.0 mM Mg2+ is present, with the peak at an EFRET of approximately 0.8 likely representing the structure involving the KL formation. In contrast, the peak with an EFRET ∼ 0.5 corresponded to a more compact structure compared to the unfolded structure, which we referred to as the pre-folded structure (Figure 2D). Notably, at 2.0 mM Mg2+, these three states exhibited high dynamics, with transitions occurring particularly between the pre-folded and the unfolded states (Figures 2B and 2C). Our results demonstrate that the presence of Mg2+ induces a conformational change in the unfolded riboG-apt, leading to the adoption of more compact pre-folded and folded conformations. The proportion of the folded conformation significantly increased to approximately 90% at 20.0 mM Mg2+ (Figure 2E and Figure 2– figure supplement 2G). However, even with high concentrations of Mg2+, riboG-apt remained flexible and dynamic in its transition between states (Figure 2E and Figure 2– figure supplement 2). The nucleotides surrounding the KL are crucial for its formation. Specifically, the G77C mutation has been found to significantly interfere with the KL formation, aligning with previous research (Lenkeit et al., 2020). Consistent with our expectations, the peaks corresponding to EFRET values of approximately 0.5 and 0.8 were not observed in our riboG-G77C variant, which contains the G77C mutation, even in the presence of a high Mg2+ concentration (50 mM; Figure 2– figure supplement 3). Our findings indicate that the G77C mutation disrupts the formation of the KL, consequently affecting the structures associated with EFRET ∼ 0.5 and 0.8. This observation strongly supports our hypothesis that the peak at EFRET ∼ 0.8 corresponds to the conformation folded with the KL.
In addition to Mg2+, Gua+ also had the ability to promote the folded conformation (EFRET ∼ 0.8) of riboG-apt. However, Gua+ exhibited lower efficacy compared to Mg2+, as evidenced by the proportion of the folded conformation being approximately 25% in the presence of 20.0 mM Gua+. This value is significantly lower than the approximately 90% observed in the presence of 20.0 mM Mg2+ (Figure 2E, Figure 2– figure supplement 2G and 4F). Our observations also revealed that riboG-apt exhibited pronounced dynamics, frequently transiting among the three states at 10.0–100.0 mM Gua+ (Figure 2– figure supplement 4E–H). The presence of Mg2+ was critical in facilitating the induction of the folded state by Gua+. Notably, riboG-apt showed increased susceptibility to Gua+ in the presence of Mg2+ (Figure 2F, Figure 2– figure supplement 5). Upon the addition of 0.5 mM Gua+ and 0.5 mM Mg2+, the KL-folded conformation predominated in riboG-apt. The proportion of the KL-folded conformation increased to over 40%, which was comparable to the effect observed with a 20-fold increase in Gua+ in the absence of Mg2+ (Figure 2– figure supplement 4B and 5E). Interestingly, at 0.5 mM Mg2+, Gua+ bound to riboG-apt with a Kdof 286 μM (Figure 2– figure supplement 5H), higher than the Kd of 64 μM that was determined by in-line probing in the presence of 20 mM Mg2+ (Salvail et al., 2020). This difference is likely due to the low concentration of Mg2+, which has a weak ability to help guanidine induced the KL conformation. In addition, we observed that riboG-apt became more stable as the concentration of Gua+ increased, particularly in the presence of high Mg2+ (Figure 2– figure supplement 6). Surprisingly, the proportion of the folded conformation hardly increased when Mg2+ exceeded 2.0 mM in the presence of 1.0 mM Gua+. Taking into account that Gua+ was present in a positively charged state in the buffer employed for our FRET studies, we conducted additional experiments to investigate the impact of commonly used cations, including Na+, K+, and urea (a structural analog of guanidine). Interestingly, we observed minimal changes in the folded conformation of riboG-apt upon the addition of Na+, K+, or urea. These findings suggest that the effects of Gua+ on the folded conformation are distinct from those of the tested cations. Furthermore, our results indicate that Gua+ specifically binds to riboG-apt and induces structural changes as a ligand, rather than simply acting as a general cation or chaotrope (Figure 2G).
