1. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
  2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
Download icon

Hematopoietic Stem Cells: The lasting influence of LSD1 in the blood

  1. Sharon YR Dent  Is a corresponding author
  2. Joya Chandra  Is a corresponding author
  1. MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
Insight
  • Cited 9
  • Views 916
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2013;2:e00963 doi: 10.7554/eLife.00963

Abstract

An enzyme called LSD1 that controls the development of blood cells by manipulating gene expression in progenitor cells could be a therapeutic target for leukemia.

Main text

Inside the nucleus, DNA is tightly packaged around scaffold proteins called histones to form chromatin. Histones control how easy it is for proteins—notably those involved in transcribing the DNA sequence into messenger RNA—to access the DNA, so they have a critical role in regulating gene expression. Lysine residues within histones, particularly histones H3 and H4, are susceptible to many types of modification, including the addition of acetyl, methyl or ubiquitin groups. These modifications, often referred to as histone ‘marks’, influence how compact the chromatin is and help to recruit protein complexes that activate or repress transcription. Although knockouts of histone-modifying enzymes are often lethal in mice, gene deletions that are restricted to specific tissues or time periods provide valuable insights into how these enzymes choreograph cell fate. Now, in eLife, Stuart Orkin and colleagues at the Boston Children’s Hospital and the Dana Farber Cancer Institute reveal how a histone-modifying enzyme called lysine specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) affects the development of blood cells.

LSD1, which removes methyl groups from lysine 4 on histone H3 (H3K4), was the first histone demethylase to be discovered (Shi et al. 2004). H3K4 is methylated by enzymes from the MML (mixed lineage leukemia) family of methyltransferases, which are known to be important for the development of blood (Figure 1A) and are often altered in leukemias (Deshpande et al. 2012). Whether LSD1 inhibition might affect the development of blood cell progenitors has been explored in only one other study: last year researchers from University Hospital Essen used RNA-mediated gene silencing in mice to show that LSD1 depletion disrupts the formation of granulocytes (a type of white blood cell) and red blood cells, leading to acute anemia and a reduced number of platelets (Sprussel et al. 2012). While powerful, such knockdown models struggle to identify the role of LSD1 in the development of individual blood lineages, as they do not result in a complete loss of LSD1 expression. In the current study, Orkin and colleagues—including Marc Kerenyi as first author—overcame these limitations to reveal the functions of LSD1 in the formation of mature blood cells (hematopoiesis).

The enzymes LSD1 and MLL are both essential for the formation of blood cells (hematopoiesis), even though they have opposing roles in histone methylation.

(A) MLL adds methyl groups (Me) to lysine 4 on histone 3 (H3K4), whereas LSD1 removes methyl groups from methylated H3K4. (B) Hematopoietic stem cells are pluripotent cells that give rise to myeloid and lymphoid progenitor cells, which in turn give rise to all lineages of blood cells. Conditional knockout mouse models reveal that both MLL and LSD1 are required for the maintenance of hematopoietic stem cells, and for the maintenance of myeloid and lymphoid progenitor cells. This is likely to be via shared roles in regulating the expression of Hox genes (not shown). LSD1 is also required for the production of erythrocytes (red blood cells) and granulocytes, and might be involved in the formation of B cells, T cells and NK cells.

All blood cells are derived from pluripotent cells called hematopoietic stem cells, which reside in bone marrow (Figure 1B). These give rise to two types of progenitor cells: lymphoid progenitors, from which immune cells called lymphocytes are derived; and myeloid progenitors, which give rise to all other types of blood cells. Kerenyi et al. used Cre-recombinase technology to delete two exons from Lsd1 that encode elements essential for catalysis. By systematically inactivating Lsd1 in different blood cell lineages, they identified roles for LSD1 in virtually all blood cell types. Collectively, their experiments revealed that the loss of LSD1 led to profound deleterious effects in both early and late hematopoiesis.

LSD1 has previously been implicated in stem cell pluripotency (Adamo et al. 2011), both in embryonic stem cells and in cancer stem cells. In the current study, bone marrow that contained LSD1 deficient cells was unable to replenish supplies of myeloid and lymphoid progenitors when transplanted into recipient mice. This indicates that loss of LSD1 reduced the ability of hematopoietic stem cells to replicate themselves. Altogether, these findings reveal that LSD1 is centrally important to several aspects of normal blood development, both in embryos and adults.

To determine how LSD1 regulates blood cell maturation, Kerenyi et al. examined gene expression in LSD1 deficient cells, and used a technique called ChIP-Seq—which maps interactions between DNA and proteins—to identify the DNA sequences to which Lsd1 binds in normal cells. Their data showed that many of the genes targeted by LSD1 are found in stem/progenitor cells. The data also revealed that gene expression networks involving specific Hox genes, which help to control embryonic development, are upregulated in the absence of LSD1. This provides a molecular explanation for the observed impairment of both early and late hematopoiesis in the absence of LSD1. Surprisingly, the data showed little association of LSD1 with known promoter regions or with patterns of H3K4 methylation that are hallmarks of promoters. Instead, LSD1 binding was found to be enriched at certain enhancer regions—DNA sequences remote from the transcription start site that bind proteins that upregulate transcription. These results indicate that LSD1 limits expression of Hox genes by inactivating enhancers, and dovetail neatly with previous reports that LSD1 ‘decommissions’ enhancers during the differentiation of embryonic stem cells (Whyte et al. 2012).

