Single-molecule tracking in live cells reveals distinct target-search strategies of transcription factors in the nucleus

  1. Ignacio Izeddin
  2. Vincent Récamier
  3. Lana Bosanac
  4. Ibrahim I Cisse
  5. Lydia Boudarene
  6. Claire Dugast-Darzacq
  7. Florence Proux
  8. Olivier Bénichou
  9. Raphaël Voituriez
  10. Olivier Bensaude
  11. Maxime Dahan
  12. Xavier Darzacq  Is a corresponding author
  1. Institut de Biologie de l'École normale supérieure (IBENS) CNRS UMR 8197, France
  2. Université Pierre et Marie Curie, France
  3. Institut Curie, CNRS UMR168, France

Abstract

Gene regulation relies on transcription factors (TFs) exploring the nucleus searching their targets. So far, most studies have focused on how fast TFs diffuse, underestimating the role of nuclear architecture. We implemented a single-molecule tracking assay to determine TFs dynamics. We found that c-Myc is a global explorer of the nucleus. In contrast, the positive transcription elongation factor P-TEFb is a local explorer that oversamples its environment. Consequently, each c-Myc molecule is equally available for all nuclear sites while P-TEFb reaches its targets in a position-dependent manner. Our observations are consistent with a model in which the exploration geometry of TFs is restrained by their interactions with nuclear structures and not by exclusion. The geometry-controlled kinetics of TFs target-search illustrates the influence of nuclear architecture on gene regulation, and has strong implications on how proteins react in the nucleus and how their function can be regulated in space and time.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ignacio Izeddin

    Institut de Biologie de l'École normale supérieure (IBENS) CNRS UMR 8197, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Vincent Récamier

    Institut de Biologie de l'École normale supérieure (IBENS) CNRS UMR 8197, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Lana Bosanac

    Institut de Biologie de l'École normale supérieure (IBENS) CNRS UMR 8197, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Ibrahim I Cisse

    Institut de Biologie de l'École normale supérieure (IBENS) CNRS UMR 8197, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Lydia Boudarene

    Institut de Biologie de l'École normale supérieure (IBENS) CNRS UMR 8197, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Claire Dugast-Darzacq

    Institut de Biologie de l'École normale supérieure (IBENS) CNRS UMR 8197, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Florence Proux

    Institut de Biologie de l'École normale supérieure (IBENS) CNRS UMR 8197, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Olivier Bénichou

    Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Raphaël Voituriez

    Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Olivier Bensaude

    Institut de Biologie de l'École normale supérieure (IBENS) CNRS UMR 8197, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Maxime Dahan

    Institut Curie, CNRS UMR168, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Xavier Darzacq

    Institut de Biologie de l'École normale supérieure (IBENS) CNRS UMR 8197, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    darzacq@ens.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Copyright

© 2014, Izeddin et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 11,029
    views
  • 1,471
    downloads
  • 289
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ignacio Izeddin
  2. Vincent Récamier
  3. Lana Bosanac
  4. Ibrahim I Cisse
  5. Lydia Boudarene
  6. Claire Dugast-Darzacq
  7. Florence Proux
  8. Olivier Bénichou
  9. Raphaël Voituriez
  10. Olivier Bensaude
  11. Maxime Dahan
  12. Xavier Darzacq
(2014)
Single-molecule tracking in live cells reveals distinct target-search strategies of transcription factors in the nucleus
eLife 3:e02230.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02230

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02230

Further reading

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Laura-Marie Silbermann, Benjamin Vermeer ... Katarzyna Tych
    Review Article

    Molecular chaperones are vital proteins that maintain protein homeostasis by assisting in protein folding, activation, degradation, and stress protection. Among them, heat-shock protein 90 (Hsp90) stands out as an essential proteostasis hub in eukaryotes, chaperoning hundreds of ‘clients’ (substrates). After decades of research, several ‘known unknowns’ about the molecular function of Hsp90 remain unanswered, hampering rational drug design for the treatment of cancers, neurodegenerative, and other diseases. We highlight three fundamental open questions, reviewing the current state of the field for each, and discuss new opportunities, including single-molecule technologies, to answer the known unknowns of the Hsp90 chaperone.

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Chuchu Wang, Chunyu Zhao ... Cong Liu
    Research Advance

    Previously, we reported that α-synuclein (α-syn) clusters synaptic vesicles (SV) Diao et al., 2013, and neutral phospholipid lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) can mediate this clustering Lai et al., 2023. Meanwhile, post-translational modifications (PTMs) of α-syn such as acetylation and phosphorylation play important yet distinct roles in regulating α-syn conformation, membrane binding, and amyloid aggregation. However, how PTMs regulate α-syn function in presynaptic terminals remains unclear. Here, based on our previous findings, we further demonstrate that N-terminal acetylation, which occurs under physiological conditions and is irreversible in mammalian cells, significantly enhances the functional activity of α-syn in clustering SVs. Mechanistic studies reveal that this enhancement is caused by the N-acetylation-promoted insertion of α-syn’s N-terminus and increased intermolecular interactions on the LPC-containing membrane. N-acetylation in our work is shown to fine-tune the interaction between α-syn and LPC, mediating α-syn’s role in synaptic vesicle clustering.