smFRET analysis revealed the slight effects of Mg2+ and Gua+ on riboG-term and riboG
Unlike riboG-apt, riboG-term labeled with dual fluorophores (Figure 3A, Figure 3–figure supplement 1) exhibited the coexistence of three conformations, characterized by EFRET values of approximately 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8. This coexistence was observed even in the absence of Mg2+ and Gua+ (Figure 3B, Figure 3–figure supplement 2A and 2B). The sensitivity of RiboG-term to Gua+ was significantly lower compared to riboG-apt. This is evidenced by the fact that, in the presence of 2.0 mM Mg2+, the addition of 1.0 mM Gua+ only resulted in a proportion of approximately 4% of the folded conformation for riboG-term, while it was approximately 60% for riboG-apt (Figures 2B and 3B). With the increase of either Mg2+ from 0 to 50.0 mM or Gua+ from 0 to 100.0 mM, less than 12% of the molecules transited dynamically among the three states of riboG-term (Figure 3C, Figure 3–figure supplement 2 and 3). This finding suggests that the unfolded structure of riboG-term without KL (EFRET ∼ 0.2) is stable, and high concentrations of Mg2+ or Gua+ only slightly affect the KL formation. In the presence of 0.5 mM Mg2+, the structural change of riboG-term in response to increasing Gua+ was negligible (Figure 3D, Figure 3–figure supplement 4). Surprisingly, in the presence of 1.0 mM Gua+, the conformation dynamics of riboG-term became more evident as Mg2+ increased. Moreover, at high Mg2+ concentrations, such as 10.0 mM, the abundance of the folded conformation (EFRET ∼ 0.8) significantly elevated with increasing Gua+ (Figure 3E and Figure 3–figure supplement 5). This suggests that Gua+ enhances the flexibility of riboG-term, potentially triggering its structural changes and facilitating the regulatory function of riboG in the presence of Mg2+.
In the presence of Mg2+ and/or Gua+, the FRET histogram of Cy3Cy5-riboG (Figures 4A and Figure 4–figure supplement 1) displayed a greater number of peaks compared to riboG-apt and riboG-term (Figures 4B and Figure 4–figure supplement 2). Additionally, the smFRET traces revealed structural transitions among the states, as shown in Figure 4–figure supplement 2–5. The presence of more structures in the full-length riboswitch compared to the aptamer domain is consistent with findings in other RNA molecules, such as the 2′-dG riboswitch (Helmling et al., 2017). Notably, upon the addition of 1.0 mM Gua+ in the presence of 2.0 mM Mg2+, the proportion of the new peak (EFRET ∼ 0.4) increased from 19% to 29%, and then decreased as the Mg2+ concentrations increased from 2 to 10 mM (Figure 4– figure supplement 2D and 4B–D). The addition of 0–50.0 mM Mg2+ or 0–100 mM Gua+ only slightly altered the proportion of the folded conformation (EFRET ∼ 0.8) of riboG (Figure 4C, 4D, Figure 4–figure supplement 2 and 3). Even in the presence of 1.0 mM Gua+, an increase in Mg2+ concentration from 0 to 10.0 mM had little effect on the proportion of the folded conformation (Figure 4–figure supplement 3B and 4B–D). However, the effect of Gua+ on riboG in the presence of 10.0 mM Mg2+ was significantly more pronounced compared to its effect in the absence of Mg2+ (Figure 4C and Figure 4–figure supplement 5B–F). The impact of Mg2+ and Gua+ on the folded conformation of riboG showed similarities to their effects on riboG-term but had distinct differences compared to their effects on riboG-apt (Figures 4D and 4E). Overall, the effects of Mg2+ and Gua+ on the structures of riboG and riboG-term were weaker compared to their effects on riboG-apt.
