Abstract

We report that bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) is the functional cellular target of the depsipeptide antibiotic salinamide A (Sal), and we report that Sal inhibits RNAP through a novel binding site and mechanism. We show that Sal inhibits RNA synthesis in cells and that mutations that confer Sal-resistance map to RNAP genes. We show that Sal interacts with the RNAP active-center 'bridge-helix cap,' comprising the 'bridge-helix N-terminal hinge,' 'F-loop,' and 'link region.' We show that Sal inhibits nucleotide addition in transcription initiation and elongation. We present a crystal structure that defines interactions between Sal and RNAP and effects of Sal on RNAP conformation. We propose that Sal functions by binding to the RNAP bridge-helix cap and preventing conformational changes of the bridge-helix N-terminal hinge necessary for nucleotide addition. The results provide a target for antibacterial drug discovery and a reagent to probe conformation and function of the bridge-helix N-terminal hinge.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. David Degen

    Rutgers University, Piscataway, United States
    Competing interests
    David Degen, patents pending on Sal derivatives and on bridge-helix-cap target.
  2. Yu Feng

    Rutgers University, Piscataway, United States
    Competing interests
    Yu Feng, patents pending on Sal derivatives.
  3. Yu Zhang

    Rutgers University, Piscataway, United States
    Competing interests
    Yu Zhang, patents pending on Sal derivatives.
  4. Katherine Y Ebright

    Rutgers University, Piscataway, United States
    Competing interests
    Katherine Y Ebright, patent pending on bridge-helix-cap target.
  5. Yon W Ebright

    Rutgers University, Piscataway, United States
    Competing interests
    Yon W Ebright, patents pending on Sal derivatives.
  6. Matthew Gigliotti

    Rutgers University, Piscataway, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Hanif Vahedian-Movahed

    Rutgers University, Piscataway, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Sukhendu Mandal

    Rutgers University, Piscataway, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Meliza Talaue

    Rutgers University, Newark, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Nancy Connell

    Rutgers University, Newark, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Eddy Arnold

    Rutgers University, Piscataway, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. William Fenical

    University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    William Fenical, patent on SalA and SalB; patent pending on Sal derivatives.
  13. Richard H Ebright

    Rutgers University, Piscataway, United States
    For correspondence
    ebright@waksman.rutgers.edu
    Competing interests
    Richard H Ebright, patents pending on Sal derivatives and on bridge-helix-cap target.

Copyright

© 2014, Degen et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,167
    views
  • 439
    downloads
  • 74
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. David Degen
  2. Yu Feng
  3. Yu Zhang
  4. Katherine Y Ebright
  5. Yon W Ebright
  6. Matthew Gigliotti
  7. Hanif Vahedian-Movahed
  8. Sukhendu Mandal
  9. Meliza Talaue
  10. Nancy Connell
  11. Eddy Arnold
  12. William Fenical
  13. Richard H Ebright
(2014)
Transcription inhibition by the depsipeptide antibiotic salinamide A
eLife 3:e02451.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02451

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02451

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Gabriella O Estevam, Edmond Linossi ... James S Fraser
    Research Article

    Mutations in the kinase and juxtamembrane domains of the MET Receptor Tyrosine Kinase are responsible for oncogenesis in various cancers and can drive resistance to MET-directed treatments. Determining the most effective inhibitor for each mutational profile is a major challenge for MET-driven cancer treatment in precision medicine. Here, we used a deep mutational scan (DMS) of ~5764 MET kinase domain variants to profile the growth of each mutation against a panel of 11 inhibitors that are reported to target the MET kinase domain. We validate previously identified resistance mutations, pinpoint common resistance sites across type I, type II, and type I ½ inhibitors, unveil unique resistance and sensitizing mutations for each inhibitor, and verify non-cross-resistant sensitivities for type I and type II inhibitor pairs. We augment a protein language model with biophysical and chemical features to improve the predictive performance for inhibitor-treated datasets. Together, our study demonstrates a pooled experimental pipeline for identifying resistance mutations, provides a reference dictionary for mutations that are sensitized to specific therapies, and offers insights for future drug development.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Kira Breunig, Xuifen Lei ... Luiz O Penalva
    Research Article

    RNA binding proteins (RBPs) containing intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) are present in diverse molecular complexes where they function as dynamic regulators. Their characteristics promote liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) and the formation of membraneless organelles such as stress granules and nucleoli. IDR-RBPs are particularly relevant in the nervous system and their dysfunction is associated with neurodegenerative diseases and brain tumor development. Serpine1 mRNA-binding protein 1 (SERBP1) is a unique member of this group, being mostly disordered and lacking canonical RNA-binding domains. We defined SERBP1’s interactome, uncovered novel roles in splicing, cell division and ribosomal biogenesis, and showed its participation in pathological stress granules and Tau aggregates in Alzheimer’s brains. SERBP1 preferentially interacts with other G-quadruplex (G4) binders, implicated in different stages of gene expression, suggesting that G4 binding is a critical component of SERBP1 function in different settings. Similarly, we identified important associations between SERBP1 and PARP1/polyADP-ribosylation (PARylation). SERBP1 interacts with PARP1 and its associated factors and influences PARylation. Moreover, protein complexes in which SERBP1 participates contain mostly PARylated proteins and PAR binders. Based on these results, we propose a feedback regulatory model in which SERBP1 influences PARP1 function and PARylation, while PARylation modulates SERBP1 functions and participation in regulatory complexes.