The phenotypes caused by LSD1 knockout—including impaired blood cell formation and aberrant Hox gene expression—are reminiscent of those caused by mutation of some MLL family methyltransferases (Figure 1B) (Hess, 2004). Why would mutation of enzymes that have opposing functions (removing versus adding methyl groups) have similar phenotypes? At least part of the answer lies in the discovery that chromosomal translocations can give rise to MLL fusion proteins that contain a ‘super elongation complex’. This increases elongation of Hox gene transcripts, thereby increasing Hox expression just as loss of LSD1 does. Also, MLL proteins and LSD1 both function as components of multi-protein complexes, so developmental issues arising from mutations in these factors could reflect effects on a third party conspirator that interacts with both complexes. Furthermore, non-histone proteins can be substrates for both methyltransferases and demethylases. LSD1, for example, is documented to demethylate several non-histone proteins (Nicholson and Chen, 2009), pointing to additional potential mediators of the observed effects on hematopoiesis.

Several tumor types show heightened expression of LSD1 (Amente et al. 2013), suggesting that it may function as an oncogene. Studies in acute myeloid leukemia models further support this idea. Two independent groups have reported that LSD1 inhibition has anti-leukemic effects in cell lines and in mouse models of human leukemia (Harris et al. 2012; Schenk et al. 2012). In light of such findings, pharmaceutical companies are rapidly developing LSD1 inhibitors for therapeutic uses. However, whether inhibition of LSD1 will hinder development of non-leukemic cells, which would limit its potential as a therapeutic target, has been a lingering question, particularly in light of data demonstrating that mice harboring germline deletion of LSD1 die early in development (Foster et al. 2010). The findings of Kerenyi et al. raise additional questions about the feasibility of LSD1 as a drug target, as loss of LSD1 affects multiple aspects of hematopoiesis. On the other hand, drugs such as tranylcypromine, an LSD1 inhibitor that is used in the treatment of neurological disorders (Lee et al. 2006), do not cause severe toxicities in mice or humans. Clearly, preclinical and clinical evaluation of any newly developed LSD1 inhibitors must address potential adverse effects on the blood, which are a common side effect of many cancer therapies.

References

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sharon YR Dent

    Department of Molecular Carcinogenesis, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Texas, United States
    For correspondence
    sroth@mdanderson.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Joya Chandra

    Department of Pediatrics Research and the Department of Molecular Carcinogenesis, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Texas, United States
    For correspondence
    jchandra@mdanderson.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published: June 18, 2013 (version 1)

Copyright

© 2013, Dent and Chandra

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 916
    Page views
  • 117
    Downloads
  • 9
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, Scopus, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

    1. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Longfei Gao et al.
    Research Article Updated

    The bone marrow niche plays critical roles in hematopoietic recovery and hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) regeneration after myeloablative stress. However, it is not clear whether systemic factors beyond the local niche are required for these essential processes in vivo. Thrombopoietin (THPO) is a key cytokine promoting hematopoietic rebound after myeloablation and its transcripts are expressed by multiple cellular sources. The upregulation of bone marrow-derived THPO has been proposed to be crucial for hematopoietic recovery and HSC regeneration after stress. Nonetheless, the cellular source of THPO in myeloablative stress has never been investigated genetically. We assessed the functional sources of THPO following two common myeloablative perturbations: 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) administration and irradiation. Using a Thpo translational reporter, we found that the liver but not the bone marrow is the major source of THPO protein after myeloablation. Mice with conditional Thpo deletion from osteoblasts and/or bone marrow stromal cells showed normal recovery of HSCs and hematopoiesis after myeloablation. In contrast, mice with conditional Thpo deletion from hepatocytes showed significant defects in HSC regeneration and hematopoietic rebound after myeloablation. Thus, systemic THPO from the liver is necessary for HSC regeneration and hematopoietic recovery in myeloablative stress conditions.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Jinrui Dong et al.
    Short Report Updated

    It is generally accepted that IL6-mediated STAT3 signaling in hepatocytes, mediated via glycoprotein 130 (gp130; IL6ST), is beneficial and that the synthetic IL6:IL6ST fusion protein (HyperIL6) promotes liver regeneration. Recently, autocrine IL11 activity that also acts via IL6ST but uses ERK rather than STAT3 to signal, was found to be hepatotoxic. Here we examined whether the beneficial effects of HyperIL6 could reflect unappreciated competitive inhibition of IL11-dependent IL6ST signaling. In human and mouse hepatocytes, HyperIL6 reduced N-acetyl-p-aminophenol (APAP)-induced cell death independent of STAT3 activation and instead, dose-dependently, inhibited IL11-related signaling and toxicities. In mice, expression of HyperIl6 reduced ERK activation and promoted STAT3-independent hepatic regeneration (PCNA, Cyclin D1, Ki67) following administration of either IL11 or APAP. Inhibition of putative intrinsic IL6 trans-signaling had no effect on liver regeneration in mice. Following APAP, mice deleted for Il11 exhibited spontaneous liver repair but HyperIl6, despite robustly activating STAT3, had no effect on liver regeneration in this strain. These data show that synthetic IL6ST binding proteins such as HyperIL6 can have unexpected, on-target effects and suggest IL11, not IL6, as important for liver regeneration.