Single-molecule tracking in live cells reveals distinct target-search strategies of transcription factors in the nucleus

  1. Ignacio Izeddin
  2. Vincent Récamier
  3. Lana Bosanac
  4. Ibrahim I Cisse
  5. Lydia Boudarene
  6. Claire Dugast-Darzacq
  7. Florence Proux
  8. Olivier Bénichou
  9. Raphaël Voituriez
  10. Olivier Bensaude
  11. Maxime Dahan
  12. Xavier Darzacq  Is a corresponding author
  1. Institut de Biologie de l'École normale supérieure (IBENS) CNRS UMR 8197, France
  2. Université Pierre et Marie Curie, France
  3. Institut Curie, CNRS UMR168, France

Abstract

Gene regulation relies on transcription factors (TFs) exploring the nucleus searching their targets. So far, most studies have focused on how fast TFs diffuse, underestimating the role of nuclear architecture. We implemented a single-molecule tracking assay to determine TFs dynamics. We found that c-Myc is a global explorer of the nucleus. In contrast, the positive transcription elongation factor P-TEFb is a local explorer that oversamples its environment. Consequently, each c-Myc molecule is equally available for all nuclear sites while P-TEFb reaches its targets in a position-dependent manner. Our observations are consistent with a model in which the exploration geometry of TFs is restrained by their interactions with nuclear structures and not by exclusion. The geometry-controlled kinetics of TFs target-search illustrates the influence of nuclear architecture on gene regulation, and has strong implications on how proteins react in the nucleus and how their function can be regulated in space and time.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ignacio Izeddin

    Institut de Biologie de l'École normale supérieure (IBENS) CNRS UMR 8197, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Vincent Récamier

    Institut de Biologie de l'École normale supérieure (IBENS) CNRS UMR 8197, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Lana Bosanac

    Institut de Biologie de l'École normale supérieure (IBENS) CNRS UMR 8197, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Ibrahim I Cisse

    Institut de Biologie de l'École normale supérieure (IBENS) CNRS UMR 8197, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Lydia Boudarene

    Institut de Biologie de l'École normale supérieure (IBENS) CNRS UMR 8197, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Claire Dugast-Darzacq

    Institut de Biologie de l'École normale supérieure (IBENS) CNRS UMR 8197, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Florence Proux

    Institut de Biologie de l'École normale supérieure (IBENS) CNRS UMR 8197, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Olivier Bénichou

    Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Raphaël Voituriez

    Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Olivier Bensaude

    Institut de Biologie de l'École normale supérieure (IBENS) CNRS UMR 8197, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Maxime Dahan

    Institut Curie, CNRS UMR168, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Xavier Darzacq

    Institut de Biologie de l'École normale supérieure (IBENS) CNRS UMR 8197, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    darzacq@ens.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Copyright

© 2014, Izeddin et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 11,018
    views
  • 1,466
    downloads
  • 288
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ignacio Izeddin
  2. Vincent Récamier
  3. Lana Bosanac
  4. Ibrahim I Cisse
  5. Lydia Boudarene
  6. Claire Dugast-Darzacq
  7. Florence Proux
  8. Olivier Bénichou
  9. Raphaël Voituriez
  10. Olivier Bensaude
  11. Maxime Dahan
  12. Xavier Darzacq
(2014)
Single-molecule tracking in live cells reveals distinct target-search strategies of transcription factors in the nucleus
eLife 3:e02230.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02230

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02230

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Jie Luo, Jeff Ranish
    Tools and Resources

    Dynamic conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes play a central and ubiquitous role in the regulation of protein function, yet it is very challenging to study these changes, especially for large protein complexes, under physiological conditions. Here, we introduce a novel isobaric crosslinker, Qlinker, for studying conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes using quantitative crosslinking mass spectrometry. Qlinkers are small and simple, amine-reactive molecules with an optimal extended distance of ~10 Å, which use MS2 reporter ions for relative quantification of Qlinker-modified peptides derived from different samples. We synthesized the 2-plex Q2linker and showed that the Q2linker can provide quantitative crosslinking data that pinpoints key conformational and structural changes in biosensors, binary and ternary complexes composed of the general transcription factors TBP, TFIIA, and TFIIB, and RNA polymerase II complexes.

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Yuanyuan Wang, Fan Xu ... Yongning He
    Research Article

    SCARF1 (scavenger receptor class F member 1, SREC-1 or SR-F1) is a type I transmembrane protein that recognizes multiple endogenous and exogenous ligands such as modified low-density lipoproteins (LDLs) and is important for maintaining homeostasis and immunity. But the structural information and the mechanisms of ligand recognition of SCARF1 are largely unavailable. Here, we solve the crystal structures of the N-terminal fragments of human SCARF1, which show that SCARF1 forms homodimers and its epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like domains adopt a long-curved conformation. Then, we examine the interactions of SCARF1 with lipoproteins and are able to identify a region on SCARF1 for recognizing modified LDLs. The mutagenesis data show that the positively charged residues in the region are crucial for the interaction of SCARF1 with modified LDLs, which is confirmed by making chimeric molecules of SCARF1 and SCARF2. In addition, teichoic acids, a cell wall polymer expressed on the surface of gram-positive bacteria, are able to inhibit the interactions of modified LDLs with SCARF1, suggesting the ligand binding sites of SCARF1 might be shared for some of its scavenging targets. Overall, these results provide mechanistic insights into SCARF1 and its interactions with the ligands, which are important for understanding its physiological roles in homeostasis and the related diseases.