DRAM enables transcriptome-wide analysis of m5C methylation.
(A) Schematic of the DRAM-seq method.
(B, C) Integrative genomics viewer (IGV) browser traces of DRAM-seq data expressing the indicated constructs in RPSA (B, left panel), TARBP2 (B, right panel), AP5Z1(C, left panel), and TRAF7 (C, left panel) mRNAs. C-to-U or A-to-G mutations found in at least 10% of reads are indicated by coloring. The previously published RNA BS-seq datasets from two individual studies were displayed as panel “Yang et al.” and “Zhang et al.”. (n(DRAM)=3 independent samples, n(Deaminase)=2 independent samples, and n(DRAMmut)=1 independent sample.)
(D, E) Integrative genomics viewer (IGV) browser traces of DRAM-seq data in wildtype and methyltranferases knockout cells in AP5Z1 (D) and RPSA (E) mRNAs. C-to-U or A-to-G mutations were found in at least 10% of reads are indicated by coloring. The previously published RNA BS-seq datasets from two individual studies were displayed as panel “Yang et al.” and “Zhang et al.”. n=3 independent samples.
(F) Screening process for DRAM-seq assays and principles for screening high-confidence genes.
(G) The pie chart shows the distribution of editing sites in different transcript region in cells expressing DRAM (n=3 independent samples).
(H) The density map showing the distribution of editing events across the mRNA transcripts detected by DRAM-seq.
(I) The frequency plot shows the distribution of the distances of edit events in DRAM-seq relative to the m5C sites from the published BS-seq datasets. The position of each m5C site of BS-seq is determined as 0, and the relative distance of each site to the nearest edit event in DRAM-seq is calculated and plotted. The plots are presented separately based on the cutoff of upstream and downstream 3000bp (above) and 80bp (below) windows.
(J, K) Motif analysis discovered within the ±20nt region around the C-to-U or A-to-G editing site in cells expressing DRAM-CBE (J), APOBEC1(J), DRAM-ABE (K) and TadA-8e (K).