Tyrosine phosphorylation of RNA Polymerase II CTD is associated with antisense promoter transcription and active enhancers in mammalian cells

  1. Nicolas Descostes
  2. Martin Heidemann
  3. Lionel Spinelli
  4. Roland Schüller
  5. Muhammad A Maqbool
  6. Romain Fenouil
  7. Frederic Koch
  8. Charlène Innocenti
  9. Marta Gut
  10. Ivo Gut
  11. Dirk Eick
  12. Jean-Christophe Andrau  Is a corresponding author
  1. Centre d'Immunologie de Marseille Luminy, Université Aix-Marseille, France
  2. Helmholtz Center Munich, Center of Integrated Protein Science Munich (CIPSM), Germany
  3. Centre d'Immunologie de Marseille-Luminy, Université Aix-Marseille, France
  4. Institut de Génétique Moléculaire de Montpellier (IGMM), CNRS-UMR, France
  5. Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Germany
  6. Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, France
  7. Centre Nacional D'Anàlisi Genòmica, Spain
  8. Insitut de Génétique Moléculaire de Montpellier (IGMM), CNRS-UMR, France

Abstract

In mammals, the carboxy-terminal domain (CTD) of RNA polymerase (Pol) II consists of 52 conserved heptapeptide repeats containing the consensus sequence Tyr1-Ser2-Pro3-Thr4-Ser5-Pro6-Ser7. Post-translational modifications of the CTD coordinate the transcription cycle and various steps of mRNA maturation. Here we describe Tyr1 phosphorylation (Tyr1P) as a hallmark of promoter (5' associated) Pol II in mammalian cells, in contrast to what was described in yeast. Tyr1P is predominantly found in antisense orientation at promoters but is also specifically enriched at active enhancers. Mutation of Tyr1 to phenylalanine (Y1F) prevents the formation of the hyper-phosphorylated Pol IIO form, induces degradation of Pol II to the truncated Pol IIB form and results in a lethal phenotype. Our results suggest that Tyr1P has evolved specialized and essential functions in higher eukaryotes associated with antisense promoter and enhancer transcription, and Pol II stability.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Nicolas Descostes

    Centre d'Immunologie de Marseille Luminy, Université Aix-Marseille, Marseille, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Martin Heidemann

    Helmholtz Center Munich, Center of Integrated Protein Science Munich (CIPSM), Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Lionel Spinelli

    Centre d'Immunologie de Marseille-Luminy, Université Aix-Marseille, Marseilles, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Roland Schüller

    Helmholtz Center Munich, Center of Integrated Protein Science Munich (CIPSM), Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Muhammad A Maqbool

    Institut de Génétique Moléculaire de Montpellier (IGMM), CNRS-UMR, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Romain Fenouil

    Centre d'Immunologie de Marseille-Luminy, Université Aix-Marseille, Marseilles, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Frederic Koch

    Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Charlène Innocenti

    Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Marta Gut

    Centre Nacional D'Anàlisi Genòmica, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Ivo Gut

    Centre Nacional D'Anàlisi Genòmica, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Dirk Eick

    Helmholtz Center Munich, Center of Integrated Protein Science Munich (CIPSM), Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Jean-Christophe Andrau

    Insitut de Génétique Moléculaire de Montpellier (IGMM), CNRS-UMR, Montpellier, France
    For correspondence
    jean-christophe.andrau@igmm.cnrs.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Copyright

© 2014, Descostes et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,017
    views
  • 627
    downloads
  • 80
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Nicolas Descostes
  2. Martin Heidemann
  3. Lionel Spinelli
  4. Roland Schüller
  5. Muhammad A Maqbool
  6. Romain Fenouil
  7. Frederic Koch
  8. Charlène Innocenti
  9. Marta Gut
  10. Ivo Gut
  11. Dirk Eick
  12. Jean-Christophe Andrau
(2014)
Tyrosine phosphorylation of RNA Polymerase II CTD is associated with antisense promoter transcription and active enhancers in mammalian cells
eLife 3:e02105.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02105

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02105

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Hans Tobias Gustafsson, Lucas Ferguson ... Oliver J Rando
    Research Article

    Among the major classes of RNAs in the cell, tRNAs remain the most difficult to characterize via deep sequencing approaches, as tRNA structure and nucleotide modifications can each interfere with cDNA synthesis by commonly-used reverse transcriptases (RTs). Here, we benchmark a recently-developed RNA cloning protocol, termed Ordered Two-Template Relay (OTTR), to characterize intact tRNAs and tRNA fragments in budding yeast and in mouse tissues. We show that OTTR successfully captures both full-length tRNAs and tRNA fragments in budding yeast and in mouse reproductive tissues without any prior enzymatic treatment, and that tRNA cloning efficiency can be further enhanced via AlkB-mediated demethylation of modified nucleotides. As with other recent tRNA cloning protocols, we find that a subset of nucleotide modifications leave misincorporation signatures in OTTR datasets, enabling their detection without any additional protocol steps. Focusing on tRNA cleavage products, we compare OTTR with several standard small RNA-Seq protocols, finding that OTTR provides the most accurate picture of tRNA fragment levels by comparison to "ground truth" Northern blots. Applying this protocol to mature mouse spermatozoa, our data dramatically alter our understanding of the small RNA cargo of mature mammalian sperm, revealing a far more complex population of tRNA fragments - including both 5′ and 3′ tRNA halves derived from the majority of tRNAs – than previously appreciated. Taken together, our data confirm the superior performance of OTTR to commercial protocols in analysis of tRNA fragments, and force a reappraisal of potential epigenetic functions of the sperm small RNA payload.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Omid Gholamalamdari, Tom van Schaik ... Andrew S Belmont
    Research Article

    Models of nuclear genome organization often propose a binary division into active versus inactive compartments yet typically overlook nuclear bodies. Here, we integrated analysis of sequencing and image-based data to compare genome organization in four human cell types relative to three different nuclear locales: the nuclear lamina, nuclear speckles, and nucleoli. Although gene expression correlates mostly with nuclear speckle proximity, DNA replication timing correlates with proximity to multiple nuclear locales. Speckle attachment regions emerge as DNA replication initiation zones whose replication timing and gene composition vary with their attachment frequency. Most facultative LADs retain a partially repressed state as iLADs, despite their positioning in the nuclear interior. Knock out of two lamina proteins, Lamin A and LBR, causes a shift of H3K9me3-enriched LADs from lamina to nucleolus, and a reciprocal relocation of H3K27me3-enriched partially repressed iLADs from nucleolus to lamina. Thus, these partially repressed iLADs appear to compete with LADs for nuclear lamina attachment with consequences for replication timing. The nuclear organization in adherent cells is polarized with nuclear bodies and genomic regions segregating both radially and relative to the equatorial plane. Together, our results underscore the importance of considering genome organization relative to nuclear locales for a more complete understanding of the spatial and functional organization of the human genome.