Kinetic analysis of smFRET data to identify the folding pathway of the guanidine-IV riboswitch
The guanidine-IV riboswitch exhibits dynamic behavior, with its structural transitions in response to Mg2+ and Gua+ closely linked to transcription termination. The relative free energy (ΔΔG) was calculated based on the state populations in the FRET histogram (Figures 5A and 5B). For riboG-apt, both the pre-folded and folded states displayed higher ΔΔG values compared to the unfolded state, indicating that the former states were less stable in the presence of 2.0 mM Mg2+. However, the addition of 1 mM Gua+ successfully reduced the ΔΔG of the folded state to a level lower than that of the unfolded state (Figure 5A). Meanwhile, only slight decreases in ΔΔG were observed for riboG-term and riboG upon the addition of 1.0 mM Gua+ in the presence of 2.0 mM Mg2+ (Figure 5B). The dwell time distributions were obtained from the single-molecule trajectories of FRET data for riboG-apt, riboG-term, and riboG (Figures, 5C–E and Figure 5–figure supplement 1–4). The exponential decays of the dwell time were fitted to a first-order kinetic equation, allowing for the determination of dwell time and rate constants for the individual states of riboG-apt (Figures 5C–E). Based on these results, we proposed folding pathways to illustrate the transcriptional fate of the guanidine-IV riboswitch under different conditions (Figure 5F and Figure 5–figure supplement 4). The analysis of the dwell time data from single-molecule trajectories indicated that the folding process of riboG-apt was influenced by Mg2+ and/or Gua+. In the presence of 2.0 mM Mg2+, there was inefficient structural switching from the unfolded riboG-apt (τ ≈ 0.7 s) to the pre-folded state (τ ≈ 0.11 s) or folded riboG-apt (τ ≈ 0.4 s), resulting in the production of the terminator during transcription (red arrows, Figure 5F). Conversely, in the presence of 1.0 mM Gua+, the primary switching of riboG-apt occurred between the unfolded (τ ≈ 0.6 s) and folded states (τ ≈ 1.04 s), which can subsequently be transcribed into the anti-terminator (blue arrows, Figure 5F).
smFRET analysis revealed the Gua+-sensitive transcription window of riboG
The sensitivity of Gua+ varied among the post-transcriptional riboG-apt, riboG-term, and riboG sequences. The folding and interactions of RNA during transcription play a critical role in its control functions for transcriptional riboswitch. To mimick how nascent riboG responds to Gua+ and its regulatory effects during transcription, we utilized PLOR to control its transcription at a single-nucleotide pace, Simultaneously, we collected smFRET data from active transcription elongation complexes (ECs) containing nascent RNA of different lengths (Figures 6A, 6B and Figure 6–figure supplement 1). PLOR is a liquid–solid hybrid phase transcription process that allows for pausing transcription at specific positions by omitting certain nucleotide triphosphates (NTPs). This paused transcription can then be restarted by adding the necessary NTPs. This unique “pause–restart” transcriptional mode enables the evaluation of instant changes in the environment, such as the addition or removal of Gua+ at specific steps, facilitating the monitoring of nascent RNA under varied conditions. To investigate the range of ligand-responsiveness in riboG, we employed PLOR to generate various transcriptional complexes with different RNA lengths, this allowed us to assess the impact of Gua+ on the guanidine-IV riboswitch throughout the transcription process. We monitored the behavior of active transcription complexes containing guanidine-IV riboswitches with varying lengths of 87 to 105 nucleotides (nt) using smFRET (Figures 6C–I and Figure 6–figure supplement 2–6). To distinguish between the different complexes, we named them based on their nucleotide length, for example, the EC-87 for the 87 nt complex. We collected smFRET histograms for EC-87, EC-88, EC-89, EC-91, EC-94, EC-96, and EC-105 in the presence of 0.5 mM Mg2+ and either 0 or 10.0 mM Gua+ (Figures 6C–I and Figure 6–figure supplement 2–4). Three distinct peaks (EFRET ≈ 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8) were observed, with the high-FRET peak suggesting the presence of a newly folded RNA structure, potentially containing a KL, as the transcript size exceeded 87 nt. In the presence of 0.5 mM Mg2+, the proportion of the folded structure slightly decreased during transcription from 87 to 88 nt (from approximately 15% to 13%), but then sharply decreased to 3% at 89 nt. The addition of Gua+ significantly increased the proportion of the folded state for EC-88 compared to EC-87. For longer ECs, such as EC-89, EC-91, and EC-94, the proportion of the folded state remained relatively stable, with only a few molecule traces between the unfolded and folded states (Figures 6E–I, Figure 6–figure supplement 3–4). At 0.5, 2.0, and 6.0 mM Mg2+, the proportions of the peaks changed differently, but EC-88 exhibited more dramatic changes than other ECs upon the addition of Gua+ (Figure 6J and Figure 6–figure supplement 2–7). These results suggest that the optimal formation of KL occurs during transcription of the 88 nt nascent RNA, and a drastic structural switch takes place between 88 and 89 nt in the presence of Mg2+. Interestingly, the addition of 1.0 mM Gua+ induced more pronounced changes in the majority of ECs at higher Mg2+ concentrations (Figure 6J and Figure 6–figure supplement 5–6). These findings suggest that the ECs exhibit a greater propensity for structural transitions upon the addition of Gua+ at high Mg2+ concentrations. Furthermore, under conditions of 0.5 mM Mg2+ and 10.0 mM Gua+, the proportions of folded structures (EFRET ∼ 0.8) in EC-88 and EC-105 were approximately 36% and 14% lower, respectively, compared to those observed in the isolated post-transcriptional riboG-apt and riboG-term (Figures 6D, 6I, Figure 2–figure supplement 4G and Figure 3–figure supplement 4F). These results suggest that the interactions between nascent RNA and DNA templates or RNA polymerase (RNAP) can hinder the folding of the RNA. Additionally, our collected eluent was active elongation complex, as evidenced by the production of full-length and terminated transcripts when NTPs were added to the eluent in the elongation assay (Figure 6K).
Gua+ modulated the transcription of the guanidine-IV riboswitch at specific sequences
To investigate the regulatory functions of the nascent riboswitch at different lengths during transcription, we performed a transcriptional termination assay of the guanidine-IV riboswitch using PLOR (Figure 7A and Figure 7–figure supplement 1). Specifically, we carefully designed eight PLOR experiments to temporarily pause the transcription at nucleotides 69, 77, 78, 83, 88, 91, 94 and 105, respectively, before transcribing the remaining RNA fragment in the last step, following strategies 1–8 (Figures 7B, 7C and Figure 7–figure supplement 1B). In the absence of Gua+, there was minimal change in transcriptional termination among strategies 1–7, but a sharp decrease of approximately 20% was observed for strategy 8 (Figure 7–figure supplement 1C and 1D). However, with the addition of Gua+ in the last step, there was littler variation in transcriptional read-through of the guanidine-IV riboswitch among strategies 1–5, but a gradual decrease was observed from strategy 6 to strategy 8. Notably, there was a dramatic decrease in anti-termination from strategy 5 to strategy 8 (Figure 7–figure supplement 1C and 1D). Furthermore, we observed a significant increase in read-through upon the addition of Gua+ in our single-round transcription reactions when the RNA length reached 88 nt (Figure 7D). Additionally, a slight increase in read-through was observed at the pausing site 105, which is consistent with the smFRET data presented in Figure 6J. This indicates that Gua+ can still bind and induce slight structural changes in the guanidine-IV riboswitch, even if its full terminator sequence has been transcribed. Our findings from in vitro transcriptional termination assays and smFRET results, indicating that EC-91 exhibits a more stable fold with a longer stem, making it less sensitive to environmental changes compared to EC-88 (Figures 6F and 7D).
Discussion
In this study, we have demonstrated that both Mg2+ and Gua+ play critical roles in promoting structural folding and transcriptional anti-termination in guanidine-IV riboswitches. Based on our findings, we propose a model illustrating the termination/anti-termination process of the guanidine-IV riboswitch as transcription progresses (Figure 8). In the presence of Mg2+, the proportion of the anti-terminator induced by Gua+ increases as transcription progresses up to EC-88. However, after EC-88 a significant decrease is observed up to EC-105 (Figures 6 and 8). The elongation of transcriptional from EC-88 to EC-105 leads to impaired KL formation and an increase in terminator abundance. This incremental switch from the anti-terminator to the terminator from EC-88 to EC-105 is influenced by the elongating P2 structure (Figure 8). The competition between the P2 and KL structures determines the proportions of the terminator and the anti-terminator in the guanidine-IV riboswitch. The stability of the terminator is enhanced by the presence of P2, and the increase in base pairs within P2 strengthens the terminator as transcription proceeds (highlighted in orange, Figure 8). On the other hand, the stability of the anti-terminator is dependent on the formation of KL. The elongation of P2 shortens the flexible linker between P1 and P2, which creates steric hindrance for KL after EC-88. Furthermore, the addition of Gua+ facilitates the functional switch from the terminator to the anti-terminator for constructs ranging from EC-87 to EC-105. However, we propose a narrow Gua+-sensitive transcription window for the guanidine-IV riboswitch, with a dramatic switch observed during the extension from EC-87 to EC-88 upon Gua+ addition (shown in a green box, Figure 8). It is worth noting that the ligand-sensitive sequence for the guanidine-IV riboswitch is located within the aptamer domain, spanning 88 nucleotides.
Our findings demonstrate that the guanidine-IV riboswitch possesses a distinct binding window that can be modulated by guanidine. The mechanism of anti-termination supports a model in which the formation of a long-range KL prevents the assembly of a rigid terminator. This distinguishes the guanidine-IV riboswitch from typical transcriptional riboswitches that rely on overlapping sequences and base-pair rearrangements for functional change (Strobel et al., 2019; Yadav et al., 2022; Zhao et al., 2017). Moreover, our results reveal the existence of at least three distinct states in the guanidine-IV riboswitch, including a folded state characterized by the presence of a KL that plays a critical role in ligand binding and transcriptional regulation. Importantly, the formation of the long-range KL in the aptamer domain is specifically responsive to guanidine, as other cations such as K+, Na+, and urea do not produce the same effect. While guanidine contributes to structural switching in the aptamer domain, its impact on the terminator or full-length guanidine-IV riboswitch is comparatively weak. Additionally, our data indicate that guanidine induces less significant changes once the RNA polymerase has transcribed the aptamer domain. Kinetic analysis reveals that the addition of guanidine leads to a slight decrease in the dwell time of the unfolded state of the aptamer domain but a significant increase in the dwell time of the folded state containing a KL. This facilitates the structural transition from the unfolded state to the folded state, ultimately promoting transcriptional read-through.
In the transcriptional mimicking assay, the nascent RNA displayed a weaker response to guanidine compared to the post-transcriptional counterparts. This suggests that in the guanidine-IV riboswitch system, the DNA templates and RNA polymerase play a role in RNA folding and guanidine binding, in line with the previous findings for the pre-Q1 and SAM-VI riboswitches (Widom et al., 2018; Xue et al., 2023). Moreover, the guanidine sensitivity of EC-87 indicates that guanidine regulation for the guanidine-IV riboswitch occurs before transcription of the aptamer domain is completed. Additionally, the sensitivity to guanidine gradually increases in the RNA within ECs until EC-88, after which it decreases. In other words, there exhibits a limited transcriptional window for the guanidine-IV riboswitch to dynamically respond to guanidine, and the inclination to form the terminator increases after transcribing 88 nucleotides, resulting in a decrease in the abundance of the KL-folded conformation. This aligns with previous findings that the transcription decision of a transcriptional riboswitch is made prior to terminator formation (Sherwood & Henkin, 2016; Wickiser et al., 2005). However, our data also suggest that guanidine can induce slight structural changes in the guanidine-IV riboswitch even after the terminator domain has been transcribed and stabilized. Similar observations have been reported for other riboswitches, although the transcriptional window sensitive to the ligand differs among riboswitches (Wickiser et al., 2005).
Material and methods
DNA template preparation
The biotin labeled DNA templates were prepared by PCR as described earlier (Liu et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2015). The sequences of the DNA templates are listed in Supplementary Table S1. The primers used in PCR were ordered from Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China). The DNA products generated from PCR were purified by 12% denaturing PAGE (polyacrylamide electrophoresis) before immobilized on streptavidin-coated agarose beads (Smart-Life Science, Changzhou, China) in the buffer (40 mM Tris-HCl, 100 mM K2SO4, 6 mM MgSO4, pH 8.0) as described earlier (Liu et al., 2018). The solid-phase DNA templates were stored at 4 °C before usage.
Cy3Cy5-labeled riboG-apt, riboG-term and riboG synthesis
The Cy3Cy5-labeled RNA used in smFRET were synthesized by PLOR as described earlier (Liu et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2015). The schemes and reagents of synthesis of Cy3Cy5-riboG-apt, Cy3Cy5-riboG-term and Cy3Cy5-riboG are listed in Supplementary Tables S2, S3 and S4. For Cy3Cy5-riboG-apt synthesis, 10 μM DNA-beads gently shook with 10 μM T7 RNAP, 0.96 mM ATP, 0.96 mM GTP and 96 μM UTP in the buffer (40 mM Tris-HCl, 100 mM K2SO4, 6 mM MgSO4, 10 mM DTT, pH 8.0) at 37 °C for 15 min in the first step. The reaction mixture was filtered by solid-phase extraction and rinsed for 3∼4 times in the buffer (40 mM Tris-HCl, 6 mM MgSO4, pH 8.0). And the bead-rinsing procedure was performed before the addition of NTPs in each step except noted. The residual steps were proceeded in the elongation buffer (40 mM Tris-HCl, 6 mM MgSO4, 10 mM DTT, pH 8.0) at 25 °C for 10 min with the addition of different NTP mixture at individual step as listed in Supplementary Table S2. The Cy3Cy5-labeled riboG-apt was collected at the last step, purified by 12% denaturing PAGE and reversed phase HPLC loaded with C8 column (4.6*250 mm, Cat. No. EXL-122-2546U, Phenomenex Luna, USA) as described earlier. The Cy3Cy5-riboG-term and Cy3Cy5-riboG were synthesized as Cy3Cy5-riboG-apt except different NTPs were added. The purified RNA was stored at –80 °C before usage.
Preparation of transcription complexes containing RNA at different lengths
The RNA sequences in the transcription complexes (ECs) are listed in Supplementary Table S5, and the ECs were collected at different steps of PLOR as listed in Supplementary Table S6. For example, EC-87 was obtained as the following procedures: took 10 μL 10 μM DNA-beads from 200 μL of the PLOR reaction at step 14 and incubated with 1 μL 1 mM biotin at 25 °C for 20 min. The addition of biotin was to displace the biotin-labeled DNA template on the streptavidin-labeled beads, filtered by solid-phase exchange and collected the elution containing EC-87. EC-88, 89, 91, 94, 96 and 105 were obtained at steps15, 16, 17, 18, 20 and 21 similarly as EC-87 (Supplementary Table S6).
smFRET experiments and data analysis
0.5 μM Cy3Cy5-riboG-apt, Cy3Cy5-riboG-term or Cy3Cy5-riboG were hybridized with 0.75 μM biotinylated 13 nt-DNA by incubating at 90 °C for 5 min and then cooled to room temperature in the T50 buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM NaCl, pH 8.0). The sequence of the biotinylated DNA is listed in Supplementary Table S1. The hybridized Cy3Cy5-labeled RNA was then diluted to 10∼100 pM for the subsequent smFRET measurements. Polymer-coated quartz slides were immersed at the 0.1 mg/μL biotin-PEG and 0.3 mg/μL m-PEG for 2 h (Roy et al., 2008), then coated with 0.2 mg/mL streptavidin for 5 min. 10∼100 pM Cy3Cy5-labeled RNA or ECs in the buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM NaCl, 0∼100 mM guanidine, 0∼100 mM Mg2+) was injected and then rinsed 3 times to remove the free RNA or ECs. 3 mM Trolox (MCE, USA), 5 mM 3,4-protocatechuic acid (PCA, Shanghai Aladdin Bio-Chem Technology Co., China) and 5 nM protocatechuate dioxygenase (PCD) was added to reduce the photobleaching (Aitken et al., 2008). smFRET experiments were performed by using an objective-type total internal reflection fluorescence (TRIF) microscopy and an inverted microscope (Eclipse Ti, Nikon, Japan) at 20 °C, with FRET marker dyes Cy3 (donor) and Cy5 (acceptor) was excited by 532 nm and 640 nm laser, respectively. Open-sourced software iSMS (Preus et al., 2015) was used to process the single-molecule videos to extract the time-dependent signals. Single-molecule trajectories were identified by Deep FRET (Thomsen et al., 2020). The FRET efficiency, EFRET was calculated using the equation:
Where IA and ID are acceptor and donor fluorescence intensity, respectively. We used empirical Bayesian method of the hidden Markov modelling (HMM) package vbFRET to estimate the FRET states and the time points of transitions (Bronson et al., 2009). The transition density plots (TDP) were plotted by Python module matplotlib, and the lifetimes were plotted in histogram and fitted with a simple exponential decay function by Origin 8.5 to obtain the rate constants. The relative free energy, ΔΔG was measured using the equation ΔΔGab= −RT ln(Pb/Pa), where R, T, Pa and Pb are the gas constant, absolute temperature, population of the observed state b and population of the control state a, respectively (Manz et al., 2017).
In vitro transcription termination assay
The single-round transcription termination assay was carried out by PLOR (Chien et al., 2023). The detailed procedure and reagents are listed in Supplementary Tables S7–15. 0∼10 mM guanidine and 2∼6 mM Mg2+ were added at step 8 in Supplementary Tables S7 to measure the effect of guanidine on transcription read-through of the guanidine-IV riboswitch. The products collected at the last step were loaded to 12% denaturing PAGE to compare the transcription read-through efficiencies at different conditions.
Acknowledgements
The work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China [grant no. 2021YFA0910300] and National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant no. 32071300].
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
References
- 1.An oxygen scavenging system for improvement of dye stability in single-molecule fluorescence experimentsBiophys J 94:1826–1835https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.107.117689
- 2.Guanidine-sensing riboswitches: How do they work and what do they regulate?Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA 9https://doi.org/10.1002/wrna.1482
- 3.The conformational landscape of transcription intermediates involved in the regulation of the ZMP-sensing riboswitch from Thermosinus carboxydivoransNucleic Acids Res 48:6970–6979https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa427
- 4.The Biochemical Landscape of Riboswitch LigandsBiochemistry 61:137–149https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.1c00765
- 5.Learning Rates and States from Biophysical Time Series: A Bayesian Approach to Model Selection and Single-Molecule FRET DataBiophysical Journal 97:3196–3205https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2009.09.031
- 6.Quantitative Analysis of Transcription Termination via Position-Selective Labeling of RNA (PLOR) MethodInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences 24https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24054934
- 7.Direct Observation of Cotranscriptional Folding in an Adenine RiboswitchScience 338:397–400https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1225722
- 8.Riboswitches: structures and mechanismsCold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 3https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a003533
- 9.NMR Structural Profiling of Transcriptional Intermediates Reveals Riboswitch Regulation by Metastable RNA ConformationsJ Am Chem Soc 139:2647–2656https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b10429
- 10.Real-time monitoring of single ZTP riboswitches reveals a complex and kinetically controlled decision landscapeNature Communications 11https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18283-1
- 11.Mimicking Co-Transcriptional RNA Folding Using a SuperhelicaseJ Am Chem Soc 140:10067–10070https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b03784
- 12.The Structure of the Guanidine-II RiboswitchCell Chem Biol 24:695–702https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chembiol.2017.05.014
- 13.Structure of the Guanidine III RiboswitchCell Chemical Biology 24:1407–1415https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chembiol.2017.08.021
- 14.Long-Range Interactions in Riboswitch Control of Gene ExpressionAnnu Rev Biophys 46:455–481https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biophys-070816-034042
- 15.Discovering riboswitches: the past and the futureTrends Biochem Sci 48:119–141https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2022.08.009
- 16.Guanidinium export is the primal function of SMR family transportersProc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:3060–3065https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719187115
- 17.The cotranscriptional folding landscape for two cyclic di-nucleotide-sensing riboswitches with highly homologous aptamer domains acting either as ON– or OFF-switchesNucleic Acids Res 50:6639–6655https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac514
- 18.Discovery and characterization of a fourth class of guanidine riboswitchesNucleic Acids Res 48:12889–12899https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa1102
- 19.Incorporation of isotopic, fluorescent, and heavy-atom-modified nucleotides into RNAs by position-selective labeling of RNANat Protoc 13:987–1005https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2018.002
- 20.Synthesis and applications of RNAs with position-selective labelling and mosaic compositionNature 522:368–372https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14352
- 21.Gene regulation by riboswitchesNat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5:451–463https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm1403
- 22.Single-molecule FRET reveals the energy landscape of the full-length SAM-I riboswitchNat Chem Biol 13:1172–1178https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.2476
- 23.Riboswitch diversity and distributionRna 23:995–1011https://doi.org/10.1261/rna.061234.117
- 24.Metabolism of Free Guanidine in Bacteria Is Regulated by a Widespread Riboswitch ClassMol Cell 65:220–230https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2016.11.019
- 25.iSMS: single-molecule FRET microscopy softwareNat Methods 12:593–594https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3435
- 26.A practical guide to single-molecule FRETNat Methods 5:507–516https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1208
- 27.Biochemical Validation of a Fourth Guanidine Riboswitch Class in BacteriaBiochemistry 59:4654–4662https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00793
- 28.A decade of riboswitchesCell 152:17–24https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.12.024
- 29.Former orphan riboswitches reveal unexplored areas of bacterial metabolism, signaling, and gene control processesRna 26:675–693https://doi.org/10.1261/rna.074997.120
- 30.Riboswitch-Mediated Gene Regulation: Novel RNA Architectures Dictate Gene Expression ResponsesAnnu Rev Microbiol 70:361–374https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-micro-091014-104306
- 31.A ligand-gated strand displacement mechanism for ZTP riboswitch transcription controlNat Chem Biol 15:1067–1076https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-019-0382-7
- 32.DeepFRET, a software for rapid and automated single-molecule FRET data classification using deep learningeLife 9https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60404
- 33.Single-molecule FRET studies on the cotranscriptional folding of a thiamine pyrophosphate riboswitchProc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:331–336https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1712983115
- 34.The speed of RNA transcription and metabolite binding kinetics operate an FMN riboswitchMol Cell 18:49–60https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2005.02.032
- 35.Ligand Modulates Cross-Coupling between Riboswitch Folding and Transcriptional PausingMol Cell 72:541–552https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2018.08.046
- 36.Genetic control by metabolite-binding riboswitchesChembiochem 4:1024–1032https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.200300685
- 37.Observation of structural switch in nascent SAM-VI riboswitch during transcription at single-nucleotide and single-molecule resolutionNature Communications 14https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38042-2
- 38.An anionic ligand snap-locks a long-range interaction in a magnesium-folded riboswitchNature Communications 13https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27827-y
- 39.An excited state underlies gene regulation of a transcriptional riboswitchNat Chem Biol 13:968–974https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.2427
Article and author information
Author information
Version history
- Sent for peer review:
- Preprint posted:
- Reviewed Preprint version 1:
- Reviewed Preprint version 2:
Copyright
© 2024, Gao et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
- views
- 187
- downloads
- 20
- citations
- 0
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.